Disclaimer: These guidelines were developed under contract using generally accepted secondary sources. The protocol used by the contractor for surveying these data sources was developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Department of Energy (DOE). The information contained in these guidelines is intended for reference purposes only. None of the agencies have conducted a comprehensive check of the information and data contained in these sources. It provides a summary of information about chemicals that workers may be exposed to in their workplaces. The secondary sources used for supplements 111 and 1V were published before 1992 and 1993, respectively, and for the remainder of the guidelines the secondary sources used were published before September 1996. This information may be superseded by new developments in the field of industrial hygiene. Therefore readers are advised to determine whether new information is available.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH GUIDELINE FOR HEXACHLOROETHANE
INTRODUCTION
This guideline summarizes pertinent information about hexachloroethane for
workers and employers as well as for physicians, industrial hygienists, and
other occupational safety and health professionals who may need such
information to conduct effective occupational safety and health programs.
Recommendations may be superseded by new developments in these fields;
readers are therefore advised to regard these recommendations as general
guidelines and to determine whether new information is available.
SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION
* Formula
C(2)Cl(6)
* Structure
(For Structure, see paper copy)
* Synonyms
Perchloroethane, carbon hexachloride, carbon trichloride, HCE,
Avlotane, ethane hexachloride, ethylene hexachloride, hexachloroethylene,
Distopan, Egitol, Falkitol
* Identifiers
1. CAS No.: 67-72-1
2. RTECS No.: KI4025000
3. DOT NA: 9037 53
4. Specific DOT label: None
* Appearance and odor
Hexachloroethane takes the form of rhombic, triclinic, or cubic crystals
that are colorless and have a camphor-like odor.
CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
* Physical data
1. Molecular weight: 236.7
2. Boiling point (at 760 mm Hg): 186.8 degrees C (336.2 degrees F)
(triple point; sublimes simultaneously)
3. Specific gravity (water = 1): 2.09 at 20 degrees C (68 degrees F)
4. Vapor density: 8.2
5 Melting point: 186.8 degrees C (336.2 degrees F) (triple point;
sublimes simultaneously)
6. Vapor pressure at 20 degrees C (68 degrees F): 0.22 mm Hg
7. Solubility: Insoluble in water; soluble in alcohol, benzene,
chloroform, ether, and oils.
8. Evaporation rate: Not applicable.
* Reactivity
1. Conditions contributing to instability: None reported.
2. Incompatibilities: Contact between hexachloroethane and hot iron,
zinc, or aluminum, strong oxidizers, or strong alkalies should be avoided.
Dehalogenation reactions can produce spontaneously explosive chloroacetylene.
3. Hazardous decomposition products: Toxic gases and vapors (such as
phosgene, chlorine, carbon tetrachloride, and tetrachloroethylene) may be
released in a fire involving hexachloroethane.
4. Special precautions: None reported.
* Flammability
Hexachloroethane is a noncombustible solid.
1. Flash point: Not applicable.
2. Autoignition temperature: Not applicable.
3. Flammable limits in air: Not applicable.
4. Extinguishant: Use an extinguishant that is suitable for the materials
involved in the surrounding fire.
Fires involving hexachloroethane should be fought upwind from the
maximum distance possible. Isolate the hazard area and deny access to
unnecessary personnel. Firefighters should wear a full set of protective
clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus when fighting fires involving
hexachloroethane.
EXPOSURE LIMITS
* OSHA PEL
The current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
permissible exposure limit (PEL) for hexachloroethane is 1 part per million
(ppm) parts of air (10 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m(3))) as an 8-hour
time-weighted average (TWA) concentration. The OSHA PEL also bears a "Skin"
notation, which indicates that the cutaneous route of exposure (including
mucous membranes and eyes) contributes to overall exposure [29 CFR 1910.1000,
Table Z-1].
* NIOSH REL
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
has established a recommended exposure limit (REL) for hexachloroethane of 1
ppm (10 mg/m(3)) as a TWA for up to a 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek.
NIOSH also assigns a "Skin" notation to hexachloroethane. NIOSH considers
hexachloroethane a potential occupational carcinogen [NIOSH 1992].
* ACGIH TLV
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH) has assigned hexachloroethane a threshold limit value (TLV) of 1 ppm
(9.7 mg/m(3)) as a TWA for a normal 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek.
The ACGIH also assigns a "Skin" notation to hexachloroethane. The ACGIH
considers hexachloroethane a suspected human carcinogen [ACGIH 1994, p.
23].
* Rationale for Limits
The NIOSH limit is based on the risk of potential for cancer; liver
tumors in animals [NIOSH 1992].
The ACGIH limit is based on the risk of liver and kidney injury
[ACGIH 1991, p. 743].
HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION
* Routes of Exposure
Exposure to hexachloroethane can occur through inhalation,
ingestion, eye or skin contact, and absorption through the skin, eyes, and
mucous membranes [Sittig 1991, p. 879].
* Summary of toxicology
1. Effects on Animals: Hexachloroethane is an eye irritant, a kidney
toxin, and a central nervous system depressant and stimulant; it is also a
liver carcinogen in mice [Hathaway et al. 1991]. The oral LD(50) in rats is
6,000 mg/kg and the 24-hour dermal LD(50) in rabbits is greater than 32,000
mg/kg [ACGIH 1991]. Rats exposed to 260 ppm of hexachloroethane for 8 hours
did not demonstrate any ill effects, but rats exposed to 59,000 ppm for 8
hours developed toxic neurological symptoms and some died [Hathaway et al.
1991]. Rabbits that ingested 12 daily oral doses of 1,000 mg/kg had reduced
body weights and showed damage to the liver and kidneys at autopsy. Rabbits
fed 320 mg/kg for 12 daily oral doses also developed liver damage [Clayton
and Clayton 1982]. Oral doses of 1 to 1.4 grams/kg in dogs produced
weakness, staggering gait, and muscle twitching [ACGIH 1986]. Rats and dogs
exposed to 260 ppm of hexachloroethane for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week for 6
weeks, developed serious neurological effects, and mortality was increased;
no toxic effects occurred in rats, dogs, or guinea pigs exposed to 15 ppm on
a similar schedule. Rats, dogs, and guinea pigs exposed to 48 ppm for the
same length of time had irritation of the eyes and the respiratory tract, but
did not show liver or kidney damage [Hathaway et al. 1991]. Male rats
developed kidney and liver damage after being fed 20 to 80 mg/kg per day for
110 days, and female rats had evidence of mild liver damage after being fed
80 mg/kg per day for 110 days [Clayton and Clayton 1982]. Rats fed 423 or
212 mg/kg/day and mice fed 1,179 or 590 mg/kg/day for 5 days a week for 44
week developed kidney damage [ACGIH 1991]. No teratogenic effects were noted
in the offspring of rats that were fed 50, 100, or 500 mg/kg hexachloroethane
while pregnant, or in rats that were exposed to 15, 48, or 260 ppm of the
vapor for 6 hours a day on days 6 through 16 of gestation [NLM 1992; Clayton
and Clayton 1982]. Hexachloroethane instilled into the eyes of rabbits causes
corneal injury, iritis, severe swelling, and discharge [Hathaway et al.
1991]. Mice that were gavaged with hexachloroethane in corn oil 5 days a week
or 78 weeks showed a significant increase in hepatocellular carcinomas. Rats
that were similarly gavaged for 5 days a week for 11 cycles, each consisting
of 4 weeks of treatment and 1 week off, did not have a significant increase
in tumors compared with controls but did show a few renal tumors of a type
rarely seen [ACGIH 1991]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer
has concluded that there is limited evidence the carcinogenicity of
hexachloroethane in experimental animals [IARC 1987].
2. Effects on Humans: Few data are available on the effects of exposure
to hexachloroethane in humans. No adverse effects were reported in workers
who handled hexachloroethane during World War II. Workers exposed to the
vapors of hot hexachloroethane have experienced excessive blinking,
photophobia, tearing, and reddened eyes, but did not develop corneal injuries
or permanent damage to their eyes [Grant 1986]. There have not been reports
of chronic effects of industrial exposure to hexachloroethane [Hathaway et
al. 1991].
* Signs and symptoms of exposure
1. Acute exposure: Exposure to hexachloroethane dust or vapors may cause
blinking, tearing, reddening of the eyes, and photophobia. Exposure to the
hot vapors or the dust of hexachloroethane may cause irritation of the skin
and mucous membranes.
2. Chronic exposure: No signs or symptoms of chronic exposure to
hexachloroethane have been reported in humans.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROCEDURES
* Emergency medical procedures: [NIOSH to supply]
5. Rescue: Remove an incapacitated worker from further exposure and
implement appropriate emergency procedures (e.g., those listed on the
Material Safety Data Sheet required by OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard
[29 CFR 1910.1200]). All workers should be familiar with emergency
procedures, the location and proper use of emergency equipment, and methods
of protecting themselves during rescue operations.
EXPOSURE SOURCES AND CONTROL METHODS
The following operations may involve hexachloroethane and lead to worker
exposures to this substance:
* The manufacture and transportation of hexachloroethane * Use in the
manufacture of pyrotechnics and smoke devices, to reduce ignitability of
combustibles, and as an additive to fire extinguishers * Use as a
fumigant, insecticide, and fungicide and formerly used as an animal
anthelmintic. Used as a moth repellant * Use as a degassing agent in
production of metals and alloys, principally aluminum and magnesium; used to
remove impurities from molten metals and to recover metals from ores and
smelting products * Use in the production of polymers, for flameproofing,
and to increase sensitivity to radiation crosslinking * Use as a
plasticizer for cellulose esters (as a camphor substitute);
as a retarding agent in fermentation; as a solvent; and in submarine
paint to prevent corrosion
Methods that are effective in controlling worker exposures to
hexachloroethane, depending on the feasibility of implementation, are as
follows:
* Process enclosure * Local exhaust ventilation * General dilution
ventilation * Personal protective equipment
Workers responding to a release or potential release of a hazardous
substance must be protected as required by paragraph (q) of OSHA's Hazardous
Waste Operations and Emergency Response Standard [29 CFR 1910.120].
Good sources of information about control methods are as follows:
1. ACGIH [1992]. Industrial ventilation--a manual of recommended
practice. 21st ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists.
2. Burton DJ [1986]. Industrial ventilation--a self study companion.
Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
3. Alden JL, Kane JM [1982]. Design of industrial ventilation systems.
New York, NY: Industrial Press, Inc.
4. Wadden RA, Scheff PA [1987]. Engineering design for control of
workplace hazards. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Plog BA [1988]. Fundamentals of industrial hygiene. Chicago, IL:
National Safety Council.
MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE
OSHA is currently developing requirements for medical surveillance. When
these requirements are promulgated, readers should refer to them for
additional information and to determine whether employers whose employees are
exposed to hexachloroethane are required to implement medical surveillance
procedures.
* Medical Screening
Workers who may be exposed to chemical hazards should be monitored
in a systematic program of medical surveillance that is intended to prevent
occupational injury and disease. The program should include education of
employers and workers about work-related hazards, early detection of adverse
health effects, and referral of workers for diagnosis and treatment. The
occurrence of disease or other work-related adverse health effects should
prompt immediate evaluation of primary preventive measures (e.g., industrial
hygiene monitoring, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment).
A medical surveillance program is intended to supplement, not replace, such
measures. To detect and control work-related health effects, medical
evaluations should be performed (1) before job placement, (2) periodically
during the term of employment, and (3) at the time of job transfer or
termination.
* Preplacement medical evaluation
Before a worker is placed in a job with a potential for exposure to
hexachloroethane, a licensed health care professional should evaluate and
document the worker's baseline health status with thorough medical,
environmental, and occupational histories, a physical examination, and
physiologic and laboratory tests appropriate for the anticipated occupational
risks. These should concentrate on the function and integrity of the liver
and kidneys.
A preplacement medical evaluation is recommended to assess medical
conditions that may be aggravated or may result in increased risk when a
worker is exposed to hexachloroethane at or below the prescribed exposure
limit. The health care professional should consider the probable frequency,
intensity, and duration of exposure as well as the nature and degree of any
applicable medical condition. Such conditions (which should not be regarded
as absolute contraindications to job placement) include a history and other
findings consistent with diseases of the liver and kidneys.
