GOAL #2 Expeditious and Accurate Claims Processing



Goal: To process applications as expeditiously, accurately, and efficiently as possible so that eligible victims may receive financial assistance promptly and in accordance with the program's mandates and requirements.

Objectives


1. To establish and improve processes that ensure the highest efficiency and productivity in processing applications.

2. To train and manage staff to ensure high quality in processing applications.

3. To ensure that applications are processed consistently and in accordance with applicable statutes and rules.

STRATEGIES

Objective 1: To establish and improve processes that ensure the highest efficiency and productivity in processing applications.

Basic Strategies


a. Establish a goal of 90 - 150 calendar days for (1) notifying applicants of their eligibility and (2) making payment on the first expenses that have been submitted, counting from the time the application is received. This goal should be achieved for a majority of applications. [Programs in which applications are processed and decided within a court-based system may establish processing goals longer than this time frame, since laws and associated court rules may allow parties a certain number of days within which to file their documents. These programs should process their cases as quickly as possible within the parameters of the particular court system.]

b. Study work flow and analyze how process can be improved by eliminating wasteful actions and enhancing productive steps.

c. Assess procedures on a regular basis to maintain productivity. Be sure to seek input from claims-processing staff on which procedures are working and which should be changed.

d. Take advantage of available technology (computers and automated application-tracking system) to the extent possible to speed and facilitate processing.

e. Acknowledge receipt of each application with a letter to the applicant as soon after receiving the application as possible. Acknowledgement within 10 working days is recommended.

f. Make prompt requests of law enforcement, medical and mental health providers, employers, and others for information necessary to analyzing the application. Ask for responses by a certain date or at least as soon as possible. Develop procedures for following up with procrastinators.



g. Develop management tools and reports to measure accurately how quickly applications are being processed by individual staff and the program as a whole. A "monthly claims activity" report showing total claims received and determined, with a breakdown on each staff member's progress on assigned applications, is one recommended monitoring tool.

h. Set and achieve a goal of processing the same number of applications in a 12-month period as are received during that period. In other words, if a program receives 1,000 applications in one year, it should try to process at least 1,000 applications during that same year. Status should be monitored monthly.

i. If facing a backlog, develop a strategy to reduce and eliminate the backlog within a reasonable time frame. One recommended strategy is to define the backlog as all applications currently pending, and to process and eliminate those backlogged applications at the same time as new applications are processed. By this means, the program establishes a definite and non-increasing number of backlogged claims that can gradually be reduced, at the same time that current applications are being handled at the rate they are being received.



Advanced Strategies


a. Acknowledge receipt of each application with a letter to the applicant within 2 or 3 working days of receiving the application.

b. Develop ways to expedite the processing of applications involving emergency needs. If feasible, make use of law enforcement or prosecutor-based advocates to "certify" emergency need.

c. Develop ways to expedite applications requiring preauthorization for services.

d. Develop ways to expedite the processing of applications that require little analysis.

e. Set and achieve a goal of less than 90 calendar days for making a decision on the eligibility of each applicant and the expenses that should be paid that applicant, counting from the time that an application is received until the decision is made to deny or pay the first expenses.

f. Set a goal for the time within which an application should be analyzed fully and a recommendation of eligibility is made, counting from the day the police or crime report is received. This is a goal separate and in addition to the goal for processing an application from the time the application is received; it focuses on that portion of processing that involves the analysis of all the information once it has been received, rather than the overall time it may take to process an application.





g. Develop expertise among some staff members to handle specific types of victims, such as seniors, non-English speakers, and child victims.

h. Use an outside consultant to evaluate processes and productivity.

i. Seek direct linkages with police departments and state agencies, such as Medicaid administrators, Social Security, and employment services, to obtain on-line access to necessary information.

j. If calls from applicants and service providers regarding status of applications and payments is interfering significantly with processing efficiency, develop procedures to limit interruptions, such as assigning one staff person (or a small group in larger programs) to respond to calls; responding to status calls only between certain designated hours; or developing a means for service providers to gain on-line access to status information.


Objective 2: To train and manage staff to ensure high quality in processing applications.

Basic Strategies


a. Develop job descriptions, and update them as necessary.

b. Orient and train staff to ensure understanding of the following:

o Program mission, mandates, and goals

o Eligibility requirements

o Benefits

o Process for analyzing applications

o Collateral resources

o Basic concepts and terms used by medical and mental health providers

o Basic issues relating to victimization, and service programs available to assist victims

o Criminal justice process

c. Train staff to communicate with and interact with victims and service providers in a sensitive, professional way that facilitates information exchange and promotes the purposes and image of the program.

d. Conduct annual staff performance evaluations.

e. Recognize and reward superior achievement of individual staff members.

f. Send staff to state conferences relating to victim issues, and to regional and national conferences relating specifically to compensation, as resources allow.



Advanced Strategies


a. Provide training to staff on time-management techniques.

b. Consider rotating staff through different jobs to maintain motivation and promote personal development of staff.

c. Establish performance measures for all processing activities, and provide data to encourage staff to conduct self-examination of performance and compare productivity to that of fellow employees.

d. Provide management training to managers to assist in managing staff and directing program.

e. Develop written training materials for each staff person to aid in orientation and training.


Objective 3: To ensure that applications are processed consistently and in accordance with applicable statutes and rules.

Basic Strategies


a. Develop and maintain a policy and procedure manual.

b. Establish ways that staff members can consult with each other and management when they face problems in processing applications.

c. Convene regular meetings of staff to discuss changes in policies and procedures, or problems in performing work.

d. Develop a checklist of work that needs to be accomplished in evaluating each application, such as evaluating eligibility requirements and checking collateral resources.



e. Develop a method for reviewing and monitoring staff work in processing applications, such as a quality review list.

Advanced Strategies


a. Develop and maintain an index of decisions on applications, with fact situations, issues, and results. The index could focus on only those cases that set precedent or are worth consulting as a guide to future decisions.

b. Develop process of peer review to allow staff the opportunity to review decision making of other investigators.

Back to Program Standards

This document was last updated on June 26, 2008