Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Management of chronic heart failure. A national clinical guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic heart failure. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2007 Feb. 53 p. (SIGN publication; no. 95). [155 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): In addition to these evidence-based recommendations, the guideline development group also identifies points of best clinical practice in the full-text guideline document.

The grades of recommendations (A–D) and levels of evidence (1++, 1+, 1-, 2++, 2+, 2-, 3, 4) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Diagnosis and Investigations

B - Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N terminal-pro-BNP (NT pro-BNP) levels and/or an electrocardiogram should be recorded to indicate the need for echocardiography in patients with suspected heart failure.

B - A chest X-ray is recommended early in the diagnostic pathway to look for supportive evidence of chronic heart failure and to investigate other potential causes of breathlessness.

Behavioural Modifications

C - All patients with heart failure should be advised to refrain from excessive alcohol consumption. When the aetiology of heart failure is alcohol related, patients should be strongly encouraged to stop drinking alcohol.

B - Patients with chronic heart failure should be strongly advised not to smoke and should be offered smoking cessation advice and support.

B - Motivational techniques should be used to promote regular low intensity physical activity amongst patients with stable heart failure.

Pharmacological Therapies

A - Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors should be considered in patients with all New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes of heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

A - All patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction of all NYHA functional classes should be started on beta-blocker therapy as soon as their condition is stable (unless contraindicated by a history of asthma, heart block or symptomatic hypotension).

A - Patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction alone, or heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction or both following myocardial infarction who are intolerant of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors should be considered for an angiotensin receptor blocker.

B - Patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction who are still symptomatic despite therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a beta-blocker may benefit from the addition of candesartan, following specialist advice.

B - Following specialist advice, patients with moderate to severe heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be considered for spironolactone unless contraindicated by the presence of renal impairment or a high potassium concentration.

B - Patients who have suffered a myocardial infarction and with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and either diabetes or clinical signs of heart failure should be considered for eplerenone unless contraindicated by the presence of renal impairment or a high potassium concentration.

B - Diuretic therapy should be considered for heart failure patients with dyspnoea or oedema (ankle or pulmonary).

A - Digoxin should be considered as an add-on therapy for heart failure patients in sinus rhythm who are still symptomatic after optimum therapy.

A - African American patients with advanced heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be considered for treatment with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate in addition to standard therapy.

B - Patients who are intolerant of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker due to renal dysfunction or hyperkalaemia should be considered for treatment with a combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate.

D - Patients with chronic heart failure should receive one pneumococcal vaccination and an annual influenza vaccination.

Interventional Procedures

Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

A - For patients in sinus rhythm with drug refractory symptoms of heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <35%) and who are in NYHA class III or IV and who have a QRS duration of >120 ms, cardiac resynchronisation should be considered.

B - Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and heart failure may be safely treated with continuous positive airway pressure.

B - Consideration should be given to enrolling stable heart failure patients who are in NYHA class II – III into a moderate intensity supervised exercise training programme to give improved exercise tolerance and quality of life.

Surgical Assessment and Intervention

B - In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% consideration should be given to preoperative introduction of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation.

Models of Care

Post-Discharge Care

A - Comprehensive discharge planning should ensure that links with post-discharge services are in place for all those with symptomatic heart failure. A nurse led, home based element should be included.

A - Follow up (including by telephone) by trained heart failure nurses should be considered for patients post-discharge or with stable heart failure. Nurses should have the ability to alter diuretic dose and the interval between telephone calls, and recommend emergency medical contact.

A - Patients with heart failure should be offered multidisciplinary follow up, including pharmacy input to address knowledge of drugs and compliance. Follow up should include feedback to clinicians about possibilities for optimising pharmacological interventions.

Refer to the original guideline document for a discussion of palliative care for patients with chronic heart failure.

Definitions:

Grades of Recommendation

Note: The grade of recommendation relates to the strength of the evidence on which the recommendation is based. It does not reflect the clinical importance of the recommendation.

A: At least one meta-analysis, systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or RCT rated as 1++ and directly applicable to the target population; or

A body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results

B: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+

C: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++

D: Evidence level 3 or 4; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+

Good Practice Points: Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group

Levels of Evidence

1++: High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or RCTs with a very low risk of bias

1+: Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias

1-: Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a high risk of bias

2++: High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies
High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal

2+: Well-conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal

2-: Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal

3: Non-analytic studies (e.g. case reports, case series)

4: Expert opinion

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for the assessment of suspected chronic heart failure.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic heart failure. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2007 Feb. 53 p. (SIGN publication; no. 95). [155 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1999 Feb (revised 2007 Feb)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Scottish Executive Health Department

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Guideline Development Group: Professor Allan Struthers (Chair) Consultant Physician, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Ms Gillian Armstrong, Senior 1 Physiotherapist, Glasgow Royal Infirmary; Ms Lynda Blue, Heart Failure Nurse Co-ordinator, Western Infirmary, Glasgow; Ms Joyce Craig, Senior Health Economist, NHS Quality Improvement Scotland; Dr Martin Denvir, Consultant Cardiologist, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh; Dr Geoff Dobson, General Practitioner, Edinburgh; Dr Barbara Dymock, Associate Specialist in Palliative Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Dundee; Dr Andrew Elder, Consultant in Acute Elderly Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh; Ms Trisha Graham, Physiotherapist, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow; Dr Hamish Greig, General Practitioner, Brechin; Mr Robin Harbour, Quality and Information Director, SIGN Executive; Dr Kerry-Jane Hogg, Consultant Cardiologist, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow; Mr Steve McGlynn, Area Pharmacy Specialist, Glasgow; Professor John McMurray, Consultant Cardiologist, Western Infirmary, Glasgow; Dr Caroline Morrison, Public Health Consultant, Greater Glasgow Health Board; Mr Andrew Murday, Consultant in Cardiothoracic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary; Dr Moray Nairn, Programme Manager, SIGN Executive; Dr David Northridge, Consultant Cardiologist, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh; Ms Agnes Sloey, Clinical Co-ordinator for Cardiology, Wishaw General Hospital; Mr Peter Thompson, Patient Representative, Edinburgh; Dr Deborah Tinson, Chartered Clinical Psychologist, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Declarations of interests were made by all members of the guideline development group. Further details are available from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Executive.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • Chronic heart failure for patients. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2007 Feb. 26 p.

Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Web site. Urdu translation is also available from the SIGN Web site.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on January 3, 2002. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of February 4, 2002. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 24, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo