December 20, 2004
International Council of Cruise Lines
2111 Wilson Boulevard, 8th Floor
Arlington, Virginia 22201
Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director
U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
1331 F Street, N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, DC. 20004.1111
Reference: Fed. Reg. Vol. 69 No. 27 Page 69224
Docket No. 2004-I
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Passenger
Vessels: Large Vessels
Availability of draft guidelines: notice of hearingAnd
Docket No. 2004-2
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Passenger
Vessels: Small Vessels
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking: notice of hearing
Dear Mr. Roffee:
The International Council of Cruise Lines (ICCL) requests that the hearing scheduled for January 10, 2005 regarding the referenced Dockets and subject be rescheduled at a later date, appropriately after the U.S. Supreme Court Decision in the case of Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line.
ICCL is a Virginia based trade association that represents the interests of 16 of the largest cruise ship companies which operate over 115 cruise passenger ships. In 2003, ICCL operators carried over 10 million vacationers to over 400 ports around the world and in the United States. Consistent with ship safety and operations, it is a priority of ICCL members to provide accessible vacation experiences to all guests needing extra assistance and consideration.
ICCL requests an extension in the date of the announced hearing based upon the following reasons:
• In order to offer educated testimony at the hearing on the Board's draft proposed guidelines, cruise lines require substantially more time to comprehensively review the text of the Access Board's draft guidelines. The recommendations of the Passenger Vessel Access Advisory Committee ("PVAAC") were issued four years ago. and neither the individual cruise lines nor ICCL have been privy to the ongoing internal discussions regarding these guidelines. Additionally, the draft proposed guidelines released on November 26" appear to diverge significantly from the PVAAC recommendations. In our view, a number of issues have been changed and/or new issues introduced. Consequently, the draft proposed guidelines must be reviewed fully prior to the scheduled hearing. At any time of the year. six weeks from the release of the draft proposed guidelines is simply an inadequate amount of time in which to prepare meaningful testimony on the numerous issues to be addressed. Given the intervening major holidays and the complexity of the rulemaking thus far, we urge you to extend this first hearing to a later date after the decision of the Supreme Court.
• The passenger vessel rulemaking raises issues unique to the industry and unlike those issues, which characterize rulemakings undertaken by the Board for landside facilities in that passenger vessel guidelines are complicated by numerous maritime-specific issues. These include international treaties and U.S. Coast Guard regulations relating to safety; limitations on accessibility which are inherent in the context of moving, seagoing vessels, particularly in the docking (on-off) process; and the space limitations which characterize all passenger vessels.
• While the January 10'" hearing may be but the first in a series, it will set the tone for the balance of the regulatory process, and will have a substantial impact upon its outcome. It is, therefore, essential that cruise lines have adequate time in which to prepare comments for this first hearing.
• The Board's issuance of the draft guidelines in the midst of the long Thanksgiving holiday weekend, with several other major holidays occurring prior to the hearing and during the review period, severely limits the amount of time available for impacted entities to review and prepare comments. This is particularly true for the cruise industry, as this period is one of the busiest times of the cruise season. Under these circumstances, each cruise line's ability to adequately address the myriad of important details in the Board's draft guidelines prior to the scheduled hearing will be severely limited.
• Additionally, the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on February 28, 2005 and rule on the applicability of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act to foreign flag vessels during this session of the Court. This decision of the court will have a significant impact on the scope of applicability of the Act, and any decision of the court will hopefully give guidance that will affect the responses to the requests for information.
During the past six years, ICCL and our members participated in every passenger vessel related meeting held by the Access Board - whether in a formal session, a hearing or an informal site visit (e g.. New Orleans, Seattle). We plan to continue that dialogue, but considering the enormity of the issue coupled with the press of business during this season, and recognizing the multitude of questions posed by the Board, as well as the request for comment on the lengthy draft plan for regulatory assessment, we request that hearings be postponed until an appropriate date after the decision of the Supreme Court concerning this issue.
With these points in mind, we also request an appropriate extension to the ending date for comments on the draft guidelines, until after the decision of the Supreme Court regarding the application to non-US flag passenger ships.
Sincerely,
T. E. Thompson
Executive Vice President
cc: James J. Raggio. General Counsel
DOT Docket OST-2004-19700
Alexander Acosta, US Department of Justice