Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Adjuvant taxane therapy for women with early-stage, invasive breast cancer.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Trudeau M, Eisen A, Messersmith H, Sinclair S, Pritchard K, Breast Cancer Disease Site Group. Adjuvant taxane therapy for women with early-stage, invasive breast cancer. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Jan 16. 29 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 1-7). [24 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary Recommendation

The following taxane containing regimens are considered reasonable treatment options for the target population:

  • Six cycles of three-weekly docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) (75/50/500mg/m2)
  • Four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) (60/600mg/m2) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175mg/m2 or 225mg/m2 every three weeks or 175 mg/m2 every two weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]).
  • Three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-100 followed by three cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2)

These regimens are recommended over their non-taxane containing counterparts (six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC), four cycles of AC, and six cycles of FEC-100), as they have been shown to be superior in efficacy. Taxane-containing counterparts to other commonly used non-taxane anthracycline regimens (e.g., cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil [CEF]) have not yet been evaluated by randomized clinical trials. However, these non-taxane-containing regimens remain reasonable treatment options.

Question #1: Compared with a Standard Anthracycline-Based Regimen, Does a Concurrent Taxane-Anthracycline Regimen Improve Clinically Meaningful Outcomes?

  • Women in the target population are recommended to receive six cycles of three-weekly docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide over six-cycles of three-weekly 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (500/50/500mg/m2).

Question #2: Compared with an Anthracycline-Based Regimen, Does a Sequential Taxane-Anthracycline Regimen Improve Clinically Meaningful Outcomes?

  • For women in the target population, four cycles of three-weekly AC (60/600mg/m2) followed by four cycles of three-weekly paclitaxel (175mg/m2 or 225mg/m2) is recommended over four cycles of three-weekly AC alone (60/600mg/m2).
  • For women in the target population, three cycles of FEC-100 followed by three cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2) is recommended over six cycles of FEC-100 alone.

Question #3: Compared with a Standard (Three-Weekly) Anthracycline-Taxane Regimen, Does a Dose-Dense (Two-Weekly) Regimen Improve Clinically Meaningful Outcomes?

  • Women in the target population should be considered for dose-dense therapy. In practice, four cycles of two-weekly AC (60/600mg/m2) followed by four cycles of two-weekly paclitaxel (175mg/m2) (AC followed by docetaxel [T]) is more commonly used due to a shorter duration of treatment.
  • Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (days three to 10 of each cycle [a total of seven doses] at 5 micrograms /kg rounded to either 300 micrograms or 480 micrograms total dose) should be given in combination with four cycles of two-weekly AC followed by docetaxel to prevent neutropenia.

Question #4: Compared with an Anthracycline-Based Regimen, Does a Non-Anthracycline Taxane Regimen Improve Clinically Meaningful Outcomes?

  • There is insufficient evidence at this time to make any evidence-based recommendations regarding non-anthracycline taxane regimens versus anthracycline-based regimens.

Question #5: What are the Harms Associated with Adjuvant Taxane Regimens?

  • Women receiving an adjuvant anthracycline-taxane regimen should be closely monitored for febrile neutropenia. In those who experience febrile neutropenia while receiving TAC, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (days three to ten of each cycle [a total of seven doses] at 5 micrograms/kg rounded to either 300 micrograms or 480 micrograms total dose) should be administered with subsequent docetaxel infusions. Alternatively, a dose reduction should be considered.
  • Women receiving an anthracycline-taxane regimen should also be monitored for other toxicities, including diarrhea, stomatitis, amenorrhea, asthenia, myalgia, paresthesia, and leukopenia.
  • Women receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) should be monitored for paresthesia, edema, weight gain, rash, and arthralgia.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are supported by randomized controlled trials.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Trudeau M, Eisen A, Messersmith H, Sinclair S, Pritchard K, Breast Cancer Disease Site Group. Adjuvant taxane therapy for women with early-stage, invasive breast cancer. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Jan 16. 29 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 1-7). [24 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Jan 16

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC) is a Province of Ontario initiative sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Provincial Breast Cancer Disease Site Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The members of the Breast Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) disclosed potential conflicts of interest relating to the topic of this practice guideline. One of the guideline lead authors (MT) reported related research involvement and funding from Aventis Pharmaceuticals. One author (MT) reported related research involvement and funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb as well as the receipt of honoraria from both companies. In addition, several Disease Site Group members reported related research involvement with those companies.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on May 3, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on June 1, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo