(image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Skip To Content
(image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Search SAMHSA Financing
Financing Center of Excellence

Second-generation antipsychotics: cost-effectiveness, policy options, and political decision making.

Posted on December 15, 2008 14:32

Topics: Expenditures | Health Care Financing | Mental Health | Outcomes | Prescription Drugs | Rates/Reimbursement/Cost

Post Type:

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention and Effectiveness (CATIE) revealed that second-generation antipsychotics (excluding clozapine) are not significantly better than their first-generation counterparts and do not justify current expenditure levels.  This article discusses the potential avenues for curtailing drug costs, improving cost-effectiveness, and maintaining drug availability.  The authors conclude that the available policy options and the current political climate indicate that expenditures for second-generation anti-psychotics will likely remain high despite the lack of significant public health benefits.   

Rosenheck, R. A., Leslie, D. L., & Doshi, J. A. (2008). Second-generation antipsychotics: cost-effectiveness, policy options, and political decision making. Psychiatric Services, 59(5), 515-20. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.5.515. http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/59/5/515

Authors: Robert A. Rosenheck, Douglas L. Leslie, Jalpa A. Doshi. 

E-mail to Friend | Print | Permalink | | Post RSSRSS comment feed