spacer

CDC HomeHIV/AIDS > Topics > Research > Prevention Research Synthesis > 2009 Compendium of Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Interventions > Best-Evidence Interventions

spacer spacer
spacer
Skip Nav
spacer
BEST-EVIDENCE

Focus on the Future
spacer
spacer

Intervention Description
Intervention Package Information
Evaluation Study and Results
References and Contact Information


Intervention Description

Target Population
Young African-American heterosexual men newly diagnosed with an STD

Goals of Intervention

  • Increase the quality, correctness, and consistency of condom use
  • Eliminate or decrease unprotected sex
  • Reduce number of female sex partners
  • Reduce STD reinfections
Brief Description
Focus on the Future is an individual-level, clinic-based, single-session intervention designed to address the common errors made and the multiple problems experienced by young African American heterosexual men when using condoms. In addition to the standard care at public STD clinics (i.e., disease-specific diagnosis and treatment, nurse-delivered condom-use information, and access to free condoms), the 45 to 50 minute one-on-one intervention provides information, motivation, and skills to increase men’s ability to use condoms correctly and consistently. The intervention is delivered by lay health advisors, who are African American men from the participants' community, selected based on their ability to quickly establish rapport and effectively communicate with men about sex and condom use in a non-judgmental manner. The lay health advisor provides information about the variety of condoms and proper lubricants, motivates the participant to protect himself and to respond personally to the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the African American community, and increase the participant’s condom application skills through demonstrations and practice.  Additionally, the lay health advisor helps the participant link condom use to an investment in his future.  Each man is given pocket-sized lubricants and allowed to select 12 or more condoms from a wide variety of brands and sizes.

Theoretic Basis

  • Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills (IMB) Model
  • Lay Health Advisor Model

Intervention Duration
One session, 45 to 50 minutes

Intervention Setting
Public STD clinic

Deliverer
African American man from the local community, trained as a lay health advisor

Delivery Methods

  • Counseling
  • Demonstration
  • Practice
  • Printed Materials
  • Risk Reduction Supplies (condoms, water-based lubricants)

Go to top


Intervention Package Information

An intervention package is not available at this time. Please contact Richard A. Crosby, PhD, Department of Health Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 121 Washington Ave. Lexington, KY 40506-0003, e-mail: rcros2@email.uky.edu, for details on intervention materials.

Go to top


Evaluation Study and Results

The original evaluation was conducted in Kentucky between 2004 and 2006.

Key Intervention Effects

  • Reduced STD reinfections
  • Increased condom use
  • Reduced number of female sex partners

Study Sample

  • 100% African American
  • 100% Male
  • 100% heterosexual
  • Mean age of 23.2 years

Recruitment Settings
Public STD clinic in a Southern U.S. city

Key Intervention Effects

  • Couple intervention increased protected vaginal sex acts.
  • Woman-Alone intervention reduced unprotected vaginal sex acts and increased protected vaginal sex acts.

Eligibility Criteria
Men were eligible if they self-identified as African American, were between the ages of 18 and 29 years, had just received an STD diagnosis and treatment at the clinic, reported their HIV status as negative or unknown, used a male condom during vaginal sex at least once during past 3 months, and spoke English.

Assignment Method
African-American heterosexual men (n=266) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: Focus on the Future intervention (n=141) or Standard of Care comparison (n=125).

Comparison Group
The comparison group received a clinical disease-specific diagnosis and treatment, nurse-delivered messages about condom use, and free condoms (limit 12 per person).

Relevant Outcomes Measured and Follow-up Time

  • STD reinfections (including chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, trichomonas, and genital warts) were assessed by reviewing medical records for the 6-month period after intervention.
  • Sex behaviors (including condom use during last penetrative vaginal or anal sex act with a female partner, number of female sex partners during past 3 months, and frequency of unprotected penetrative vaginal or anal sex with a female partner during past 3 months) were measured at the 3-month follow-up.

Participant Retention

  • Focus on the Future Intervention:
  • 74% retained at 3 months
    100% medical records recovery at 6 months

  • Standard of Care Control:

    74% retained at 3 months
    100% medical records recovery at 6 months

Significant Findings

  • Over the 6 months following the intervention, men receiving the Focus on the Future intervention were significantly less likely to have an STD reinfection than men receiving only Standard of Care (p = 0.02).
  • Men receiving the Focus on the Future intervention reported significantly fewer female partners than men receiving only Standard of Care at the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.0002).
  • At the 3-month follow-up, men receiving the Focus on the Future intervention were significantly more likely to report condom use during last sex than men receiving only Standard of Care (p = 0.03).

Considerations

  • Findings were only applicable to African American heterosexual males with recent experience with condoms prior to intervention. Intervention effects for men without recent condom use were not ascertained.
  • Mixed results were found for frequency of unprotected sex acts during the past 3 months. The significant intervention effect depends on the model used (i.e., unadjusted model with complete case analysis).  Sensitivity analyses that excluded extreme outlying values for unprotected sex did not yield statistically significant results.

Go to top


References and Contact Information

  • Crosby, R., DiClemente, R., Charnigo, R., Snow, G., & Troutman, A. (2009). Evaluation of lay health advisor model risk-reduction for promoting safer sex among heterosexual African American men newly diagnosed with an STD: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 99 (suppl 1.), 1-8.

Researcher: Richard A. Crosby, PhD
University of Kentucky, Department of Health Behavior
College of Public Health
121 Washington Ave.
Lexington, KY 40506-0003.
e-mail: rcros2@email.uky.edu

Go to top

spacer
Last Modified: April 1, 2009
Last Reviewed: April 1, 2009
Content Source:
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
spacer
spacer
spacer
Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
spacer
spacer
spacer Safer, Healthier People
spacer
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 24 Hours/Every Day - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
spacer USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services