|
|
Objectives and Subobjectives
Goal:
Ensure that
Federal, Tribal, State, and local health agencies have the infrastructure to
provide essential public health services effectively.
As a result of the Healthy People 2010 Midcourse
Review, changes were made to the Healthy People 2010 objectives and
subobjectives.
These changes are
specific to the following situations:
- Changes in the wording of an
objective to more accurately describe what is being measured.
-
Changes to reflect a different data
source or new science.
-
Changes resulting from the
establishment of a baseline and a target (that is, when a formerly
developmental objective or subobjective became measurable).
-
Deletion of an objective or
subobjective that lacked a data source.
-
Correction of errors and omissions
in Healthy People 2010.
Revised baselines and targets for measurable objectives and
subobjectives do not fall into any of the above categories and, thus, are not
considered a midcourse review change.1
When changes were made to an objective, three
sections are displayed:
-
In the
Original Objective section, the objective as published in Healthy People 2010 in
2000 is shown.
-
In the
Objective With Revisions section, strikethrough indicates text deleted, and
underlining is used to show new text.
-
In the Revised Objective section, the objective appears as revised
as a result of the midcourse review.
Details of the objectives and subobjectives in this
focus area, including any changes made at the midcourse, appear on the following
pages.
1See Technical Appendix for more information on
baseline and target revisions.
Data and
Information Systems
OBJECTIVE
DELETED
|
23-1. |
(Objective deleted due to lack of data source)
(Developmental) Increase the proportion of Tribal, State, and local public
health agencies that provide Internet and e-mail access for at least 75
percent of their employees and that teach employees to use the Internet and
other electronic information systems to apply data and information to public
health practice.
|
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-2. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local health agencies that have
made information available to the public in the past year on the Leading
Health Indicators, Health Status Indicators, and Priority Data Needs.
Potential
data sources:
CDC, NCHS;
National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO);
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO); National
Public Health Performance Standards Program, CDC, PHPPO; IHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-2. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal,* State, and local health agencies that
have made information available for internal or external public use
in the past year based on health indicators related to Healthy People 2010
objectivesto the public in the past year on the Leading Health
Indicators, Health Status Indicators, and Priority Data Needs.†
* Tribal agencies encompass American
Indian/Alaska Native health departments, regional Tribal organizations,
health boards, and Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters).
† There are currently no data
sources at the Federal, State, or local level.
Potential
data source:
CDC, NCHS;
National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO);
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO); National
Public Health Performance Standards Program, CDC, PHPPO; IHS.Survey
of Regionally Based Public Health Services/Infrastructure in Indian
Country, Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters), CDC, IHS.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-2. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal,* State, and local health agencies that have
made information available for internal or external public use in the past
year based on health indicators related to Healthy People 2010 objectives.†
* Tribal agencies encompass American Indian/Alaska
Native health departments, regional Tribal organizations, health boards, and
Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters).
† There are currently no data sources at
the Federal, State, or local level.
Potential
data source: Survey of
Regionally Based Public Health Services/Infrastructure in Indian Country,
Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters), CDC, IHS.
|
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-3. |
Increase the proportion of all
major national, State, and local health data systems that use geocoding to
promote nationwide use of geographic information systems (GIS) at all levels.
Target:
90 percent.
Baseline:
45 percent of major national, State, and
local health data systems geocoded records to street address or latitude and
longitude in 2000.
Target
setting method:
100
percent improvement.
Data
source:
CDC, NCHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-3. |
Increase the proportion of all
major national, State, and local health data systems that use
geocoding to promote nationwide use of geographic information systems (GIS).at
all levels.
Target:
9100 percent.
Baseline:
45 50 percent of major
national, State, and local health data systems geocoded records to
street address or latitude and longitude in 2000.
Target
setting method:
100
percent improvement.
Data
source:
CDC, NCHS.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-3. |
Increase the proportion of major
national health data systems that use geocoding to promote nationwide use of
geographic information systems (GIS).
Target:
100 percent.
Baseline:
50 percent of major national health data
systems geocoded records to street address or latitude and longitude in 2000.
Target
setting method:
100
percent improvement.
Data
source:
CDC, NCHS.
|
NO
CHANGE IN OBJECTIVE
(Data updated
and footnoted)
|
23-4. |
Increase the proportion of
population-based Healthy People 2010 objectives for which national data are
available for all population groups identified for the objective.
Target:
100 percent.
Baseline:
131 percent of the
population-based objectives had national data for all select population
groups in 2004.1
Target
setting method:
Total
coverage.
Data
source:
CDC, NCHS.
1 Baseline and baseline year revised from
11 and 2000 after November 2000 publication.
|
OBJECTIVE
DELETED
|
23-5. |
(Objective deleted due to lack of data source and to
be combined with objective
23-2) (Developmental) Increase the proportion of Leading
Health Indicators, Health Status Indicators, and Priority Data Needs for
which data—especially for select populations—are available at the Tribal,
State, and local levels.
|
NO
CHANGE IN OBJECTIVE
(Data updated
and footnoted)
|
23-6. |
Increase the proportion of Healthy
People 2010 objectives that are tracked regularly at the national level.
Target:
100 percent.
Baseline:
441 percent of measurable
objectives, including their subobjectives, were tracked at least every 3
years in 2004.1
Target
setting method:
Total
coverage.
Data
source:
CDC, NCHS.
1 Baseline and baseline year revised from
82 and 2000 after November 2000 publication.
|
NO
CHANGE IN OBJECTIVE
|
23-7. |
Increase the proportion of Healthy
People 2010 objectives for which national data are released within 1 year of
the end of data collection.
Target:
100 percent.
Baseline: 36 percent of the objectives, including
their subobjectives, measured by major data systems were tracked, with data
released within 1 year of the end of data collection in 2000.
Target
setting method: Total
coverage (as measured by major data systems).
Data
source: CDC, NCHS.
|
Workforce
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-8. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local agencies that incorporate
specific competencies in the essential public health services into personnel
systems.
Potential
data sources:
National
Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO); Association of
State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO); HRSA; IHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-8. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local agencies that
incorporate specific core competencies in the essential public
health services into personnel systemsjob descriptions and
performance evaluations.
23-8a.
Increase the proportion of Tribal
health agencies that incorporate core competencies in the essential
public health services into job descriptions and performance
evaluations.
23-8b.
Increase the proportion of local health
agencies that incorporate core competencies in the essential public
health services into job descriptions and performance evaluations.
Potential
data source:
Profile of
Local Health Departments, National Association of County and City Health
Officials (NACCHO);Association of State and Territorial Health Officials(ASTHO);
HRSA; IHS.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-8. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Tribal and local agencies that incorporate core competencies in
the essential public health services into job descriptions and performance
evaluations.
23-8a. Increase the proportion of Tribal health
agencies that incorporate core competencies in the essential public health
services into job descriptions and performance evaluations.
23-8b. Increase the proportion of local health
agencies that incorporate core competencies in the essential public health
services into job descriptions and performance evaluations.
Potential
data source: Profile of
Local Health Departments, National Association of County and City Health
Officials (NACCHO). |
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-9. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of schools for public health workers that integrate into their
curricula specific content to develop competency in the essential public
health services.
Potential
data sources:
Association
of Schools of Public Health; American Association of Medical Colleges; HRSA’s
Bureau of Health Professions; American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-9. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)
accredited schools forof public health, CEPH-accredited
academic programs, and schools of nursing (with a public health or
community health component) that integrate core competencies in the
essential public health services into curricula. workers that
integrate into their curricula specific content to develop competency
in the essential public health services.
Potential
data sources:
Association
of Schools of Public Health; American Association of Medical Colleges;
HRSA’s Bureau of Health Professions; American Association of Colleges
of NursingPublic Health Competencies Survey (PHCS), Council on
Linkages in collaboration with American Schools of Public Health, Association
of Teachers of Preventive Medicine, and the Quad Council.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-9. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) accredited
schools of public health, CEPH-accredited academic programs, and schools of
nursing (with a public health or community health component) that integrate
core competencies in the essential public health services into curricula.
