Print Friendly

Workshop "Food Security: Make It Your Business"
Awareness: Protecting the Food Supply

Food Security Awareness in the 21st Century (several images of inspectors at work)

Food Security vs. Food Safety

  • Food Security
    • protection of food products from intentional adulteration
  • Food Safety
    • protection of food products from unintentional contamination

Why the Food Supply?

  • Deliberate contamination could have significant consequences:
    • Economic
    • Public Health
    • Psychological & Political

Potential Impacts

  • Economic
    • $1.24 trillion or 13% of GDP
    • 2% of jobs relate to agriculture
    • $60 billion in U.S. exports
  • Economic affects: Farm-to-Table
    • 2.2 million farms located across the U.S.
    • More than 57,000 food processors, including 6,500 process meat, poultry, and egg products
    • 164 import establishments
    • More than 1.2 million retail food facilities nationwide
  • Public Health:
    • Consequences of Foodborne Disease Incidents from unintentional contamination of the U.S. food supply - CDC reports annually
      • > 76 million illnesses; 325,000 hospitalizations; 5,000 deaths
  • Psychological and Political

Lessons Learned

  • Foodborne disease outbreaks provide insight into:
    • Foods more vulnerable to terrorism
    • Points in the production where vulnerabilities exist
    • Public health impact

Unintentional Incidents

  • In 1985 > 16,000 confirmed illnesses; 17 deaths in six states from Salmonella typhimurium
    • Product: Milk produced at a single dairy plant
    • Cause: Recontamination of pasteurized milk
  • In 1994: 150 confirmed illnesses from Salmonella enteritidis
    • Product: Ice cream produced in a single facility
    • Cause: Cross contamination of pasteurized ice cream mix

Intentional Adulteration (graphics of foods)

Intentional Incidents

  • In 1984: Oregon cult members added Salmonella to restaurant salad bars
    • Intent: Affect outcome of local election
    • Result: 751 illnesses, 45 hospitalized, no fatalities
  • In 1996: Contaminated tray of doughnuts and muffins with Shigella dysenteriae Type 2
    • Intent: Disgruntled former employee
    • Result: 12 employees suffered severe gastrointestinal illness; 4 hospitalized; no fatalities
  • In 2003: 200 pounds of ground beef contaminated at supermarket with a nicotine-based pesticide
    • Intent: Disgruntled current employee
    • Result: 92 individuals reported becoming ill after consuming the ground beef

Let's Think Globally

  • Using threats as a weapon
  • Threat of economic or public health impacts
  • Threat of tampering

Threat Incident

  • In 1989: Threat of cyanide contaminated Chilean grapes imported into the U.S.
    • Intent: Economic and political gain by terrorist group
    • Result: Incident cost $200 million in lost revenue

What Foods Are Most Vulnerable?

  • Factors associated with foods more vulnerable to terrorism:
    • Large batches
    • Uniform mixing
    • Short shelf life
    • Ease of access
  • Other Factors
    • Large serving size
    • Ease to disguise a contaminant
    • Absence of tamper evident packaging
    • Highly desirable targets for emotional impact
    • Country of Origin
    • Ready-to-eat foods

Potential Agents

  • Biological agents
  • Chemical agents
  • Radiological agents
  • Physical agents

Attractiveness of Agents

  • Incubation period
  • Heat sensitivity
  • Potency
  • History of use
  • Stability in food conditions
  • Availability
  • Physical form of material
  • Traceable

Aggressors

  • Adulteration of products requires aggressor have:
    • Desire
    • Knowledge of product
    • Materials, skills and ability
    • Access to sufficient contaminant

Types of Aggressors

  • Disgruntled insiders
  • Criminals
  • Protestors
  • Subversives
  • Terrorists

Tactics of Aggressors

  • Insider compromise
  • Exterior attack
  • Forced entry
  • Covert entry

Employee Attitudes

  • Apathy
  • Too few resources
  • Lack of knowledge
  • Lack of commitment

Your Responsibilities

  • Awareness
  • Decrease vulnerabilities
  • Decrease availability of potential contaminants
  • Identify possible aggressors
  • Encourage employee vigilance
  • Communication

Any Questions?

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service