Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Ulnar Nerve Block for Procedural Anesthesia - Wrist Versus Palm
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by McMaster University, January 2009
First Received: January 21, 2009   Last Updated: January 22, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsors and Collaborators: Hamilton Health Sciences
McMaster University
Information provided by: McMaster University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00827658
  Purpose

Ulnar nerve blockade is necessary for sensory anesthesia and analgesia in the hand during minor procedures. The course of the ulnar nerve in the forearm, wrist, and hand is predictable and has low variability. However even with known anatomic location and landmarks, ulnar nerve blocks at the wrist frequently are inadequate for procedural anesthesia. The antebrachial fascia at the wrist acts as a barrier to local infiltration. Since the fascia can not be visualized or palpated, it is commonly is not penetrated, resulting in an inadequate block.

Furthermore at the level of the wrist the ulnar artery lies in close proximity to the nerve and there is potential for arterial puncture while attempting injection for volar wrist block. The palmar ulnar nerve block is an injection distal to the hook of the hamate in the thenar eminence which avoids the ulnar artery and antebrachial fascia. This block has been used successfully for many years in clinical practice but has not been assessed or compared in a research study. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of using a palmar ulnar nerve block for procedures in the hand as compared to the standard volar wrist ulnar nerve block.


Condition Intervention
Hand Surgery
Procedure: Local Block

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Investigator), Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Ulnar Nerve Block for Procedural Anesthesia - Wrist Versus Palm

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by McMaster University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Primary outcome is efficacy of sensory anesthesia and analgesia [ Time Frame: 15-45 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Secondary outcome is patient perceived discomfort with block [ Time Frame: 15-45 Minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 246
Study Start Date: February 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Hypothenar Palm block: Active Comparator
Hypothenar Palmar block group. Local is placed at this location in this study arm. The same local composition (Intervention) is used for both study arms. The trial is a comparison of location not the Intervention.
Procedure: Local Block
total 3 cc injection (1.5 cc 1% plain lidocaine and 1.5 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine)
Volar Wrist Block: Active Comparator
Volar Wrist block group. Local is placed at this location in this study arm. The same local composition (Intervention) is used for both study arms. The trial is a comparison of location not the Intervention.
Procedure: Local Block
total 3 cc injection (1.5 cc 1% plain lidocaine and 1.5 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine)

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • any individual who can give informed consent and is scheduled for elective hand procedures by the PI necessitating an Ulnar nerve block of the hand.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients unable to give informed consent
  • patients with previous or ongoing ulnar nerve deficits or neuropathy
  • patients undergoing Guyon's canal decompression
  • patients who can not comprehend or cooperate with assessment testing
  • patients with abnormal two point discrimination (> 6 mm at the test location) prior to the nerve block
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00827658

Contacts
Contact: Stuart Martin 905-572-6226 smartin@mcmaster.ca
Contact: Annika Card 905-526-1948 annika@quadrant.net

Locations
Canada, Ontario
Hamilton General Hospital Recruiting
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact: Sonia Giangregorio-Campanella         giangreg@hhsc.ca    
Principal Investigator: Stuart Martin            
Sub-Investigator: Annika Card            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Hamilton Health Sciences
McMaster University
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Stuart Martin McMaster University
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University ( Dr. S. Martin )
Study ID Numbers: McMaster 08-053
Study First Received: January 21, 2009
Last Updated: January 22, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00827658     History of Changes
Health Authority: Canada: Ethics Review Committee

Keywords provided by McMaster University:
anesthesia, local
ulnar nerve
hand
surgery, plastic
blinded
randomized
prospective
local anesthesia
volar wrist block
hypothenar palm block
ulnar nerve
hand surgery

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Lidocaine
Central Nervous System Depressants
Anesthetics
Bupivacaine

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Therapeutic Uses
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Central Nervous System Depressants
Anesthetics
Central Nervous System Agents
Pharmacologic Actions

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 11, 2009