DeFazio Examines Public-Private Partnerships in Highways Hearing |
| Print |
|
February 13, 2007
Press Release | Contact: Danielle Langone (202) 225-6416
WASHINGTON, DC—Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) made the following
statement after the House Highways and Transit Subcommittee hearing this
morning on "Public-Private Partnerships: Innovative Financing and
Protecting the Public Interest":
"The Bush administration has been warning state
governments about the growing gap between infrastructure needs and resources. Unfortunately,
their only suggested solution is to privatize the existing infrastructure. In
pushing this ideological policy, the administration has failed to disclose the
potential downfalls as well as possible gains of privatization. Under
questioning, a witness from the Department of Transportation (DOT) agreed that,
in addition to issuing model legislation for privatization, the DOT should also
disclose potential problems with privatization, like monopoly pricing and
noncompete agreements. Dennis Enright, principal of the NW Financial
Group, a witness who has analyzed recent public-private partnerships, made
a strong case that there's no inherent advantage to privatizing existing
assets. In fact, the public sector could monetize assets to generate an up-front
payment while realizing a revenue stream from the facilities. Capital is readily
available to states for these projects.
"Overall, the hearing raised questions about the
appropriateness of many of these anticipated agreements, especially those
involving existing assets like the Pennsylvania toll road, and others."
|