Potential
data source: Public Health
Competencies Survey (PHCS), Council on Linkages in collaboration with
American Schools of Public Health, Association of Teachers of Preventive
Medicine, and the Quad Council. |
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-10. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local public health agencies that
provide continuing education to develop competency in essential public health
services for their employees.
Potential
data sources:
National
Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO); Association of
State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO); IHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-10. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local public health agencies
personnel who provide receive continuing education consistent
with the core competencies to develop competency in the essential
public health servicesfor their employees.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in the
Proportion of Public Health Personnel
Who Receive Continuing Education Consistent With the Core Competencies
in the Essential Public Health Services |
2000
Baseline
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-10a. |
Tribal public health
personnel |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-10b. |
State public health
personnel* |
13 |
14 |
23-10c. |
Local public health
personnel* |
15 |
17 |
* Data are for State and local public health nurses
and address general continuing education. As data for other health
professionals are obtained, the information will be added.
Target
setting method:
10
percent improvement.
Potential
dData
sources:
National Association
of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO); Association of State and
Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO); IHSSample Survey of
Registered Nurses (NSSRN), HRSA, BHPr.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-10. |
Increase the proportion of Tribal,
State, and local public health personnel who receive continuing education
consistent with the core competencies in the essential public health
services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in the Proportion
of Public Health Personnel Who Receive Continuing Education Consistent With
the Core Competencies in the Essential Public Health Services |
2000
Baseline
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-10a. |
Tribal public health
personnel |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-10b. |
State public health
personnel* |
13 |
14 |
23-10c. |
Local public health
personnel* |
15 |
17 |
* Data are for State and local public health nurses
and address general continuing education. As data for other health
professionals are obtained, the information will be added.
Target
setting method: 10 percent
improvement.
Data
source: National Sample
Survey of Registered Nurses (NSSRN), HRSA, BHPr.
|
Public Health
Organizations
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-11. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of State and local public health agencies that meet national
performance standards for essential public health services.
Potential
data source:
National
Public Health Performance Standards Program, CDC, PHPPO.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-11. |
(Developmental) Increase the
number proportion of State and local public health agencies systems
that meet national performance standards for the essential public
health services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in State and
Local Public Health Systems That
Use the National Public Health Performance Standards Program |
2004
Baseline
Number |
2010
Target
Number |
23-11a. |
State public health
systems |
9 |
35 |
|
|
Percent |
Percent |
23-11b. |
Local public health
systems |
12 |
50 |
|
Increase in State and
Local Public Health Systems
Participating in the National Public Health Performance Standards Program That Meet National Public Health Performance Standards |
|
|
|
|
Percent |
Percent |
23-11c. |
State public health
systems |
0 |
50 |
23-11d. |
Local public health
systems |
36 |
50 |
Target
setting method: Expert
opinion.
Potential
dData
source: National Public
Health Performance Standards Program, CDC, Office of the Chief of Public
Health Practice.PHPPO. |
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-11. |
Increase the number of State and
local public health systems that meet national performance standards for the
essential public health services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in State and Local
Public Health Systems That Use the National Public Health Performance
Standards Program |
2004
Baseline
Number |
2010
Target
Number |
23-11a. |
State public health systems |
9 |
35 |
|
|
Percent |
Percent |
23-11b. |
Local public health systems |
12 |
50 |
|
Increase in State and Local
Public Health Systems Participating in the National Public Health
Performance Standards Program That Meet National Public Health Performance
Standards |
|
|
|
|
Percent |
Percent |
23-11c. |
State public health systems |
0 |
50 |
23-11d. |
Local public health systems |
36 |
50 |
Target
setting method:
Expert
opinion.
