I have mailed this letter in its full form
anticipating that parts of this will have to be
deleted due to the "Posting Policy"...
I have no medical degree, but I have learned more
in the past few years than I ever thought I would
know about blood and medicine.
[PHI Redacted]
was diagnosed with ITP over 4 years ago and since
that diagnosis has endured numerous treatments
that have failed to control his severely low
platelet counts.
I am aware that this particular topic is
referring to the adult use of drugs like Nplate,
but please allow me to state a strong case
regarding why this drug is needed, has been
needed and will continue to be needed for adults
and children alike. Please note that limiting
access to patients by not covering its use would
hinder the progress that is being made in this
area of medicine.
[PHI Redacted] received his first IVIg 12 days after his
initial diagnosis, to which he had a severe
reaction. The 2nd infusion was less than 2 weeks
later, pre-treated to ease the side effects.
This form of treatment has, continued throughout
the 4 years as his “standard” emergency
treatment. He responds for 2-3 days and then
drops back down to what is considered
his “normal” platelet count of less than 10k.
High dose steroids failed next, followed by a
short therapy of Vincristin w/ Cyclosprine and
steroids. Short because after the second dose,
he suffered a life threatening paralytic ileus
reaction to the Vincristin. This information is
relevant because it shows his limits for future
types of treatments.
7 months after his diagnosis his spleen was
removed. [PHI Redacted] moved down the list of treatments,
almost in clinical order. The splenectomy
resulted in a recovery of counts in the 40k’s –
60k’s range for about a year before plummeting
back to his normal range again. This particular
year was a blessing for the mere reason that [PHI Redacted] who is an excessive, frequent and spontaneous
bleeder was free from his two and a half hour
nose bleeds for that year.
Once the year of “somewhat peace” was over, we
were in what seemed to be worse condition than
before. His body seemed to reject all
treatments. That year we tried Rituximab, 6MP,
Dapsone, and Cellcept.
His next treatment was a combination therapy of
high dose infusions of prednisone, IVIg and
WinRho injections supplemented by daily oral meds
of Decadron and Azathioprine. He received the
infusions every Wednesday because they only held
his counts for 2-4 days before they drop
dramatically. Each Wednesday appointment his
counts are less than 10k.
[PHI Redacted] doctors have told [PHI Redacted] on
numerous occasions that this is the worst case of
ITP they have seen at their hospital. The mix of
the persistently low count with the excessive
bleeding and the side effects to standard
treatments has been a challenge for all of us.
The doctors would consistently reach out to the
leading specialists. Their recommendations had
all begun to turn to the new thrombopoietin lines
of treatments like Nplate which gave us renewed
hope.
[PHI Redacted] is now in the pediatric clinical trial for
Nplate. He is showing great progress. All of
the treatments he has tried before were used “off-
label” to attempt to treat his ITP. THIS drug is
designed TO TREAT his ITP, not some other
disorder/disease/illness. Unlike the other
treatments, he has had NO side effects at all.
NONE. He is progressively getting his life back
and [PHI Redacted].
I am a member of the Platelet Disorder Support
Association. I communicate daily with parents of children with ITP as well as adults
that are currently in or were in one of the
clinical trials for this drug. We are excited
and anxious for this desperately needed drug to
become available for children and just as excited
that it is now available for adults. I am aware
that the “numbers” of patients with ITP are not
great, that the level of attention “our” illness
receives is much lower than some higher profile
illnesses. Please keep in mind though that the
effects are still the same. The life-threatening
risk of a brain bleed is no different if a
patient has low platelets due to ITP or due to
another illness with low platelets as a “side
effect”. The difference comes into play when you
are able to treat the “other” illnesses and the
platelet function returns. With ITP, there is no
other alternative than to treat the platelet
issue.
FDA’s job was and continues to be watching to
make sure these drugs are safe. It is my
understanding that data is coming in on a regular
basis to ensure that safety. That should not be
a concern for anyone beyond their group, it is
their expertise. There are many of us that are
and will continue to benefit from the use of this
drug. Please do not allow that number to be
limited by the lack of coverage some families
will need in order to obtain the treatments. In
my honest opinion, it just seems natural to me
that our government agencies would allow our
physicians to make treatment decisions with their
patients based on what is best for the patient.
FDA approving the drug might be viewed by some as
an agreement with that statement. Questioning
coverage determination seems to undermine all
parties involved (FDA, doctors and patients) and
at what expense? |