Los Alamos National Laboratory
 
 
LANL  Environment

Contacts

  • Environmental Communication & Public Involvement
    P.O. Box 1663
    MS J591
    Los Alamos, NM 87545
    Phone: 505-667-0216
    FAX: 505-665-1812
    envoutreach@lanl.gov

Environmental Monitoring Data (RACER)

What is RACER?

RACER (Risk Analysis, Communication, Evaluation, and Reduction) was created to enhance the Laboratory’s ability to effectively communicate data to the public in a uniform way. RACER provides web-based access to environmental measurement data collected by LANL and the New Mexico Environment Department. Its purpose is to provide a "transparent" view to the public. Nearly six million data records are available.

An integrated data analysis tool provides the user with a variety of features for analyzing, displaying, and mapping the measurement data. Data may be compared to applicable standards and screening values prescribed by regulators and agencies. Information may also be downloaded in spreadsheet format for additional analysis. RACER is administered by the New Mexico Community Foundation. Public input is vital to RACER effectiveness. The idea is to help neighboring communities understand environmental releases of chemicals and radionuclides as a result of Laboratory operations. Anyone may access RACER to perform their own analyses, using the same data used by LANL and its regulators. The NMCF requests input for making RACER even more useful through an email address available at the RACER site.

Explanations for abbreviations used in groundwater and surface water data tables in RACER and LANL environmental reports are available on the following tabs.

Lab Qualifier Codes

Codes Description
* *(Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
** **(Organic) and (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Control Sample analysis was outside acceptance criteria
*E *(Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative
B (B)(Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit
B* (B)(Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
B*E (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative
BE (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative
BE* (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria.
BEN (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
BEN* (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
BJ (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL)
BJN (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (J) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC)
BJP (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantities Limit (PQL). (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference
BJPX (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample.  (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit.  (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL).  (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference.  (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference. (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
BN (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
BN* (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
BNE (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative
BP (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference
BPX (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference. (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
BW (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit. (W) (Inorganic GFAA CLP) - The result for this analyte in the post-digestion spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
BX (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (X) Diode array didn't confirm
D (D) (Organic) - The result for this analyte was reported from a dilution
DJ (D) (Organic) - The result for this analyte was reported from a dilution. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL)
DNA Did not analyze due to broken equipment
DP (D) (Organic) - The result for this analyte was reported from a dilution. (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference
DPX (D) (Organic) - The result for this analyte was reported from a dilution. (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference. (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
E (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative
E* (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
EJ (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL)
EJ* (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
EJN (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
EN (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
EN* (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
H (H) (Organic/Inorganic) - The required extraction or analysis holding time for this result was exceeded
H* (H) (Organic/Inorganic) - The required extraction or analysis holding time for this result was exceeded. * (Organic) and (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Control Sample analysis was outside acceptance criteria
HJ (H) (Organic/Inorganic) - The required extraction or analysis holding time for this result was exceeded. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL)
HJ* (H) (Organic/Inorganic) - The required extraction or analysis holding time for this result was exceeded. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
I (I) (DIOXIN) The lab is reporting an interference for the associated congener. The reported concentration is an Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration (EMPC) due to the reported interference
INS (d15N) - The d15N of nitrate is a signature of the nitrate present in a sample. Therefore, nitrate has to be present to have a signature. A d15N value can not be given to a blank, since the blank does not have nitrate. This is different than most analytical methods where you would run a blank and use the designator: "non detect" or detected, but below detection limit
J (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL)
J* (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
JN (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
JN* (J) (Organic/Inorganic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
JP (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference
JPX (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference. (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
JX (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL). (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
L (L) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution sample indicates physical and chemical interferences are present
LT (LT) (Rad) - The result for this analyte is affected by spectral interference
N (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
N* (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
P (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference
PJ (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference. (J) (Organic/General Inorganics) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Method Detection Limit (MDL) but less than the Practical Quantitaion Limit (PQL)
PX (P) (Pesticides/PCBs) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary GC columns were greater than 25% difference. (P) (SW-846 EPA Method 8310 High Pressure Liquid Chromotography, HPLC results) - The quantitative results for this analyte between the primary and secondary HPLC columns or primary and secondary HPLC detectors were greater than 40% difference. (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
Q (Q) The result for this analyte was reported at an elevated reporting limit
R (Inorganic) -The data are not useable. Organic -The data are unusable (compound may or may not be present.) Resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification
SI (SI) (Rad) - Gamma spectroscopy result should be regarded as an uncertain identification due to spectral interference
SQ (SQ) (Rad) - Gamma spectroscopy result should be regarded as an uncertain identification due to spectral interference
TI (TI) (Rad) - Gamma spectroscopy result should be regarded as an uncertain identification due to spectral interference
U (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit
U* (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
UE (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative
UE* (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
UEN (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (E) (Organic) - The result for this analyte exceeded the upper range of the instrument initial calibration curve. (E) (Inorganic) (ICP-AES) - The result for this analyte in the serial dilution analysis was outside acceptance criteria. (E) (Inorganic) (GFAA) - The result for this analyte failed one or more CLP acceptance criteria as explained in the case narrative. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
UH (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (H) (Organic/Inorganic) - The required extraction or analysis holding time for this result was exceeded
UH* (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (H) (Organic/Inorganic) - The required extraction or analysis holding time for this result was exceeded. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
UI (UI) (Rad) - Gamma spectroscopy result should be regarded as an uncertain identification
UJ (UJ) (Organic) Legacy CST lab code should not be used
UL UL (all suites) Not detected legacy - This lab qual code is applied by WQ personnel for CST data and other legacy data that was reported as not detected using the less than symbol without the laboratory assigning a U lab code
UN (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
UN* (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (N) (Organic) - The reported analyte is a tentatively identified compound (TIC). (N) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the matrix spike sample was outside acceptance criteria. * (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte in the Laboratory Replicate analysis was outside acceptance criteria
UUI (UUI) (Rad) - Gamma spectroscopy result should be regarded as an uncertain identification and the lab assigned these gamma spectroscopy results as not detected
UW (U) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was not detected at the specified reporting limit. (W) (Inorganic GFAA CLP) - The result for this analyte in the post-digestion spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
UY2 (UY2) (Rad) - Result should be regarded as an uncertain identification due to spectral interference
W (W) (Inorganic GFAA CLP) - The result for this analyte in the post-digestion spike sample was outside acceptance criteria
X (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected
XB (X) (Organic/Inorganic) - The result for this analyte should be regarded as not detected. (B) (Organic) - This analyte was detected in the associated Laboratory Method Blank and the sample. (B) (Inorganic) - The result for this analyte was greater than the Instrument Detection Limit but less than the Contract Required Detection Limit

