Midcourse Review  >  Table of Contents  > Focus Area 9: Family Planning  >  Disparities Table

Figure 9-2. Disparities Table for Focus Area 9: Family Planning
Disparities from the best group rate for each characteristic at the most recent data point and changes in disparity from the baseline to the most recent data point.



Characteristics: Race and Ethnicity
Population-based objectives American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian
or other
Pacific Islander
Two or more races Hispanic or Latino Black non-Hispanic White non-Hispanic Summary index
9-1. Intended pregnancies: females
15-44 years (1995)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rate. Data include persons of Hispanic origin. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic.  Data include persons of Hispanic origin. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-2. Births within 24 months of a previous birth: females 15-44 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
9-3. Contraceptive use: females 15-44 years at
risk of unintended pregnancy (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
9-4. Contraceptive failure: females
15-44 years (1995)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
9-6a. Gone to family planning clinic with female partner: unmarried males 15-24 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
9-6b. Received from family planning clinic birth control counseling: unmarried males 15-24 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
9-6c. Received advice and counseling from doctor on birth control: unmarried males 15-24 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-7. Pregnancy: females 15-17 years
(1996, 2000)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available. Increase in disparity 10-49 percentage points (100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rate) Increase in disparity 10-49 percentage points (100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rate) The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Increase in disparity 10-49 percentage points (100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rate)
9-8a. Abstinence before age 15 years:
females 15-19 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-8b. Abstinence before age 15 years:
males 15-19 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-9a. Abstinence, ages 15-17 years: females
(1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.
9-9b. Abstinence, ages 15-17 years: males
(1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-10a. Condom use at first intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-10b. Condom use at first intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995, 2002) * Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-10c. Condom plus hormonal use at first intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
9-10d. Condom plus hormonal use at first intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
9-10e. Condom use at last intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-10f. Condom use at last intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
9-10g. Condom plus hormonal use at last intercourse: unmarried females 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-10h. Condom plus hormonal use at last intercourse: unmarried males 15-17 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-11a. Formal abstinence education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-11b. Formal abstinence education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
9-11c. Formal birth control methods education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-11d. Formal birth control methods education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-11i. Informal abstinence education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantMost favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.
9-11j. Informal abstinence education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-11k. Informal birth control methods education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-11l. Informal birth control methods education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
9-11o. Informal sexually transmitted disease education: females 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateMost favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.
9-11p. Informal sexually transmitted disease education: males 15-19 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
9-12. Problems in conceiving or maintaining a pregnancy: wives 15-44 years (1995, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.

Notes:

Data for objectives 9-5, 9-11e through h, 9-11m and n, and 9-13 are unavailable or not applicable.

Years in parentheses represent the baseline data year and the most recent data year (if available).

Disparity from the best group rate is defined as the percent difference between the best group rate and each of the other group rates for a characteristic (for example, race and ethnicity). The summary index is the average of these percent differences for a characteristic. Change in disparity is estimated by subtracting the disparity at baseline from the disparity at the most recent data point. Change in the summary index is estimated by subtracting the summary index at baseline from the summary index at the most recent data point. See Technical Appendix for more information.







<<  Previous—Progress Quotient Chart    |   Table of Contents   |   Next—Disparities Table: Income and Disability  >>


[ Top ]