* Periodic medical evaluations
Occupational health interviews and physical examinations should be
performed at regular intervals during the employment period, as mandated by
any applicable Federal, State, or local standard. Where no standard exists
and the hazard is minimal, evaluations should be conducted every 3 to 5 years
or as frequently as recommended by an experienced occupational health
physician. Additional examinations may be necessary if a worker develops
symptoms attributable to hexachloroethane exposure. The interviews,
examinations, and medical screening tests should focus on identifying the
adverse effects of hexachloroethane on the liver or kidneys. Current health
status should be compared with the baseline health status of the individual
worker or with expected values for a suitable reference population.
* Termination medical evaluations
The medical, environmental, and occupational history interviews, the
physical examination, and selected physiologic or laboratory tests that were
conducted at the time of placement should be repeated at the time of job
transfer or termination to determine the worker's medical status at the end
of his or her employment. Any changes in the worker's health status should
be compared with those expected for a suitable reference population. Because
occupational exposure to hexachloroethane may cause diseases with prolonged
latent periods, the need for medical surveillance may extend well beyond the
termination of employment.
* Biological monitoring
Biological monitoring involves sampling and analyzing body tissues
or fluids to provide an index of exposure to a toxic substance or metabolite.
No biological monitoring test acceptable for routine use has yet been
developed for hexachloroethane.
WORKPLACE MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
Determination of a worker's exposure to airborne hexachloroethane is made
using a charcoal tube (100/50 mg sections, 20/40 mesh). Samples are
collected at a maximum flow rate of 0.2 liter/minute until a maximum
collection volume of 70 liters is reached. The sample is then treated with
carbon disulfide. Analysis is conducted by gas chromatography using a flame
ionization detector (GC/FID). This method is fully validated and is
described in the OSHA Computerized Information System [OSHA 1994] and in
NIOSH Method No. 1003 [NIOSH 1994b].
PERSONAL HYGIENE PROCEDURES
If hexachloroethane contacts the skin, workers should immediately wash the
affected areas with soap and water.
Clothing contaminated with hexachloroethane should be removed immediately,
and provisions should be made for the safe removal of the chemical from the
clothing. Persons laundering the clothes should be informed of the hazardous
properties of hexachloroethane.
A worker who handles hexachloroethane should thoroughly wash hands,
forearms, and face with soap and water before eating, using tobacco products,
using toilet facilities, applying cosmetics, or taking medication.
Workers should not eat, drink, use tobacco products, apply cosmetics, or
take medication in areas where hexachloroethane or a solution containing
hexachloroethane is handled, processed, or stored.
STORAGE
Hexachloroethane should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area in
tightly sealed containers that are labeled in accordance with OSHA's Hazard
Communication Standard [29 CFR 1910.1200]. Containers of hexachloroethane
should be protected from physical damage and contact with hot metals, and
should be stored separately from strong oxidizers, or strong alkalies.
SPILLS AND LEAKS
In the event of a spill or leak involving hexachloroethane, persons not
wearing protective equipment and clothing should be restricted from
contaminated areas until cleanup has been completed. The following steps
should be undertaken following a spill or leak:
1. Notify safety personnel.
2. Ventilate the area of spill or leak.
3. Do not touch the spilled material; stop the leak if it is possible to
do so without risk.
4. For small dry spills, use a clean shovel and place the material into a
clean, dry container; cover and remove the container from the spill area.
5. For large liquid spills, build dikes far ahead of the spill to contain
the hexachloroethane for later reclamation or disposal.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements for emergency
planning, reportable quantities of hazardous releases, community
right-to-know, and hazardous waste management may change over time. Users are
therefore advised to determine periodically whether new information is
available.
* Emergency planning requirements
Hexachloroethane is not subject to EPA emergency planning
requirements under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
(Title III) in 42 USC 11022.
