Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
BOAT: Beta Blocker Uptitration With OptiVol After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
This study has been terminated.
( Insufficient enrollment )
First Received: February 8, 2007   Last Updated: May 5, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsors and Collaborators: St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
Medtronic
Information provided by: St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00433043
  Purpose

Many heart failure patients are unable to reach target beta blocker doses. This study will address whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) will enable uptitration of beta-blockers to target doses and whether it will favorably affect remodeling by reducing left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), with measurable clinical benefit, beyond CRT alone (without changes in beta-blocker dose).


Condition Intervention Phase
Congestive Heart Failure
Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate)
Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)
Phase IV

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Dose Comparison, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: Beta-Blocker Uptitration in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Optivol Fluid Status Monitoring System

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • LVESVI change in patients with CRT/ increased dose of beta-blockers vs CRT and no change in beta-blocker dose. [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Correlation of Optivol fluid measurement increases (decreased impedance) with symptomatic worsening of heart failure during beta blocker uptitration [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Optivol measurements (decreased impedance, increase volume index) correlated with the need for adjusting diuretic therapy when uptitrating beta blocker dose [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Functional improvements [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Exercise - 6 minute walk [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • QOL - NYHA, Minnesota LWHFQ, Symptom Assessment Questionnaire [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Ejection fraction [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • LVEDVI [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Remodeling [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • HF Hospitalizations/ Mortality [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Evaluation of LVESVI in patients who actually achieve target dose [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Comparison of LVESVI changes based on initial beta-blocker dose [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Plasma Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) change [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • 12 month comparison after Group 2 has been uptitrated. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 60
Study Start Date: January 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2013
Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Active Comparator
CRT and b-blocker uptitration to target dose
Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate)
Both groups get CRT. Group 1 is uptitrated to target dose beta blocker after CRT. Group 2 maintains their b-blocker dose from study entry.
Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)
Both arms
2: Active Comparator
CRT and continuation of entry b-blocker dose to 6 month evaluation
Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate)
Both groups get CRT. Group 1 is uptitrated to target dose beta blocker after CRT. Group 2 maintains their b-blocker dose from study entry.
Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)
Both arms

Detailed Description:

Beta blockers have been proven to have benefit in heart failure (HF) patients with regard to morbidity and mortality. However, initiation and uptitration remains a challenge in many patients. Worsening of heart failure, symptomatic hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia all limit up-titration to the target doses that have been shown to have mortality benefits (carvedilol [Coreg] 25 mg bid, metoprolol succinate [Toprol-XL] 200 mg qd) in the large clinical trials (COPERNICUS, MERIT-HF).

It is debated whether the benefit of beta-blockade is solely due to heart rate reduction or more broadly from the cardiac, central and peripheral effects of blocking sympathetic activity. Clearly, there is a remodeling effect on the dilated ventricle. Furthermore, patients with heart rates of 64 bpm or less are rarely begun on beta-blocker therapy. It is not known whether these patients should be given a pacemaker in order to then safely initiate beta-blocker therapy.

It is also clear that isolated right ventricular pacing can have deleterious effects on ventricular dysynchrony and symptomatic heart failure despite medical therapy. Biventricular pacing (BIVPM), also known as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is the pacing mode of choice for patients with wide QRS complexes and symptomatic HF.

It is hypothesized that CRT therapy allows for increased Beta -blocker dose (or initiation of beta-blocker in patients previously intolerant) with improved NYHA, ejection fraction, and remodeling effects. The synergy between two established heart failure therapies requires further evaluation in a prospective randomized trial.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • NYHA III-IV
  • QRS > 120 msec
  • On medical therapy, but beta blocker dose not @ target (carvedilol 25 bid, metoprolol succinate 200 qd)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • QRS < 120 msec
  • On target beta blocker dose
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00433043

Locations
United States, New York
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital
New York, New York, United States, 10019
United States, Pennsylvania
Jefferson Medical College
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
Sponsors and Collaborators
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
Medtronic
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Marrick L Kukin, MD St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospitals
  More Information

Publications:
Responsible Party: St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital ( Marrick Kukin, MD )
Study ID Numbers: 06-107
Study First Received: February 8, 2007
Last Updated: May 5, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00433043     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center:
Heart Failure
Beta blockers
Resynchronization
Congestive Heart Failure, NYHA III-IV
Candidate for BIVPM
Not on Target Dose (Coreg 25 Bid or Toprol XL 200 qd)

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Heart Failure
Neurotransmitter Agents
Heart Diseases
Adrenergic Agents
Cardiovascular Agents
Metoprolol
Antihypertensive Agents
Metoprolol succinate
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Adrenergic Antagonists
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Carvedilol

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Sympatholytics
Heart Failure
Neurotransmitter Agents
Heart Diseases
Adrenergic Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Cardiovascular Agents
Antihypertensive Agents
Metoprolol
Pharmacologic Actions
Autonomic Agents
Therapeutic Uses
Metoprolol succinate
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Cardiovascular Diseases
Adrenergic Antagonists
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 02, 2009