Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Dallas VA Medical Center, January 2009
First Received: January 26, 2009   No Changes Posted
Sponsored by: Dallas VA Medical Center
Information provided by: Dallas VA Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00830232
  Purpose

The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).


Condition Intervention
Stroke
Carotid Stenosis
Device: closed-cell stent
Device: Open-cell stent

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Prevention, Randomized, Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization

Further study details as provided by Dallas VA Medical Center:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Transcranial doppler counts of micro-embolic signals in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. [ Time Frame: First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction or death [ Time Frame: within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Subclinical cerebral embolization [ Time Frame: within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 40
Study Start Date: December 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Closed-cell stent: Active Comparator Device: closed-cell stent
Closed-cell stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
Open-cell stent: Active Comparator Device: Open-cell stent
Open-cell Stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.

Detailed Description:

Stroke is responsible for more than 10% of all deaths and much severe disability in developed countries. In the United States, approximately 600,000 new strokes are reported annually, of which 150,000 are fatal, and more than 4,000,000 surviving stroke victims are affected by significant disability. Seventy-five percent of strokes occur in the distribution of the carotid arteries and are considered of a thromboembolic etiology, most of which originate in carotid lesions. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with cerebral embolic protection is currently the preferred treatment of carotid stenosis in high risk surgical patients, i.e., those with significant comorbidities or a hostile neck from previous surgical procedures or radiation. Although several predictors of adverse outcomes after CAS have been identified, the effects of device characteristics, including stent design, on neurologic adverse events have not been established.

The proposed study will be a randomized prospective controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that the implantation of closed-cell stents for carotid lesions in high-risk patients will be associated with a reduced perioperative cerebral microembolization as detected by transcranial Doppler, and reduced 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates when compared with the implantation of open-cell stents.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
  • Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis

    • 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
  • Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
  • Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
  • Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
  • Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
  • Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
  • Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
  • Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00830232

Locations
United States, Texas
Dallas VA Medical Center Recruiting
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216
Contact: Carlos H Timaran, MD     214-857-1888     timaran1@msn.com    
Principal Investigator: Carlos H. Timaran, MD            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Dallas VA Medical Center
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Carlos H Timaran, MD Dallas VA Medical Center
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Dallas VA Medical Center ( James LePage, PhD/ ACOS for Research )
Study ID Numbers: IRB#08-035
Study First Received: January 26, 2009
Last Updated: January 26, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00830232     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by Dallas VA Medical Center:
Stroke
Carotid stenosis
stents

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Carotid Stenosis
Cerebral Infarction
Stroke
Vascular Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Constriction, Pathologic
Brain Diseases
Carotid Artery Diseases
Cerebrovascular Disorders

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Carotid Stenosis
Nervous System Diseases
Stroke
Vascular Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Brain Diseases
Carotid Artery Diseases
Cerebrovascular Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 03, 2009