Data
source: National Public
Health Performance Standards Program, CDC, Office of the Chief of Public
Health Practice.
|
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-12. |
Increase the proportion of Tribes,
States, and the District of Columbia that have a health improvement plan and
increase the proportion of local jurisdictions that have a health improvement
plan linked with their State plan.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Jurisdiction |
1997
Baseline
(unless noted)
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-12a. |
Tribes |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-12b. |
States and the District of
Columbia |
78 |
100 |
23-12c. |
Local jurisdictions |
32 (1992–93) |
80 |
Target
setting method:
Total
coverage for Tribes, States, and the District of Columbia; 150 percent
improvement for local jurisdictions.
Data
sources:
National Profile
of Local Health Departments, National Association of County and City Health
Officials (NACCHO); Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
(ASTHO); IHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-12. |
Increase the proportion of Tribales,
States,* and the District of Columbia and local
health agencies that have implemented a health improvement plan
and increase the proportion of local health jurisdictions that have a
health improvement plan linked with their State plan.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
JurisdictionIncrease in Jurisdictions That Have Implemented a Health Improvement Plan |
1997 Baseline(unless noted)
Percent |
2010 Target
Percent |
23-12a. |
Tribesal agencies† |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-12b. |
States and the
District of Columbia health agencies |
78 |
100 |
23-12c. |
Local health jurisdictionsagencies |
32 (1992–93) |
80 |
23-12d. |
Local jurisdictionsDepartments that
have linked health improvement plans to the State plans |
Developmental |
Developmental |
* Includes the District of Columbia.
† At this time, data for Tribal agencies
are not collected.
However, if data
should become available by 2010, the information will be included.
Target
setting method: Total
coverage for Tribes, States and the District of Columbia; 150 percent
improvement for local jurisdictionshealth departments.
Data
sources: National Profile of Local Health DepartmentsPublic Health Agencies Study
and National Profile of Local Health Departments, National Association of
County and City Health Officials (NACCHO); Salary Survey of State and
Territorial Health Officials, Association of State and Territorial
Health Officials (ASTHO); IHS.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-12. |
Increase the proportion of Tribal,
State,* and local health agencies that have implemented a health improvement
plan and increase the proportion of local health jurisdictions that have
implemented a health improvement plan linked with their State plan.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in Jurisdictions
That Have Implemented a Health Improvement Plan |
1997
Baseline
(unless noted)
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-12a. |
Tribal agencies† |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-12b. |
State and the District of
Columbia health agencies |
78 |
100 |
23-12c. |
Local health agencies |
32 (1992–93) |
80 |
23-12d. |
Local jurisdictions that
have linked health improvement plans to the State plans |
Developmental |
Developmental |
* Includes the District of Columbia.
† At this time, data for Tribal agencies
are not collected.
However, if data
should become available by 2010, the information will be included.
Target
setting method:
Total
coverage for States and the District of Columbia; 150 percent improvement for
local health departments.
Data
sources:
Profile of Local
Public Health Agencies Study and National Profile of Local Health
Departments, National Association of County and City Health Officials
(NACCHO); Salary Survey of State and Territorial Health Officials,
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO).
|
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-13. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Tribal, State, and local health agencies that provide or assure
comprehensive laboratory services to support essential public health
services.
Potential
data sources:
CDC;
Association of Public Health Laboratories; Association of State and
Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO); and National Association of County and
City Health Officials (NACCHO).
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-13. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Tribal* and, State,† and
local public health agencies that provide or assure comprehensive
laboratory services to support essential public health services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in State Public
Health Agencies That Provide or Assure Comprehensive Laboratory Services |
2004
Baseline (States†)
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-13a. |
Disease prevention,
control, and surveillance |
90 |
98 |
23-13b. |
Integrated data
management |
69 |
85 |
23-13c. |
Reference and specialized
testing |
65 |
80 |
23-13d. |
Environmental health and
protection |
31 |
70 |
23-13e. |
Food safety |
2 |
50 |
23-13f. |
Laboratory improvement
and regulation |
94 |
99 |
23-13g. |
Policy development |
23 |
50 |
23-13h. |
Emergency response |
29 |
65 |
23-13i. |
Public health related
research |
65 |
85 |
23-13j. |
Training and education |
85 |
90 |
23-13k. |
Partnerships and
communication |
48 |
75 |
* At this time, data for Tribal agencies are not
collected.
However, if data should
become available by 2010, the information will be included.
† Includes Puerto Rico and the District
of Columbia.
Target
setting method:
Expert
opinion.
Potential
dData
sources: Comprehensive
Laboratory Services Survey (CLSS), CDC; Association of Public Health
Laboratories; Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO);
National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO)Association
of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), Leadership Committee.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-13. |
Increase the proportion of Tribal* and State† public health agencies that provide or assure
comprehensive laboratory services to support essential public health
services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in State Public Health
Agencies That Provide or Assure Comprehensive Laboratory Services |
2004
Baseline
(States †)
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-13a. |
Disease prevention, control,
and surveillance |
90 |
98 |
23-13b. |
Integrated data
management |
69 |
85 |
23-13c. |
Reference and specialized
testing |
65 |
80 |
23-13d. |
Environmental health and
protection |
31 |
70 |
23-13e. |
Food safety |
2 |
50 |
23-13f. |
Laboratory improvement and
regulation |
94 |
99 |
23-13g. |
Policy development |
23 |
50 |
23-13h. |
Emergency response |
29 |
65 |
23-13i. |
Public health related
research |
65 |
85 |
23-13j. |
Training and education |
85 |
90 |
23-13k. |
Partnerships and
communication |
48 |
75 |
* At this time, data for Tribal agencies are not
collected. However, if data should become available by 2010, the information
will be included.
† Includes Puerto Rico and the District
of Columbia.
Target
setting method:
Expert
opinion.
Data
source:
Comprehensive
Laboratory Services Survey (CLSS), Association of Public Health Laboratories
(APHL).
|
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-14. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Tribal, State, and local public health agencies that provide or
assure comprehensive epidemiology services to support essential public health
services.
Potential
data sources:
Council of
State and Territorial Epidemiologists; IHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-14. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Tribal, State, and local public health agencies that provide or
assure comprehensive epidemiology services to support essential public health
services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in Public Health
Agencies That Provide or Assure
Comprehensive Epidemiology Services To Support Essential
Public Health Services |
2001
Baseline
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-14a. |
State epidemiologists
with formal training in
epidemiology |
58 |
80 |
23-14b. |
Tribal public health
agencies* |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-14c. |
State public health
agencies |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-14d. |
Local public health
agencies |
Developmental |
Developmental |
* Tribal agencies encompass American Indian/Alaska
Native health departments, regional Tribal organizations, health boards, and
Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters).
Target
setting method:
Expert
opinion.
Potential
dData
sources:
Epidemiology
Capacity Assessment, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists
(CSTE); Survey of Regionally Based Public Health
Services/Infrastructure in Indian Country, Tribal Epidemiology Centers
Program (EpiCenters), CDC, IHS.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-14. |
Increase the proportion of Tribal,
State, and local public health agencies that provide or assure comprehensive
epidemiology services to support essential public health services.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in Public Health
Agencies That Provide or Assure Comprehensive Epidemiology Services To
Support Essential Public Health Services |
2001
Baseline
Percent |
2010
Target
Percent |
23-14a.
| State epidemiologists with
formal training in epidemiology |
58 |
80 |
23-14b. |
Tribal public health
agencies* |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-14c. |
State public health agencies |
Developmental |
Developmental |
23-14d. |
Local public health
agencies |
Developmental |
Developmental |
* Tribal agencies encompass American Indian/Alaska
Native health departments, regional Tribal organizations, health boards, and
Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters).
Target
setting method: Expert
opinion.
