Posted on December 10, 2008 12:51
Topics: Medicaid | Mental Health | Rates/Reimbursement/Cost
Post Type: citation
This article assesses reimbursement plans by cost-effectiveness and quality of life measures. For Medicaid patients with severe mental illness, the article finds that capitation models with for-profit elements are more cost-effective than FSS or non-for-profit models.
Grieve, R., Sekhon, J. S., Hu, T., & Bloom, J. R. (2008). Evaluating health care programs by combining cost with quality of life measures: a case study comparing capitation and fee for service. Health Services Research, 43(4), 1204-22. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-34984747_ITM
Authors: Richard Grieve, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, The-wei Hu, Joan R. Bloom.
E-mail to Friend |
Print |
Permalink |
|
Post RSS
