Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® chronic neck pain.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Daffner RH, Weissman BN, Bennett DL, Blebea JS, Jacobson JA, Morrison WB, Resnik CS, Roberts CC, Rubin DA, Schweitzer ME, Seeger LL, Taljanovic M, Wise JN, Payne WK, Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® chronic neck pain. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2008. 7 p. [27 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Daffner RH, Dalinka MK, Alazraki NP, DeSmet AA, El-Khoury GY, Kneeland JB, Manaster BJ, Pavlov H, Rubin DA, Steinbach LS, Weissman BN, Haralson RH III, Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. Chronic neck pain. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2005. 7 p. [21 references]

The appropriateness criteria are reviewed annually and updated by the panels as needed, depending on introduction of new and highly significant scientific evidence.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

ACR Appropriateness Criteria®

Clinical Condition: Chronic Neck Pain

Variant 1: Patient of any age, without or with a history of previous trauma, first study.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
X-ray cervical spine 9 AP, lateral, open mouth, both obliques. Low
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   None
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 2   High
MRI cervical spine without contrast 2   None
NUC Tc-99 bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography, cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 2: Patients of any age, history of previous malignancy, first study.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
X-ray cervical spine 9 AP, lateral, open mouth, both obliques. Low
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
MRI cervical spine without contrast 2   None
NUC, Tc-99 bone scan neck 2   Med
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 3: Patients of any age, history of previous neck surgery, first study.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
X-ray cervical spine 9 AP, lateral, open mouth, both obliques. Low
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
MRI cervical spine without contrast 2   None
NUC, Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 4: Radiographs normal. No neurologic findings.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 2   High
MRI cervical spine without contrast 2   None
NUC Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 5: Radiographs normal. Neurologic signs or symptoms present.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
MRI cervical spine without contrast 9   None
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 5 If MRI contraindicated High
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
NUC Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 6: Radiographs show spondylosis. No neurologic findings.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 2   High
MRI cervical spine without contrast 2   None
NUC Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
X-ray discography cervical spine 1   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 7: Radiographs show spondylosis. Neurologic signs or symptoms present.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
MRI cervical spine without contrast 9   None
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 5 If MRI contraindicated High
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
NUC Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
X-ray discography cervical spine 1   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 8: Radiographs show old trauma. No neurologic findings.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 2   High
MRI cervical spine without contrast 2   None
NUC Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
X-ray discography cervical spine 1   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 9: Radiographs show old trauma. Neurologic signs or symptoms present.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
MRI cervical spine without contrast 9   None
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 5 If MRI contraindicated High
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
NUC Tc-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
INV facet injection/arthrography cervical spine selective nerve root block 2   Low
X-ray discography cervical spine 1   Low
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Variant 10: Radiographs show bone or disc margin destruction.

Radiologic Procedure Rating Comments RRL*
MRI cervical spine without contrast 9   None
X-ray myelography cervical spine 2   Med
CT cervical spine without contrast 2   Med
Myelography and post myelography CT cervical spine 2   High
NUC TC-99m bone scan neck 2   Med
Rating Scale: 1=Least appropriate, 9=Most appropriate *Relative Radiation Level

Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Recommendations

These guidelines apply to imaging of patients with chronic neck pain regardless of the etiology (trauma, arthritis, neoplasm):

