Internet: www.bls.gov/ro5/ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
GENERAL INFORMATION: (312) 353-1880 Friday, November 21, 2008
MEDIA CONTACT: Paul LaPorte 
(312) 353-1138  

 

County Employment and Wages in Ohio, First Quarter 2008

The average weekly wage in Butler County increased 3.9 percent from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008, the largest increase among Ohio’s 13 counties with employment of 75,000 or more (as measured by 2007 annual average employment).  Summit County had the second-highest wage growth at 2.9 percent, followed by Lorain County at 1.7 percent.  Hamilton County had the highest average weekly wage in the State at $961, followed by the counties of Cuyahoga ($907) and Franklin ($906).  (See table 1.)  Regional Commissioner Jay A. Mousa noted that only two of Ohio’s large counties had wage growth above the 2.4 percent national increase and three had wages above the national average of $905.


Among the 13 largest counties in Ohio, employment in March 2008 was highest in Cuyahoga County (725,600) and lowest in Trumbull County (75,500). Ten of the 13 large counties in the State reported declines in employment levels from March 2007 to March 2008.  Lorain County reported the largest decline in employment, dropping 4.2 percent.  Only Butler and Summit counties increased employment, each up 0.6 percent.  Hamilton County reported no change in employment level.  Nationally, employment grew 0.4 percent during this time period.

 
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 75 counties in Ohio with employment below 75,000.  Seventy-three of these smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national average.  (See table 2.)


Large County Average Weekly Wages

Average weekly wages in 5 of Ohio’s 13 large counties placed in the top half of the national rankings among the 334 largest counties in the United States.  As noted, the three highest-paid counties in the State—Hamilton, Cuyahoga, and Franklin—were above the average weekly wage of $905 and ranked 64th, 90th, and 91st, respectively.  Joining these three counties were Summit ($814/156th) and Montgomery ($804/165th).


The average weekly wages in Ohio’s eight other large counties placed in the bottom half of the national rankings:  Mahoning ($618/322nd), Stark ($679/297th), Trumbull ($709/274th), Lorain ($721/261st), Lake ($731/249th), Warren ($747/228th), Lucas ($771/196th), and Butler ($778/190th).

 
Average weekly wages were higher than the national average in 92 of the largest 334 U.S. counties. New York, N.Y., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average weekly wage of $2,805. Fairfield, Conn., was second with an average weekly wage of $1,905, followed by Somerset, N.J. ($1,765), Suffolk, Mass. ($1,708), and San Francisco, Calif. ($1,639).


Nationwide, there were 241 counties with an average weekly wage below the national average in the first quarter of 2008. The lowest average weekly wage was reported in Cameron County, Texas ($523), followed by the counties of Hidalgo, Texas ($532), Horry, S.C. ($534), Webb, Texas ($554), and Yakima, Wash. ($587).


Large County Wage Changes

Only 2 of Ohio's 13 large counties recorded wage growth above the national increase of 2.4 percent from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008.  (See table 1.)  Butler County’s 3.9-percent wage gain was the largest increase in the State and ranked 70th in the nation while Summit County, at 2.9 percent, placed 140th.  Conversely, Trumbull County reported the largest decline in average weekly wages in the State and the nation, falling 17.2 percent.

 
Nationwide, Westmoreland, Pa., ranked first in average weekly wage growth with an increase of 14.9 percent from the first quarter of 2007. Williamson, Texas, was second with growth of 10.8 percent, followed by the counties of Somerset, N.J. (9.0 percent), San Luis Obispo, Calif. (8.3 percent), and Jefferson, Texas (7.9 percent).


Thirty-four large counties experienced over-the-year declines in average weekly wages.  As mentioned, Trumbull, Ohio, had the largest decrease (-17.2 percent), followed by the counties of Saginaw, Mich. (-4.4 percent), Rockingham, N.H. (-3.9 percent), Fairfield, Conn. (-3.8 percent), and Mecklenburg, N.C. (-3.4 percent).

 

Wage Levels in Ohio’s Smaller Counties

Seventy-three of the 75 smaller counties in Ohio with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages below the national level of $905.  The exceptions were Delaware County, which reported an average weekly wage of $972, followed by Union County, at $919.  The third-highest wage among the smaller counties was $870 in Wood County.  Meigs County reported the lowest average weekly wage at $454 in the first quarter of 2008.  (See table 2.)


When all 88 counties in Ohio were considered, 29 counties in the State reported average weekly wages under $600, 34 reported average weekly wages between $600 and $699, 15 had average weekly wages between $700 and $799 and 10 counties had average weekly wages greater than $800.


State Average Weekly Wages

At the state level, the average weekly wage in Ohio was $798, $107 below the nationwide figure, ranking 23rd among the 50 states and the District of Columbia.  (See table 3.)  The five highest wage levels in the nation were in the District of Columbia ($1,488), New York ($1,399), Connecticut ($1,254), Massachusetts ($1,143) and New Jersey ($1,133).  All five had wages at least 25 percent higher than the national average.  Five states had average earnings of less than 75 percent of the national average:  Montana ($625), South Dakota ($632), Mississippi ($634), North Dakota ($652), and Arkansas ($667).


Ohio experienced wage growth of 1.0 percent from the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008, ranking 46th among the 50 States and District of Columbia.  Wage gains in the neighboring states of Indiana (2.4 percent) and Pennsylvania (2.4 percent) were higher, while in Michigan, weekly wages rose at about the same pace (0.9 percent).   (See table 3.)  Nationwide, the highest over-the-year wage gains in the first quarter of 2008 were recorded by Wyoming (6.7 percent), North Dakota (6.2 percent) and South Dakota (5.2 percent).  The only state to report a decline in average weekly wages was Connecticut, where wages were down 0.6 percent.


Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program.  The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs).  The 9.1 million employer reports cover 135.4 million full- and part-time workers.  The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs.  The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter.  It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work.  Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level.  Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised (see Technical Note below) and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

 

Additional statistics and other information

An annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states.  The 2006 edition of this bulletin contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2007 version of this news release.  As with the 2005 edition, this edition includes the data on a CD for enhanced access and usability with the printed booklet containing selected graphic representation of QCEW data; the data tables themselves are published exclusively in electronic formats as PDF.  The 2006 bulletin is available in a PDF on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn06.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request.  Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the Midwest Information Office in Chicago at (312) 353-1880 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ET.

TECHNICAL NOTE

QCEW data are not designed as a time series.  QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time.  Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasonssome reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site.  These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time.  On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons.  Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification.  Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period.  Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases. 

 

 

Table 1. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the 13 largest counties in Ohio, first quarter 2008(2)
Area Employment Average Weekly Wage (3)
March 2008 (thousands) Percent change, March 2007-08 (5) Average weekly wage National ranking by level (4) Percent change, first quarter 2007-08 (5) National ranking by percent change (4)

United States (6)

134,761.1 0.4 $905 -- 2.4 --

Ohio

5,189.1 -1.0 798 23 1.0 46

Butler, Ohio

146.9 0.6 778 190 3.9 70

Cuyahoga, Ohio

725.6 -1.7 907 90 -0.4 300

Franklin, Ohio

674.4 -0.1 906 91 1.2 243

Hamilton, Ohio

511.0 0.0 961 64 1.2 243

Lake, Ohio

98.8 -0.6 731 249 1.0 253

Lorain, Ohio

95.9 -4.2 721 261 1.7 224

Lucas, Ohio

212.7 -2.0 771 196 -0.5 304

Mahoning, Ohio

100.5 -1.5 618 322 1.0 253

Montgomery, Ohio

259.2 -3.2 804 165 -1.5 316

Stark, Ohio

160.1 -0.2 679 297 1.3 239

Summit, Ohio

270.8 0.6 814 156 2.9 140

Trumbull, Ohio

75.5 -3.2 709 274 -17.2 328

Warren, Ohio

76.0 -0.7 747 228 (7) -
  1. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
  2. Data are preliminary.
  3. Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
  4. Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  5. Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
  6. Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
  7. Data do not meet BLS or State agency disclosure standards.
 
Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and all of the counties in Ohio, first quarter 2008 (2)
Area Employment March 2008 Average weekly wage (3)

United States (4)

134,761,100 $905

Ohio -- Statewide

5,189,100 798

Adams

6,603 569

Allen

51,884 668

Ashland

18,089 634

Ashtabula

31,253 584

Athens

19,860 640

Auglaize

19,544 677

Belmont

23,486 562

Brown

8,016 588

Butler

146,881 778

Carroll

5,968 537

Champaign

10,305 677

Clark

50,780 625

Clermont

56,451 760

Clinton

26,677 803

Columbiana

31,475 558

Coshocton

11,594 680

Crawford

14,323 583

Cuyahoga

725,600 907

Darke

17,528 609

Defiance

16,419 712

Delaware

67,911 972

Erie

34,268 674

Fairfield

39,412 588

Fayette

11,809 571

Franklin

674,401 906

Fulton

19,544 617

Gallia

11,716 697

Geauga

33,778 695

Greene

66,101 821

Guernsey

14,294 594

Hamilton

511,010 961

Hancock

42,477 744

Hardin

8,181 599

Harrison

3,531 568

Henry

10,954 654

Highland

11,000 569

Hocking

6,837 551

Holmes

16,751 541

Huron

21,675 644

Jackson

11,120 553

Jefferson

25,042 702

Knox

19,312 670

Lake

98,758 731

Lawrence

12,817 512

Licking

52,886 674

Logan

20,329 697

Lorain

95,897 721

Lucas

212,694 771

Madison

13,845 670

Mahoning

100,461 618

Marion

27,252 664

Medina

58,711 684

Meigs

3,504 454

Mercer

17,083 586

Miami

40,426 660

Monroe

3,748 688

Montgomery

259,228 804

Morgan

2,324 546

Morrow

5,430 577

Muskingum

32,775 590

Noble

3,220 555

Ottawa

12,193 789

Paulding

5,225 618

Perry

6,081 583

Pickaway

14,500 691

Pike

9,668 758

Portage

52,380 712

Preble

10,896 609

Putnam

11,490 579

Richland

55,158 648

Ross

26,106 718

Sandusky

26,131 626

Scioto

24,440 610

Seneca

20,263 598

Shelby

29,585 732

Stark

160,089 679

Summit

270,817 814

Trumbull

75,528 709

Tuscarawas

35,229 579

Union

27,443 919

Van Wert

11,335 604

Vinton

2,353 551

Warren

75,954 747

Washington

24,945 686

Wayne

45,292 639

Williams

16,839 629

Wood

59,324 870

Wyandot

8,587 595
  1. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
  2. Data are preliminary.
  3. Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
  4. Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
 
Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, first quarter 2008(2)
State Employment Average weekly wage (3)
March 2008 (thousands) Percent change, March 2007-08 Average weekly wage National ranking by level Percent change, first quarter 2007-08 National ranking by percent change

United States (4)

134,761.1 0.4 $905 - 2.4 -

Alabama

1,947.0 -0.2 740 34 3.2 27

Alaska

303.0 1.0 866 16 4.2 11

Arizona

2,639.7 -1.3 820 22 2.4 34

Arkansas

1,178.4 -0.1 667 46 4.1 12

California

15,561.5 0.1 1,008 6 2.1 41

Colorado

2,300.0 1.7 920 10 3.6 16

Connecticut

1,683.9 1.2 1,254 3 -0.6 51

Delaware

418.4 0.5 987 7 0.1 49

District of Columbia

680.8 1.1 1,488 1 4.3 9

Florida

7,918.6 -2.2 777 26 1.8 43

Georgia

4,060.9 0.1 847 20 1.3 44

Hawaii

628.1 0.2 773 28 3.5 19

Idaho

645.3 0.2 635 48 0.3 48

Illinois

5,796.1 0.1 980 8 2.6 33

Indiana

2,858.7 -0.7 757 33 2.4 34

Iowa

1,469.8 0.9 710 40 3.6 16

Kansas

1,363.2 1.0 737 35 2.4 34

Kentucky

1,794.0 0.1 714 39 2.4 34

Louisiana

1,887.3 1.3 765 30 4.8 4

Maine

584.1 0.5 701 42 3.5 19

Maryland

2,530.3 0.0 963 9 2.8 31

Massachusetts

3,203.1 0.9 1,143 4 3.3 23

Michigan

4,058.8 -1.8 857 18 0.9 47

Minnesota

2,644.8 0.6 908 12 4.0 13

Mississippi

1,138.2 0.8 634 49 3.3 23

Missouri

2,708.0 0.0 768 29 3.5 19

Montana

432.4 0.9 625 51 4.3 9

Nebraska

912.2 1.4 687 44 3.2 27

Nevada

1,266.3 -1.2 839 21 4.7 5

New Hampshire

621.2 0.3 863 17 3.4 22

New Jersey

3,939.9 0.5 1,133 5 3.3 23

New Mexico

823.8 0.6 717 38 4.7 5

New York

8,555.0 1.3 1,399 2 0.1 49

North Carolina

4,069.1 0.9 788 24 1.3 44

North Dakota

343.3 2.6 652 47 6.2 2

Ohio

5,189.1 -1.0 798 23 1.0 46

Oklahoma

1,560.0 1.6 707 41 4.7 5

Oregon

1,713.1 0.3 776 27 2.9 30

Pennsylvania

5,608.8 0.5 869 15 2.4 34

Rhode Island

464.8 -1.5 851 19 2.3 39

South Carolina

1,888.3 0.1 695 43 2.8 31

South Dakota

389.4 2.0 632 50 5.2 3

Tennessee

2,746.4 0.6 761 31 3.3 23

Texas

10,420.8 2.8 903 13 3.6 16

Utah

1,220.2 1.4 718 37 3.2 27

Vermont

300.8 -0.3 735 36 4.4 8

Virginia

3,653.5 0.2 918 11 2.0 42

Washington

2,928.6 2.1 899 14 3.7 15

West Virginia

700.3 0.3 679 45 4.0 13

Wisconsin

2,734.3 0.2 760 32 2.2 40

Wyoming

277.2 2.9 779 25 6.7 1

Puerto Rico

1,004.5 -1.6 489 (5) 2.7 (5)

Virgin Islands

46.5 1.1 708 (5) 3.4 (5)
  1. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
  2. Data are preliminary.
  3. Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
  4. Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
  5. Data not included in the national ranking.

Last Modified Date: November 21, 2008