 |
Home | Previous Page | |
|
||
 |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Excerpt From May 2001 Interim Supplement to Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
Interpretations Issued October 2000
|
| 1. | Can an issuer ever confirm selectively a forecast it has previously made to the public without triggering the rule's public reporting requirements?
Yes. In assessing the materiality of an issuer's confirmation of its own forecast, the issuer should consider whether the confirmation conveys any information above and beyond the original forecast and whether that additional information is itself material. That may depend on, among other things, the amount of time that has elapsed between the original forecast and the confirmation (or the amount of time elapsed since the last public confirmation, if applicable). For example, a confirmation of expected quarterly earnings made near the end of a quarter might convey information about how the issuer actually performed. In that respect, the inference a reasonable investor may draw from such a confirmation may differ significantly from the inference he or she may have drawn from the original forecast early in the quarter. The materiality of a confirmation also may depend on, among other things, intervening events. For example, if it is clear that the issuer's forecast is highly dependent on a particular customer and the customer subsequently announces that it is ceasing operations, a confirmation by the issuer of a prior forecast may be material. We note that a statement by an issuer that it has "not changed," or that it is "still comfortable with," a prior forecast is no different than a confirmation of a prior forecast. Moreover, under certain circumstances, an issuer's reference to a prior forecast may imply that the issuer is confirming the forecast. If, when asked about a prior forecast, the issuer does not want to confirm it, the issuer may simply wish to say "no comment." If an issuer wishes to refer back to the prior estimate without implicitly confirming it, the issuer should make clear that the prior estimate was as of the date it was given and is not being updated as of the time of the subsequent statement. |
| 2. | Does Regulation FD create a duty to update?
No. Regulation FD does not change existing law with respect to any duty to update. |
| 3. | If an issuer wants to make public disclosure of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD by means of a conference call, what information must the issuer provide in the notice and how far in advance should notice be given?
An adequate advance notice under Regulation FD must include the date, time, and call-in information for the conference call. Issuers also should consider the following non-exclusive factors in determining what constitutes adequate advance notice of a conference call:
|
| 4. | Can an issuer satisfy Regulation FD's public disclosure requirement by disclosing material nonpublic information at a shareholder meeting that is open to all shareholders, but not to the public?
No. If a shareholder meeting is not accessible by the public, an issuer's selective disclosure of material nonpublic information at the meeting would not satisfy Regulation FD's public disclosure requirement. |
| 5. | Could an Exchange Act filing other than a Form 8-K, such as a Form 10-Q or proxy statement, constitute public disclosure?
Yes. In general, including information in a document publicly filed on EDGAR with the SEC within the time frames that Regulation FD requires would satisfy the rule. In considering whether that disclosure is sufficient, however, companies must take care to bring the disclosure to the attention of readers of the document, must not bury the information, and must not make the disclosure in a piecemeal fashion throughout the filing. |
| 6. | For purposes of Regulation FD, must an issuer wait some period of time after making a filing or furnishing a report on EDGAR that complies with the Exchange Act before making disclosure of the same information to a select audience?
Prior to making disclosure to a select audience, the issuer need only confirm that the filing or furnished report has received a filing date (as determined in accordance with Rules 12 and 13 of Regulation S-T) that is no later than the date of the selective disclosure. |
| 7. | Can an issuer ever review and comment on an analyst's model privately without triggering Regulation FD's disclosure requirements?
Yes. It depends on whether, in so doing, the issuer communicates material nonpublic information. For example, an issuer ordinarily would not be conveying material nonpublic information if it corrected historical facts that were a matter of public record. An issuer also would not be conveying such information if it shared seemingly inconsequential data which, pieced together with public information by a skilled analyst with knowledge of the issuer and the industry, helps form a mosaic that reveals material nonpublic information. It would not violate Regulation FD to reveal this type of data even if, when added to the analyst's own fund of knowledge, it is used to construct his or her ultimate judgments about the issuer. An issuer may not, however, use the discussion of an analyst's model as a vehicle for selectively communicating – either expressly or in code – material nonpublic information. |
| 8. | During a nonpublic meeting with analysts, an issuer's CEO provides material nonpublic information on a subject she had not planned to cover. Although the CEO had not planned to disclose this information when she entered the meeting, after hearing the direction of the discussion, she decided to provide it, knowing that the information was material and nonpublic. Would this be considered an intentional disclosure that violated Regulation FD because no simultaneous public disclosure was made?
Yes. A disclosure is "intentional" under Regulation FD when the person making it either knows, or is reckless in not knowing, that the information he or she is communicating is both material and nonpublic. In this example, the CEO knew that the information was material and nonpublic, so the disclosure was "intentional" under Regulation FD, even though she did not originally plan to make it. |
| 9. | May an issuer provide material nonpublic information to analysts as long as the analysts expressly agree to maintain confidentiality until the information is public?
Yes. |
| 10. | If an issuer gets an agreement to maintain material nonpublic information in confidence, must it also get the additional statement that the recipient agrees not to trade on the information in order to rely on the exclusion in Rule 100(b)(2)(ii) of Regulation FD?
No. An express agreement to maintain the information in confidence is sufficient. If a recipient of material nonpublic information subject to such a confidentiality agreement trades or advises others to trade, he or she could face insider trading liability. |
| 11. | If an issuer wishes to rely on the confidentiality agreement exclusion of Regulation FD, is it sufficient to get an acknowledgment that the recipient of the material nonpublic information will not use the information in violation of the federal securities laws?
No. The recipient must expressly agree to keep the information confidential. |
| 12. | Must road show materials in connection with a registered public offering be disclosed under Regulation FD?
Any disclosure made "in connection with" a registered public offering of the type excluded from Regulation FD is not subject to Regulation FD. That includes road shows in those offerings. All other road shows are subject to Regulation FD in the absence of another applicable exclusion from Regulation FD. For example, a disclosure in a road show in an unregistered offering is subject to Regulation FD. Also, a disclosure in a road show made while the issuer is not in registration and is not otherwise engaged in a securities offering is subject to Regulation FD. If, however, those who receive road show information expressly agree to keep the material nonpublic information confidential, disclosure to them is not subject to Regulation FD. |
| 13. | Can an issuer disclose material nonpublic information to its employees (who may also be shareholders) without making public disclosure of the information?
Yes. Rule 100(b)(1) states that Regulation FD applies to disclosures made to "any person outside the issuer." Regulation FD does not apply to communications of confidential information to employees of the issuer. An issuer's officers, directors, and other employees are subject to duties of trust and confidence and face insider trading liability if they trade or tip. |
| 14. | If an issuer has a policy that limits which senior officials are authorized to speak to persons enumerated in Rule 100(b)(1)(i) – (b)(1)(iv), will disclosures by senior officials not authorized to speak under the policy be subject to Regulation FD?
No. Selective disclosures of material nonpublic information by senior officials not authorized to speak to enumerated persons are made in breach of a duty of trust or confidence to the issuer and are not covered by Regulation FD. Such disclosures may, however, trigger liability under existing insider trading law. |
| 15. | A publicly traded company has decided to conduct a private placement of shares and then subsequently register the resale by those shareholders on a Form S-3 registration statement. The company and its investment bankers conduct mini-road shows over a three-day period during the private placement. Does the resale registration statement filed after completion of the private placement affect whether disclosure at the road shows is covered by Regulation FD?
No. The road shows are made in connection with an offering by the issuer that is not registered (i.e., the private placement), regardless of whether a registration statement is later filed for an offering by those who purchased in the private placement. |
| 16. | Does the mere presence of the press at an otherwise non-public meeting attended by persons outside the issuer described in paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 100 under Regulation FD render the meeting public for purposes of Regulation FD?
Regulation FD states that a company can make public disclosure by filing or furnishing a Form 8-K or by disseminating information through another method (or combination of methods) that is reasonably designed to provide broad, non-exclusionary distribution of the information to the public. Some companies may attempt to satisfy the latter method for public dissemination by merely having the press in attendance at a meeting to which the public is not invited or otherwise present. If it is attended by persons outside the issuer described in paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 100 under Regulation FD and if it is not otherwise public, the meeting will not necessarily be deemed public for purposes of Regulation FD by the mere presence of the press at the meeting. Whether or not the meeting would be deemed public would depend, among other things, on when, what and how widely the press reports on the meeting. |
| 17. | Is Regulation FD intended to replace the practice of using a press release to disseminate earnings information in advance of a conference call or webcast at which earnings information will be discussed?
No. In adopting Regulation FD, the Commission specifically indicated that it did not intend the regulation to alter or supplant the rules of self-regulatory organizations with respect to the use of press releases to announce material developments. In this regard, the Commission specifically endorsed a model for the planned disclosure of material information, such as earnings, in which the conference call or webcast is preceded by a press release containing the earnings information. |
http://www.sec.gov/interps/telephone/phonesupplement4-excerpt.htm
| Home | Previous Page | Modified: 03/25/2009 |