  • Patients of any age with chronic neck pain without or with a history of remote trauma should initially undergo a 5-view (anteroposterior [AP], lateral, open mouth, both obliques) radiographic examination.
  • Patients with a history of previous malignancy should initially undergo a 3-view radiographic examination. Radionuclide bone scanning should not be the initial procedure of choice. (Barton et al., 1993).
  • Patients with a history of neck surgery in the remote past should initially undergo a 3-view radiographic examination.
  • Patients with normal radiographs and no neurologic signs or symptoms need no further imaging.
  • Patients with normal radiographs and neurologic signs or symptoms should undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (Anderberg et al., 2004; Arana et al., 2004; Boutin, Steinbach, & Finnesey, 2000; Chen et al., 2003; Kaale et al., 2005). If there is a contraindication to the MRI examination such as a cardiac pacemaker or severe claustrophobia, computed tomography (CT) myelography, preferably using spiral technology and multiplanar reconstruction is recommended.
  • Patients with radiographic evidence of cervical spondylosis or of previous trauma without neurologic signs or symptoms need no further imaging.
  • Patients with radiographic evidence of cervical spondylosis or of previous trauma and neurologic signs or symptoms should undergo MRI. (Anderberg et al., 2004; Arana et al., 2004; Boutin, Steinbach, & Finnesey, 2000; Chen et al., 2003; Kaale et al., 2005). If there is a contraindication to MRI, CT myelography is recommended.
  • Patients with radiographic evidence of bone or disc margin destruction should undergo MRI. If an epidural abscess is suspected, the examination should be performed with intravenous contrast. CT is indicated only if MRI cannot be performed.
  • Facet injection and arthrography are useful for patients with multilevel disease diagnosed by any imaging modality to identify the specific level(s) producing symptoms.
  • Discography is not recommended. (Aprill & Bogduk, 1992; Bogduk & Aprill, 1993).
  • Patients with chronic neck pain from "whiplash" should undergo imaging following the guidelines above.

Summary

There are no existing guidelines for the evaluation of the patient with chronic neck pain.

All investigators generally agree that plain radiographs should be the initial study performed for evaluating these patients. However, there is no consensus on exactly which views should be obtained for the initial study. The guideline developers recommend a basic 3-view study, with oblique radiographs added at the discretion of the attending physician.

MRI should be performed on all patients who have chronic neck pain with neurologic signs or symptoms, or both. If there is a contraindication to MRI, CT myelography is recommended.

The use of additional imaging procedures should be determined in a case-by-case manner, and the evaluation of patients with chronic neck pain should follow this "tailor-made" approach. Discography is not recommended.

Abbreviations

  • AP, anteroposterior
  • CT, computed tomography
  • INV, invasive
  • Med, medium
  • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
  • NUC, nuclear medicine
  • Tc, technetium

Relative Radiation Level Effective Dose Estimated Range
None 0
Minimal <0.1 mSv
Low 0.1-1 mSv
Medium 1-10 mSv
High 10-100 mSv

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

REFERENCES SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are based on analysis of the current literature and expert panel consensus.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Daffner RH, Weissman BN, Bennett DL, Blebea JS, Jacobson JA, Morrison WB, Resnik CS, Roberts CC, Rubin DA, Schweitzer ME, Seeger LL, Taljanovic M, Wise JN, Payne WK, Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® chronic neck pain. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2008. 7 p. [27 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1998 (revised 2008)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Radiology - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

The American College of Radiology (ACR) provided the funding and the resources for these ACR Appropriateness Criteria®.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Committee on Appropriateness Criteria, Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Panel Members: Richard H. Daffner, MD; Barbara N. Weissman, MD; D. Lee Bennett, MD; Judy S. Blebea, MD; Jon A. Jacobson, MD; William B. Morrison, MD; Charles S. Resnik, MD; Catherine C. Roberts, MD; David A. Rubin, MD; Mark E. Schweitzer, MD; Leanne L. Seeger, MD; Mihra Taljanovic, MD; James N. Wise, MD; William K. Payne, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Daffner RH, Dalinka MK, Alazraki NP, DeSmet AA, El-Khoury GY, Kneeland JB, Manaster BJ, Pavlov H, Rubin DA, Steinbach LS, Weissman BN, Haralson RH III, Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. Chronic neck pain. [online publication]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2005. 7 p. [21 references]

The appropriateness criteria are reviewed annually and updated by the panels as needed, depending on introduction of new and highly significant scientific evidence.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Web site.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Anytime, Anywhere™ (PDA application). Available from the ACR Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Drive, Reston, VA 20191. Telephone: (703) 648-8900.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on May 6, 2001. The information was verified by the guideline developer as of June 29, 2001. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on January 27, 2006. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 30, 2009.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo