Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Haloperidol in Patients With Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-Associated Agitation and Delirium
This study has been completed.
First Received: July 23, 2007   Last Updated: July 6, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsored by: Austin Health
Information provided by: Austin Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00505804
  Purpose

The purpose of the study is to determine whether dexmedetomidine is a more effective medication than haloperidol in the treatment of agitation and delirium in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Haloperidol is a medication conventionally used for this purpose.

The investigators will study only patients who have recovered from their illness to the point that, were it not for agitation and delirium, they would no longer require mechanical ventilation.

The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving dexmedetomidine will be able to discontinue mechanical ventilation earlier than those receiving haloperidol.


Condition Intervention Phase
Delirium
Agitation
Ventilator Weaning
Respiration, Artificial
Intensive Care
Drug: dexmedetomidine
Drug: haloperidol
Phase II

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: A Randomised Open Label Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Haloperidol in Ventilated Patients With ICU-Associated Agitation and Delirium

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Austin Health:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Time from the commencement of treatment to extubation

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Time taken to achieve a satisfactory sedation score (score 3 or 4 on the Riker scale)
  • The need for supplemental sedative and analgesic medication (morphine, midazolam or propofol, as clinically indicated) [ Time Frame: During delivery of trial medication ]
  • Average Riker score for agitation [ Time Frame: During delivery of trial medication ]
  • Average RASS score for agitation [ Time Frame: During delivery of trial medication ]
  • Need for re-intubation [ Time Frame: During the same ICU admission ]
  • Average Bergeron ICDSC score for delirium [ Time Frame: During delivery of trial medication ]
  • Duration of ICU stay

Estimated Enrollment: 20
Study Start Date: January 2005
Study Completion Date: November 2008
Primary Completion Date: November 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Experimental Drug: dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine IV infusion of 0.0 to 0.7 mg/kg/min for as long a deemed necessary by the treating clinician.
2: Active Comparator Drug: haloperidol
Haloperidol IV loading dose of 2.5mg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.0 to 2mg/hr for as long as deemed necessary by the treating clinician

Detailed Description:

Up to 80% of patients undergoing intensive care have delirium. Early in the ICU stay, delirium and agitation are usually prevented using analgesic and sedative drugs which essentially render the patient unconscious. This is appropriate in the context of aggressive treatment of pathophysiological instability, which often requires multiple painful procedures. However, after the underlying pathophysiological problem has resolved, patients sometimes remain delirious and agitated. This often requires ongoing heavy sedation, which in turn necessitates continued mechanical ventilation, and can worsen the (temporarily masked) delirium. Prolonged mechanical ventilation increases the risk of ventilator associated pneumonia and other life threatening complications.

The drug most commonly used to treat delirium is haloperidol, which reduces hallucinations and unstructured thought patterns, but also reduces the interaction with the environment. Haloperidol has significant side effects, including extrapyramidal reactions (in 1-10% of patients), neuroleptic malignant syndrome (in which it is the cause in 50% of cases), and prolonged QT syndrome (which can precipitate fatal arrhythmias).

An ideal sedative agent in this context would have fewer side effects, relieve agitation without causing excessive sedation, and be easily titrated. An analgesic action might allow less opioid use, also lessening delirium. Early studies in other contexts suggest dexmedetomidine has all these properties.

The investigators hypothesise that patients with ICU-associated delirium after the resolution of their underlying pathological process who receive dexmedetomidine will be able to be extubated earlier than those who receive haloperidol.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be eligible for the study if, in the opinion of the treating clinician, they continue to require mechanical ventilation only because their degree of agitation requires such a high dose of sedative medication (midazolam or propofol, the only commonly used specific sedatives in our unit) that extubation is not possible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who could not be extubated even if delirium or agitation were corrected. This will include:

    • Patients receiving high dose opioid analgesia (>20 m/morphine/day)
    • Patients shortly to return to the operating theatre
    • Patients undergoing repeated invasive procedures, in whom it is desirable to maintain deep sedation.
    • Patients likely to require ongoing airway protection or control, or ventilatory support (for example, spinal patients with an inadequate vital capacity)
  • Known allergy to haloperidol or alpha2 agonists
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00505804

Sponsors and Collaborators
Austin Health
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Rinaldo Bellomo, MD FJFICM Austin Health, University of Melbourne
Study Director: Michael C Reade, MBBS FJFICM Austin Health, University of Melbourne
  More Information

No publications provided by Austin Health

Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID):
Study ID Numbers: H2004/02026
Study First Received: July 23, 2007
Last Updated: July 6, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00505804     History of Changes
Health Authority: Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration

Keywords provided by Austin Health:
dexmedetomidine
haloperidol

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Neurotransmitter Agents
Adrenergic Agents
Psychotropic Drugs
Antiemetics
Psychomotor Agitation
Adrenergic Agonists
Haloperidol
Signs and Symptoms
Dopamine
Mental Disorders
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Dexmedetomidine
Analgesics
Dementia
Neurobehavioral Manifestations
Delirium
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
Tranquilizing Agents
Central Nervous System Depressants
Confusion
Antipsychotic Agents
Dyskinesias
Cognition Disorders
Haloperidol decanoate
Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic, Cognitive Disorders
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Neurologic Manifestations
Dopamine Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Neurotransmitter Agents
Adrenergic Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Anti-Dyskinesia Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Psychotropic Drugs
Antiemetics
Psychomotor Agitation
Adrenergic Agonists
Haloperidol
Signs and Symptoms
Sensory System Agents
Mental Disorders
Therapeutic Uses
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Psychomotor Disorders
Analgesics
Dexmedetomidine
Neurobehavioral Manifestations
Delirium
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
Tranquilizing Agents
Nervous System Diseases
Gastrointestinal Agents
Central Nervous System Depressants
Dopamine Antagonists
Confusion
Antipsychotic Agents
Dyskinesias
Pharmacologic Actions

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 11, 2009