Information
Technology Initiative
Table:
Evaluations of the Interventions
For a printer-friendly version, download the doc File (52KB). |
Grantee |
What
is |
What
is the |
What
are |
What are the indicators being measured? | ||
Health Care Delivery |
Quality of Health Care |
Cost Effectiveness of Intervention |
||||
Evaluation
of Patient-Focused Intervention
|
||||||
Cornell University Weill Medical College |
Evaluation of A Patient-Centered Electronic Medical Record in a Medicaid Special Needs Program |
Nonrandomized study with comparisons to historical results for same patients, patients not receiving intervention at same sites, and patients enrolled in Medicaid at other sites |
Patient and provider interviews Consultation with outside panel of experts Chart abstraction Data collection from EMRs
|
ACASI EMR implementation feasibility within Medicaid Managed Care plan: Provider acceptance: provider interviews and observation at case conferences Payer evaluation: consultation with Medicaid managed care plan and outside experts Referrals: medical, psychiatric and substance abuse specialists and services Medical and psychiatric hospital admissions
|
Patient health status: Clinical markers: CD4 counts and viral loads Quality of life: MOS-HIV, rating scale Provider response to intervention: HAART regimen: frequency, appropriateness of regimen changes, opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis Frequency of screening: substance abuse Patient adherence to medications: self-report, number of prescriptions filled Patient acceptance of ACASI, measured by survey using Likert scale |
Staff time for clinical care and evaluation Patient time Software development cost External evaluation costs IT technical support costs Overhead costs |
Johns Hopkins University AIDS Service HIV Outcomes Program |
Computer Adherence Technology Study (CATS) |
Randomized clinical trial with control group not receiving direct feedback from administration of ACASI |
Data collection from EMRs Chart abstractions Patient and provider surveys |
Feasibility within clinic setting: Provider acceptance: Surveys, observation at weekly care conference Referrals: medical, psychiatric, pharmacy, and substance abuse specialists and services
|
Patient health status: Clinical markers: Level and duration of viral suppression (whether 50 copies/ml or less at 6 and 12 months) Change in CD4 count (at 6 and 12 months) Genotype resistance at viral rebound Duration of treatment with HAART Patient adherence to treatment: ACASI self-report with Medication Event Monitoring System validation Patient acceptance of ACASI: measured by survey using 5-point Likert scale Provider assessment of ACASI: measured by survey using 5-point Likert scale |
Analysis of health care utilization data and cost of intervention based on variables such as length of time to complete interview, software cost, IT technical support cost, computer station cost, and overhead costs.. |
Johns Hopkins University AIDS Service HIV Outcomes Program |
Computer Adherence Technology Study (CATS) |
Randomized clinical trial with control group not receiving direct feedback from administration of ACASI |
Data collection from EMRs Patient and provider surveys |
Feasibility within clinic setting: Provider acceptance: Surveys, observation at weekly care conference Referrals: medical, psychiatric, pharmacy, and substance abuse specialists and services
|
Patient health status: Clinical markers: Level and duration of viral suppression (whether 50 copies/ml or less at 6 and 12 months) Change in CD4 count (at 6 and 12 months) Genotype resistance at viral rebound Duration of treatment with HAART Patient adherence to treatment: ACASI self-report with Medication Event Monitoring System validation Patient acceptance of ACASI: measured by survey using 5-point Likert scale Provider assessment of ACASI: measured by survey using 5-point Likert scale |
Analysis of health care utilization data and cost of intervention based on variables such as length of time to complete interview, software cost, IT technical support cost, computer station cost, and overhead costs.. |
Grantee |
What
is |
What
is the |
What
are |
What are the indicators being measured? | ||
Health Care Delivery |
Quality of Health Care |
Cost Effectiveness of Intervention |
||||
Evaluation of Provider-Focused Interventions |
||||||
Columbia University
|
An Internet-Based IT to Reduce Prescription Errors with HIV/AIDS Anti-Retroviral Medications |
Group randomized clinical trial with 3 arms: enhanced intervention, intervention without motivational component, and nonintervention control |
