Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsors and Collaborators: |
VA Connecticut Healthcare System The Donaghue Foundation Yale University |
---|---|
Information provided by: | VA Connecticut Healthcare System |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00829478 |
The primary aim of this proposal is to determine the effectiveness of a decision support tool on improving the process of shared decision-making for treatment on nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) compared to receipt of usual care.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Atrial Fibrillation |
Behavioral: Decision Aid for Atrial Fibrillation Other: Usual Care |
Phase I |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Randomized, Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Improving Quality of Care for Atrial Fibrillation by Promoting Patient-Centered Decision Making |
Estimated Enrollment: | 100 |
Study Start Date: | October 2008 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2010 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
1: Placebo Comparator
Usual Care
|
Other: Usual Care
Usual Care
|
2: Experimental
Intervention
|
Behavioral: Decision Aid for Atrial Fibrillation
Single contact educational session
|
Decision-making regarding appropriate therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a complex process.
Different options carry with them different profiles of risks and benefits, and choosing the "right" therapy depends upon the patient's understanding of these risks and benefits and a consideration of the risks and benefits according to the patient's values and preferences. Studies have shown that patients' preferred therapy frequently disagrees with what is recommended by disease management guidelines.
The purpose of this study is to examine an intervention to improve the quality of decision-making for NVAF compared to usual care. The intervention has several components, including: a) educating the patient about why values and preferences are important to the decision-making process, b) providing an individualized assessment of the risks and benefits of each of the treatment options, c) exploring patients' values and preferences as they relate to the risks and benefits of each of the treatment options, d) preparing the patient to discuss his/her preferences with the physician.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 45 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Lynne P Iannone, MS | 203 932-5711 ext 2403 | lynne.iannone@yale.edu |
United States, Connecticut | |
VA Connecticut Healthcare System - West Haven Campus | Recruiting |
West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516 | |
Principal Investigator: Terri R. Fried, M.D. | |
Principal Investigator: Liana Fraenkel, M.D. |
Responsible Party: | VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Yale University ( Terri Fried ) |
Study ID Numbers: | Fried0011 |
Study First Received: | January 24, 2009 |
Last Updated: | January 26, 2009 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00829478 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board; United States: Federal Government |
Atrial fibrillation Cerebrovascular accident Anticoagulation Decision-making |
Heart Diseases Cerebral Infarction Stroke Atrial Fibrillation Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
Pathologic Processes Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Atrial Fibrillation Arrhythmias, Cardiac |