Workshop "Food Security: Make It Your Business"
Awareness: Protecting the Food Supply
Food Security Awareness in the 21st Century (several images of
inspectors at work)
Food Security vs. Food Safety
- Food Security
- protection of food products from intentional
adulteration
- Food Safety
- protection of food products from unintentional
contamination
Why the Food Supply?
- Deliberate contamination could have significant consequences:
- Economic
- Public Health
- Psychological & Political
Potential Impacts
- Economic
- $1.24 trillion or 13% of GDP
- 2% of jobs relate to agriculture
- $60 billion in U.S. exports
- Economic affects: Farm-to-Table
- 2.2 million farms located across the U.S.
- More than 57,000 food processors, including 6,500 process
meat, poultry, and egg products
- 164 import establishments
- More than 1.2 million retail food facilities nationwide
- Public Health:
- Consequences of Foodborne Disease Incidents from unintentional
contamination of the U.S. food supply - CDC reports annually
- > 76 million illnesses; 325,000 hospitalizations; 5,000
deaths
- Psychological and Political
Lessons Learned
- Foodborne disease outbreaks provide insight into:
- Foods more vulnerable to terrorism
- Points in the production where vulnerabilities exist
- Public health impact
Unintentional Incidents
- In 1985 > 16,000 confirmed illnesses; 17 deaths in six states
from Salmonella typhimurium
- Product: Milk produced at a single dairy plant
- Cause: Recontamination of pasteurized milk
- In 1994: 150 confirmed illnesses from Salmonella enteritidis
- Product: Ice cream produced in a single facility
- Cause: Cross contamination of pasteurized ice cream mix
Intentional Adulteration (graphics of foods)
Intentional Incidents
- In 1984: Oregon cult members added Salmonella to restaurant
salad bars
- Intent: Affect outcome of local election
- Result: 751 illnesses, 45 hospitalized, no fatalities
- In 1996: Contaminated tray of doughnuts and muffins with Shigella
dysenteriae Type 2
- Intent: Disgruntled former employee
- Result: 12 employees suffered severe gastrointestinal illness;
4 hospitalized; no fatalities
- In 2003: 200 pounds of ground beef contaminated at supermarket
with a nicotine-based pesticide
- Intent: Disgruntled current employee
- Result: 92 individuals reported becoming ill after consuming
the ground beef
Let's Think Globally
- Using threats as a weapon
- Threat of economic or public health impacts
- Threat of tampering
Threat Incident
- In 1989: Threat of cyanide contaminated Chilean grapes imported
into the U.S.
- Intent: Economic and political gain by terrorist group
- Result: Incident cost $200 million in lost revenue
What Foods Are Most Vulnerable?
- Factors associated with foods more vulnerable to terrorism:
- Large batches
- Uniform mixing
- Short shelf life
- Ease of access
- Other Factors
- Large serving size
- Ease to disguise a contaminant
- Absence of tamper evident packaging
- Highly desirable targets for emotional impact
- Country of Origin
- Ready-to-eat foods
Potential Agents
- Biological agents
- Chemical agents
- Radiological agents
- Physical agents
Attractiveness of Agents
- Incubation period
- Heat sensitivity
- Potency
- History of use
- Stability in food conditions
- Availability
- Physical form of material
- Traceable
Aggressors
- Adulteration of products requires aggressor have:
- Desire
- Knowledge of product
- Materials, skills and ability
- Access to sufficient contaminant
Types of Aggressors
- Disgruntled insiders
- Criminals
- Protestors
- Subversives
- Terrorists
Tactics of Aggressors
- Insider compromise
- Exterior attack
- Forced entry
- Covert entry
Employee Attitudes
- Apathy
- Too few resources
- Lack of knowledge
- Lack of commitment
Your Responsibilities
- Awareness
- Decrease vulnerabilities
- Decrease availability of potential contaminants
- Identify possible aggressors
- Encourage employee vigilance
- Communication
Any Questions? |