This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-08-537R 
entitled 'September 11: Fiscal Year 2008 Cost Estimation Process for 
World Trade Center Health Programs' which was released on March 14, 
2008. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

March 11, 2008: 

The Honorable Charles E. Schumer: 
Chairman, Joint Economic Committee: 

The Honorable Carolyn B. Maloney: 
Vice Chair, Joint Economic Committee: 

The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton: 
Chairman, Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health: 
Committee on Environment and Public Works: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Vito J. Fossella: 
House of Representatives: 

The Honorable Jerrold Nadler: 
House of Representatives: 

Subject: September 11: Fiscal Year 2008 Cost Estimation Process for 
World Trade Center Health Programs: 

Following the World Trade Center (WTC) attack, federal funding was 
provided to government agencies and private organizations to establish 
programs for screening, monitoring,[Footnote 1] or treating responders 
for illnesses and conditions related to the WTC disaster.[Footnote 
2],[Footnote 3] Within the Department of Health and Human Services 
(HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) awards grants for 
and oversees the WTC health programs that provide services for 
responders to the WTC attack. Federal funds appropriated or awarded for 
the WTC health programs from October 2001 through November 2007 have 
totaled $261.1 million.[Footnote 4] These funds were provided for 
screening and monitoring services, outpatient and inpatient treatment, 
and program support.[Footnote 5] NIOSH has awarded the bulk of the 
funding.[Footnote 6] 

For fiscal year 2007, NIOSH estimated that medical monitoring, 
treatment services, and associated program support services for WTC 
health programs could range in cost from about $230 million to $283 
million. However, in July 2007 we reported that NIOSH did not have a 
reliable cost estimation process.[Footnote 7] We found that NIOSH and 
its grantees had included potential costs for certain program changes 
that might not be implemented and, in the absence of actual treatment 
cost data, had relied on questionable assumptions. We noted that HHS 
officials had required the two largest grantees--New York City Fire 
Department's WTC Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program (FDNY) and 
the New York/New Jersey (NY/NJ) WTC Consortium[Footnote 8]--to report 
detailed cost data to improve future cost estimates. In fall 2007 the 
NIOSH director briefed congressional staff on the cost estimate for the 
WTC health programs for fiscal year 2008 and on changes NIOSH made to 
its cost estimation process for that year. 

In light of our findings on NIOSH's cost estimation process for fiscal 
year 2007 and of the development of a cost estimate for fiscal year 
2008, you asked us to identify the changes that NIOSH made for fiscal 
year 2008 and to determine whether these changes represent an 
improvement. To conduct this work, we interviewed the NIOSH officials 
who worked with WTC health program officials to develop the cost 
estimates for fiscal years 2007 and 2008. We also obtained and reviewed 
the quarterly cost and workload reports that the FDNY and NY/NJ WTC 
Consortium clinical centers prepared and that NIOSH used in developing 
the fiscal year 2008 cost estimate. We compared the methods NIOSH used 
to estimate costs for screening, monitoring, treatment, and program 
support for fiscal year 2008 to the methods used for fiscal year 2007. 
We conducted this performance audit from December 2007 through March 
2008 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit 
to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable 
basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. 
We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for 
our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. In February 
2008 we held a briefing for your staffs on the results of our work. 
This report documents and expands on the information we provided in the 
briefing and transmits our findings to the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services. 

In summary, we found that, overall, the cost estimation process NIOSH 
used to estimate WTC health program costs for fiscal year 2008 
represented an improvement over the process it used for fiscal year 
2007. For the fiscal year 2008 estimate, NIOSH used actual average 
costs from the April 2007 through June 2007 quarter as the basis for 
estimating costs for screening and monitoring exams, instead of using 
assumptions as it had for fiscal year 2007. For fiscal year 2008, NIOSH 
also used actual average costs from the April 2007 through June 2007 
quarter for estimating outpatient treatment costs--which represented 
almost two-thirds of the total cost estimate. This is an improvement 
over NIOSH's fiscal year 2007 methods, which relied on proxy data based 
on New York State workers' compensation reimbursement payments, as well 
as on questionable assumptions, to estimate outpatient treatment costs. 
For fiscal year 2008, while NIOSH again used assumptions to estimate 
the number of responders to be screened and monitored, these 
assumptions were better than those NIOSH used for fiscal year 2007 
because they were based on data from actual screening and monitoring 
experience. 

Agency Comments and Our Evaluation: 

We provided a draft of this report to HHS for comment. CDC's Office of 
the Director provided oral comments on behalf of the department. 
Overall, CDC agreed that the cost estimation process NIOSH used for 
fiscal year 2008 represented an improvement over the process NIOSH used 
for fiscal year 2007. CDC had concerns, however, with the information 
in the draft about the fiscal year 2008 cost estimate that NIOSH 
provided the Congress in a fall 2007 briefing. The draft indicated 
that, in its briefing, NIOSH stated that its cost estimate for the WTC 
health programs for fiscal year 2008 was $218.5 million. In its 
comments, CDC said that it had more recently determined that the WTC 
health programs' fiscal year 2008 costs would be in the range of $55 
million to $80 million. CDC also said that all the other data in our 
report were correct. Because certain elements of the other data are 
subsets of the $218.5 million figure, we have not revised the report. 

We are sending copies of this report to the Secretary of the Health and 
Human Services and appropriate congressional committees. We will also 
provide copies to others upon request. In addition, the report is 
available at no charge on GAO's Web site at [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov]. 

If you and your staff have any questions or need additional 
information, please contact Cynthia Bascetta at (202) 512-7114 or 
bascettac@gao.gov. Contact points for our Office of Congressional 
Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this 
report. Major contributors to this report were Helene F. Toiv, 
Assistant Director; Frederick Caison; Anne Hopewell; and Roseanne 
Price. 

Signed by: 

Cynthia A. Bascetta: 
Director, Health Care: 

Enclosure-1: 

World Trade Center Health Programs: 
Cost Estimate for Fiscal Year 2008: 

Briefing for the staffs of: 
Senator Charles E. Schumer: 
Chairman, Joint Economic Committee: 
Representative Carolyn B. Maloney: 
Vice Chair, Joint Economic Committee: 
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton: 
Chairman, Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health, Senate 
Committee on Environment and Public Works: 
Representative Vito J. Fossella: 
Representative Jerrold Nadler: 

Introduction: 

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
awards grants for and oversees programs providing health screening, 
monitoring, or treatment services for responders to the 2001 World 
Trade Center (WTC) attack. NIOSH is a unit of the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC), which is an agency of the Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

Federal funds for the WTC health programs from October 2001 through 
November 2007 have totaled $261.1 million. These funds were provided 
for screening and monitoring services, outpatient and inpatient 
treatment, and program support.* NIOSH has made the bulk of the funding 
awards to the WTC health programs.**

* Program support includes a broad range of administrative, 
infrastructure support, and information management activities.

** HHS’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry awarded $29.5 
million of the total federal funds. 

Table: WTC Health Programs: 

FDNY WTC Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program; 
FDNY Bureau of Health Services provides physical and mental health 
services at seven treatment facilities in the NYC metropolitan area; 
16,000 NYC firefighters and emergency medical technicians enrolled.*

NY/NJ WTC Consortium; 
Five clinical centers provide physical and mental health services, with 
30,000 responders enrolled; one of the clinical centers—the Mount Sinai 
School of Medicine—also coordinates services for nonfederal responders 
who reside outside the NYC area, with 1,400 enrolled.*

WTC Federal Responder Screening Program; 
Initial screening exams for federal responders; 1,600 responders 
enrolled.*

WTC Health Registry; 
Long-term monitoring through periodic surveys; over 71,000 responders,  
residents, and others had enrolled by November 2004.  

Project COPE; 
Mental health services for NYPD employees and family members.

POPPA Program; 
Police Organization Providing Peer Assistance (POPPA) program provides 
peer-based and professional mental health services for NYPD uniformed 
employees. 

*Enrollment data as of July 31, 2007. 

[End of table] 

In July 2007 we reported that NIOSH did not have a reliable cost 
estimate for serving responders in fiscal year (FY) 2007.* 

On November 2, 2007, the NIOSH Director briefed congressional staff on 
the FY 2008 cost estimate for the WTC health programs and on changes 
NIOSH made to its cost estimation process for FY 2008.

In light of our July 2007 findings and NIOSH’s having a new cost 
estimation process for FY 2008, we were asked to review the process 
used by NIOSH to estimate costs for the WTC health programs for FY 2008.

* GAO, September 11: HHS Needs to Ensure the Availability of Health 
Screening and Monitoring for Al Responders, GAO-07-892 (Washington, 
D.C.: July 23, 2007). 

Objective: 

Identify the changes NIOSH made to the cost estimation process for the 
WTC health programs for FY 2008 and determine whether they represented 
an improvement. 

Scope and Methodology: 

Interviewed and obtained documents from NIOSH officials who worked with 
the FDNY program and NY/NJ WTC Consortium clinical center grantees to 
develop the cost estimate for FY 2008.

Obtained and reviewed the quarterly cost and workload reports that the 
FDNY program and the NY/NJ WTC Consortium submitted to NIOSH and that 
NIOSH used in the development of the FY 2008 cost estimate. 

Background: 

Federal funds awarded to the WTC health programs are used for

* screening and monitoring exams; 

* inpatient and outpatient treatment; 

* program support; 

Some uncertainty is inherent in NIOSH’s cost estimation process for the 
WTC health programs. 

* The number of responders who actually enroll can be difficult to 
predict because the total number of responders is unknown (estimates 
have ranged from 40,000 to over 91,000).

* Treatment costs are difficult to estimate because the impact of 
exposure on responders’ physical and mental health is unknown.

NIOSH’s cost estimate for the WTC health programs, FY 2008 (dollars in 
millions); 

Total estimated costs for FY 2008 $218.5; 
Funds carried over from FY 2007* 116.1; 
Estimated funding needed for FY 2008 $102.4; 

$116.1 million carried over from FY 2007 included funds awarded to 
grantees that were not spent and funds NIOSH had not yet awarded, 
including a $50 million emergency supplemental appropriation to CDC in 
May 2007. 

*As of October 1, 2007.

Summary of Findings: 

For FY 2008, NIOSH changed its cost estimation process for screening 
and monitoring costs and outpatient treatment costs. These changes 
improved the overall process.

* For FY 2008, NIOSH used actual average costs from the previous year 
as the basis for estimating costs for screening and monitoring exams, 
instead of using assumptions as it had for FY 2007. 

* For FY 2008, NIOSH used actual average costs from the previous year 
for estimating outpatient treatment costs—which represented almost two-
thirds of the total cost estimate—instead of proxy data or questionable 
assumptions as it had for FY 2007. 

* For FY 2008, while NIOSH again used assumptions to estimate the 
number of responders to be screened and monitored, these assumptions 
were better than those NIOSH used for FY 2007 because they were based 
on data from actual experience. 

Screening and Monitoring Cost Estimation for FY 2007: 

In estimating screening and monitoring costs for FY 2007, NIOSH 

* assumed that the cost of monitoring exams would be $500 per exam for 
responders in treatment and $1,500 per exam for responders not in 
treatment; 

* assumed that every responder who had ever been screened (34,000) 
would be monitored in FY 2007 (10,486 received monitoring exams from 
July 2006 through June 2007); and: 

* did not include screening exams in its estimate (5,489 responders 
received a screening exam from July 2006 through June 2007).

For FY 2007, NIOSH estimated screening and monitoring costs to be about 
$30.7 million.

Screening and Monitoring Cost Estimation for FY 2008: 

In estimating screening and monitoring costs for FY 2008, NIOSH made 
the following changes:

* used actual costs reported for April-June 2007 (an average of $1,100 
per screening or monitoring exam*), and: 

* multiplied the average cost by the number of screening exams that it 
estimated would be performed, based on (1) the May through July 2007 
pattern of 500 responders enrolling for screening per month and (2) the 
number of responders who had previously received a screening exam and 
were expected to return for an annual monitoring exam. 

For FY 2008 NIOSH estimated screening and monitoring costs to be about 
$37.5 million, or 17 percent of the total cost estimate.

* This amount includes program support costs associated with direct 
patient care. 

Considerations: 

* NIOSH used only the most recent quarter of actual data* on which to 
base its estimate of screening and monitoring costs for FY 2008; NIOSH 
officials said these data were the most accurate. 

* The estimated number of responders to be screened and monitored for 
FY 2008 was based on the number expected to enroll for screening and 
assumptions regarding the number of screened responders expected to 
return for exams. 

* NIOSH told us that in fall 2007, new enrollment had decreased from 
500 responders per month to 250 to 300. 

* For both FY 2007 and FY 2008, NIOSH based its cost estimate on the 
medically recommended practice of scheduling monitoring exams every 12 
months, instead of the 18-month interval specified in the WTC protocol.

* The term “actual data” refers to information regarding a specific 
activity, such as outpatient treatment provided, during a specific time 
period. 

Outpatient Treatment Cost Estimation for FY 2007: 

In estimating outpatient treatment costs for FY 2007, NIOSH: 

* used proxy data based on New York State workers’ compensation medical 
reimbursement payments, and: 

* adjusted the data to reflect three different levels of treatment 
utilization (we reported in 2007 that there were no data to support the 
accuracy of the adjustments*). 

For FY 2007, NIOSH estimated outpatient treatment costs to be about 
$150.6 million. 

* GAO, September 11: HHS Needs to Ensure the Availability of Health 
Screening and Monitoring for All Responders, GAO-07-892 (Washington, 
D.C.: July 23, 2007). 

Outpatient Treatment Cost Estimation for FY 2008: 

In estimating outpatient treatment costs for FY 2008, NIOSH made the 
following changes:

* used actual average outpatient costs reported for April-June 2007 
($8,400*), and: 

* in general, used actual data to project the number of responders 
expected to receive outpatient treatment (16,500). 

For FY 2008, NIOSH estimated outpatient treatment costs to be about 
$139 million, or 64 percent of the total cost estimate. 

* This amount includes program support costs associated with direct 
patient care. 

Considerations:

* NIOSH used only the most recent quarter of actual data on which to 
base its estimate of outpatient treatment costs for FY 2008; NIOSH 
officials said these data were the most accurate. 

* NIOSH did not have actual data with which to estimate the number of 
responders expected to receive treatment in FY 2008 who reside outside 
the NYC area. Based on assumptions, NIOSH estimated this number to be 
930. 

Inpatient Treatment Cost Estimation for FY 2007 and FY 2008: 

For both FY 2007 and FY 2008, NIOSH’s estimates for inpatient treatment 
costs were based on assumptions about the potential for high-cost 
medical procedures such as lung transplants. 

For FY 2007, NIOSH estimated inpatient treatment costs to be about $7.5 
million. NIOSH estimated that from October 2006 through mid-December 
2007, about $250,000 was obligated for inpatient treatment; no lung 
transplants or other high-cost procedures were performed.

For FY 2008, NIOSH estimated inpatient treatment costs to be $
10 million, or 4.6 percent of the total cost estimate. 

Considerations:

* According to NIOSH, one responder is currently on a waiting list for 
a lung transplant.

Program Support Cost Estimation for FY 2007 and FY 2008: 

For FY 2007, NIOSH calculated program support costs as a percentage of 
total direct medical costs* plus federal administrative costs. It 
identified program support costs as a separate item. 

For FY 2007, NIOSH estimated program support costs to be about $73
.7 million. 

For FY 2008, NIOSH changed the way it identified program support costs. 
It identified as a separate item the cost for certain functions, such 
as a new Business Process Center (to consolidate claims processing, 
negotiate pharmaceutical purchasing, coordinate services for responders 
residing outside NYC, and report data such as program costs, patient 
health status, and service utilization). However, NIOSH did not 
identify as a separate item the program support costs associated with 
direct medical costs; these costs were folded into the items on direct 
medical costs, such as outpatient treatment. 

For FY 2008, NIOSH estimated program support costs to be $32 million, 
or 14.7 percent of the total cost estimate; the $32 million does not 
include the program support costs associated with direct medical costs. 

* Direct medical costs are those for screening, monitoring, and 
treatment. 

Concluding Observations: 

Changes introduced by NIOSH have improved the WTC health program cost 
estimation process for FY 2008. 

NIOSH has reduced uncertainties in the cost estimation process by using 
actual data in some instances rather than proxy data; the largest 
portion of the cost estimate—outpatient treatment—uses actual treatment 
cost data. 

NIOSH provided clear explanations of the assumptions it used to make 
estimates.

Over time, as more actual data become available, it is probable that 
NIOSH will be able to continue to reduce uncertainties in its cost 6 
estimation process.

[End of section] 

Footnotes: 

[1] In this report, "screening" refers to initial physical and mental 
health examinations of affected individuals. "Monitoring" refers to 
tracking the health of individuals over time, either through periodic 
surveys or through follow-up physical and mental health examinations. 

[2] These programs are referred to in this report as the WTC health 
programs or as grantees. 

[3] One of the WTC health programs, the WTC Health Registry, also 
includes people living or attending school in the area of the WTC or 
working or present in the vicinity on September 11, 2001. 

[4] As of November 2007 some of these funds had not yet been awarded by 
NIOSH to the WTC health programs. 

[5] Program support includes a broad range of administrative, 
infrastructure support, and information management activities. 

[6] HHS's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry awarded 
$29.5 million of the total federal funds. 

[7] GAO, September 11: HHS Needs to Ensure the Availability of Health 
Screening and Monitoring for All Responders, GAO-07-892 (Washington, 
D.C.: July 23, 2007). 

[8] The NY/NJ WTC Consortium consists of five clinical centers operated 
by (1) Mount Sinai School of Medicine's Mount Sinai-Irving J. Selikoff 
Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine; (2) Long Island 
Occupational and Environmental Health Center at SUNY, Stony Brook; (3) 
New York University School of Medicine/Bellevue Hospital Center; (4) 
Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, at CUNY, Queens College; and 
(5) University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Robert Wood 
Johnson Medical School, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences 
Institute. 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.  

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each 
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly 
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] 
and select "Subscribe to Updates."  

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to:  

U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room LM: 
Washington, D.C. 20548:  

To order by Phone: 
Voice: (202) 512-6000: 
TDD: (202) 512-2537: 
Fax: (202) 512-6061:  

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:  

Contact:  

Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: 
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:  

Congressional Relations:  

Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4400: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7125: 
Washington, D.C. 20548:  

Public Affairs: 

Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4800: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7149: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: