Supplemental Guidelines for the Ruth L. Kirschstein
Institutional National Research Service Award (T32)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institutes of Health
Revised May 2009
Update: The following update relating to this
announcement/supplemental guidelines has been issued:
March
27, 2009 - See Notice NOT-OD-09-074 Enhancing Peer Review: The
NIH Announces Consolidation of Review Criteria for Institutional
Research Training Grant Applications (T32) Submitted for FY 2010
Funding.
This document contains instructions for preparing applications
for the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Institutional
National Research Service Awards (T32). These instructions must
be used for all T32 applications submitted to the NHLBI effective
with the January 25, 2009 receipt date for new, renewal (competing
continuation) and resubmission (revised/amended) applications and
the September 25, 2009 receipt date for resubmission (revised/amended)
applications, and are to be used in conjunction with the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 Program Announcement (PA-08-226),
the PHS 398, referenced under General Information,
VI. Other Documents Required for Preparing Applications,
and the NHLBI Notice of Change in Submission Dates, NOT-HL-07-109.
Receipt dates for competing applications:
- January 25 - The NHLBI will accept all types of competing T32
applications (new, renewal/competing continuation, resubmission/amended)
on this date.
- September 25 - Only resubmission/amended T32 applications will
be accepted on this date.
The T32 mechanism has not yet converted to electronic submissions.
Conversion to electronic submission is tentatively planned for the
September 25, 2009 receipt date. Further
details regarding the transition process are at http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt.
Also included in this document are:
- Frequently Asked Questions for T32 applications; and
- Recruitment and Retention Plan to Enhance Diversity
All potential applicants, whether applying for new or renewal awards,
are encouraged to consult with NHLBI program staff listed under
General Information, VII.
Staff Contacts early in the preparation process.
Contents:
General
Information
I.___Introduction
II. __Special
Requirements and Provisions
III.__Application
Procedures
IV.__Review
Procedures and Criteria
V. __Award
Criteria
VI.__Other
Documents Required for Preparing Applications
VII.__Staff
Contacts
- Preparation Instructions
Additional documents: Frequently
Asked Questions Recruitment
and Retention Plan to Enhance Diversity
General Information
I. Introduction
Areas of training to receive increased emphasis by NHLBI include:
- providing multidisciplinary training and exposure of trainees
to collaborative research;
- developing new investigators with the necessary competencies
and breadth of expertise needed for the future of biomedical
research;
- ensuring that trainees receive adequate mentorship, and
that mentorship is taught and evaluated;
- recruiting and retaining such investigators in the scientific
workforce and ensuring adequate representation of the nation’s
diversity in that workforce; and
- providing a continued flow of qualified physician-scientists
able to translate findings freely between the basic and clinical
spheres.
To ensure that T32 applications address these areas of emphasis,
the NHLBI has set forth the following specific requirements and
review criteria.
II. Special Requirements
and Provisions
A. Special NHLBI Programmatic Emphases:
1. Multidisciplinary training
a. At all stages of education and training, Program Directors
should foster broad, multidisciplinary approaches to research,
including encouragement of interaction
and collaboration among trainees in related disciplines. This
could include travel by trainees
to other laboratories outside the applicant institution to
receive training in specialized disciplines, methodologies,
or technologies.
b. Program Directors should encourage new trainees to widen
the scope of their interests and capabilities, to avoid too
narrow a focus too early in their
careers and to develop the flexibility needed for pursuing
rapidly evolving scientific advances.
c. NHLBI encourages development of novel programs of research
training, to emphasize multidisciplinary team approaches,
networking, and collaboration,
emphasizing the competencies needed for the future of biomedical
research.
d. NHLBI encourages development of “virtual”
research training centers, to link (electronically or through
other means) multiple institutions
with unique or specific expertise to address a common problem.
Program Directors are encouraged to broaden training
experiences beyond a single institution (in academia and industry)
using both long and short-term training experiences. Such
experiences might include exchanges of faculty and students.
Plans should be described for how interactions among participants
will take place.
2. Necessary competencies
a. Applicants are encouraged to identify scientific disciplines
and evolving areas of scientific need which are currently
under-represented and to design
and implement training programs in such disciplines. Documentation
of available opportunities in such fields and of the lack
of qualified scientists to realize
these opportunities should be included to justify emphasis
on these evolving areas.
b. Programs in disciplines related to clinical research should
also include training in bioethics, clinical trials and behavioral
science. When possible and appropriate,
training programs should include training in state-of-the-art
technologies, integrative approaches, and such mathematically-based
areas as bioinformatics, computational biology, and statistics.
c. Training at the pre- and postdoctoral levels should include
“survival skills” such as grant and manuscript
writing, public speaking, obtaining funding,
mentorship (that is, providing skills that will enable current
trainees to train subsequent “generations” of
scientists), and establishing
research collaborations in a multidisciplinary setting.
3. Mentorship
a. NHLBI encourages “group mentorship,” where
multiple senior partners in team-based research lend their
individual expertise to the trainee,
as appropriate to the trainee's level of development and under
the overall guidance of the Program Director.
b. Applications should have a detailed mentoring plan for
the "typical" trainee and should describe the process
by which such plans will be developed
for future trainees. Items to be discussed in a mentoring
plan may include: 1) a description of approaches to be used
in mentoring; 2) experience and
expertise of mentors and proposed time commitment; 3) training
in oral and written communication and personal
interactions; 4) career planning; and 5) methods for evaluating
and reporting effectiveness of mentoring program in annual
progress reports. Formal evaluation
by trainees is encouraged. Formal evaluation of trainees by
their mentors or advisory committees
is also encouraged.
c. Applicant institutions should demonstrate their support
of mentoring, in terms of institutional administrative support,
protected time for mentoring,
and departmental support for student activities. They should
detail the steps taken to ensure that trainees are aware of
what they may expect from their
mentors and institutions and what in turn is expected of them.
d. Consideration should be given to including as mentors
or co-mentors junior faculty who have established active,
independent research programs
early in their careers. The mentoring abilities of dynamic
young investigators may need to be documented in ways other
than a long track record of producing
seasoned independent investigators, but the value of such
individuals as role models should not be underestimated.
Likewise effort should be made in mentoring junior faculty
to provide a pipeline for program mentoring stability.
e. Where possible and practical, the training experience
should be broadened by encouraging the active participation
of scientists and laboratories
in industry settings. This could include industry scientists
acting as mentors on training grants or providing short-term
experiences in industry settings
for trainees. Cost sharing in such partnerships on the part
of industry is encouraged.
4. Workforce diversity
a. NHLBI is strongly committed to ensuring diversity in its
research training programs. Each application must include
plans for active recruitment
of individuals from diverse backgrounds such as individuals
from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, individuals
with disabilities, and individuals
from socially, culturally, economically, or educationally
disadvantaged backgrounds that have inhibited their ability
to pursue a career in health-related research. The definition
of diversity recruitment groups and detailed instructions
on preparing the diversity recruitment
portion of the application can be found in Item 8.9.4 in the
PHS-398, referenced under General Information, VI., Other
Documents Required for Preparing Applications. The diversity
recruitment plan must be specific for the program proposed
and should not rely on the diversity
recruitment efforts of the institution. Applicants should
also describe their personal involvement in recruitment
efforts for the specific application (visits to minority institutions,
personal follow-up of potential applicants and interviewees,
etc). Applications without adequate
diversity recruitment plans will not be awarded until an adequate
recruitment plan is received and approved.
Additional information regarding
recruitment strategies for underrepresented individuals
from racial and ethnic groups, individuals
with disabilities, and individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds
can be found at the following link: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/policies/t32/t32recruitment.htm.
Once all training positions
are filled, including adequate representation of individuals
from diverse backgrounds, institutional NRSA training
grants funded by NHLBI may request an administrative increase
to support training of an additional trainee from an underrepresented
racial/ethnic group, a trainee with a disability, and/or an
individual from a disadvantaged background. While NRSA pre-
and postdoctoral trainees are usually at an advanced level
of achievement, candidates who remain disadvantaged will be
considered for an additional
position on the training grant on a case-by-case basis. Procedures
for requesting these administrative increases are available
at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/policies/t32slotpros.htm.
b. The NRSA program has a program for limited part-time training
for trainees beginning families and facing other unique pressures,
which is described in the NIH
T32 Program Announcement PA-08-226 (see General Information,
VI. Other Documents Required for Preparing
Applications).
5. Clinical research
a. NHLBI encourages development of physician-investigators
with necessary skills to translate research findings from
the laboratory and clinical research
program into clinical practice.
b. Programs of clinical relevance should be established for
PhD scientist-trainees, with an emphasis on postdoctoral training
and course work in human biology
and behavioral science, and population-based research to facilitate
their subsequent engagement in human subjects research
or clinical trials.
c. Applicants are encouraged to develop innovative approaches
to training physicians and non-physicians in clinical research
skills in the context of NHLBI
clinical networks and multicenter studies. Such training can
be facilitated by building on existing study infrastructure
and ongoing activities. Programs
that foster translational research skills bridging basic and
clinical research, or clinical and population-based research
are encouraged.
B. NHLBI Provisions of Award
- Support may be requested for predoctoral training, postdoctoral
training, or a combination of both as defined under the NRSA guidelines.
In addition, applicants may request support for short-term (that
is, 2-3 months' duration) research training positions for students
enrolled in a program leading to a clinical doctorate or a masters
or doctorate in a physical or quantitative science such as physics,
chemistry, mathematics, or engineering.
- NHLBI will not award costs through the tuition and fees category
for items such as malpractice insurance, computer fees, or radioactive
waste disposal.
- Trainee Travel: Up to $1,400 per trainee per year may be requested
for trainee travel (for pre- and post-doctoral trainees only)
and up to $500 per trainee per year may requested for short-term
trainees.
- Stipend increases are reviewed annually and will be incorporated
into future year commitments. Actual funding levels for each budget
period will be determined annually following NHLBI staff evaluation
of the non-competing renewal application.
- New strategies to manage the number of Full-Time Training Positions
(FTTPs) will enable the NHLBI to support a greater number of meritorious
training programs. During FY 2008 and thereafter, FTTP allocations
will be held to the following limits:
New programs (Type 1) can request no more than 8 FTTPs.
Renewal/Competing Continuations (Type 2) that had 12 or fewer
FTTPs during the previous period will be capped at 12.
Renewal/Competing Continuations that had more than 12 FTTPs during
the prior award period will be capped at the previous number.
Renewal/Competing Continuations that entail a change of program
director since the prior award period will be capped at 8 FTTPs.
III. Application Procedures
A. Application Receipt and Award Dates:
Receipt dates for competing applications:
- January 25 - The NHLBI will accept all types of competing T32
applications (new, renewal/competing continuation, resubmission/amended)
on this date.
- September 25 - Only resubmission/amended T32 applications will
be accepted on this date.
Award Date:
New competing awards for T32 grants will be issued as early as
February. Competing Renewals will usually follow the dates of the
last non-competing award end date.
B. Applications with Direct Costs of
$500,000 or More in any One Year:
Applications for NRSA Institutional Grants requesting $500,000
or more in direct costs for any year must obtain, prior to submission,
NHLBI agreement to accept their applications for consideration.
This policy applies to new competing, renewal/competing continuation,
and resubmission/amended applications. Requests must be received
by the NHLBI no later than 6 weeks prior to the application receipt
dates (see A. above). Without this advance acceptance, applications
will be returned by the Center for Scientific Review.
Amended Applications:
NHLBI agreement to accept an application includes a statement that
the Institute will automatically accept a single resubmission (amended)
application (i.e., and "A1" application) provided that
the proposed aims and total direct costs per year remain unchanged
(excluding adjustments for changes in stipend levels or other allowable
costs mandated by NRSA, or reductions in response to peer review).
The NHLBI will not accept a second resubmission application (i.e.,
an "A2" application) requesting $500,000 or more in direct
costs in any year regardless of the direct costs requested in the
previous submissions.
Procedures: The
training director must send a written request to NHLBI at least
6 weeks in advance of the application receipt date. The
letter, countersigned by an institutional business official, should
be addressed to the Director of the appropriate NHLBI division as
identified below, and include:
- Number of training positions that will
be requested and what level (pre, post, short-term);
- For competing renewal applications, state
whether that is the same number and type of positions as the last
5 years, or an increase; in the case of an increase, provide a
brief justification;
- For competing renewals, are any substantial
changes to the training program proposed, (e.g., the types and
levels of students to be trained, or in the scientific areas of
training);
- Include two budget pages - Kirschstein-NRSA-Substitute
form pages 4 and 5
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/nrsafp4.pdf and http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/nrsafp5.pdf);
- Do not apply the NIH tuition formula to
the dollars requested, list the actual costs of tuition.
Criteria for Acceptance: NHLBI
considers the following criteria in determining whether to accept
a proposed application:
- the proposed research training is relevant
to the NHLBI mission;
- the proposed research training complements
ongoing or new NHLBI programs;
- the proposed research training will provide
a valuable addition to existing knowledge;
- the proposed annual costs are reasonable;
- the proposed plans for data sharing;
- the proposed annual costs are reasonable
given the prior training record of the faculty involved and, for
renewal (competing continuation) applications, on how many of
the trainee slots for which funds have been provided have been
used;
- and for all proposed research involving
human subjects, the following additional criteria:
- the proposed research is applicable to public health.
Acceptance: Within
two to six weeks of receipt of the request letter, NHLBI staff will
inform the applicant whether or not to proceed with submission of
the proposed application. The acceptance letter from the NHLBI must
be included with the cover letter of the application. The NIH Center
for Scientific Review will not accept the application without documentation
of NHLBI permission to submit an application.
NHLBI Extramural Program Division
Directors: All written requests
for NHLBI agreement to accept applications subject to this policy
are to be submitted to one of the following Division Directors:
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Dr. Sonia Skarlatos (Acting)
NHLBI/DCVD
Two Rockledge Center, Room 8124
6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7940
Bethesda, MD 20892-7940
Phone: 301-435-0477
Fax: 301-480-7971
Email: skarlats@nhlbi.nih.gov
Division of Lung Diseases
Dr. James Kiley
NHLBI/DLD
Two Rockledge Center, Room 10042
6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7952
Bethesda, MD 20892-7952
Phone: 301-435-0233
Fax: 301-480-3547
Email: kileyj@nhlbi.nih.gov
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
Dr. Susan Shurin (Acting)
NHLBI/DBDR
Two Rockledge Center
6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7950
Bethesda, MD 20892-7950
Phone: 301-435-0080
Fax: 301-480-0867
Email: shurinsb@nhlbi.nih.gov
Division of Prevention and Population Sciences
Dr. Michael Lauer
NHLBI/DPPS
Two Rockledge Center, Room 10122
6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7936
Bethesda, MD 20892-7936
Phone: 301-435-0422
Fax: 301-480-1864
Email: lauerm@nhlbi.nih.gov
C. Where to Send the Application:
The
signed original and five complete photocopies of the application;
with full Appendix materials submitted on CD (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-031.html)
should be submitted to the Center for Scientific Review (CSR), NIH,
at the following address:
Center for Scientific Review
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7710 (U.S. Postal Service Express
or regular mail)
Bethesda, Maryland 20817 (for express/courier service; non-USPS
service)
Personal
deliveries of applications are no longer permitted (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-040.html.)
To expedite the review process conducted by NHLBI, one additional
signed complete photocopy with full appendix materials submitted
on CD of the application should be sent to:
Chief, Review Branch
Division of Extramural Research Activities
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Two Rockledge Center, Suite 7214
6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7924
Bethesda, MD 20892-7924
Bethesda, MD 20817 (express/courier service)
Prior to submission, applicants are strongly encouraged to contact
the appropriate NHLBI program director to discuss preparation and
review of the application (see General Information, VII.
Staff Contacts).
IV. Review Procedures and Criteria
A. Review Procedures:
Applications judged to be complete and eligible will be evaluated
for merit by a peer review group convened by the NHLBI Division
of Extramural Research Activities. NHLBI has several specific review
criteria related to its areas of emphasis, as described below, which
will be used in addition to the peer review criteria stated in the
NIH T32 Program Announcement (PA-08-226), referenced under General
Information, VI. Other Documents Required for Preparing
Applications. Applications will receive a second-level review
by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council to ensure
that they meet the broad programmatic needs and priorities of the
NHLBI.
B. Review Criteria:
1. Environment: The training environment will be
evaluated with regards to fostering a multi-disciplinary training
environment and institutional commitment to program success.
a. Evidence of the involvement and integration of mentors from
multiple disciplines, as well as clinical and basic sciences in
providing a coordinated training program to individual trainees.
b. Evidence of collaboration and interaction among training programs
and trainees in related disciplines, to included exchanges of
faculty and trainees, linking of multiple institutions, or other
approaches.
c. The level of institutional commitment, including:
i. Institutional administrative support;
ii. Protected time for mentoring;
iii. Trainees' stipend supplementation from institutional sources;
iv. Departmental support for student activities.
