SEC Seal Home | Jobs | Fast Answers | Site Map | Search
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


  About the SEC

  Filings & Forms

  Regulatory Actions

  Staff Interps

  Investor Info

  News & Statements

  Litigation


  ALJ

  Information for...

  Divisions


Commission Appellate Court Briefs

This page provides links to some of the legal briefs the Commission's staff submitted in various court actions. See also:

 Commission Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs

 Request for Commission Amicus Participation in a Pending Case

SEC Appellate Court Briefs

Date Case
Apr. 2009 SEC v. American Equity Investment Life Ins.: Petition for review challenging rulemaking that defines certain indexed annuities as ineligible for the "annuity contract" exemption in Section 3(a)(8) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Aug. 2008 SEC v. Dorozhko (Reply): Reply brief on appeal argues that a breach of fiduciary or similar duty is not an element of every claim brought under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act.
May 2008 SEC v. Dorozhko: Appeal challenging denial of preliminary injunction argues that hacking into a secure computer system in order to obtain material nonpublic information immediately used to trade in securities is a "deceptive device or contrivance" within the meaning of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
Jun. 2006 SEC v. Rocklage: Appeal challenging denial of motion to dismiss a complaint alleging insider trading
Jun. 2006 Financial Planning Association v. Securities and Exchange Commission: Petition for Review challenging rulemaking relating to certain broker-dealers deemed not to be investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
May 2005 Goldstein v. Securities and Exchange Commission: Petition for Review challenging rulemaking relating to registration under the Advisers Act of 1940 of certain hedge fund advisers
Jan. 2005 Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. Securities and Exchange Commission: Petition for Review challenging amendments to exemptive rules permitting certain transactions under the Investment Company Act of 1940
May 2004 Securities and Exchange Commission v. ETS Payphones, Inc.: Supplemental brief filed after Supreme Court remand argues that “common enterprise” is not a distinct element of an “investment contract,” but that the latter term encompasses any investment in which the promoter or a third party, not the investor, manages and controls the enterprise through which the investor has been led to expect to receive a financial return.

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/appellatebriefs.shtml


Modified: 04/14/2009