Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
The Use of an Acellular Dermal Matrix in a Two-Staged Breast Reconstruction
This study is enrolling participants by invitation only.
First Received: February 5, 2008   Last Updated: February 14, 2008   History of Changes
Sponsored by: Vanderbilt University
Information provided by: Vanderbilt University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00616824
  Purpose

This study intends to compare postoperative outcomes of a tissue expander placement following a mastectomy with two different operative techniques. This study will be randomized and double blinded comparing the traditional placement of the tissue expander under an inferolateral serratus muscle flap to a new technique which uses an acellular dermal matrix as an inferolateral sling, instead of the muscle flap. The study we are proposing will evaluate the question of whether there is a difference between the traditional method of serratus flap and the new technique of using an acellular matrix with tissue expander placement. This will be a double blinded randomized study of thirty women in each group comparing outcomes which will include postoperative pain, complications (wound infection, hematoma, capsular contracture, etc), and patient satisfaction with the procedure.


Condition Intervention Phase
Mastectomy
Postoperative Pain
Complications
Procedure: Dermamatrix to cover lateral aspect of tissue expander
Procedure: Serratus anterior to cover lateral aspect of tissue expander
Phase IV

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: The Use of an Acellular Dermal Matrix in a Two-Staged Breast Reconstruction The Use of an Acellular Dermal Matrix in a Two-Staged Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Vanderbilt University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • postoperative pain [ Time Frame: perioperative up to 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • aesthetic outcome [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • complications (infection, hematoma, capsular contracture) [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Patient satisfaction [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 60
Study Start Date: September 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: July 2008
Estimated Primary Completion Date: July 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Traditional Method: Active Comparator
Arm which uses the Serratus Anterior muscle mobilization for lateral coverage of the tissue expander
Procedure: Serratus anterior to cover lateral aspect of tissue expander
Traditional use of serratus anterior for coverage of lateral aspect of tissue expander
Dermamatrix Arm: Experimental
Arm which uses Dermamatrix as the lateral expander coverage
Procedure: Dermamatrix to cover lateral aspect of tissue expander
Dermamatrix used to cover lateral aspect of breast tissue expander after mastectomy

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting to Dr. Wendel's clinic who are older than 17 years of age undergoing a mastectomy and wish to have breast reconstruction with a tissue expander or those who have previously undergone a mastectomy and are now seeking reconstruction will be solicited for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative radiation therapy
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Fever
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Inability to comprehend or cooperate with postoperative instructions
  • Local or systemic infection
  • Have any allergies to the excipient ingredients found in the matrix
  • Pregnancy
  • Low vascularity of the surrounding tissue
  • Mechanical trauma
  • Poor nutrition
  • Poor general medical condition
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00616824

Locations
United States, Tennessee
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-2345
Sponsors and Collaborators
Vanderbilt University
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Jason J. Wendel, M.D. Vanderbilt University
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Vanderbilt University Department of Plastic Surgery ( J. Jason Wendel, M.D. )
Study ID Numbers: 070415, 070415
Study First Received: February 5, 2008
Last Updated: February 14, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00616824     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Vanderbilt University:
Acellular dermal matrix
breast reconstruction
tissue expander
postoperative pain
complication
pain
patient satisfaction

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Signs and Symptoms
Postoperative Complications
Pain
Pain, Postoperative

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Signs and Symptoms
Pathologic Processes
Postoperative Complications
Pain
Pain, Postoperative

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 10, 2009