NIDA Home > Publications > NIDA Notes > Vol. 22, No. 3 > Research Findings |
|||
Prenatal Nicotine Exposure May Damage Receptors That Influence Auditory Processing |
Research Findings
Vol. 22, No. 3 (April 2009) |
||
Tests correlate biochemical abnormality with deficits in rats' responses to sounds.BY NIDA Notes Staff Some children of women who smoked during pregnancy experience subtle difficulties processing auditory information; for example, they may have more than average problems recognizing slightly garbled words or understanding speech in a noisy environment. A recent series of animal experiments indicates that the cause of the problem is not in the ear but in the brain: Nicotine exposure during development damages a set of receptors in the brain's auditory processing center.
HEARING VERSUS HEEDINGThe NIDA-funded experiments first demonstrated a deficit in sound processing in rats that had been exposed to nicotine at a developmental stage corresponding to that of a human fetus in the third trimester of gestation. Dr. Raju Metherate and colleagues at the University of California, Irvine, began by injecting rat pups with nicotine twice daily for 5 days (postnatal days 8 to 12). The injections produced nicotine blood levels approximating those of smokers, and presumably of pregnant smokers' fetuses. A group of same-aged control rats received injections of saline. When the rats were 2 months old, a researcher trained them to escape an electrical shock by crossing from one chamber of an experimental box to another. The next day, a 5-second tone preceded each shock. All the animals immediately turned their heads toward the tone, indicating that they had heard it. Over 4 days, the rats had the opportunity to learn that the tone signaled an impending shock. By the end of the training, all but one of the 12 control animals had learned the lesson well enough to routinely avoid the shock by crossing into the safe chamber during the tone. These animals moved to the safe chamber more rapidly as time went on, and eventually, many went into the safe chamber as soon as the tone began. Just 6 of the 11 rats exposed to nicotine, however, learned to associate the tone with the shock, and they responded more slowly than the control animals. The remaining 5 nicotine-exposed rats moved to the safe chamber only after receiving the shock. A LESS RESPONSIVE CORTEXThe UC-Irvine researchers' next experiment linked the nicotine-exposed rats' poorer responses to warning tones to a difference in the animals' brains. The auditory cortex is the brain's primary area for interpreting sounds. Normally, nicotine amplifies the cortex's responsiveness to auditory inputs. Researchers measure this effect by comparing electrical activity levels in the cortex before and after an injection of the drug. Using this protocol when their rats were 2 to 3 months of age, Dr. Metherate's team documented smaller increases in cortical activity levels, on average, in the animals with early exposure to nicotine than in the control animals. Among adult rats not exposed to nicotine as pups, a stronger auditory cortex response to nicotine at 2 to 3 months of age correlated with faster and more accurate learning to associate sound with electrical shocks. These observations may provide a hint why rats' early nicotine exposure leads to later difficulty using warning tones. UNDERDEVELOPED RECEPTORSThe researchers next investigated the underlying mechanism for their nicotine-exposed rats' diminished cortical responsiveness. The findings indicated that nicotine exposure during early development prevents a key receptor in the brain's acetylcholine signaling system from achieving full functionality. Nicotine binds to the same receptors as acetylcholine, a chemical that neurons in the auditory cortex and elsewhere use to transmit electrical excitation to neighboring neurons. "When nicotine or acetylcholine binds to a receptor on the surface of a nerve cell, the binding process sets off chemical reactions inside the cell that help the cell function properly and fulfill its special physiological role," Dr. Metherate says. The researchers measured electrical activity in the auditory cortex before and after injecting 2- to 3-month-old rats with mecamylamine, a compound that shuts down the nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors. The injection markedly reduced electrical activity in normal rats but made little difference in the rats that had been exposed to nicotine shortly after birth. This finding indicates that their nACh receptors were ineffective. "Somehow, early nicotine exposure disconnects the receptors from the inside of the cell," Dr. Metherate says. "Acetylcholine and nicotine bind to the cell surface, but no chemical reactions take place in the interior."
A CLUE AND A CAUTIONBecause human and rat brains process sounds similarly, the UC-Irvine findings may relate to the problems that people prenatally exposed to nicotine have interpreting sounds, and the experimental results may provide a clue to effective treatments as well. "If we can figure out how to reconnect the receptors to the activity inside the cells, we may be able to reverse these auditory-cognitive deficits in children, adolescents, or even adults," Dr. Metherate says. He adds that nACh receptors also play a role in the development of other parts of the brain, including cortical areas that process vision and touch. So, prenatal nicotine exposure may undermine brain activity in those areas as well. "Even though Dr. Metherate's rats were exposed to nicotine for only 5 days, the damage to their brains was long-lasting," says Dr. Thomas Aigner of NIDA's Division of Basic Neuroscience and Behavioral Research. "This is important information for women who think that smoking only intermittently during pregnancy is safe for the fetus. If they smoke during a critical period of brain development, in this case a few days into the third trimester, it looks as though the nicotine exposure can produce serious and long-lasting damage." SOURCES Liang, K., et al. Neonatal nicotine exposure impairs nicotinic enhancement of central auditory processing and auditory learning in adult rats. European Journal of Neuroscience 24(3):857-866, 2006. [Abstract] Liang, K., et al. Nicotinic modulation of tone-evoked responses in auditory cortex reflects the strength of prior auditory learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 90(1):138-146, 2008. [Abstract]
Volume 22, Number 3 (April 2009) |
|
NIDA Home | Site Map | Search | FAQs | Accessibility | Privacy | FOIA (NIH) | Employment |
|