FROM A UNIVERSITY
OF TEXAS/NASA PRESS RELEASE
Oct
13, 1999: The controlled crash of NASA's Lunar Prospector
spacecraft into a crater near the south pole of the Moon on July
31 produced no observable signature of water, according to scientists
digging through data from Earth- based observatories and spacecraft
such as the Hubble Space Telescope.
This lack of physical evidence leaves open the question of whether
ancient cometary impacts delivered ice that remains buried in
permanently shadowed regions of the Moon, as suggested by the
large amounts of hydrogen measured indirectly from lunar orbit
by Lunar Prospector during its main mapping mission.
Above: The estimated trajectory of
Lunar Prospector over local topography near the moon's south
pole. The blue lines indicate uncertainties in the path followed
by the spacecraft. Estimated errors in the radar-derived topography
(by Margot et al, 1999) was 300m. [more
information]
Research group leaders from the University of Texas at
Austin announced their results today at the annual meeting of
the American Astronomical Society's Division for Planetary Sciences
meeting in Padua, Italy.
In a low-budget attempt to wring one last bit of scientific productivity
from the low-cost Lunar Prospector mission, NASA worked with
engineers and astronomers at the University of Texas to precisely
crash the barrel-shaped spacecraft into a specific shadowed crater.
NASA accepted the team's proposal based on successful scientific
peer review of the idea and the pending end of the spacecraft's
useful life, although the chances of positive detection of water
were judged to be less than 10 percent.
To learn more about the Lunar Prospector
and water on the Moon visit
LunarImpact.com
Worldwide observations of the crash were focused primarily on
using sensitive spectrometers tuned to look for the ultraviolet
emission lines expected from the hydroxyl (OH) molecules that
should be a by-product of any icy rock and dust kicked up by
the impact of the 354- pound spacecraft.
"There are several possible explanations why we did not
detect any water signature, and none of them can really be discounted
at this time," said Dr. Ed Barker, assistant director of
the university's McDonald Observatory at UT Austin, who coordinated
the observing campaign. These explanations include:
- the spacecraft might have missed the target area;
- the spacecraft might have hit a rock or dry soil at the target
site;
- water molecules may have been firmly bound in rocks as hydrated
mineral as opposed to existing as free ice crystals, and the
crash lacked enough energy to separate water from hydrated minerals;
- no water exists in the crater and the hydrogen detected by
the Lunar Prospector spacecraft earlier is simply pure hydrogen;
- studies of the impact's physical outcome were inadequate;
- the parameters used to model the plume that resulted from
the impact were inappropriate;
- the telescopes used to observe the crash, which have a very
small field of view, may not have been pointed correctly;
- water and other materials may not have risen above the crater
wall or otherwise were directed away from the telescopes' view.
Although the crash did not confirm the existence of water
ice on the Moon, "this high-risk, potentially high- payoff
experiment did produce several benefits," said Dr. David
Goldstein, the aerospace engineer who led the UT Austin team.
"We now have experience building a remarkably complex, coordinated
observing program with astronomers across the world, we established
useful upper limits on the properties of the Moon's natural atmosphere,
and we tested a possible means of true 'lunar prospecting' using
direct impacts."
Above:
Artist's concept of ice in a crater on the Moon. Is water-ice
really there? The Lunar Prospector impact experiment did not
result in the detection of water, and it leaves the question
open. Image credit NASA/Ames.
Lunar Prospector was launched on Jan. 6, 1998, from Cape Canaveral
Air Station, FL, aboard an Athena 2 rocket. In March 1998, mission
scientists announced their first tentative findings of the presence
of water ice in shadowed craters near the Moon's south and north
poles. They estimated later that up to six billion metric tons
of water ice might be buried in these craters under about 18
inches of soil, in more concentrated deposits than originally
thought. However, the evidence was indirect, they cautioned,
based on reasonable scientific assumptions given the levels of
hydrogen detected, from which water ice is inferred.
Since then, Prospector data have also been used to develop the
first precise gravity map of the entire lunar surface. While
the Moon's magnetic field is relatively weak, Prospector has
confirmed the presence of local magnetic fields that create the
two smallest magnetospheres in the Solar System. Another scientific
landmark is the assembly of the first global maps of the Moon's
elemental composition.
The $63 million Lunar Prospector mission was led by Dr. Alan
Binder of the Lunar Research Institute, Tucson, AZ, and managed
by NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, CA. It was built
by Lockheed Martin Missiles & Space, Sunnyvale, CA. Other
participating organizations included the Department of Energy's
Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, and NASA's Goddard Space
Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, and Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
Pasadena, CA.
Left: During its 18-month mission
orbiting the Moon, Lunar Prospector used a method called neutron
spectroscopy to look for lunar water. Neutrons are subatomic
particles that are continually ejected from the lunar soil by
cosmic rays. In this graphic, the coincident dips in medium-energy
neutrons at both lunar poles (see arrows) are a possible signature
of water. Scientists hoped that by crashing the spacecraft into
a shadowed crater they would be able to find direct evidence
of water-ice. More
information about lunar water. Credit NASA/Ames. |