Provider interviews Chart abstraction Collection of utilization data from website
|
Provider satisfaction measured by interview using Likert-type scale: Attitudes about using the system; Attitudes about IT clinical support
|
Clinician behavior in response to components of HIVTIPS guidelines: Checklist: diagnostic procedures and tests ordered or evaluated at initial visit HAART treatment guidelines: dates and results of CD4 count and viral load; date of treatment start Drug dose and combination guides: Medication prescribing and dosage information Delayed initiation for psychosocial reasons: CD4 count, viral load, reason for delay noted in chart System alerts: Clinician response to specific alert Patient health status: Clinical markers: viral load, CD4 count |
Incremental costs of IT (time for programming support, maintaining the system, and updating system information) Clinical staff time on diagnosis, education, and treatment Treatment costs Future costs and effects analysis |
Duke University Health Inequalities Program
|
HIV Integration Health Outcomes Project Evaluation (HIHOPE) |
Non-random case/control study Longitudinal pre- and post-intervention analysis |
Patient and provider surveys Chart abstraction Data collection from EMRs |
Primary care: Whether patient has regular source of care Continuity of care: measured by type and amount of information shared between providers and case managers, and the mode of sharing measured by patient Health care utilization Hospitalizations and ER visits Primary care appts kept
|
Patient health status: Clinical markers: CD4 count, viral load, OIs Quality of life and functional status: MOS SF-36 Patient adherence to medications measured by quarterly adherence assessment administered by case manager Provider and patient satisfaction: Measured by satisfaction with health care received, perceived coordination of care and functionality of Provide. More frequent communication among providers |
Total costs of care Treatment costs of clinical & non-clinical services Overall cost of integrative care Effect of integrative care on health system indirect and direct costs Employment status of patients |
Los Angeles Department of Health Services (DHS) Public Health
Office of AIDS Programs and Policy (OAPP) |
HIV/AIDS Interface Technology System (HITS) |
Nonrandomized intervention study with control
Pre- and post-HITS implementation analysis |
Data collection from electronic databases
Data from ADAP database
Client surveys
Provider pre- and post-HITS implementation surveys |
Health care utilization: Proportion of confidentially testing clients who return for HIV test results
Time between confidentially testing clients learning seropositive status and entering medical care
|
Client health status: Clinical markers: CD4 count, viral load
Client satisfaction: measured using 4-point Likert scale survey: client experiences moving from HCT into medical care
|
Utilization of third party and other payment sources
Time utilization by HCT and medical outpatient staff |
Louisiana State University Health Care Services Division (HCSD) |
Evaluating Information Technology’s Impact on a Statewide System of HIV Care |
Concurrent cohort studies Pre/post implementation studies Quasiexperimental and experimental studies Validation study |
Chart abstraction Data collection from the electronic database Provider and patient satisfaction surveys, interviews, and focus groups
|
Health care utilization: Hospitalizations, emergency room visits, frequency of primary care visits, completed referrals to ancillary services Provider satisfaction measured by interview (scale): quality of the IT, associated time savings; reduction in problems in finding patient medical record
|
Clinician adherence to standards of care Administration of HAART and OI prophylaxis, presence of opportunistic infections, frequency of pelvic exams, Pap smears, and PPD screening, receipt of CD4 and viral load testing within last 6 months, hepatitis testing, immunizations, and perinatal transmission prophylaxis Patient health status: Clinical markers: CD4 counts and viral loads, occurrence of OI’s Patient adherence to HAART: reduction in viral load Health care utilization: Length of time between learning HIV positive test result and entry into care, number of visits, type of visit Patient satisfaction measured by survey: Acceptability of the intervention, improvement in clinic efficiency |
Reduction in care costs Increased provider efficiency Infrastructure and software development costs |