Table C-14,,,
U.S.-NAFTA Trade by State for All Surface Modes: 2001,,,
(Millions of current dollars),,,
U.S. state1,"Total U.S.-NAFTA
surface trade",U.S.-Canada,U.S. -Mexico
Michigan,"89,327","61,787","27,540"
Texas,"77,324","14,972","62,352"
California,"53,845","21,623","32,222"
New York,"31,748","27,133","4,616"
Ohio,"28,335","22,919","5,417"
Illinois,"28,023","22,750","5,273"
Pennsylvania,"15,697","11,947","3,751"
Indiana,"15,270","9,745","5,525"
Washington,"14,585","13,382","1,203"
Tennessee,"11,891","8,097","3,794"
North Carolina,"11,047","6,289","4,758"
Arizona,"10,287","2,150","8,137"
Georgia,"9,903","6,541","3,362"
New Jersey,"9,569","7,736","1,833"
Wisconsin,"9,131","7,595","1,537"
Minnesota,"8,332","7,354",978
Massachusetts,"7,975","6,958","1,017"
Kentucky,"7,319","5,431","1,888"
Florida,"7,067","4,471","2,596"
Missouri,"6,344","4,694","1,650"
South Carolina,"5,815","4,067","1,747"
Virginia,"5,426","3,717","1,709"
Vermont,"4,453","4,427",26
Connecticut,"4,326","3,356",970
Oregon,"3,879","3,398",481
Iowa,"3,872","3,311",562
Alabama,"3,845","2,591","1,253"
Kansas,"3,571","2,924",647
Maryland,"2,862","2,085",778
Colorado,"2,722","2,192",529
Maine,"2,695","2,657",37
Oklahoma,"2,121","1,629",492
Arkansas,"2,022","1,630",391
Montana,"1,909","1,863",46
Utah,"1,902","1,659",242
Louisiana,"1,882","1,509",374
New Hampshire,"1,725","1,402",323
North Dakota,"1,716","1,616",100
Mississippi,"1,647",864,783
Nebraska,"1,593","1,097",497
Delaware,"1,517","1,099",418
Wyoming,"1,310","1,254",56
West Virginia,"1,174","1,095",79
Nevada,992,888,105
Idaho,893,813,80
Rhode Island,869,725,144
South Dakota,611,531,80
New Mexico,473,252,221
Alaska,303,275,28
District of Columbia,122,109,13
Hawaii,60,57,3
"Total, all U.S. states","547,312","346,515","200,797"
1 States are ranked by total U.S.-NAFTA surface trade.,,,
"NOTE: U.S. state surface trade value equals imports to the U.S. state of destination plus exports from the U.S. state of origin. The U.S. state of destination reflects the state of the importer of record. This state may not always represent the ultimate physical destination of shipments. The U.S. state of origin typically reflects the state of origin where the goods were grown, manufactured or otherwise produced. In some instances, however, it may not always reflect the actual state of physical origin. Shipments for Hawaii are intermodal and are included in this dataset, because a portion of the shipment moves by a land mode from either its origin or final destination. Total for all U.S. states includes data where the state of origin or destination was unknown.",,,
"SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Transborder Surface Freight Data, as of January 2002.",,,