Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Retention and Retrieval for Three Different Training Methods
This study is enrolling participants by invitation only.
First Received: July 2, 2009   Last Updated: July 6, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsors and Collaborators: Doczero
Ambulance Oost
Information provided by: Doczero
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00933660
  Purpose

The hypotheses that will be studied are:

H0: Providers trained by a web based application for skill competency in basic life support (BLS) and automated external defibrillation (AED) are as competent as those who were trained by certified instructors using the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) curriculum

H00-1: Providers who trained themselves with the used of web based training are more competent when they had a personal manikin for home exercise compared to providers who trained themselves with only a web based training

H0-2: Providers who did not receive any training will score lower than those who did.

Research questions for this study are:

  1. What are the results in skill competency for non trained people?
  2. What are the results in skill competency for trained people immediately after training?
  3. What is the retention of skills for trained and non trained people after six months?

Condition Intervention
Improvement of BLS/AED Training Methods
Other: ERC-training by instructor
Other: Web-based training only
Other: Web-based training with a personal training manikin

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Randomized, Single Blind (Investigator), Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Do we Need an Instructor, or a Manikin to Learn BLS/AED, or is Web Based Training as Good as Instructor Based Training?

Further study details as provided by Doczero:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Kruskal-Wallis [ Time Frame: 10-2007 - 03-2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 280
Study Start Date: October 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: September 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: March 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Control-1: Active Comparator
ERC-training by instructor
Other: ERC-training by instructor
Standard way of training with an instructor
Control-2: No Intervention
No intervention
Experimental-1: Experimental
Web-based training only
Other: Web-based training only
Experimental way of training with a web based training application
Experimental-2: Experimental
Web-based training with a personal training manikin
Other: Web-based training with a personal training manikin
Experimental way of training with a web based training application and a simple personal training manikin

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   15 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • willing to follow a BLS/AED course

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CPR training within the last five years
  • professional health care provider
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00933660

Sponsors and Collaborators
Doczero
Ambulance Oost
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Wiebe de Vries, MSc Doczero
Study Chair: Koenraad Monsieurs, Professor University Hospital, Ghent
Study Director: Joost Bierens, Professor VU Medical Centre
Study Chair: Rudolph Koster, PhD Academical Medical Centre Amsterdam
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Doczero ( Wiebe de Vries )
Study ID Numbers: 081203_Ed-web
Study First Received: July 2, 2009
Last Updated: July 6, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00933660     History of Changes
Health Authority: Netherlands: Independent Ethics Committee

Keywords provided by Doczero:
Education
Retention
Retrieval

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Urinary Retention

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 10, 2009