Top of page

Secondary Validation Flag Codes

Code Description
A The contractually-required supporting documentation for this datum is absent.
DNA did not analyze
GUP Matrix and Units are inconsistent
IUP Matrix and Units are inconsistent A
J The analyte is classified as detected but the reported concentration value is expected to be more uncertain than usual.
J- The analyte is classified as detected but the reported concentration value is expected to be more uncertain than usual with a potential negative bias.
J+ The analyte is classified as detected but the reported concentration value is expected to be more uncertain than usual with a potential positive bias.
JN- Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material at an estimated quantity with a suspected negative bias.
JN+ Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material at an estimated quantity with a suspected positive bias.
JPM The analyte is classified as detected but the reported concentration value is expected to be more uncertain than usual. Manual review of raw data is recommended to determine if the observed non-compliances with quality acceptance criteria adversely impacts data use.
LIMIT The limit type is uncertain.
MS Invalid validation flag. MS indicates a laboratory matrix spike sample.
MSD Invalid validation flag. MSD indicates a laboratory matrix spike duplicate sample.
N Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material.
NJ (Organic) -Analyte has been tentatively identified and the associated numerical value is estimated based upon 1:1 response factor to the nearest eluting internal standard
NQ No validation qualifier flag is associated with this result, and the analyte is classified as detected.
NUP Matrix and Units are inconsistent B
P Use professional judgment based on data use. A decision must be made by the project manager or a delegate with regard to the need for further review of the data. This review should include some consideration of potential impact that could result from using the P-qualified data.
PM Manual review of raw data is recommended to determine if the observed non-compliances with quality acceptance criteria adversely impacts data use.
R The reported sample result is classified as rejected due to serious non-compliances regarding quality control acceptance criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified based on routine validation alone
RPM The reported sample result is classified as rejected due to serious non-compliances regarding quality control acceptance criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified based on routine validation alone.
RUP Matrix and Units are inconsistent C
U The analyte is classified as not detected.
UA Invalid validation flag of unknown meaning.
UJ The analyte is classified as not detected, with an expectation that the reported result is more uncertain than usual.
VUP Matrix and Units are inconsistent D

Top of page

Secondary Validation Reason Codes

Code Description
C12d VOC_C12d
DR12a ORGANIC_ODRO12a
DR3b ORGANIC_ODRO3b
DR9a ORGANIC_ODRO9a
G_LIA The sample was lost in analysis. Results are not available for this sample
G_MDA The limit type (e.g. MDA, MDC, or DLC) was not reported by the analytical laboratory; the reported limit value has been saved in the MDA field
G_NQ No data qualifier flag has been applied to this sample result
G_TPU Result less than or equal to 3 * 1-sigma TPU, therefore not detected (U)
G165b GAMMA_GR165b
G165c GAMMA_GR165c
G16b GAMMA_G16b
G16c GAMMA_G16c
G3TPU The sample result is less than or equal to three times the 1-sigma total propagated uncertainty
G9a GAMMA_G9a
G9ra GAMMA_G9ra
GADM1 GAMMA_GADMIN1
GCZ CST put zeros in the TPU field to indicate non-detects, therefore not detected (U)
GI16b GAMMA_GI16b
GI16c GAMMA_GI16c
GI16d GAMMA_GI16d
GI4 GAMMA_GI4
GI5 GAMMA_GI5
GIQ GIQ
GIR16 GAMMA_GIR16c
GJCST Chemical Sciences and Technology validators assigned a J qualifier to this sample result. The hardcopy validation report should be reviewed to determine the reason for applying the J qualifier
GJLAB GJLAB_GAMMA
GLCS The percent recovery from the laboratory control sample for this analyte was less than 10%
GNONE A reason code is not available in the database for the data qualifier(s) applied to this sample result
GNPO The reported result should be regarded as rejected because no peak was observed for this radionuclide in the gamma spectrum
GNQ The reported result should regarded as rejected because the the gamma spectrum peak was not quantitated
GR1 The tracer yield information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
GR10 GAMMA_GR10
GR10a GAMMA_GR10a
GR11 GAMMA_GR11
GR15b GAMMA_GR15b
GR15c GAMMA_GR15c
GR16 GAMMA_GR16
GR165 GAMMA_GR165b
GR166 GAMMA_GR166
GR16a GAMMA_GR16a
GR16b GAMMA_GR16b
GR16c GAMMA_GR16c
GR16d GAMMA_GR16d
GR16g GAMMA_GR16g
GR17c GAMMA_GR17c
GR19 The validator identified quality deficiencies in the reported data that require qualification
GR1a The tracer %R value is less than 10%
GR1c The MDC for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated because the associated tracer recovery was less than 30% but greater than 10% and the result is a non-detect
GR1d The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased high because the associated tracer yield was greater than 105%
GR3 The matrix spike information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
GR3a ORGANIC_OGRO3a
GR3b ORGANIC_OGRO3b
GR3c ORGANIC_OGRO3c
GR3d ORGANIC_OGRO3d
GR3e The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associate matrix spike recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are non-detect
GR4 GAMMA_GR4
GR4a The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as not-detected (U) because the associated sample concentration is less than or equal to 5x the associated sample concentration
GR5 GAMMA_GR5
GR54 GAMMA_GR54
GR5a The MDC and/or TPU documentation is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
GR5b GR5b
GR6 GAMMA_GR6
GR6a GR6a
GR6b The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the LCS %R was less than 10%
GR6c The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associated LCS was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are detected
GR6d The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associated LCS was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are non-detect
GR6e GR6e
GR7 GAMMA_GR7
GR7a The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated because the associated duplicate results were prepared separately from the original analysis
GR7b GAMMA_GR7b
GR7c The affected analytes are qualified as as rejected because the RER was greater than 4
GR8 GAMMA_GR8
GR9 GAMMA_GR9
GR9a GAMMA_GR9a
GR9b GAMMA_GR9b
GRA GAMMA_GRA
GRLAB R Lab Gamma
GRNA GAMMA_GRNA
GRR16 GAMMA_GRR16c
GRR1b GAMMA_GRR1b
GRR6c GAMMA_GRR16c
GSI The reported result for this radionuclide should be regarded as rejected (R) due to spectral interference in the gamma spectrum
GTI The reported result should be regarded as rejected because the radionuclide identification based on the gamma spectrum is tentative
GUJC This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the analytical laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. Chemical Sciences and Technology validators assigned the J qualifier. The hardcopy validation report should be reviewed to determine the reason for applying the J qualifier
GULAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the analytical laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier
GUP_R Gamma:Units and matrix inconsistent
GZR The result for this radionuclide was reported as zero (0); therefore this analyte should be regarded as not detected
GZUNC Chemical Sciences and Technology division reported this result with an uncertainty value of zero(0), indicating that this analyte should be regarded as not detected
H10 The affected analytes are considered suspect because the sample was diluted without any target analytes identified due to matrix interference
H11 The required retention time information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
H11a The affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the associated retention times have shifted by more than 0.05 minutes from the initial calibration
H12 Required LCS data are missing. The LCS analyte recoveries could not be evaluated. Data may not be acceptable for use
H12a H12a
H12b HEXP_H12b
H12c HEXP_H12c
H12d HEXP_H12d
H14a Insufficient sample volume was received for a matrix spike and/or a matrix spike duplicate analysis
H14b The matrix spike and/or the matrix spike duplicate analyses were not performed on a sample associated with a LANL request number
H14c The matrix spike and/or the matrix spike duplicate were analyzed on a sample associated with a different LANL request number but no summary was included
H15 Because the sample was damaged, lost, or of insufficient quantity, the laboratory was unable to analyze it
H16 Required calibration information is missing or samples were analyzed on an expired calibration. Data may not be acceptable for use
H19 The validator identified quality deficiencies in the reported data that require qualification
H3 The surrogate percent recovery is greater than the UAL, which indicates the potential for a high bias in the results and the potential for false positive results
H3a The surrogate percent recovery is less than the LAL but greater than 10%R, which indicates the potential for a low bias in the detected results
H3b The surrogate is less than 10%R, which indicates the potential for a severely low bias in the results
H3c The reporting limit is approximated for nondetects because a surrogate percent recovery is lower than the LAL but greater than or equal to 10%R, which indicates an increased potential for false negative results
H3d The surrogate recovery is less than 10% and the result is a nondetect, which indicates significant potential for false negative results
H3e At least one surrogate percent recovery exceeds its upper UAL and at least one surrogate is less than its LAL, which indicates a greater than normal degree of uncertainty in the data
H3f At least one surrogate is less than 10%R and the sample result is a detect, which indicates the potential for a severely low bias in the results
H3g Required surrogate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
H4 The sample result is greater than the EQL and less than five times the concentration of the related analyte in the blank, which indicates that the reported detection is considered indistinguishable from blank contamination
H4a The affected analytes are considered estimated and biased high because this analyte was identified in the method blank but was greater than 5x
H4b Required method blank information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
H5 The sample result is less than the EQL and less than five times the concentration of the analyte in the method blank, which indicates the reported detection is considered indistinguishable from contamination in the blank
H5a Method-blank data is missing, or method blank was not analyzed. Data may not be acceptable for use
H6 The recovery of the LCS analyte is greater than the UAL, which indicates the potential for high bias in the results and for false positive results
H6a HEXP_H6a
H6b The of the LCS analyte percent recovery is less than the LAL and greater than or equal to 10%R, which indicates (1) the reporting limit is approximate and probably biased low for nondetected results, and (2) that detected results likely are biased low
H6c H6c
H6d The result is a nondetect and the %R value of surrogates or the analyte in the LCS is less than 10%R, which indicates a greatly increased potential for false negative results
H7 The affected results were not analyzed with a valid 5 point calibration curve and/or a standard at the reporting limit
H7a HEXP_H7a
H7c The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated and/or rejected because the associated analyte did not have a standard at the reporting limit
H8 HEXP_H8
H8a The required confirmation column analysis data is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use
H9 The holding time is exceeded. The data user should conduct a technical evaluation of the data of interest with respect to the effects of exceeding the holding time. Factors to consider include how long the holding time was exceeded, sample preservation, sample storage practices, use of the data, levels of contamination found in the sample, and the physical, chemical, and biological stability of the target analytes in the sample matrix
H9a H9a
H9b HEXP_H9b
Hba HEXP_Hba
HEQLM The result should be regarded as estimated (J) because the result was less than the EQL, but greater than the MDL
HERB ORGANIC_HERB3A
HERB1 ORGANIC_HERB12A
HERB3 ORGANIC_HERB3
HERB4 ORGANIC_HERB4
HERB8 ORGANIC_HERB8
HERB9 ORGANIC_HERB9
HHOLD The result should regarded as rejected (R) because the holding time was exceeded by more than 2 times
HJCST CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason
HNONE No reason for historic HEXP data
HNQ HNQ
HQCBL The J or R qualifier should not be accepted because the qualifier was assigned by CST based on a non-certified standard. The J or R qualifier should be ignored
HR12a ORGANIC_HERB12A
HR12b ORGANIC_HERB12B
HR12c ORGANIC_HERB12C
HR12d ORGANIC_HERB12D
HR3a ORGANIC_HERB3A
HR3b ORGANIC_HERB3D
HR3d ORGANIC_HERB3D
HR9 ORGANIC_HERB9
HRLAB R Lab HEXP
HSM HEXP_SPECTRAL MATCH
HUJCS This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason
HUJL HUJL
HUJLA HUJL_HEXP
HULAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier
HWQ1 Relative percent difference of the MS/MSD is greater than the acceptance criteria
HWQ10 Calibration Verification %D exceeded 60%
HWQ2 The spike percent recovery value is greater than or equal to the upper acceptance limit and the result is a detect, which indicates a potential high bias in the sample results
HWQ3 The spike percent recovery value is greater than 10% and less than the lower acceptance limit, which indicates a potential low bias in the results
HWQ4 The spike percent recovery value is less than 10% which increases the potential for false negatives being reported. This could be caused by analytical interferences
HWQ5 Non-specified quality control failure - see validation report
HWQ6 The sample was improperly preserved
HWQ7 Calibration % RSD was greater than the acceptance criteria but less than 60%
HWQ8 Calibration % RSD was greater than 60%
HWQ9 Calibration verification %D exceeded acceptance criteria but was less than 60%
I INORGANIC_I
I1 The sample result was reported as detected between the IDL and the EDL. Reported result may be less precise than results which are reported as being above the EDL
I10 The duplicate sample RPD is greater than the advisory limit and the sample result is a detect. Manual review is suggested to determine the source of the difference between analyses
I10a The duplicate sample RPD is greater than the advisory limit and the sample result is a nondetect. Manual review is suggested to determine the source of the difference between analyses
I10b The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the duplicate results were not analyzed on a LANL sample
I10c The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the duplicate results exceeded the RPD requirements
I10d The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the duplicate results were greater than 2x the RL and the RPD was greater than 20 for water and 35 for soils
I110 INORGANIC_I110
I113a INORGANIC_I113a
I114b INORGANIC_I114b
I13 INORGANIC_I13
I134b INORGANIC_I134b
I13a Insufficient sample volume was received for a duplicate-sample analysis
I13b The duplicate-sample analysis was not performed on a sample associated with this request number
I13d INORGANIC_I13d
I14 I14
I14a Insufficient sample volume was received for a matrix-spike analysis
I14b The matrix-spike analysis was not performed on a sample associated with this request number
I15 The sample was damaged, lost, or there was insufficient quantity and the analytical laboratory was unable to analyze it
I15a An ICV was not reported for this sample
I15b A CCV was not reported for this sample
I16 Relative percent difference is greater than 10% in the serial dilution sample
I16a The affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the ICV/CCV recovered high
I16b INORGANIC_I16b
I16c The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the ICV/CCV recovered low
I16d The affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the ICV/CCV recovered less than 10%
I16e The affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the initial calibrations correlation coefficient was less than 0.995
I16z The affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the ICV/CCV was not analyzed with the associated samples
I17d INORGANIC_I17d
I18 The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because a serial dilution sample was not analyzed
I18a The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because a serial dilution sample was not analyzed on a LANL sample
I18b The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the serial dilution sample RPD exceeded criteria
I19 INORGANIC_I19
I1a INORGANIC_I1a
I20 INORGANIC_I20
I24b INORGANIC_I24b
I2h INORGANIC_I2h
I3 The spike percent recovery value is greater than or equal to the upper acceptance limit (125%) but less than or equal to 150% and the result is a detect, which indicates a potential high bias in the sample results
I3a The spike percent recovery value is greater than 30% and less than the lower acceptance limit (75%), and the sample result is a detect, which indicates a potential low bias in the results
I3b INORGANIC_I3b
I3c INORGANIC_I3c
I3d The spike percent recovery value is less than 30%, and the result is a nondetect, which increases the potential for false negatives being reported. This could be caused by analytical interferences
I3e The spike percent recovery value is greater than 30% and less than the lower acceptance limit (75%), and the sample result is a nondetect, which indicates a potential for false negatives being reported
I3e I INORGANIC_I3e I4
I3eI4 INORGANIC_I3e I4
I3f The spike percent recovery value is less than 30% and the sample result is a detect, which indicates a potential low bias
I3g The sample result is undetected and the spike percent recovery value is greater than 150%, which indicates a potential bias in the sample result
I3h The sample result is detected and the spike percent recovery value is greater than 150%, which indicates a potential high bias in the sample result
I3j INORGANIC_I3j
I3l INORGANIC_I3l
I4 INORGANIC_I4
I4a In comparison with the preparation blank, the sample result is greater than the EDL but less than or equal to five times the concentration of the related analyte in the blank
I4b Preparation blank data was not reported by the analytical laboratory
I5 The sample result is less than the estimated detection limit (EDL) and is considered to be not detected.
I6 The percent recovery value of the analyte in the LCS is greater than the upper acceptance limit, which indicates a potential for quantitation problems in the analyses and the potential for false positive results being reported
I6a The percent recovery value of the analyte in the LCS is less than the lower acceptance limit and the analyte is a detect, which indicates a potential for quantitation problems in the analyses and the potential for false negative results being reported
I6b The percent recovery value of the analyte in the LCS is less than the lower acceptance limit and the analyte is a nondetect, which indicates a potential for quantitation problems in the analyses and the potential for false negative results being reported.
I6c The corresponding LCS or LCS analyte was not analyzed with the associated batch
I7 The ICS percent recovery value is greater than 120% and the result is a detect, which indicates potential quantitation problems in the analyses and the potential for false positive results being reported
I7a The ICS percent recovery value is greater than or equal to 50% and less than 80% and the result is a detect, which indicates a potential for a low bias
I7b The ICS percent recovery value is less than 50%, which indicates a greatly increased potential for false negative sample results being reported
I7c The ICS percent recovery value is greater than or equal to 50% and less than 80%, and result is a nondetect, which indicates a potential for false negative results being reported
I7d The ICS data was not provided by the analytical laboratory
I9 The holding time is exceeded. Positive results may be biased low and nondetected analytes may be false negatives. An evaluation of the data with respect to the technical implications of exceeding the holding time is recommended. Factors to consider include sample preservation; sample storage practices; data use; levels of contamination found in the sample; and the physical, chemical, and biological stability of the target analytes in the sample matrix
I9a The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the extraction holding time was exceeded by 2 times the acceptable holding time
IADM1 INORGANIC_IADMIN1
IADMI INORGANIC_IADMIN1
IB Instrument broken
ICSTZ CST put zeros in the TPU field to indicate non-detects, therefore not detected (U)
Id INORGANIC_Id
IDRPD IDRPD
IEQL INORGANIC_IEQL/MDL
IEQL/ INORGANIC_IEQL/MDL
IH6a INORGANIC_IH6a
IHOLD IHOLD
IICP IICP
IJCST CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason
IJLAB IJLAB
ILCS ILCS
ILIA ILIA
ILOWS VOC_LOWSTD
ILS VOC_LOW STD
IMS10 IMS10
IMS30 IMS30
INONE No Reason for historical inorganic data
INQ INQ
IPM INORGANIC_IPM
IQCBL IQCBL
IR10b INORGANIC_IR10b
IR14b INORGANIC_IR14b
IR3 INORGANIC_IR3
IR3a INORGANIC_IR3a
IR4 INORGANIC_IR4
IR5 INORGANIC_IR5
IR6a INORGANIC_IR6a
IR7 INORGANIC_IR7
IR9a INORGANIC_IR9a
IR9b INORGANIC_IR9b
IRCST CST assigned the R qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason
Is INORGANIC_Is
IU1 INORGANIC_IU1
IU3e INORGANIC_IU3e
IUA INORGANIC_IUA
IUJCS This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason
IUJLA IUJLA
IULAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier
IUP_R Inorganic:Units and matrix inconsistent
IUUJ This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason
IV3a INORGANIC_IV3a
IWQ1 The sample temperature was elevated
IWQ2 Negative blank samples results were greater than the MDL
IWQ3 Failed serial dilution RPD
IWQ4 Sample should have been preserved by acidification, but was not. Error not corrected at laboratory
IWQ5 Sample should not have been acidified, but was. Error could not be corrected at laboratory
IWQ6 Non-specified quality control failure - see validation report
IWQ7 Reporting limit verification recovery was greater than the acceptance criteria
IZR IZR
J- VOC_J-
J_LAB The analytical laboratory qualified the detected result as estimated (J) because the result was less the PQL but greater than the MDL
J+ VOC_J+
LB Gross contamination exists from a source other than the standard
LB1 Method-blank data is missing, or method blank was not analyzed at the required frequency
LB2 ICB/CCB data is missing, or ICB/CCB was not run at the required frequency
LB9 The sample result is less than five times the concentration of the related analyte in the blank
LC1 The frequency of the CCV did not meet method criteria
LC2 The CCV %D failed high
LC3 The CCV %D failed low
LCO Suspected carry over. Compound detected in sample at value < 5X PQL. The previous sample had a value > high standard and required dilution
LDL1 No CRI was analyzed to verify the reporting limit
LDL2 The CRI recovery failed high
LDL3 The CRI recovery failed low
LDS1 An initial dilution was performed and the surrogate recovery was >/= 10% OR < 10% but some sample results are > PQL
LDS2 An initial dilution was performed and the surrogate recovery was 0% and sample results are non-detect
LDS3 The sample result in a diluted sample was non-detect
LDS4 The instrument response for a diluted sample result was < half the lowest calibration standard and the sample result is detect
LH1 The holding time is exceeded for sample analysis
LH2 The holding time is exceeded for sample extraction
LH3 The holding time is exceeded by greater than twice the specified holding time
LI Required calibration information is missing or samples were analyzed on an expired calibration. Data may not be acceptable for use
LI2 A second source ICV (or second standard made from the same stock) was not used to verify the Ical
LI3 The initial calibration %RSD or correlation coefficient failed to meet acceptance criteria
LI4 The initial calibration slope or RF criteria were not met
LI5 The initial calibration y-intercept criteria were not met
LI6 An insufficient number of calibration standards were used and/or all standards were not analyzed within a 24 hour period. Data may not be acceptable for use
LI7 Points were removed from the calibration curve and the reporting limits were not adjusted accordingly
LIR1 Chorine isotope ratio criteria not met.
LIS Required IS information is missing.
LIS1 The IS area count failed high.
LIS2 The IS area count failed low.
LIS4 The IS RT is > 30secs from that of the associated standard.
LIV2 The ICV %D failed high.
LIV3 The ICV %D failed low.
LL1 The frequency of the LCS did not meet the specified criteria.
LL2 The LCS %R failed high.
LL3 The LCS %R failed low.
LL4 The LCS %Rs failed both high and low, or the LCS/LSCD RPD failed to meet criteria.
LMS1 An applicable MS/MSD analysis was not performed.
LMS2 The MS/MSD %R failed high.
LMS3 The MS/MSD %R failed low.
LMS4 Relative percent difference of the MS/MSD is greater than the acceptance criteria or the recoveries fail both high and low.
LOW S VOC_LOW STD
LOWST VOC_LOWSTD
LP1 The sample was improperly preserved.
LP3 Sample not maintained at required temperature
LR1 The sample result exceeded the calibration range.
LR2 Because the sample was damaged, lost, or of insufficient quantity, the laboratory was unable to analyze it.
LRP1 There is no measure of precision for the sample i.e. No replicate, MSD or LCSD was performed.
LRP2 The replicate precision criteria are not met.
LS Required surrogate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
LS1 Surrogate failed high.
LS2 Surrogate failed low.
LS4 The surrogate %R in the blank did not meet acceptance criteria.
LWQ1 Non-specified quality control failure - see report
MDL ORGANIC_OEQL/MDL
N3TPU NONE_<3*TPU Result less than or equal to 3 * 1-sigma TPU, therefore not detected (U).
NJCST NONE_J_CST
NJLAB NONE_J_LAB
NND NONE_NONDETECT
NNQ NONE_NQ
NQ The analytical laboratory did not qualify the analyte as not detected and/or any other standard qualifier. The analyte is detected in the sample.
NS12a SVOC_SVV12a
NS12c SVOC_SVV12c
NS1a SVOC_SVVS1a
NUA NONE_NUA
NULAB NONE_U_LAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier.
NUP_R Units and matrix inconsistent.
O12d ORGANIC_OSV12d
O5XBL ORGANIC_O5XBLANK
ODRO1 ORGANIC_ODRO12a
ODRO3 ORGANIC_ODRO3
ODRO4 ORGANIC_ODRO4
ODRO5 ODRO5_ORGANIC
ODRO7 ODRO7_ORGANIC
ODRO9 ORGANIC_ODRO9
OEQL/ ORGANIC_OEQL/MDL
OGR3b OGR3b_ORGANIC
OGR3c OGR3c_ORGANIC
OGRO3 ORGANIC_OGRO3
OGRO7 OGRO7_ORGANIC
OGRO9 ORGANIC_OGRO9
OH12b ORGANIC_OH12b
OH9 ORGANIC_OH9
OI3 ORGANIC_OI3
OI4 ORGANIC_OI4
OI9 ORGANIC_OI9
ONONE ORGANIC_ONONE
ONQ ONQ
OP12a ORGANIC_OP12a
OP12b ORGANIC_OP12b
OP3 ORGANIC_OP3
OP3a ORGANIC_OP3a
OP3b ORGANIC_OP3b
OP3c ORGANIC_OP3c
OP3d ORGANIC_OP3d
OP4 ORGANIC_OP4
OP5 ORGANIC_OP5
OP6 ORGANIC_OP6
OP7 ORGANIC_OP7
OP7a ORGANIC_OP7a
OP9 ORGANIC_OP9
OP9a OP9a Organic
OPa ORGANIC_OPa
OR1 INORGANIC_OR1
OSIN ORGANIC_OSIN
OSV12 ORGANIC_OSV12d
OSV1a ORGANIC_OSV1a
OSV3 ORGANIC_OSV3
OSV3a ORGANIC_OSV3a
OSV4 ORGANIC_OSV4
OSV4a ORGANIC_OSV4a
OSV7 ORGANIC_OSV7
OSV7a ORGANIC_OSV7a
OSV9 ORGANIC_OSV9
OUJLA O_UJ_LAB
OULAB O_U_LAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier.
OV3 OV3
OV36 ORGANIC_OV36
OV3a ORGANIC_OV3a
OV3b ORGANIC_OV3b
OV3c ORGANIC_OV3c
OV4 INORGANIC_OV4
OV7 ORGANIC_OV7
OV7a ORGANIC_OV7a
OV9 ORGANIC_OV9
P10 The breakdown criteria have been exceeded, which indicates poor instrument performance, which can result in a low bias in the reported results and potential if the labile compounds Endrin and 4,4'--DDT.
P10a The breakdown criteria have been exceeded, which indicates poor instrument performance, which can result in a high bias in the reported results and potential false positive results for the breakdown products Endrin ketone, Endrin aldehyde, DDD, and DDE.
P10b The breakdown recovery data are missing. The analyte breakdown could not be evaluated.
P10c The affected analytes are considered suspect because the sample was diluted without any target analytes identified due to matrix interference.
P11 The surrogate retention time has shifted by more than 0.05 min, possibly affecting analyte identification and causing false positives or negatives to be reported.
P11a The surrogate recovery data are missing. Surrogate recoveries could not be evaluated.
P11b The affected analytes are considered estimated because the confirmed analytes was outside the retention time windows.
P12 The LCS data are missing. The LCS analyte recoveries could not be evaluated.
P12a The LCS analyte is less than 10%R, which indicates the potential for a severely low bias in the results.
P12b The LCS analyte is greater than 10%R but less than the LAL, which indicates the potential for a low bias in the results.
P12c The result is a nondetect and the LCS analyte is greater than 10%R but less than the LAL, which the potential for false negative results.
P12d The LCS analyte %R value is greater than the UAL, which indicates the potential for high bias in the results and for false positive results.
P13 The Florisil cleanup not conducted; interferences may have increased analytical uncertainty and the potential for both false positives and false negatives.
P13a The GPC cleanup was not conducted on this soil sample; interferences may have increased analytical uncertainty and the potential for both false positives and false negatives.
P13b The appropriate cleanup was not conducted; interferences may have increased the analytical uncertainty and the potential for both false positives and false negatives. Examples of required cleanups are sulfur contamination (sulfur cleanup required), interferences in PCB samples (sulfuric acid cleanup required), and high molecular weight interferences in water samples (GPC cleanup required).
P14a Insufficient sample volume was received for a matrix spike and/or a matrix spike duplicate analysis.
P14b The matrix spike and/or the matrix spike duplicate analysis were not performed on a sample associated a LANL request number.
P14c The matrix spike and/or the matrix spike duplicate were analyzed on a sample associated with a different LANL request number but no summary was included.
P15 Because the sample was damaged, lost, or of insufficient quantity, the laboratory was unable to analyze it.
P16 Required continuing calibration information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
P19 The validator identified quality deficiencies in the reported data that require qualification.
P23B P23B
P3 The surrogate %R value is greater than the UAL, which indicates the a potential for a high bias in the results and a potential for false positive results.
P3a The surrogate is greater than 10%R but less than the LAL, which indicates the potential for low bias in the results.
P3b The surrogate is less than 10%R, which indicates the potential for a severely low bias in the results.
P3c The result is less than the EQL and the surrogate %R value is greater than10 % but less than the LAL, which indicates a potential for false negative results being reported.
P3d The result is less than the EQL and the surrogate less than 10%R, which indicates a significant potential for false negative results.
P3e One surrogate recovery is greater than the UAL and one surrogate recovery is less than the LAL, which indicates increased uncertainty in reported results.
P3f The surrogate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
P4 The sample result is a detect but less than 5 times the concentration of the related analyte in the blank, which indicates that the reported detection is considered indistinguishable from blank contamination.
P46 PESTPCB_P46
P4a The method blank or instrument blank documentation is missing.
P4b The surrogate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
P5 PESTPCB_P5
P6 PESTPCB_P6
P7 The percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) or percent difference (%D) exceeds the applicable acceptance criterion, which indicates potential quantitation problems in the analyses and the potential for false negative results.
P77 The affected analytes are considered estimated because the associated continuing calibration standard was not analyzed within 72 hours of the initial analysis. This is for multi-component analytes.
P7a The multicomponent analyte standard was not analyzed within 72 hrs of a multicomponent analyte detection. Quantitation of the multicomponent detection in the sample may not be accurate.
P7b PESTPCB_P7b
P7c PESTPCB_P7c
P8 This analyte should be regarded as not-detected because it was not confirmed on a second dissimilar column.
P8a The required confirmation column analysis data is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
P9 The holding time is exceeded. The data user should conduct a technical evaluation of the data of interest with respect to the impact of exceeding the holding time. Factors to consider include sample preservation, sample storage practices, use of the data, levels of contamination found in the sample, and the physical, chemical, and biological stability of the target analytes in the sample matrix.
P913 PESTPCB_P913
P9a The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the extraction holding time was exceeded by 2 times the acceptable holding time.
P9b The results for the affected analytes are rejected because the analytical holding time was exceeded.
PC PESTPCB_PC
PEQL P_EQL/MDL The result should be regarded as estimated (J) because the result was less than the EQL, but greater than the MDL.
PHOLD P_HOLD_TIME
PJCST P_J_CST
PJLAB PJLAB_PESTPCB
PLIA P_LIA
PNONE No reason for historic AROCLOR data.
PNQ P_NQ
PQCBL P_QC_BLIND
PS10 P_Surr < 10%
PUJCS This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason.
PUJLA P_U_LAB
PULAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier.
PV3 PESTPCB_PV3
PV4 PESTPCB_PV4
PWQ1 No MS/MSD data was included in the data package.
PWQ10 Calibration verification %D exceeded acceptance criteria but was less than 60%
PWQ11 Calibration Verification %D exceeded 60%
PWQ2 Relative percent difference of the MS/MSD is greater than the acceptance criteria.
PWQ3 The spike percent recovery value is greater than or equal to the upper acceptance limit and the result is a detect, which indicates a potential high bias in the sample results.
PWQ4 The spike percent recovery value is greater than 10% and less than the lower acceptance limit, which indicates a potential low bias in the results.
PWQ5 The spike percent recovery value is less than 10% which increases the potential for false negatives being reported. This could be caused by analytical interferences.
PWQ6 Non-specified quality control failure - see validation report
PWQ7 The sample was improperly preserved.
PWQ8 Calibration % RSD was greater than the acceptance criteria but less than 60%
PWQ9 Calibration % RSD was greater than 60%
R 6B RAD_R 6B
R_MDA R_MDA
R1 The tracer /carrier %R value is < 10%.
R10 RAD_R10
R10a RAD_R10a
R10b RAD_R10b
R11 The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as not-detected (U) because the associated sample concentration was less than 3x the 1 sigma TPU.
R11a RAD_R11a
R11b RAD_R11b
R11c RAD_R11c
R11d RAD_R11d
R14 RAD_R14
R14a Insufficient sample volume was received for a matrix-spike analysis.
R14b The matrix-spike analysis was not performed on a sample associated with this RN
R16 RAD_R16
R16a Result is greater than the MDC for the following fission and activation products with half-lives less than 365 days: Ce-144, Co-57, Mn-54, Pa-233, Se-75, and Zn-65.
R16b Result is greater than the MDC for the following radionuclides not reliably measured by gamma spectroscopy: Ac-228, Ba-140, Bi-212, I-129, La-140, Np-237, Pa-231, Pa-234, Pb-210, Pb-211, Ra,-223, Ra-224, Ra-226, and Rn-219.
R16c Result is greater than the MDC for the following naturally occurring radionuclides that are reliably measured by gamma spectroscopy and that can provide an indication of the quality of the gamma spectroscopy measurement: Bi-211, Bi-214, K-40, Pb-212, Pb-214, Th-227, Th-234, Tl-208, and annihilation radiation.
R16d Result is greater than the MDC for the following six radionuclides typically used by the analytical labs in their LCSs for instrument calibration and checks on instrument performance: Cd-109, Ce-139, Hg-203, Sn-113, Sr-85, and Y-88.
R19 The validator identified quality deficiencies in the reported data that require qualification.
R1a The tracer %R value is 10-30% inclusive and the sample result is greater than the MDA.
R1b The tracer %R value is 10-30% inclusive and the sample result is less than the MDA.
R1c The MDC for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated because the associated tracer recovery was less than 30% but greater than 10% and the result is a non-detect.
R1d The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased high because the associated tracer yield was greater than 105%.
R1e The tracer/carrier %R value is not reported.
R1x The tracer %R value is less than 10%.
R1z The tracer %R value is less than 30% but greater than 10% and the sample result is a detect.
R3 The matrix spike %R value is greater than the upper limit and the sample result is greater than the MDA.
R3a The matrix spike %R value is less than the lower limit and the sample result is greater than the MDA.
R3b The matrix-spike %R value is less than 10% and the result is not-detected.
R3c The matrix spike %R value is less than the lower limit and the sample result is less than the MDA.
R3d The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associate matrix spike recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are detected.
R3e The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associate matrix spike recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are non-detect.
R3TPU P_UJ_LAB
R4 The sample result is greater than the MDA but less than 5 times the amount found in the blank.
R4a The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as not-detected (U) because the associated sample concentration is less than or equal to 5x the associated sample concentration.
R4b Blank data is either missing from or not reported in the data record package.
R4z The method blank information is missing. The data may be acceptable for use.
R5 Analyte is not detected because the amount reported is less than the MDC.
R5a The MDC and/or TPU documentation is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
R5b This analyte should be regarded as rejected because spectral interferences prevents positive identification of the analytes.
R6 Recovery of the analyte in the LCS is greater than the upper limit and the analyte result is greater than the MDA.
R6a Recovery of analyte in the LCS is less than the lower limit and the analyte is greater than the MDA in the sample.
R6b The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the LCS %R was less than 10%.
R6c The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associated LCS was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are detected.
R6d The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated and biased low because the associated LCS was less than the LAL but greater than 10%, and the results are non-detect.
R6e The LCS data is missing from the data record package.
R7 The duplicate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
R7a The results for the affected analytes are qualified as estimated because the associated duplicate results were prepared separately from the original analysis.
R7b The duplicate and sample results have a DER (duplicate error ratio) that is greater than 2.0.
R7c The affected analytes are qualified as as rejected because the RER was greater than 4
R8 RAD_R8
R9 The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as estimated because the holding time was exceeded.
R96 RAD_R96
R9a The results for the affected analytes should be regarded as rejected because the holding time was exceeded by 2x the method published holding times.
R9b RAD_R9b
RA R_Accidentally_
Rb RAD_Rb
RB7 RAD_RB7
RC0TP R_CST_ZERO_TPU
RC0UN R_CST_0_UNC
RI14a RAD_RI14a
RI14b RAD_RI14b
RI3 RAD_RI3
RI3a RAD_RI3a
RI4 RAD_RI4
RI5 RAD_RI5
RI6 RAD_RI6
RIA RAD_RIA
RIB RAD_RIB
RJCST R_J_CST
RJLAB R_J_LAB
RLIA R_LIA
RNONE No reason for historic RAD data.
RNQ R_NQ
RPA RAD_RPA
RQCBL RQCBL_RAD
RQCMX R_Samp_QC_Mixed
RRLAB R Lab RAD
RSQLP RAD_SQLPLUR9B
RT30 R_Tracer < 30%
RUJCS This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason.
RUJLA RUJLA_RAD
RULAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier.
RUP_R RAD: Units and matrix inconsistent.
RWQ1 Planchets were flamed
RWQ2 Result values are less than than 3 times the MDC
RWQ3 Less than the negative MDC
RWQ4 Planchets were not flamed
RWQ5 The tracer %R value is greater than 105% but less than 125%
RWQ6 The tracer %R value is greater than 125%
RWQ7 Non-specified quality control failure - see validation report
RZUNC R_ZERO_UNCERT
SEQLM The result should be regarded as estimated (J) because the result was less than the EQL, but greater than the MDL.
SHOLD SHOLD
SJCST SJCST
SJLAB SJLAB
SNQ SNQ
SPECT HEXP_SPECTRAL MATCH
SQCBL SQCBL
SQLPL RAD_SQLPLUR9B
SRO9 ORGANIC_SRO9
SSU10 SSU10
SUJCS This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason.
SUJLA SUJLA
SULAB SULAB
SV0 The IS retention time has shifted by more than ?30 sec, which could affect compound identification and result in false positives or negatives.
SV1 The IS area count for the quantitating IS is outside the -50%-+100% window in relation to the previous continuing calibration, which could affect the quantitation accuracy of the associated analytes and the correct quantitation of surrogate %R values.
SV10 The affected analytes are considered suspect because the sample was diluted without any target analytes identified due to matrix interference.
SV11 TICs are not reported but were requested by ER Project. The validator contacted the laboratory that had not provided TICs.
SV12 The LCS documentation is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV12a The LCS percent recovery was less than 10%.
SV12b The LCS percent recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10% and the result is detected.
SV12c The LCS percent recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10% and the result is not detected.
SV12d The affected analytes should be regarded as estimated and biased high because the LCS percent recovery was greater than the UAL.
SV13c SVOC_SV13c
SV15 Because the sample was damaged, lost, or of insufficient quantity, the laboratory was unable to analyze it.
SV16 Required calibration information is missing or samples were analyzed on an expired calibration. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV16a The results for the affected analytes are rejected because the instrument performance sample (DFTPP) did not pass method acceptance criteria
SV19 The affected analytes are qualified because the data validator identified quality deficiencies in the reported data.
SV1a The area count for the quantitating IS is less than 50% of the area count for the previous continuing calibration, greatly increasing the potential for false negative results.
SV1b The area count for the quantitating IS is greater than 200% of the area count for the previous continuing calibration.
SV2 The quantitating IS area count is less than 10% of the expected value, which indicates increased potential for false negative results and other possible problems with sample quantitation.
SV2a Required IS information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV2c SVOC_SV2c
SV3 The %R values for two or more surrogates in either SV fraction is greater than the UAL, which indicates the potential for high bias in the results and the potential for false positive results.
SV3a Two or more surrogates in either SV fraction are greater than or equal to 10%R but less than the LAL, which indicates the potential for low bias in the results.
SV3b A surrogate in the related fraction is less than 10%R, and the result is a detect, which indicates the potential for severely low bias in the results.
SV3c The result is a nondetect and two or more surrogates are greater than or equal to 10%R but less than the LAL, which indicates increased potential for false negative results.
SV3d The result is a nondetect and a surrogate in the related fraction is less than 10%R, which indicates a greatly increased potential for false negative results.
SV3e The %R value of one surrogate in a fraction is greater than the UAL and one is less than the LAL but greater than or equal to 10%R, which indicates a greater than normal uncertainty in the results.
SV3f Required surrogate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV4 The sample result is greater than the EQL and less than or equal to 5 times (10 times for common phthalates) the concentration of the related analyte in the blank, which indicates the reported detection is considered indistinguishable from contamination in the blank.
SV4a The affected analytes are considered estimated and biased high because this analyte was identified in the method blank but was greater than 5x (10x for common lab contaminates).
SV4b Required method blank information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV5 The sample result is less than the EQL and less than or equal to 5 times (10 times for common phthalates) the concentration of the analyte in the blank, which indicates the detected result was indistinguishable from contamination in the blank.
SV5a Method-blank data is missing, or method blank was not analyzed. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV5v7 SVOC_SV5v7a
SV6 SVOC_SV6
SV6b SVOC_SV6b
SV7 The affected results were not analyzed with a valid 5 point calibration curve and/or a standard at the reporting limit.
SV7a The affected analytes were analyzed with a initial calibration curve that exceeded the %RSD criteria and/or a continuing calibration standard that exceeded %D criteria.
SV7b The affected analytes were analyzed with a RRF of less than 0.05.
SV8< The affected analyte is considered not detected because mass spectrum did not meet specifications.
SV8a The mass spectrum documentation is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
SV9 The extraction holding time is exceeded. The data user should evaluate the data of interest with respect to the effect of exceeding the holding time. Factors to consider include sample preservation, sample storage practices, use of the data, levels of contamination found in the sample, and the physical, chemical, and biological stability of the target analytes in the sample matrix.
SV9a The affected analytes are regarded as rejected because the extraction holding time was exceeded by 2x the method published holding time requirements.
SV9b The affected analytes are regarded as rejected because the analytical holding time was exceeded.
SVA SVOC_SVA
SVC SVOC_SVC
SVD SVOC_SVD
SVI SVOC_SVI
SVIA SVOC_SVIA
SVNON No reason for historic SVOC data.
SVPM SVOC_SVPM
SVS SVOC_SVS
SVV12 SVOC_SVV12a
SVV1a SVOC_SVV1a
SVV3 SVOC_SVV3
SVV4 SVOC_SVV4
SVV5 SVOC_SVV5
SVV7a SVOC_SVV7a
SVV9 SVOC_SVV9
SVVS1 SVOC_SVVS1a
SWQ1 Relative percent difference of the MS/MSD is greater than the acceptance criteria.
SWQ10 Calibration Verification %D exceeded 60%
SWQ11 The LCS recovery was greater than the acceptance criteria
SWQ2 The spike percent recovery value is greater than or equal to the upper acceptance limit and the result is a detect, which indicates a potential high bias in the sample results.
SWQ3 The spike percent recovery value is greater than 10% and less than the lower acceptance limit, which indicates a potential low bias in the results.
SWQ4 The spike percent recovery value is less than 10% which increases the potential for false negatives being reported. This could be caused by analytical interferences.
SWQ5 Non-specified quality control failure - see validation report
SWQ6 The sample was improperly preserved.
SWQ7 Calibration % RSD was greater than the acceptance criteria but less than 60%
SWQ8 Calibration %RSD exceeded 60%
SWQ9 Calibration Verification %D was greater than the acceptance criteria but less than 60%
U_LAB The analytical laboratory qualified the analyte as not detected.
UNK Unknown
V VOC_V
V+ VOC_V+
V0 The IS retention time has shifted by more than ?30 seconds, which could affect compound identification and cause false positives or negatives to be reported.
V1 The IS area count for the quantitating IS is outside the -50%-+100% window in relation to the previous continuing calibration. This condition could affect the quantitation accuracy of the associated analytes.
V10 The affected analytes are considered suspect because the sample was diluted without any target analytes identified due to matrix interference.
V11 TICs are not reported by the analytical laboratory but were requested by the ER Project. The analytical laboratory was contacted and TICs were not provided.
V12 The LCS documentation is missing. The data may not be acceptable for use.
V126 VOC_V126
V12a The LCS percent recovery was less than 10%.
V12b The LCS percent recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10%. The result is biased low and is detected.
V12c The LCS percent recovery was less than the LAL but greater than 10%. The result was not-detected.
V12d The LCS percent recovery was greater than the UAL. The result is detected and biased high.
V14a Insufficient sample volume was received for a matrix spike and/or a matrix spike duplicate analysis.
V14b The matrix spike and/or the matrix spike duplicate analysis was not performed on a sample associated with a LANL request number.
V14c The matrix spike a nd/or the matrix spike duplicate was analyzed on a sample associated with a different LANL request number but no summary was included.
V15 Because the sample was damaged, lost, or of insufficient quantity, the laboratory was unable to analyze it.
V16 Required calibration information is missing or samples were analyzed on an expired calibration. Data may not be acceptable for use.
V16a The results should be regarded as rejected because the BFB instrument performance sample did not pass method acceptance criteria.
V19 The validator identified quality deficiencies in the reported data that require qualification.
V1a The area count for the quantitating IS is less than 50% of the area count for the previous continuing calibration, greatly increasing the potential for false negative results.
V1b This analyte should be regarded as estimated because the IS failed high.
V1c VOC_V1c
V1s VOC_V1s
V2 The quantitating IS area is less than 10% of the expected value, which indicates an increased potential for false negative results and possibly other problems with sample quantitation.
V2a Required IS information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
V3 The surrogate percent recovery is greater than the UAL, which indicates the potential for a high bias in the results and the potential for false positive results.
V3a The surrogate is less than the LAL but greater than or equal to 10%R, which indicates the potential for a low bias in the results.
V3b The surrogate is less than 10%R and the result is a detect, which indicates the potential for a severely low bias in the results.
V3c The surrogate is less than LAL and the result is a non-detect, which indicates the potential for a low bias in the results.
V3d The surrogate is less than 10%R and the result is a nondetect, which indicates a greatly increased potential for false negative results.
V3e At least one surrogate is greater than the UAL and one surrogate is less than the LAL, which indicates a greater than normal degree of uncertainty in the result.
V3f Required surrogate information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
V4 The sample result is less than or equal to 5 times (10 times for acetone, methylene chloride, and 2-butanone) the concentration of the related analyte in the method blank, which indicates the reported detection is considered indistinguishable from contamination in the blank.
V4a The affected analytes are considered estimated and biased high because this analyte was identified in the method blank but was greater than 5x (10x for common lab contaminates).
V4b Required method blank information is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
V5 VOC_V5
V5a Method-blank data is missing, or method blank was not analyzed. Data may not be acceptable for use.
V5c VOC_V5c
V6b VOC_V6b
V7 The affected results were not analyzed with a valid 5 point calibration curve and/or a standard at the reporting limit.
V76 VOC_V76
V78 VOC_V78
V7a The affected analytes were analyzed with a initial calibration curve that exceeded the %RSD criteria and/or a continuing calibration standard that exceeded %D criteria.
V7b The affected analytes were analyzed with a RRF of less than 0.05.
V8 The affected analyte is considered not detected because mass spectrum did not meet specifications.
V8a The mass spectrum documentation is missing. Data may not be acceptable for use.
V9 The analytical and/or extraction holding time is exceeded. The data user should evaluate the data of interest with respect to the effects of exceeding the holding time. Factors to consider include sample preservation, sample storage practices, use of the data, levels of contamination found in the sample, and the physical, chemical, and biological stability of the target analytes in the sample matrix.
V9a The affected analytes are regarded as rejected because the analytical/extraction holding time was exceeded by 2x the method published holding time requirements.
VC4 VOC_VC4
VEQL The result should be regarded as estimated (J) because the result was less than the EQL, but greater than the MDL.
VI1 VOC_VI1
VI4 VOC_VI4
VI45 VOC_VI45
VIA VOC_VIA
VIC VOC_VIC
VJCST VJCST
VJLAB VJLAB
VLA VOC_VLA
VNONE No reason for historic VOC data.
VNQ VNQ
VO VOC_VO
VP VOC_VP
VQCBL VQCBL
VR5 VOC_VR5
VR7b VOC_VR7b
VS VOC_SPECTRUM
VSV1 VOC_VSV1
VSV1a VOC_VSV1a
VSV3b VOC_VSV3b
VSV3c VOC_VSV3c
VSV4 VOC_VSV4
VSV5 VOC_VSV5
VSV7 VOC_VSV7
VSV7a VOC_VSV7a
VU7a VOC_VU7a
VUCST VUCST
VUJCS This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier. CST assigned the J qualifier, need hard-copy to determine CST's reason.
VUJLA VUJLA
VULAB This analyte should be regarded as not detected because the laboratory assigned a U lab qualifier.
VUP_R VOC: Units and matrix inconsistent.
VWQ1 Relative percent difference of the MS/MSD is greater than the acceptance criteria.
VWQ10 Calibration Verification %D exceeded 60%
VWQ11 The LCS recovery was greater than the acceptance criteria
VWQ2 The spike percent recovery value is greater than or equal to the upper acceptance limit but and the result is a detect, which indicates a potential high bias in the sample results.
VWQ3 The spike percent recovery value is greater than 10% and less than the lower acceptance limit, which indicates a potential low bias in the results.
VWQ4 The spike percent recovery value is less than 10% which increases the potential for false negatives being reported. This could be caused by analytical interferences.
VWQ5 Non-specified quality control failure - see validation report
VWQ6 The sample was improperly preserved.
VWQ7 Calibration % RSD was greater than the acceptance criteria but less than 60%
VWQ8 Calibration %RSD exceeded 60%
VWQ9 Calibration Verification %D was greater than the acceptance criteria but less than 60%

Top of page

Other Codes

Fld Qc Type Code Fld Qc Type Description
CO Collocated
EQB Equipment Blank
FB Field Blank
FD Field Duplicate
FPR Field Prepared Reagent
FPS Field Prepared Spike
FR Field Rinsate
FS Field Split
FTB Field Trip Blank
FTR Field Triplicate
INB Equipment blank taken during installation and not assoc with a sampling event
ITB Trip blank taken during installation and not assoc with a sampling event
NA Not Applicable
PE Performance Evaluation
PEB Performance Evaluation Blank
PEK Performance Evaluation Known
RES Resample
SS Special sampling event, data unique
SS-EQB Equipment Blank of special sampling event, data unique
SS-FB Field Blank of special sampling event, data unique
SS-FD Field Duplicate of special sampling event, data unique
SS-FTB Field Trip Blank of special sampling event, data unique
UA Unassigned
Fld Prep Code Fld Prep Description
ASHED Ashed
CRUSH Crushed
DRY Dried
F Filtered
NA Not Applicable
SV Sieved
UA Unassigned
UF Unfiltered
UNK Unknown
Anyl Suite Code Anyl Suite Description
DIOX/FUR Dioxins and Furans
DRO Diesel Range Organics
GENINORG General Inorganics
HERB Herbicides
HEXP High Explosives
ISOTOPE Isotopes Ratios
METALS Metal
MINERALS Minerals
PEST/PCB Pesticides and PCBs
RAD Radionuclides
SVOA Semivolatile Organics
VOA Volatile Organics
Lab Sample Type Code Lab Sample Type Description
CS Client Sample
DUP Duplicate
RE Reanalysis
REDP Reanalysis Duplicate
Fld Matrix Code Fld Matrix Description
SED Geologic Sediment
UA Unassigned
UNK Unknown
W Water
WG Ground Water -
Includes water that is pumped by wells and flows out through springs.
WM Snowmelt -
Flowing water that is present as a result of melting snow.
This type of water often may be present for a week or more and in some years may not be present at all.
WP Persistent Water -
Flowing water that is present as a result of storm runoff, snow melt, effluent, or base flow.
WS Base Flow -
Persistent stream flow, but not necessarily perennial water.
This stream flow is present for periods of weeks or longer.
The water source may be effluent discharge or shallow groundwater that discharges in canyons
WST Standing Water -
Water that is not flowing. This type of water is collected from a puddle or other impoundment
WT Storm Runoff -
Flowing water that is present in response to rainfall.
These flow events are generally very short lived, with flows lasting from less than an hour to several days
Lab Code Lab Description
EES6 Los Alamos National Laboratory-EES-6
GELC General Engineering Laboratories, Inc., Charleston, SC
GEO Geochron Lab
HUFFMAN Huffman
NMSSL New Mexico State Scientific Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM
PARA Paragon Analytics, Inc., Fort Collins, CO
STDEN Severn Trent Laboratories - Denver
STLA Severn Trent - Los Angeles
STR Severn Trent Laboratories - Richland
STSAC
Severn-Trent-Sacramento
STSL
Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc., St. Louis
UMTL
University of Miami Tritium Lab, Miami, FL

Top of page


Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA
Inside | © Copyright 2008-09 Los Alamos National Security, LLC All rights reserved | Disclaimer/Privacy | Web Contact