 Space Science News home |
|
|
July 22, 1999: Most people think of the sun as a featureless,
unchanging Sunspots are relatively cool areas on the Sun that appear as dark blotches. Scientists count the number of sunspots to measure the magnitude of a solar cycle, and to determine how long the cycle lasts. If scientists were able to predict sunspot activity, not only would we know ahead of time what the Sun will do, but we might gain a better understanding of how the Sun operates. Dr. David Hathaway, along with Robert Wilson and Ed Reichmann, all of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, looked at many different ways scientists predict sunspot activity. They tested each statistical method to see which worked best, and then combined the top two methods to develop an even better prediction method of their own. The scientists will publish their results, "A Synthesis of Solar Cycle Prediction Techniques," in the Journal of Geophysical Research. |
ball of light. But the Sun actually has seasons,
or cycles of activity and relative inactivity. Right now, we
are approaching the maximum activity phase of the current solar
cycle. The Sun is daily exhibiting many sunspots, flares and
|
By looking at more than 15 methods, the scientists found that
8 or 9 were better than average at predicting solar maxima -
when the sun is the most active. The two best methods essentially
used the same information - disturbances in the Earth's magnetic
field Left: Sunspots appear as dark spots on the sun. For a larger image, click here. "Explosions from the sun travel through space and hit the Earth, causing the magnetic field to wobble and shake," says Hathaway. Joan Feynman from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory developed
one of the top two methods, the Australian astronomer Richard
Thompson developed the other. Although each scientist took a
different approach to the data and reported different results,
they both looked at how the Earth's magnetic field shook during
the previous solar cycle to predict the size Scientists don't know why previous solar activity is connected
to the next active period, or why the Earth's reaction to that
activity helps in solar cycle prediction. But the connection
allows scientists to estimate what the next solar season will
bring. The new statistical model developed by Hathaway's team uses both Feynman's and Thompson's methods and integrates them with a curve-fitting technique. The "precursor" methods used by Feynman and Thompson try to determine the total number of sunspots that will appear before the season actually begins. The curve-fitting method finds the best curve to fit recent solar activity. Based on years of observations, solar scientists have developed a library of curves that follow the average of solar cycles. By using their new prediction method, Hathaway's team can pick a curve from this library before the solar cycle even begins, and than make adjustments as the cycle progresses.
 For the current solar
cycle, Hathaway's team predicted an average sunspot maximum of
154, with an uncertainty of plus or minus 20. This prediction
has a narrower range of error than a previous, widely accepted
prediction, which placed the sunspot maximum at 160 with an uncertainty
of 30.Left: The current solar cycle (cycle 23) will peak in mid-2000. The dotted lines above and below the solid curve line indicate the prediction curve's range of error. The solar cycle lasts for about 11 years. The current cycle will peak sometime in mid-2000. |
of the next one.
|
"We are entering a period where the sun will be very active," says Hathaway. "From now until mid 2001, we'll see daily sunspot numbers between 100 and 300, with an average around 154."
"Monthly values are actually jumping all over the place," says Hathaway. "You have to remember the curve is only an average of what is really going on." Recently, for example, the Sun had a sunspot number above 300 in one day - far more than the 154 average. But for the previous 5 months, there were fewer sunspots than expected. The average number of sunspots met in the middle to follow the curve picked by Hathaway's team. As good as this new method is,  "physical models to predict
sunspot activity several years in advance are not available,"
says Hathaway. "We don't understand well enough why the
sun does this to be able to predict like a meteorologist does."
A meteorologist can input weather factors like temperature
and barometric pressure into a computer model to get a weekly
forecast. Solar predictors don't have a physical model, however,
because they still don't know how all the factors of the Sun's
activity work together. |
|
Hathaway, along with most other solar astronomers, believes
the Sun's magnetic field is the key to understanding the solar
cycle. Sunspots are formed when magnetic field lines just below
the Sun's surface become twisted and poke through the solar photosphere.
The photosphere - or "ball of light" - is the familiar,
visible surface of the Sun. The Sun is actually a ball of gas, so it does not rotate rigidly like solid planets and moons do. Instead, the Sun's equatorial regions rotate faster than the polar regions. Because of this "jet stream" near the equator, the magnetic fields become wrapped around the Sun. Right: Computer animation of the Sun's magnetic field
lines. Magnetic field lines loop through the solar atmosphere
and interior to form a complicated web of magnetic structures
linking sunspots. The Sun's magnetic poles reverse at solar maxima. Starting at the equator, a slow flow at the surface drags the magnetic field toward the poles. Conversely, sunspots first appear in the mid-latitudes and then congregate toward the equator later in the solar cycle. |
 |
|
The extra ultraviolet (UV) and X-ray radiation created by
the magnetic field around sunspots causes the Earth's atmosphere
to heat up and expand. This creates added drag in the area where
satellites and the Space Shuttle orbit. This drag could slowly
pull such spacecraft out of orbit earlier than expected.
Although sunspots are cooler areas on the solar surface, the Sun is actually hotter when sunspots appear and cooler when they are absent. Scientists believe that a long period of solar inactivity may correspond with colder temperatures on Earth. From 1645 to 1715, astronomers observed very little solar activity. This time period coincides with an era known as the Little Ice Age, when rivers and lakes throughout Europe (and perhaps the world) froze. |
|
Although there are good records of solar activity since the invention of the telescope in 1610, scientists have to look toward other sources to determine if there were even earlier periods of low solar activity. Because it is believed that sun spot activity correlates to the amount of Carbon 14 and Beryllium 10 in the environment, scientists can use ice core samples on Earth to determine solar activity levels. "We can go back in time, before telescopes, by looking
at ice core samples," says Hathaway. "Based on these
sample In 1843, the amateur astronomer Heinrich Schwabe found that sunspots come and go in a predictable 11-year cycle. Ever since that announcement, many have tried to correlate the Sun's cycle with all sorts of events on Earth - some have even believed the Sun influences the stock market! Although there is no evidence that solar activity affects economic trends, by predicting what the Sun will do in the future we can better prepare for the many other impacts solar activity has for life on Earth. |
s, there appears to have been other, earlier
sunspot minima."
|
More Space Science Headlines - NASA research on the web NASA's Office of Space Science press releases and other news related to NASA and astrophysics |
 Join
our growing list of subscribers - sign
up for our express news delivery and you will receive
a mail message every time we post a new story!!!More  Headlinesreturn to Space Science News Home
|