Skip main navigation.
 U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans - Link to ED.gov Home Page
ESEA: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - FY 2007


CFDA Number: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies

Program Goal: At-risk students improve their achievement to meet challenging standards.

Objective 1 of 2: The performance of low-income students will increase substantially in reading and mathematics.
Indicator 1.1 of 2: Fourth-grade reading proficiency: The number of states administering fourth-grade reading assessments that report an increase in the percentage of low-income students who perform at either proficient or advanced performance levels will increase annually.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of fourth-grade low-income students meeting state performance standards by achieving proficiency or above in reading on state assessments.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
25
 
2005
 
25
2006
 
25
2007
 
26

Source: Consolidated State Performance Report

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: September 2006
 
Explanation: SY 2002-03 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report. Actual performance data for FY 2005 will be obtained by comparing SY 2004-05 data to 2003-04 data.
 
Indicator 1.2 of 2: Eighth-grade mathematics proficiency: The number of states administering eighth-grade mathematics assessments that report an increase in the percentage of low-income students who perform at either the proficient or advanced performance levels will increase annually.
 
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of eighth-grade low-income students meeting state performance standards by achieving proficiency or above in mathematics on state assessments.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
31
 
2005
 
25
2006
 
25
2007
 
26

Source: Consolidated State Performance Report; EDEN

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: September 2006
 
Explanation: SY 2002-03 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report. Actual performance data for FY 2005 will be obtained by comparing SY 2004-05 data to SY 2003-04 data.
 
Objective 2 of 2: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status
Indicator 2.1 of 1: Making AYP: The number of states that report an increase in schools making AYP.
 
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of schools making AYP.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005
 
10
2006
 
20
2007
 
21

Source: Consolidated State Performance Report; EDEN

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: September 2006
 
Explanation: School year 2002-2003 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated State Performance Report. Actual performance data for FY 2005 will be obtained by comparing SY 2004-2005 data to SY 2003-2004 data.
 


Return to table of contents

Last Modified: 01/27/2006