![Programs](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090901032316im_/http://nifl.gov/images/subHead_program.jpg)
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[HealthLiteracy 2009] Re: Wednesday Question: Writing how we talk: better or worse?
Jan Potter
jpotter at gha.orgMon May 19 12:29:23 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [HealthLiteracy 2006] Re: Wednesday Question: Writing how we talk:better or
- Next message: [HealthLiteracy 2010] Re: Wednesday Question: Writing how we talk: better or worse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I believe in using correct grammar and syntax - in fact, I am obnoxiously passionate about it. I teach in what is basically an engineering school and I am generally appalled by my students' writing. However, I think that we need to consider the fact that the world is moving away from what we think of as a written form of communication. These kids can send a text message in the time it takes me to figure out how to turn on my cell phone or PDA. I can despise the idea that we are losing "our" method of effective communication, but I am wondering if perhaps we are missing the point.
They communicate and they do it on their terms. I can force them to my terms, but exactly what is the point? If we are trying to communicate, don't we want to do it on THEIR terms? I am not so sure that there is a right or a wrong way here. We need to be more concerned - particularly in a health setting - about whether they hear us and understand. Text messaging English makes me crazy but they love it and it allows them to communicate rapidly and fairly clearly. Good grammar and perfect syntax allows 2 very educated people to converse (and pat themselves on the back about how smart they are).
Too often we lose the meaning for the structure.
Jan Potter, MSTC
Communications Specialist
Partnership for Health and Accountability
770-249-4549
www.gha.org/pha <http://www.gha.org/pha>
Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did, but backwards and in high heels.
- Faith Whittlesey
This Email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 and may be legally privileged. The information contained in this Email is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, please destroy the email after advising by reply that you erroneously received this. If applicable, the receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does not waive the attorney-client privilege, nor will it constitute a waiver of the work-product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify us via e-mail to (PHA at gha.org <mailto:PHA at gha.org> )
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/healthliteracy/attachments/20080519/54a337d5/attachment.html
- Previous message: [HealthLiteracy 2006] Re: Wednesday Question: Writing how we talk:better or
- Next message: [HealthLiteracy 2010] Re: Wednesday Question: Writing how we talk: better or worse?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the HealthLiteracy discussion list