Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Four commonly used methods to increase physical activity: brief interventions in primary care, exercise referral schemes, pedometers and community-based exercise programmes for walking and cycling.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Four commonly used methods to increase physical activity: brief interventions in primary care, exercise referral schemes, pedometers and community-based exercise programmes for walking and cycling. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 Mar. 37 p. (Public health intervention guidance; no. 2).

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Brief Interventions in Primary Care

Brief interventions involve opportunistic advice, discussion, negotiation, or encouragement. They are commonly used in many areas of health promotion, and are delivered by a range of primary and community care professionals. The interventions vary from basic advice to more extended, individually-focused attempts to identify and change factors that influence activity levels. The Public Health Interventions Advisory Committee (PHIAC) determined there is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of brief interventions in primary care.

Recommendation 1

Primary care practitioners should take the opportunity, whenever possible, to identify inactive adults and advise them to aim for 30 minutes of moderate activity on 5 days of the week (or more)*. They should use their judgment to determine when this would be inappropriate (for example, because of medical conditions or personal circumstances). They should use a validated tool, such as the Department of Health's forthcoming general practitioner physical activity questionnaire (GPPAQ), to identify inactive individuals.

* The practitioner may be a general practitioner (GP) or another professional with specific responsibility for providing encouragement or advice. This will depend on local conditions, professional interest, and resources. Health trainers are likely to have a role in offering brief advice. "Inactive" is used as shorthand for those failing to reach the Chief Medical Officer for England's (CMO's) recommendation. "Advise" is used as shorthand for "encourage, advise, discuss, negotiate"—see definition of brief interventions above.

Recommendation 2

When providing physical activity advice, primary care practitioners should take into account the individual's needs, preferences, and circumstances. They should agree goals with them. They should also provide written information about the benefits of activity and the local opportunities to be active. They should follow them up at appropriate intervals over a 3- to 6-month period.

Recommendation 3

Local policy makers, commissioners, and managers, together with primary care practitioners, should monitor the effectiveness of local strategies and systems to promote physical activity. They should focus, in particular, on whether or not opportunistic advice is helping to increase the physical activity levels of people from disadvantaged groups, including those with disabilities (and thereby tackling health inequalities). They should also assess how effective professionals from a range of disciplines are at raising long-term physical activity levels among these groups.

Recommendation 4

Local policy makers, commissioners, and managers, together with primary care practitioners, should pay particular attention to the needs of hard to reach and disadvantaged communities, including minority ethnic groups, when developing service infrastructures to promote physical activity.

Exercise Referral Schemes

An exercise referral scheme directs someone to a service offering an assessment of need, development of a tailored physical activity programme, monitoring of progress, and a follow-up. The Fitness Industry Association estimates that there are around 600 schemes in England. They involve participation by a number of professionals and may require the individual to go to an exercise facility such as a leisure centre.

The PHIAC determined that there was insufficient evidence to recommend the use of exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity, other than as part of research studies where their effectiveness can be evaluated.

Recommendation 5

Practitioners, policy makers, and commissioners should only endorse exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity that are part of a properly designed and controlled research study to determine effectiveness (For further information, see the "Description of the Implementation Strategy" field). Measures should include intermediate outcomes such as knowledge, attitudes and skills, as well as measures of physical activity levels. Individuals should only be referred to schemes that are part of such a study.

Pedometers, Walking and Cycling Schemes

Pedometers are a common aid to increasing physical activity through walking. Much of the research about pedometers has involved comparing the validity and reliability of different models. This guidance focuses on how effective they are at increasing people's physical activity levels.

In the context of this guidance, walking and cycling schemes are defined as organised walks or rides. Public health practitioners have increasingly become involved in these types of project in recent years.

PHIAC determined that there was insufficient evidence to recommend the use of pedometers and walking and cycling schemes to promote physical activity, other than as part of research studies where effectiveness can be evaluated. However, professionals should continue to promote walking and cycling (along with other forms of physical activity, which could include gardening, household activities and recreational activities) as a means of incorporating regular physical activity into people's daily lives (see Recommendation 1). 

Recommendation 6

Practitioners, policy makers, and commissioners should only endorse pedometers and walking and cycling schemes to promote physical activity that are part of a properly designed and controlled research study to determine effectiveness (For further information, see the "Description of the Implementation Strategy" field). Measures should include intermediate outcomes such as knowledge, attitude, and skills, as well as measures of physical activity levels.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type and quality of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see appendix A of the original guideline document).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Four commonly used methods to increase physical activity: brief interventions in primary care, exercise referral schemes, pedometers and community-based exercise programmes for walking and cycling. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 Mar. 37 p. (Public health intervention guidance; no. 2).

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Mar

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

NICE Project Team

Public Health Interventions Advisory Committee (PHIAC)

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

NICE Project Team Members: Mike Kelly, CPHE Director; Simon Ellis, Associate Director; Hugo Crombie, Analyst; Amanda Killoran, Analyst; Bhash Naidoo, Health Economics Adviser

Public Health Interventions Advisory Committee (PHIAC) Members: Mrs Cheryll Adams, Professional Officer for Research and Practice, Development with the Community Practitioners' and Health Visitors' Association (CPHVA); Professor Ron Akehurst, Professor of Health Economics and Dean of the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield; Professor Sue Atkinson, Regional Director of Public Health for London, Health Adviser to Mayor and Greater London Authority; Professor Michael Bury, Emeritus Professor of Sociology at the University of London and Honorary Professor of Sociology at the University of Kent; Professor Simon Capewell, Chair of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Liverpool; Professor K K Cheng, Professor of Epidemiology, University of Birmingham; Mr Philip Cutler, Forums Support Manager, Bradford Alliance on Community Care; Professor Brian Ferguson, Director of the Yorkshire and Humber Public Health Observatory; Dr Ruth Hall, Director of Public Health for Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire Strategic Health Authority; Ms Amanda Hoey, Director, Consumer Health Consulting Limited; Mr Andrew Hopkin, Senior Assistant Director for Derby City Council; Dr Ann Hoskins, Director of Public Health for Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic Health Authority; Professor David R Jones, Professor of Medical Statistics in the Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester; Dr Matt Kearney, General Practitioner, Castlefields, Runcorn, GP Public Health Practitioner, Knowsley; Ms Valerie King, Designated Nurse for Looked After Children for Northampton PCT, Daventry and South Northants PCT and Northampton General Hospital, Public Health Skills Development Nurse for Northampton PCT; Dr Catherine Law (Chair) Reader in Children's Health, Institute of Child Health, University College, London; Ms Sharon McAteer, Health Promotion Manager, Halton PCT; Professor Klim McPherson, Visiting Professor of Public Health Epidemiology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford; Professor Susan Michie, Professor of Health Psychology, BPS Centre for Outcomes Research & Effectiveness, University College, London; Ms Jane Putsey, Lay Representative, Chair of Trustees of the Breastfeeding Network for Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic Health Authority; Dr Mike Rayner, Director of British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford; Mr Dale Robinson, Chief Environmental Health Officer for South Cambridgeshire District Council; Professor Mark Sculpher, Professor of Health Economics at the Centre for Economics (CHE), University of York; Dr David Sloan, Director of Health Improvement & Public Health for City & Hackney Teaching PCT; Dr Michael Varnam, General Practitioner with the Community of Inner Nottingham; Dr Dagmar Zeuner, Consultant in Public Health with Islington PCT

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All members of the Public Health Interventions Advisory Committee are required to make an oral declaration all potential conflicts of interest at the start of the consideration of each public health intervention appraisal. These declarations will be minuted and published on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) website.

Members are required to provide in writing an annual statement of current conflicts of interests, in accordance with the Institute's policy and procedures.

Potential members of the Public Health Programme Development Groups (PDG), and any individuals having direct input into the guidance (including expert peer reviewers), are required to provide a formal written declaration of personal interests. A standard form has been developed for this purpose which also includes the Institute's standard policy for declaring interests. This declaration of interest form should be completed before any decision about the involvement of an individual is taken.

Any changes to a Group member's declared conflicts of interests should also be recorded at the start of each PDG meeting. The PDG Chair should determine whether these interests are significant.  If a member of the PDG has a possible conflict of interest with only a limited part of the guidance development or recommendations, that member may continue to be involved in the overall process but should withdraw from involvement in the area of possible conflict. This action should be documented and be open to external review. If it is considered that an interest is significant in that it could impair the individual's objectivity throughout the development of public health guidance, he or she should not be invited to join the group.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

  • Four commonly used methods to increase physical activity: brief interventions in primary care, exercise referral schemes, pedometers and community-based exercise programmes for walking and cycling. Quick reference guide. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 Mar. 4 p. (Public Health Intervention Guidance 2). Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Web site.
  • Costing report: four commonly used methods to increase physical activity. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 May. 23 p. (Public Health Intervention Guidance 2). Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • Costing template: four commonly used methods to increase physical activity. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 May. Variable p. (Public Health Intervention Guidance 2). Available from the NICE Web site.
  • Implementation advice: four commonly used methods to increase physical activity. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 May. 23 p. (Public Health Intervention Guidance 2). Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • Audit criteria: four commonly used methods to increase physical activity. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 May. Variable p. (Public Health Intervention Guidance 2). Available from the NICE Web site.
  • Rapid review of the economic evidence of physical activity interventions. Economics modelling report. London (UK): Matrix research and consultancy; 2006 April. 33 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • A rapid review of the effectiveness of brief interventions in primary care to promote physical activity in adults. London (UK): NICE Public Health Collaborating Centre—Physical activity; 2006 Jan 25. 49 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • A rapid review of the effectiveness of exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults. London (UK): NICE Public Health Collaborating Centre—Physical activity; 2006 May. 42 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • A rapid review of the effectiveness of pedometer interventions to promote physical activity in adults. London (UK): NICE Public Health Collaborating Centre—Physical activity; 2006 Jan 25. 35 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • A rapid review of the effectiveness of community-based walking and cycling programmes to promote physical activity in adults. London (UK): NICE Public Health Collaborating Centre—Physical activity; 2006 Jan 25. 34 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • Methods for development of NICE public health guidance. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 Mar. 131 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.
  • The public health guidance development process. An overview for stakeholders including public health practitioners, policy makers and the public. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2006 Mar. 46 p. Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the NICE Web site.

Print copies: Available from the National Health Service (NHS) Response Line 0870 1555 455. ref: N1015. 11 Strand, London, WC2N 5HR.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 23, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on February 6, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo