UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Docket 02-INS-003 Decision and Order on Appeal Decision This matter comes before the National Credit Union Administration Board (Board) pursuant to 12 CFR 745.202, as an administrative appeal of the determination by the Agent for the Liquidating Agent of First Hialeah Community Federal Credit Union denying xxxxxxxxxxx’s insurance claim in the amount of $1372.40. Background First Hialeah Community Federal Credit Union (hereinafter First Hialeah or the FCU) was originally chartered in 1970 as Coulter Employees Federal Credit Union in Hialeah, Florida. In 1997, the FCU converted to a low-income community charter serving those who live, work and worship in Hialeah, Florida. The FCU changed its name to First Hialeah Community FCU in 1999 to more accurately reflect its field of membership. The NCUA Board placed the Credit Union into liquidation on May 10, 2002, due to insolvency. The FCU’s assets and liabilities were purchased and assumed by Government Employees Credit Union, located in Jacksonville, Florida. xxxxxxxxx Account Analysis xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx had a joint ownership share certificate at the FCU, four share certificates with named beneficiaries, and a small share account with a named beneficiary. The named beneficiary accounts are also known as revocable trust accounts. The share certificates were established under a joint account (one joint share certificate) and a revocable trust account (four revocable trust share certificates. The evidence of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx’s accounts consisted of two passbooks (one for the joint account and one for the revocable trust account) and five account receipts establishing the share certificates. The FCU did not issue paper share certificates. The owners of the joint share certificate were xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx daughter, xxxx xxxxx. The value of the joint share certificate at liquidation was $114,694.28. This joint share certificate was fully insured pursuant to §745.8 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations, 12 C.F.R.§745.8. The Liquidating Agent transferred $144,694.28 to Government Employees Credit Union. The four account receipts for each of the four revocable trust share certificates stated the purchase price and the beneficiaries for each certificate. The small share account was a revocable trust account with xxxxxxxxxx named as the beneficiary. It contained $25. The information found on the account receipts as well as the value of each revocable trust share certificate at the date of liquidation is noted below.
Revocable trust account coverage Section 745.4 of the insurance regulation addresses revocable trust accounts. Section 745.4(a) defines this type of account as one “which evidences an intention that the funds shall pass on the death of the owner of the funds to a named beneficiary.” Section 745.4(b) of the regulation provides up to $100,000 insurance coverage for certain beneficiaries.
The named beneficiaries on the $25 account and on the four share certificates listed above are xxxxxxxxxxxxn’s daughter, xxxxxxxxxx; xxx son, xxxxxxxxxxxx; and xxx two grandsons, xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx. The accounts all qualify for the insurance provided by §745.4(b) of the regulations since the beneficiaries are xxxxxxxxxxxxxx’s two children and two grandchildren. The interest of each of the beneficiaries is insured up to $100,000. The total funds attributed to each beneficiary and the insurance amount for each is as follows: xxxxxxxxxxxx share is $45,309.44; xxxxxxx and xxxxxx xxxxxx share is $7,866.53 each. The Liquidating Agent determined that funds for each of these three qualifying beneficiaries are fully insured because none of them exceeds $100,000. The Liquidating Agent transferred these amounts to Government Employees Credit Union. xxxxxxxxxx share is $101,372.40. The Liquidating Agent determined that $1372.40 of this amount is uninsured because it exceeds the $100,000 maximum provided per qualifying beneficiary. The Liquidating Agent transferred $100,000 to Government Employees Credit Union and issued xxxxxxxxxxxxx an uninsured share certificate for $1372.40. Appeal xxxxxxxxxxxxx submitted an appeal of the Liquidating Agent’s determination on June 13, 2002. xxxxxxxxxxxxx states that when opening share certificate accounts at First Hialeah, staff always assured xxx that xxx funds were fully insured. All of xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx funds were insured when the share certificates were purchased. However, accumulated dividends, which were rolled into the certificates, increased the balance to exceed the insurance limit by $1,372.40. Therefore, xxxxxxxxxxxxx is only entitled to receive the claim certificate for uninsured shares. [Statements made by credit union employees are not binding on the Liquidating Agent or the NCUA Board and do not obligate either to provide coverage in excess of coverage provided by the NCUA Regulations.]
Order For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED as follows: The Board upholds the Liquidating Agent’s decision and denies xxxxxxxxxxxx’s appeal. The Board’s decision constitutes a final agency determination. Pursuant
to So ORDERED this 21st day of November, 2002 by the National Credit Union Administration Board.
_____________________
|