* Reportable quantity requirements for hazardous releases
A hazardous substance release is defined by EPA as any spilling,
leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting,
escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment (including the
abandonment or discarding of contaminated containers) of hazardous
substances. In the event of a release that is above the reportable quantity
for that chemical, employers are required to notify the proper Federal,
State, and local authorities [40 CFR 355.40].
The reportable quantity of hexachloroethane is 100 pounds. If an
amount equal to or greater than this quantity is released within a 24-hour
period in a manner that will expose persons outside the facility, employers
are required to do the following:
- Notify the National Response Center immediately at (800)
424-8802 or at (202) 426-2675 in Washington, D.C. [40 CFR 302.6].
* Community right-to-know requirements
Employers who own or operate facilities in SIC codes 20 to 39 that
employ 10 or more workers and that manufacture 25,000 pounds or more of
hexachloroethane per calendar year or otherwise use 10,000 pounds or more of
hexachloroethane per calendar year are required by EPA [40 CFR Part 372.30]
to submit a Toxic Chemical Release Inventory form (Form R) to EPA reporting
the amount of hexachloroethane emitted or released from their facility
annually.
* Hazardous waste management requirements
EPA considers a waste to be hazardous if it exhibits any of the
following characteristics: ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or
toxicity as defined in 40 CFR 261.21-261.24. Under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) [40 USC 6901 et seq.], EPA has specifically listed
many chemical wastes as hazardous. Hexachloroethane is listed as a hazardous
waste under RCRA and has been assigned EPA Hazardous Waste No. U131. It is
approved for land disposal after treatment and only if the concentration of
hexachloroethane in the waste or treatment residual does not exceed 28
mg/kg.
Providing detailed information about the removal and disposal of
specific chemicals is beyond the scope of this guideline. The U.S.
Department of Transportation, EPA, and State and local regulations should be
followed to ensure that removal, transport, and disposal of this substance
are conducted in accordance with existing regulations. To be certain that
chemical waste disposal meets EPA regulatory requirements, employers should
address any questions to the RCRA hotline at (703) 412-9810 (in the
Washington, D.C. area) or toll-free at (800) 424-9346 (outside Washington,
D.C.). In addition, relevant State and local authorities should be contacted
for information on any requirements they may have for the waste removal and
disposal of this substance.
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
* Conditions for respirator use
Good industrial hygiene practice requires that engineering controls
be used where feasible to reduce workplace concentrations of hazardous
materials to the prescribed exposure limit. However, some situations may
require the use of respirators to control exposure. Respirators must be worn
if the ambient concentration of hexachloroethane exceeds prescribed exposure
limits. Respirators may be used (1) before engineering controls have been
installed, (2) during work operations such as maintenance or repair
activities that involve unknown exposures, (3) during operations that require
entry into tanks or closed vessels, and (4) during emergencies. Workers
should only use respirators that have been approved by NIOSH and the Mine
Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).
* Respiratory protection program
Employers should institute a complete respiratory protection program
that, at a minimum, complies with the requirements of OSHA's Respiratory
Protection Standard [29 CFR 1910.134]. Such a program must include
respirator selection, an evaluation of the worker's ability to perform the
work while wearing a respirator, the regular training of personnel,
respirator fit testing, periodic workplace monitoring, and regular respirator
maintenance, inspection, and cleaning. The implementation of an adequate
respiratory protection program (including selection of the correct
respirator) requires that a knowledgeable person be in charge of the program
and that the program be evaluated regularly. For additional information on
the selection and use of respirators and on the medical screening of
respirator users, consult the latest edition of the NIOSH Respirator Decision
Logic [NIOSH 1987b] and the NIOSH Guide to Industrial Respiratory Protection
[NIOSH 1987a].
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Workers should use appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment
that must be carefully selected, used, and maintained to be effective in
preventing skin contact with hexachloroethane. The selection of the
appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) (e.g., gloves, sleeves,
encapsulating suits) should be based on the extent of the worker's potential
exposure to hexachloroethane. There are no published reports on the
resistance of various materials to permeation by hexachloroethane.
To evaluate the use of PPE materials with hexachloroethane, users should
consult the best available performance data and manufacturers'
recommendations. Significant differences have been demonstrated in the
chemical resistance of generically similar PPE materials (e.g., butyl)
produced by different manufacturers. In addition, the chemical resistance of
a mixture may be significantly different from that of any of its neat
components.
Any chemical-resistant clothing that is used should be periodically
evaluated to determine its effectiveness in preventing dermal contact. Safety
showers and eye wash stations should be located close to operations that
involve hexachloroethane.
Splash-proof chemical safety goggles or face shields (20 to 30 cm long,
minimum) should be worn during any operation in which a solvent, caustic, or
other toxic substance may be splashed into the eyes.
In addition to the possible need for wearing protective outer apparel (e.g.,
aprons, encapsulating suits), workers should wear work uniforms, coveralls,
or similar full-body coverings that are laundered each day. Employers should
provide lockers or other closed areas to store work and street clothing
separately. Employers should collect work clothing at the end of each work
shift and provide for its laundering. Laundry personnel should be informed
about the potential hazards of handling contaminated clothing and instructed
about measures to minimize their health risk.
Protective clothing should be kept free of oil and grease and should be
inspected and maintained regularly to preserve its effectiveness.
Protective clothing may interfere with the body's heat dissipation,
especially during hot weather or during work in hot or poorly ventilated work
environments.
REFERENCES
ACGIH [1991]. Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological
exposure indices. 6th ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
ACGIH [1994]. 1994-1995 Threshold limit values for chemical substances and
physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
CFR. Code of Federal regulations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, Office of the Federal Register.
Clayton G, Clayton F [1981-1982]. Patty's industrial hygiene and
toxicology. 3rd rev. ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
DOT [1993]. 1993 Emergency response guidebook, guide 53. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Hazardous Materials
Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration.
Genium [1987]. Material safety data sheet No. 628. Schenectady, NY: Genium
Publishing Corporation.
Grant WM [1986]. Toxicology of the eye. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles
C Thomas.
Hathaway GJ, Proctor NH, Hughes JP, and Fischman ML [1991]. Proctor and
Hughes' chemical hazards of the workplace. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Van
Nostrand Reinhold.
IARC [1979]. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of
chemicals to man. Volume 20. Lyon, France: World Health Organization,
International Agency for Research on Cancer.
IARC [1987]. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of
chemicals to man. Supplement 7. Lyon, France: World Health Organization,
International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Lewis RJ, ed. [1993]. Hawley's condensed chemical dictionary. 12th ed. New
York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Mickelsen RL, Hall RC [1987]. A breakthrough time comparison of nitrile and
neoprene glove materials produced by different glove manufacturers. Am Ind
Hyg Assoc J 48(11): 941-947.
Mickelsen RL, Hall RC, Chern RT, Myers JR [1991]. Evaluation of a simple
weight-loss method for determining the permeation of organic liquids through
rubber films. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 52(10): 445-447.
NIOSH [1987a]. NIOSH guide to industrial respiratory protection.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-116.
NIOSH [1987b]. NIOSH respirator decision logic. Cincinnati, OH: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS
(NIOSH) Publication No. 87-108.
NIOSH [1991]. Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances:
Hexachloroethane. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Standards
Development and Technology Transfer, Technical Information Branch.
NIOSH [1992]. Recommendations for occupational safety and health:
Compendium of policy documents and statements. Cincinnati, OH: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS
(NIOSH) Publication No. 92-100.
NIOSH [1994a]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers
for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-116.
NIOSH [1994b]. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers
for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-113.
NLM [1992]. Hazardous substances data bank: Hexachloroethane. Bethesda,
MD: National Library of Medicine.
OSHA [1994]. Computerized information system. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Parmeggiani L [1983]. Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. 3rd
rev. ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation.
Patnaik P [1992]. A comprehensive guide to the hazardous properties of
chemical substances. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Sax NI, Lewis RJ [1989]. Dangerous properties of industrial materials. 7th
ed. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Sittig M [1991]. Handbook of toxic and hazardous chemicals. 3rd ed. Park
Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications.
USC. United States code. Washington. DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Windholz M, ed. [1983]. Merck Index 10th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck & Company.
|