Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Practice management guidelines for the timing of tracheostomy.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Holevar M, Dunham JC, Clancy TV, Como JJ, Ebert JB, Griffen MM, Hoff WS, Kurek SJ Jr, Talbert SM, Tisherman SA. Practice management guideline for the timing of tracheostomy. Charleston (SC): Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST); 2006. 8 p. [27 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The levels of recommendation (1-3) and classes of evidence (I-III) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Level 1

There is no mortality difference between patients receiving early tracheostomy (3 to 7 days) and late tracheostomy or extended endotracheal intubation.

Level 2

Early tracheostomy decreases the total days of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) in patients with head injuries. Therefore, it is recommended that patients with a severe head injury receive an early tracheostomy.

Level 3

Early tracheostomy may decrease the total days of mechanical ventilation and ICU LOS in trauma patients without head injuries. Early tracheostomy may decrease the rate of pneumonia in trauma patients. Therefore, it is recommended that early tracheostomy be considered in all trauma patients anticipated to require mechanical ventilation for > 7 days.

Definitions:

Rating Scheme for Strength of Recommendations

Level 1

The recommendation is convincingly justifiable based on the available scientific information alone. This recommendation is usually based on Class I data, however, strong Class II evidence may form the basis for a Level I recommendation, especially if the issue does not lend itself to testing in a randomized format. Conversely, low quality or contradictory Class I data may not be able to support a Level I recommendation.

Level 2

The recommendation is reasonably justifiable by available scientific evidence and strongly supported by expert opinion. This recommendation is usually supported by Class II data or a preponderance of Class III evidence.

Level 3

The recommendation is supported by available data but adequate scientific evidence is lacking. This recommendation is generally supported by Class III data. This type of recommendation is useful for educational purposes and in guiding future clinical research.

Rating Scheme for Strength of Evidence

Class I

Prospective randomized controlled trials

Class II

Clinical studies in which data was collected prospectively and retrospective analyses that were based on clearly reliable data. Types of studies so classified include observational studies, cohort studies, prevalence studies and case control studies.

Class III

Studies based on retrospectively collected data. Evidence used in this class includes clinical series and database or registry review.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Holevar M, Dunham JC, Clancy TV, Como JJ, Ebert JB, Griffen MM, Hoff WS, Kurek SJ Jr, Talbert SM, Tisherman SA. Practice management guideline for the timing of tracheostomy. Charleston (SC): Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST); 2006. 8 p. [27 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Workgroup Members: Michele Holevar, MD (Chair) Chicago Medical School; J. C. Michael Dunham, MD (Vice-Chair) St. Elizabeth Health Center; Thomas V. Clancy, MD, New Hanover Regional Medical Center; John J. Como, MD, MetroHealth Medical Center; James B. Ebert, MD, Elmhurst Memorial Hospital; Margaret M. Griffen, MD, University of Florida-Jacksonville; William S. Hoff, MD, St. Luke's Hospital; Stanley J. Kurek, Jr., DO, Medical University of South Carolina; Susan M. Talbert, MD, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital; Samuel A. Tisherman, MD, University of Pittsburgh

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Michele Holevar, MD, Chicago Medical School, Mount Sinai Hospital, 1500 South California Avenue F938, Chicago, IL 60612; Phone: (773) 257-6484

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on January 9, 2007. The information was verified by the guideline developer on February 26, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is copyrighted by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo