The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Defense Security Service (DSS)

Permanent Workforce:  525    Temporary Workforce:  1    Total Workforce:   526

Workforce Composition

 

 

 
Total #
 
Men
 
Women
 
Hispanic
or
Latino
 
White
 
Black
or
African American
 
Asian
Native Hawaiian/
Other Pacific Islander
American Indian/ Alaska Native Two or More Races Individuals with Targeted Disabilities
Permanent Workforce 525 58.86% 41.14% 2.67% 76.95% 16.57% 2.48% 0.00% 1.14% 0.19% 1.14%
Major Occupations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

361 55.96% 44.04% 2.22% 77.01% 16.90% 2.22% 0.00% 1.66% 0.00% 1.11%
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

52 84.62% 15.38% 5.77% 73.08% 13.46% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
GS-14 and GS-15* 84 65.48% 34.52% 4.76% 79.76% 13.10% 1.19% 0.00% 0.00% 1.19% 1.19%
Senior Pay Level* 6 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 83.33% 16.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SES 6 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 83.33% 16.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
First-Level Officials/ Managers 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mid-Level Officials/ Managers 58 65.52% 34.48% 5.17% 79.31% 12.07% 1.72% 0.00% 1.72% 0.00% 0.00%
Senior-Level Officials/ Managers 25 76.00% 24.00% 4.00% 80.00% 16.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.00%

*Does not include pay-banded employees

Targeted Disabilities

DSS employed 6 Individuals with Targeted Disabilities in FY 2007, which was 1.14% of its total work force.  This represents a decrease of 2 employees from FY 2006 and a decrease of 15 employees since FY 2003.  The participation rate for FY 2006 was 1.47% and for FY 2003 was 0.88%.  Over the 5-year period DSS had a net increase of 0.26% in employees with targeted disabilities.

EEO Complaint Processing

I.  Counseling

DSS timely processed 60% of the 5 pre-complaint counselings (without remands) completed in FY 2007.

II.  Bases of Complaints Filed

The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Reprisal; (2) Race (Black); and (3) Sex (Female).  Of the 5 complaints filed at DSS, 4 contained allegations of race (Black) discrimination, and none contained allegations of disability discrimination.

III.  Complaint Processing Times

Of the 3 completed investigations, 66.7% were timely.  DSS' average time for completing an investigation was 164 days.  Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 93 days.

DSS’ average processing time for all complaint closures decreased from 384 days in FY 2006 to 367 days in FY 2007.  The government-wide average was 355 days.

IV.  Costs

DSS reported no counseling settlements in FY 2007.  DSS expended a total of $19,374 for 3 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $6,458.

DSS agreed to pay a total of $25,500 for 3 complaint closures through settlement agreements, final agency decisions, and final agency orders fully implementing AJ decisions.  For complaint closures with benefits, the average award was $8,500.


Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2007
Pre-Complaint Counseling Outcomes Completed by EEO Counselor Completed Using ADR All Completed Counselings
# % # % # %
Pre-Complaint Counselings: 5 0 5
Settlements 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Withdrawals or No Complaints Filed 1 20% 0 0% 1 20%
Complaints Filed* 4 80%
Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year 0 0%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2007 where counseling was also completed during FY 2007.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution in FY 2007
Counseling Complaint
Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures 5 5
Total Number Offered ADR 0 0
ADR Offer Rate* 0% 0%
ADR Participation Rate* 0% 0%
Total ADR Settlements 0 0
Total ADR Settlements Amount $0.00 $0.00

* EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006.

Timeliness in FY 2007
Total # # Timely % Timely FY 2006 APD* FY 2007 APD % Change
All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands) 5 3 60%
All Investigations 3 2 66.7% 208 164 -21.2%
All Complaint Closures 5 384 367 -4.4%
Merit Decisions (no AJ) 0 0 0% 278 0 -100%
Dismissal Decisions (no AJ) 0 0 0 NA%

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints in FY 2007
Complaint
Closures
Final Agency
Decision (no AJ
Decision)
Final Order (AJ
Decision Fully
Implemented)
Final Order (AJ
Decision Not Fully
Implemented)
# % # % # % # %
Total Complaints Filed 5
Total Closures 5
Settlements 3 60%
Withdrawals 2 40%
Total Final Agency Actions 0 0% 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA%
Dismissals 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 0% 0 0%
Merit Decisions 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA%
Finding Discrimination 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA%
Finding No Discrimination 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA% 0 NA%

This page was last modified on August 19, 2008.

Home Return to Home Page