Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80* 93* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 90* 98 Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 84* 88* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 86* 98 Bloomington, IN....................... 81* 87* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 91* 95 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 69* 85* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 89* 84* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 83* 88* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 89* 100 Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 97* 99 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 89* 90* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 89* 95 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 89* 91 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80* 81* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 88* 94* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 86* 95* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 94* 95 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 93* 91* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86* 92* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 92* 89* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 90* 86* Great Falls, MT....................... 79* 82* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 85* 95* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 84* 100 Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 100 100 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 85* 90* Honolulu, HI.......................... 94* 100 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 88* 98 Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 86* 91* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 77* 80* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 94* 85* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 85* 80* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 92* 85* Bloomington, IN....................... 85* 75* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 95* 93* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 81* 70* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 85* 94* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 89* 77* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 87* 85* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 99 94* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 95 89* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 90* 88* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 89* 89* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 82* 75* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 92* 81* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 86* 83* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 95* 93* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 96* 88* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 85* 83* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 89* 87* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 88* 92* Great Falls, MT....................... 72* 85* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 87* 81* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 82* 83* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 100 105* Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 78* 78* Honolulu, HI.......................... 94* 102 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 94* 75* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 89* 82* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 83* 77* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 88* 91* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 87* 81* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 85* 84* Bloomington, IN....................... 76* 80* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 93* 82* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 64* 66* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 85* 82* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 88* 83* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 92* 86* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 98 95* Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 86* 86* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 86* 87* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 91* 85* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81* 75* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 96 87* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 87* 79* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 95 90* Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 90* 89* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 83* 81* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 94* 90* Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 97 86* Great Falls, MT....................... 80* 70* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 91* 85* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 81* 84* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 100 98 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 86* 80* Honolulu, HI.......................... 100 83* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 93* 86* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 90* 82* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 72* 81* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 73* 89* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 68* 91* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 71* 90* Bloomington, IN....................... 64* 72* Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 86* 83* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 55* 80* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 94 89* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 65* 76* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 76* 87* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 109 97 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 76* 89* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 86* 92 Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 83* 88* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83* 89* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 75* 86* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 78* 82* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 82* 103 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 84* 88* Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 92 77* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 86* 95 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 90* 83* Great Falls, MT....................... 95 87* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 73* 77* Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 65* 75* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 94 95 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 81* 82* Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 99 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 76* 85* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 74* 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89* 84* Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL................................. 97 92* Austin-Round Rock, TX................. 86* 84* Birmingham-Hoover, AL................. 86* 93* Bloomington, IN....................... 93* 95 Bloomington-Normal, IL................ 109* 91* Brownsville-Harlingen, TX............. 71* 66* Buffalo-Niagara-Cattaraugus, NY....... 101 89* Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC............ 96 90* Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC..... 97 89* Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI.............................. 97 96 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN.............................. 95 94* Cleveland-Akron-Elyria, OH............ 96 93* Columbus-Marion-Chillicothe, OH....... 95 91* Corpus Christi, TX.................... 87* 79* Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 86* 93* Dayton-Springfield-Greenville, OH..... 99 93* Denver-Aurora-Boulder, CO............. 98 94 Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI.............. 110* 99 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 93* 94* Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 97 103 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI.............. 95* 90* Great Falls, MT....................... 88* 89* Greensboro-High Point, NC............. 93* 94 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC......... 100 85* Hartford-West Hartford-Willimantic, CT.................................... 105 100 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC.......... 96 92* Honolulu, HI.......................... 103 88* Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX........ 94 86* Huntsville-Decatur, AL................ 93* 93* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 85* 77* Iowa City, IA......................... 87* 93* Johnstown, PA......................... 77* 79* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89* 88* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 92* 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 82* 100 Lincoln, NE........................... 79* 79* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 98* 105 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 85* 85* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 85* 89* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 88* 100 Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 89* 93* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 97* 103 Mobile, AL............................ 83* 90 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 88* 89* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 103* 110* Ocala, FL............................. 80* 73* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 83* 82* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 82* 85* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 83* 82* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 94* 99 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 90* 97 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 85* 84* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 95* 93 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 97* 97 Reading, PA........................... 90* 101 Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 89* 92* Richmond, VA.......................... 87* 93* Rochester, NY......................... 89* 87* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 90* 81* Iowa City, IA......................... 87* 88* Johnstown, PA......................... 78* 80* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91* 86* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 88* 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 92* 72* Lincoln, NE........................... 77* 80* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 102 98 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 84* 86* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 85* 76* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 89* 88* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 88* 85* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 96* 102 Mobile, AL............................ 84* 79* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 94* 84* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 107* 100 Ocala, FL............................. 78* 82* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 83* 80* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 81* 79* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 80* 85* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 92* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 94 87* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 88* 83* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 93* 98 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 103 99 Reading, PA........................... 86* 87* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 91* 87* Richmond, VA.......................... 89* 85* Rochester, NY......................... 91* 95* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 77* 84* Iowa City, IA......................... 87* 86* Johnstown, PA......................... 78* 75* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94 85* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 94* 83* Knoxville, TN......................... 90* 78* Lincoln, NE........................... 78* 76* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 101 93* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 93 84* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 93* 84* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 89* 87* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 97 87* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 98 90* Mobile, AL............................ 85* 81* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 89* 84* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 103 101 Ocala, FL............................. 83* 78* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 87* 77* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 88* 78* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 85* 76* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 88* 92* Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 99 86* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 84* 84* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 100 93* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 93* 92* Reading, PA........................... 98 87* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 96 87* Richmond, VA.......................... 86* 88* Rochester, NY......................... 89* 86* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 77* 85* Iowa City, IA......................... 87 88* Johnstown, PA......................... 76* 77* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 82* 86* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 90* 89* Knoxville, TN......................... 65* 73* Lincoln, NE........................... 71* 79* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 92 97 Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 77* 81* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 79* 88* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 76* 85* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 88* 87* Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 95 90* Mobile, AL............................ 78* 78* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 78* 84* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 110* 100 Ocala, FL............................. 64* 90* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 95 85* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 79* 85* Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 78* 87* Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 86* 98 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 76* 90 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 78* 84* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 95 102 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 92* 98 Reading, PA........................... 85* 88* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 73* 91* Richmond, VA.......................... 74* 88* Rochester, NY......................... 79* 78* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Indianapolis-Anderson-Columbus, IN.... 102 91* Iowa City, IA......................... 93* 86* Johnstown, PA......................... 80* 76* Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 88* Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA.......... 94 96 Knoxville, TN......................... 82* 88* Lincoln, NE........................... 83* 90* Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA.................................... 93* 93* Louisville/Jefferson County-Elizabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN................................. 96 83* Memphis, TN-MS-AR..................... 89* 85* Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL.................................... 87* 88* Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha, WI......... 99 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul-St. Cloud, MN-WI................................. 105 98 Mobile, AL............................ 91* 90* New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA....... 98 92* New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA........................... 101 98 Ocala, FL............................. 89* 92* Oklahoma City, OK..................... 80* 78* Orlando-Kissimmee, FL................. 93 98 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL..... 101 102 Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 93* 95 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ........... 90* 91* Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA............. 91* 87* Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA... 97 93* Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA................................. 103 99 Reading, PA........................... 96 91* Reno-Sparks, NV....................... 93* 92* Richmond, VA.......................... 99 91* Rochester, NY......................... 97 89* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Rockford, IL.......................... 88* 85* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 98 101 Salinas, CA........................... 102 107* San Antonio, TX....................... 82* 91* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 98 101 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 107* 106 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 99 98 Springfield, MA....................... 99 95* Springfield, MO....................... 80* 80* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93* 96 Tallahassee, FL....................... 80* 79* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 84* 89* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 83* 81* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 90* 85* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 98* 100 York-Hanover, PA...................... 86* 105* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 84* 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Rockford, IL.......................... 90* 89* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 105 98 Salinas, CA........................... 111* 108 San Antonio, TX....................... 87* 78* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 100 104 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 110* 110* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 98 103 Springfield, MA....................... 102 95* Springfield, MO....................... 79* 77* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93* 86* Tallahassee, FL....................... 76* 83* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 83* 82* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85* 83* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 95 92* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 102 93* York-Hanover, PA...................... 91* 84* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 83* 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Rockford, IL.......................... 89* 83* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 98 92* Salinas, CA........................... 118* 94* San Antonio, TX....................... 79* 78* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 94 92* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 112* 104* Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 103 91* Springfield, MA....................... 101 94 Springfield, MO....................... 85* 76* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 90* 88* Tallahassee, FL....................... 84* 77* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 91* 83* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86* 79* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 93* 83* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 99 97 York-Hanover, PA...................... 83* 81* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 79* 81* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Rockford, IL.......................... 92* 85* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 94 97 Salinas, CA........................... 105 109 San Antonio, TX....................... 83* 88* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 91 96 San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 103 103 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 92 94 Springfield, MA....................... 91* 88* Springfield, MO....................... 66* 76* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 76* 74* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 83* 81* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 71* 82* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 73* 85* Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 84* 101 York-Hanover, PA...................... 82* 81* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 75* 79* See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2008 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-NH metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Rockford, IL.......................... 94* 94* Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV................................. 114* 99 Salinas, CA........................... 87* 95* San Antonio, TX....................... 88* 83* San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA..... 100 92* San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA.... 102 100 Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA............ 109* 101 Springfield, MA....................... 104 104 Springfield, MO....................... 88* 89* St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 102 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 86* 86* Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 86* 89* Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84* 84* Visalia-Porterville, CA............... 97 97 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV................. 99 99 York-Hanover, PA...................... 91* 89* Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA..... 88* 100 * The pay relative for this area is significantly different from the average in the metropolitan area at the 10 percent level of significance. For additional details, see the Technical Note. 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, December 2003.