Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Diagnostic imaging in breast cancer.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Myers R, Minuk T, Johnston M, Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Panel. Diagnostic imaging in breast cancer: recommendations report. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Apr 12. 19 p. [18 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

Please visit the Cancer Care Ontario Web site for details on any new evidence that has emerged and implications to the guidelines.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note: A summary of the recommendations can be found in Table 5 in the original guideline document.

Staging

Before Surgery

Until further information becomes available, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography are both useful tools to determine the extent of disease in women with operable breast cancer. The choice between those modalities should be made based on the particular conditions of each patient and the equipment availability to handle the increased workload that would entail. However, MRI should not be used as a substitute for detailed mammographic or sonographic work-up of any abnormalities detected at a routine screening or as a substitute for the clinical or image-guided core biopsy of mammographic, sonographic, or clinical abnormalities. Pathology is the gold standard. Subsets of patients that may benefit from MRI include:

  • Women with clinically palpable and mammographically occult breast cancer.
  • Women with metastatic adenocarcinoma to axillary lymph nodes, with an unknown primary (normal mammogram and ultrasound)—75% to 85% of breast malignancies will be detected by MRI in these cases, and most will be <2 cm.
  • Women with lobular carcinoma. That histology is associated with a higher risk of multifocal and multicentric spread, and the extent is frequently underestimated mammographically and sonographically. MRI is not perfect in this area and may also underestimate the extent of disease; however, it is more sensitive than standard imaging.
  • Patients who require re-excision because of positive surgical margins may benefit from the increased sensitivity of MRI. The group of patients with >50% dense fibroglandular tissue (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BIRADS] densities 3 or 4), may benefit the most.
  • Patients with a high risk of multifocal disease may warrant an MRI. The youngest patients (24 to 39 years) have significant multifocality not detected on routine imaging. Their surgical treatment is frequently dramatically altered by MRI.

After Surgery

The practice guideline issued by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (PEBC) should be followed. That guideline applies to women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who have undergone surgical resection, and who have no symptoms, physical signs, or hematological or biochemical evidence of metastases.

  • In women with intraductal and pathological stage I tumours, routine bone scanning, liver ultrasonography, and chest radiography are not indicated as part of baseline staging.
  • In women who have pathological stage II tumours, a postoperative bone scan is recommended as part of baseline staging. Routine liver ultrasonography and chest radiography are not indicated for that group.
  • In women with pathological stage III tumours, bone scanning, liver ultrasonography, and chest radiography are recommended postoperatively as part of baseline staging.
  • In women for whom treatment options are restricted to tamoxifen or hormone therapy, or for whom no further treatment is indicated because of age or other factors, routine bone scanning, liver ultrasonography, and chest radiography are not indicated as part of baseline staging.

Response

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

In the follow-up of locally advanced breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, mammography and ultrasound are not accurate at assessing tumour response. Clinical assessment is subjective and lacks accuracy as well. MRI will determine whether the tumour is responding to chemotherapy, which does have long-term prognostic implications. As well, it will determine which tumours do not respond to chemotherapy, in which case the therapeutic regime could be altered.

Metastatic Breast Cancer

In order to determine if a treatment is successfully causing tumour regression or stability and inform decisions about continuing, changing, or stopping therapy, imaging tests that are abnormal at baseline could be repeated every three or four months. The one exception to this process would be bone scanning, which can be misleading in follow-up, as healing can look very similar to new disease in bone. If a patient is diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, staging is required to identify the full extent and patterns of spread to determine if the patient should be treated with hormonal therapy instead of chemotherapy.

Follow-up

The Canadian practice guideline issued by the Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer should be followed. In patients who have been treated curatively, routine imaging tests to detect distant metastases should not be carried out.

Diagnosing Recurrence

Patients who develop symptoms or signs suggestive of recurrence require individualized testing to determine if recurrence has occurred. Recurrent breast cancer may be difficult to fully assess on mammography due to scarring and inflammation from previous surgery or radiation. If the patient is a candidate for repeat lumpectomy, MRI should be considered.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are supported by practice guidelines, one randomized trial, and case series.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Myers R, Minuk T, Johnston M, Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Panel. Diagnostic imaging in breast cancer: recommendations report. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Apr 12. 19 p. [18 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Apr 12

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC) is a Province of Ontario initiative sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Panel

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: R. Myers; T. Minuk; M. Johnston

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Prior to embarking on the guideline development, members were asked to disclose information on any potential conflicts of interest, but there were none.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

Please visit the Cancer Care Ontario Web site for details on any new evidence that has emerged and implications to the guidelines.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following is available:

  • Browman GP, Levine MN, Mohide EA, Hayward RSA, Pritchard KI, Gafni A, et al. The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J Clin Oncol 1995;13(2):502-12.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 28, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on November 24, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo