Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)
Printable Version

Appendix 8
Leading States by Value and Weight of U.S-NAFTA Air Freight and Maritime Cargo: 2005

(Ranked by total U.S.-NAFTA column)

Excel | CSV

Value

Air Freight Maritime Cargo
U.S. state Canada Mexico U.S.-NAFTA
Value of imports by air (million $)      
All U.S. states 8,471 3,903 12,374
California 1,441 737 2,178
Texas 1,145 577 1,722
New York 659 376 1,035
Florida 379 365 744
Illinois 239 299 538
North Carolina 296 141 436
Michigan 228 183 410
Arizona 298 67 365
Massachusetts 279 55 334
Ohio 171 155 325
Value of exports by air (million $)      
All U.S. States 14,264 6,439 20,704
California 3,210 1,856 5,065
Texas 1,634 659 2,293
New York 977 513 1,490
Florida 564 444 1,008
Arizona 605 387 992
Illinois 592 261 853
Massachusetts 616 211 827
Indiana 361 169 530
New Jersey 398 117 515
Ohio 358 107 465
U.S. state Canada Mexico U.S.-NAFTA
Value of imports by vessel (million $)      
All U.S. states 13,997 30,894 44,891
Texas 1,105 17,004 18,109
Louisiana 230 3,873 4,103
New Hampshire 3,429 10 3,439
Mississippi 0.2 2,951 2,952
New Jersey 2,240 484 2,723
California 858 1,520 2,379
Illinois 101 1,106 1,206
Michigan 299 825 1,123
Massachusetts 901 16 917
Pennsylvania 703 76 779
Value of exports by vessel (million $)      
All U.S. States 4,249 9,333 13,582
Texas 843 5,562 6,405
Louisiana 138 1,568 1,706
Washington 525 35 560
Florida 56 429 485
New York 126 308 435
Pennsylvania 379 25 404
California 234 170 403
Ohio 318 5 323
Michigan 287 12 299
Alaska 119 153 272

Weight

Air Freight Maritime Cargo
U.S. state Canada Mexico U.S.-
NAFTA
Weight of
imports
by air
(short tons)
     
All U.S. states 75,334 70,926 146,260
California 13,225 11,465 24,690
Texas 8,656 6,274 14,930
Florida 2,651 11,697 14,348
Michigan 3,583 6,730 10,313
New York 5,130 3,133 8,264
North Carolina 4,714 2,973 7,687
Illinois 1,903 5,398 7,301
Ohio 1,960 2,553 4,513
Tennessee 1,658 2,175 3,833
Georgia 1,779 1,613 3,392
Weight of
exports
by air
(short tons)
     
All U.S. States 213,750 60,499 274,249
California 32,694 10,787 43,481
Texas 23,218 5,574 28,792
Illinois 9,692 3,795 13,487
Ohio 10,647 2,367 13,015
New York 9,472 3,150 12,622
Florida 6,209 5,515 11,724
Michigan 6,793 4,137 10,930
Nebraska 10,510 199 10,709
North Carolina 6,875 2,553 9,428
Pennsylvania 7,484 1,692 9,176
U.S. state Canada Mexico U.S.-
NAFTA
Weight of
imports
by vessel
(short tons)
     
All U.S. states 79,149,518 112,413,751 191,563,269
Texas 3,751,136 62,727,840 66,478,976
Louisiana 756,814 16,512,097 17,268,911
Mississippi 23 11,933,995 11,934,018
California 4,360,430 6,998,145 11,358,575
Ohio 8,874,523 56,893 8,931,416
New Hampshire 8,750,015 16,769 8,766,783
New Jersey 6,692,268 1,703,353 8,395,622
Florida 5,109,304 2,996,457 8,105,761
Washington 6,941,261 590,625 7,531,887
Michigan 7,042,797 176,834 7,219,632
Weight of
exports
by vessel
(short tons)
     
All U.S. States 39,190,569 25,120,293 64,310,863
Texas 1,695,576 13,475,618 15,171,194
Louisiana 540,451 7,517,188 8,057,639
Missouri 6,101,266 4,555 6,105,821
Michigan 5,620,094 10,151 5,630,245
Minnesota 4,747,915 30,273 4,778,188
Ohio 4,240,188 1,179 4,241,366
Pennsylvania 3,608,147 30,341 3,638,487
Washington 1,939,941 74,357 2,014,298
Maryland 1,759,950 30,683 1,790,632
Wyoming 1,752,077 1,752,077

NOTE: Total for all U.S. states includes data for shipments where the U.S. state of origin or destination was unknown. For imports, the U.S. state of destination reflects the state of the importer of record, this state may not always represent the ultimate physical destination of shipments. For exports, the U.S. state of origin typically reflects the state of origin where the goods were grown, manufactured or otherwise produced, in some instances, however, it may not always reflect the actual state of physical origin.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Transborder Freight Data as of April 2006.



RITA's privacy policies and procedures do not necessarily apply to external web sites. We suggest contacting these sites directly for information on their data collection and distribution policies.