Data
sources: Epidemiology
Capacity Assessment, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE);
Survey of Regionally Based Public Health Services/Infrastructure in Indian
Country, Tribal Epidemiology Centers Program (EpiCenters), CDC, IHS.
|
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-15. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local jurisdictions that review and
evaluate the extent to which their statutes, ordinances, and bylaws assure
the delivery of essential public health services.
Potential
data sources:
National
Conference of State Legislators; Association of State and Territorial Health
Officials (ASTHO); National Association of County and City Health Officials
(NACCHO); IHS.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-15. |
(Developmental) Increase the proportion
number of Federal, Tribal, States* and local
jurisdictions that review and evaluate the extent to which their public
health statutes, ordinances, and bylaws assure the delivery
of essential public health services using tools such as the
Turning Point Model State Public Health Act and the Model State
Emergency Health Powers Act.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in States and
the District of Columbia That Use
Tools To Review and Evaluate Their Public Health Laws |
2003
Baseline
Number |
2010
Target
Number |
23-15a. |
Using the Turning Point
Model State Public Health Act |
30 |
51 |
23-15b. |
Using the Model State
Emergency Health Powers Act |
35 |
51 |
* Includes the District of Columbia.
Target
setting method:
Total
coverage.
Potential
dData
sources:
National
Conference of State Legislators; Association of State and Territorial
Health Officials (ASTHO); National Association of County and City Health
Officials (NACCHO); IHSCenter for Law and the Public’s Health,
Georgetown University Law Center and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-15. |
Increase the number of States* that
review and evaluate their public health laws using tools such as the Turning
Point Model State Public Health Act and the Model State Emergency Health
Powers Act.
Target
and baseline:
Objective |
Increase in States and the
District of Columbia That Use Tools To Review and Evaluate Their Public
Health Laws |
2003
Baseline
Number |
2010
Target
Number |
23-15a. |
Using the Turning Point
Model State Public Health Act |
30 |
51 |
23-15b. |
Using the Model State
Emergency Health Powers Act |
35 |
51 |
* Includes the District of
Columbia.
Target
setting method:
Total
coverage.
Data
source:
Center for Law and
the Public’s Health, Georgetown University Law Center and Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health.
|
Resources
OBJECTIVE
DELETED
|
23-16. |
(Objective
deleted due to lack of data source) (Developmental) Increase
the proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local public health agencies
that gather accurate data on public health expenditures, categorized by
essential public health service.
|
Prevention
Research
ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVE
|
23-17. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal, State, and local public health agencies that
conduct or collaborate on population-based prevention research.
Potential
data sources:
Association
of Schools of Public Health; National Association of County and City Health
Officials (NACCHO); Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
(ASTHO); and CDC Sentinel Network.
|
OBJECTIVE
WITH REVISIONS
|
23-17. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal,* State, and local public health agencies that
conduct or collaborate on population-based prevention research.†
* Tribal agencies encompass American Indian/Alaska
Native health departments, regional Tribal organizations and health boards,
and Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters).
† There are currently no data sources at
the Federal, State, or local level. However, if data should become available
by 2010, the information will be included.
Potential
data source: Association
of Schools of Public Health; National Association of County and City Health
Officials (NACCHO); Association of State and Territorial Health
Officials (ASTHO); CDC Sentinel NetworkSurvey of Regionally Based
Public Health Services Infrastructure in Indian Country, Tribal
Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters), CDC, IHS.
|
REVISED
OBJECTIVE
|
23-17. |
(Developmental) Increase the
proportion of Federal, Tribal,* State, and local health agencies that conduct
or collaborate on population-based prevention research.†
* Tribal agencies encompass American Indian/Alaska
Native health departments, regional Tribal organizations and health boards,
and Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters).
† There are currently no data sources at
the Federal, State, or local level. However, if data should become available
by 2010, the information will be included.
Potential
data source:
Survey of
Regionally Based Public Health Services Infrastructure in Indian Country,
Tribal Epidemiology Centers (EpiCenters), CDC, IHS.
|
<< Previous—Progress Quotient Chart
| Table of Contents | Next—References
>>
[ Top ]
|