2. Program Administration: The adequacy and appropriateness
of the programmatic administrative structure, roles, and governance
will be evaluated:
a. Evaluation of the program director's (and co-director, as
appropriate) qualifications and program commitment will include:
i. Appropriate scientific background with areas of interest
aligning with NHLBI areas of interest;
ii. A successful history in mentoring;
iii. Adequate time commitment to insure program success.
b. Well defined roles with a clear distribution of responsibilities
among the various administering bodies such as the program director,
co-director, internal and external advisory committee, or other.
3. Quality of Preceptors as Researchers/Mentors and Program
Outcomes: The collective experience and success of the
program staff as researchers and mentors will be assessed, by:
a. Experience and expertise of the mentor(s) in providing training
and career development;
b. Experience and expertise of the mentor(s) in a scientific
discipline aligned with the career plans of the trainee.
c. Success at maintaining independent research programs in heart,
lung, blood or sleep related areas;
d. Trainee publication record;
e. Success in producing trainees remaining engaged in the scientific
enterprise (academia, industry, government, etc.).
4. Mentoring Plan: The quality of mentoring plans
will be evaluated based on the adequacy and appropriateness of specific
mentoring plan (for individual trainees) or representative plan
(and proposals for tailoring it to needs of multiple trainees),
to include:
a. Identification of primary mentor and secondary mentors or
advisors and specific areas in which they provide guidance;
b. Description of specific time commitment of primary mentor
to trainee/candidate and how it may change as needed during the
period;
c. Adequacy and appropriateness of steps taken to delineate
trainee, mentor, and institution expectations;
d. Timeline for training and career development with specific
milestones for acquiring necessary scientific knowledge and for
developing research and communication skills, logical reasoning,
independent thinking, ability to collaborate, collegial relationships
with the professional community, responsible scientific behavior,
and career planning (including planned publications and future
grant support);
e. Provisions for facilitating transition of trainee to a more
independent status;
f. Relationship of mentoring plan to candidate's stated career
goals and career development plan (for a single candidate) or
to representative training plan (for multiple trainees).
5. Research Training Program: The research training
program will be evaluated in regard to the adequacy and appropriateness
of plans to pursue the Special NHLBI Programmatic Emphasis described
above, including:
a. Adequacy and appropriateness of plans for training in scientific
competencies needed for future heart, lung, blood, and sleep disorders
research, including;
i. Didactic courses, hands-on research participation, and other
training experiences in areas of scientific need which currently
are or are anticipated to be underrepresented. Such programs
should be justified by documentation of scientific opportunities
in the proposed area and demonstration of expected lack of qualified
personnel to pursue them in the near future;
ii. "Survival Skills", such as seminars or courses
on grant and manuscript writing, public speaking, obtaining
funding, mentorship skills and establishing research collaborations
in a multidisciplinary setting;
iii. Training in state-of-the-art technologies, integrative
approaches, and such mathematically-based areas as bioinformatics
and statistics where relevant, and demonstration of close integration
of such training in the overall training program.
b. Adequacy and appropriateness of plans for training in clinical
research, to include:
i. Plans for effective use of NHLBI center programs, clinical
networks and multicenter studies to provide opportunities for
training clinical investigators and PhD scientists in collaborative
clinical research;
ii. Didactic courses, hands-on research participation, and
other training experiences in disciplines fundamental to clinical
research such as bioethics, clinical trials and behavioral science.
iii. Programs of clinical relevance for PhD scientists-trainees,
with an emphasis on postdoctoral training and course work in
human biology and behavioral science.
c. Evidence of multidisciplinary approaches to research training,
designed to produce trainees able to bridge disciplines and move
rapidly into new disciplines as they emerge, including:
i. Involvement and integration of mentors from multiple related
disciplines in providing a coordinated training program to individual
trainees.
ii. Exposure of trainees to multidisciplinary research environments
when feasible and appropriate.
iii. Evidence of collaboration and interaction among training
programs and trainees in related disciplines (basic and clinical
trainee interaction, as appropriate), to include exchanges of
faculty and trainees, linking multiple institutions, or other
approaches, with clear plans for how productive interactions
among participants will be established and monitored.
6. Quality of the Applicant Pool and Current Trainees:
The quality of the applicant pool and current trainees will be evaluated,
as follows:
a. Applicant pools will be judged by the number of quality applicants,
standard test scores, previous candidate commitment and success
to science, as appropriate;
b. Current trainees (renewals) will be evaluated against the
general applicant pool qualifications and progress to date in
the current training program.
