Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Visibility of Site Marking for Surgical Time Out With Two Different Skin Preparation Solutions (site marking)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Johns Hopkins University, August 2008
First Received: August 20, 2008   No Changes Posted
Sponsored by: Johns Hopkins University
Information provided by: Johns Hopkins University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00739583
  Purpose

Skin preparation solutions are used to clean the skin of the patient before surgery to decrease the rate of infection. This is particularly important for hip replacement to reduce the risk of prosthetic joint infection.

The use of a mark on the skin for site identification has become the standard of care to decrease wrong site surgery. The Joint Commission has mandated site identification as part of the surgical "time-out". This procedure is also mandated by hospital policy. Preliminary work on cadaveric skin shows that the type of skin preparation can erase the mark used for surgical site identification. Erasure of the mark presents the surgeon with difficulty in performing the site identification. Any error or lack of visualization of the site marking could lead to catastrophic wrong site surgery.

The investigators hypothesis is that chlorhexidine based skin preparation solutions erase site marking in comparison to iodine based skin preparation solutions. The investigators intend to prospectively study twenty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Patients will be randomized to either a chlorhexidine based or an iodine based skin preparation solution. These solutions are both the current gold standard of clinical care. No differences have been shown in infection rates for total hip arthroplasty between these solutions. The site marking will be performed by the same surgeon in a standardized manner. The site marking will include the surgeon's three initials as per usual routine. Underneath the initials three random initials will be placed with a horizontal line drawn underneath. The preparation of the skin will be performed according to the manufacturer's specifications. Digital photographs will be taken of the skin marking after skin preparation. Photographs of the three random initials will be de-identified and placed in a "Powerpoint" presentation form. Ten orthopaedic surgeons will then read the site markings to identify the random initials and to tell whether the mark looks appropriate to perform a surgical timeout. The horizontal line will be digitally analyzed using Adobe Photoshop to quantitatively measure blackness of the mark.


Condition Intervention Phase
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Drug: CHG 2% w/v and IPA 70% v/v
Drug: Iodophor 0.7% and IPA 74% w/w
Phase IV

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Visibility of Site Marking for Surgical Time Out With Two Different Skin Preparation Solutions

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Johns Hopkins University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Identification of the random initials by the reviewing orthopaedic surgeons [ Time Frame: After study completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • The mean gray level of the horizontal line [ Time Frame: After study completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Judgment of reviewing orthopaedic surgeons that the site marking is identifiable for them to perform site identification [ Time Frame: After study completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 20
Study Start Date: August 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date: August 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: August 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Active Comparator
Skin preparation for hip replacement with a Chlorhexidine based skin preparation solution, Chloraprep® (CHG 2% w/v and IPA 70% v/v; Enturia Inc., Leawood, KS, USA)
Drug: CHG 2% w/v and IPA 70% v/v
Skin preparation of the surgical site per label of the product. The area for surgery will be prepared for 30 seconds
2: Active Comparator
Skin preparation for hip replacement with an Iodine based skin preparation solution, Duraprep® (Iodophor 0.7% and IPA 74% w/w; 3M Healthcare, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Drug: Iodophor 0.7% and IPA 74% w/w
Skin preparation of the surgical site per product labeling. The area will be painted with the solution.

  Show Detailed Description

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   21 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Patients undergoing primary total hip surgery in a supine position.
  • Patients must be of light skin color
  • Patients must not be allergic to chlorhexidine or iodine

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non English speaking
  • Patients not undergoing primary total hip surgery in a supine position.
  • Patients not of light skin color
  • Patients allergic to chlorhexidine or iodine
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00739583

Contacts
Contact: Simon C Mears, MD, PhD 410-550-0101 smears1@jhmi.edu

Locations
United States, Maryland
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Recruiting
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
Contact: Simon C Mears, MD, PhD     410-550-0101     smears1@jhmi.edu    
Principal Investigator: Simon C Mears, MD, PhD            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University
  More Information

Publications:
Responsible Party: Johns Hopkins University ( Simon C Mears, Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery )
Study ID Numbers: NA_00011971
Study First Received: August 20, 2008
Last Updated: August 20, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00739583     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Johns Hopkins University:
Skin preparation
Skin marking
site marking
Site identification

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine gluconate

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 11, 2009