7. Recruitment and Retention Plan to Enhance Diversity:
The plan must be specific for the program under review and include:
a. Adequacy of the plan for recruiting individuals from diverse
backgrounds into the proposed training program. Suggested
recruitment and retention strategies to enhance diversity
are available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/policies/t32/t32recruitment.htm.
b. For renewal (competing continuation) applications, track record
of the plan in recruiting individuals from diverse backgrounds;
c. For resubmissions (revised/amended) or renewal (competing
continuation) applications, modifications of the plan since the
last review to overcome deficiencies.
8. Short-term Training Program (as applicable):
These programs will be evaluated in regards to scope and integration
with the pre and/or post doctoral training program.
a. For applications choosing to include these programs, they
must include the scope of training, a mechanism to assess program
success in attracting students to careers in science through recruitment
or re-recruitment to this or other training programs (renewals),
and minority inclusion.
b. The programs must easily integrate with the pre or post-doctoral
training component(s) and provide for plans to follow the careers
of short-term trainees for the evaluation of the program effect
on subsequent career choices (renewals).
V. Award Criteria
Shortly after review of the competing application by the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council, the NHLBI will notify the
applicant of his/her funding status. Awards are made based on the
availability of funds each fiscal year, the degree of merit as determined
by peer reviewers and the program priorities of the NHLBI.
VI. Other Documents Required for Preparing
Applications
In addition to this document, there are four other documents necessary
for the preparation of the NHLBI T32 application:
1.
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Institutional
Research Training Grants (T32)” Program Announcement PA-08-226,
issued in the NIH GUIDE FOR GRANTS AND CONTRACTS, August 1, 2008,
available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-08-226.html.
2. PHS
398 application kit with particular attention paid to Part I,
8., Instructions for Preparing an Institutional National Research
Service Award Application, including Ruth L. Kirschstein - NRSA
applications available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html.
3. Specific NHLBI funding guidelines for NRSA programs are described
in “NHLBI
Funding and Operating Guidelines: NRSA and Career Awards”
(includes information on Limits on Full-Time Training Positions,
Receipt Dates, and Stipend Levels) available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/policies/nrsa.htm.
4. "Notice
of New NIH Policy for Funding of Tuition, Fees, and Health Insurance
on Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards"
available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-093.html.
Additional Helpful Resources
Excellent guides to professional mentorship are available and prospective
Program Directors are encouraged to use them in developing their
training programs.
VII. Staff Contacts
Programmatic or scientific issues: For more information
and/or advice about the objectives and scope of this award, eligibility
requirements, structure and organization of grant applications and
peer review trends, please contact the scientific staff in the relevant
Division as listed below. For applicants in the area of sleep disorders
research, contact the Division most relevant to the training program
being proposed.
For training in the program areas of the Division of Cardiovascular
Diseases, contact:
Dr. Michael Commarato
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
6701 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7940
Tel: 301-435-0535
Fax: 301-480-7971
Email: commaram@nhlbi.nih.gov
For training in the program areas of Division of Lung Diseases,
contact:
Ms. Ann Rothgeb
Division of Lung Diseases
6701 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7952
Tel: 301-435-0202
Fax: 301-480-3557
Email: rothgeba@nhlbi.nih.gov
For training in the program areas of the Division of Blood Diseases
and Resources, contact:
Dr. Henry Chang
Division of Blood Diseases and Resources
6701 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7950
Tel: 301-435-0067
Fax: 301-480-0867
Email: changh@nhlbi.nih.gov
For training in the program areas of the Division of Prevention
and Population Sciences, contact:
Dr. Charlotte Pratt
Division of Prevention and Population Sciences
6701 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7936
Tel: 301-435-0382
Fax: 301-480-5158
Email: prattc@nhlbi.nih.gov
Fiscal Issues:
For more information about the appropriate procedures for dealing
with issues that involve budget and period of support of the award
or that involve any other issues requiring approval by the NHLBI
or post award actions, please contact the Grants Management Specialist
listed below:
Ms. Beckie Chamberlin
Division of Extramural Research Activities
6701 Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7926
Tel: 301-435-0183
Fax: 301-451-5462
Email: chamberr@nhlbi.nih.gov
Preparation Instructions
Follow the instructions in the PHS 398, Part I, 8., Instructions
for Preparing an Institutional National Research Service Award Application
including Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA applications. Please
use the NIH tables located in PHS 398 Part I, 8., to complete your
application. The NHLBI suggested tabular formats are no longer accessible.
|