Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Atrial fibrillation.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Atrial fibrillation. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2008 Oct. 62 p. [91 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Atrial fibrillation. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2007 Feb. 64 p.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI): For a description of what has changed since the previous version of this guidance, refer to Summary of Changes Report– October 2008.

The recommendations for atrial fibrillation are presented in the form of an algorithm with 24 components, accompanied by detailed annotations. An algorithm is provided for Atrial Fibrillation clinical highlights and selected annotations (numbered to correspond with the algorithms) follow.

Class of evidence (A-D, M, R, X) and conclusion grade (I-III, Not Assignable) definitions are repeated at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Clinical Highlights

There are five key steps in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter ("SALT-E"): stabilize, assess, label, treat, and educate.

After confirming the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with a 12-lead electrocardiogram (Annotation #2):

Stabilize

  • Assess for hemodynamic instability (hypotension, myocardial ischemia, uncompensated congestive heart failure, altered medical status, or end-organ dysfunction). (Annotation #6)
  • Treat hemodynamic instability with emergent direct current cardioversion and obtain an emergent cardiology or internal medicine consult. (Annotation #6)
  • Establish adequate rate control. (Annotation #6)

Assess

  • Assess for potentially reversible causes and for comorbidities of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (Annotation #7)
  • Hypertension is one of the most common causes of atrial fibrillation. In addition, hypertension is one of the most common risk factors for thromboembolic complications associated with atrial fibrillation. Treatment for hypertension should be initiated early. (Annotation #7)

Label

  • Label (classify) patients into one of three categories:
    • First Detected Episode, Duration Known >48 hours or Duration Unknown
    • Recurrent atrial fibrillation
      • Paroxysmal
      • Persistent
      • Permanent
    • Recurrent atrial flutter

    Treatment options are determined by these three categories. (Annotations #9, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20)

Treat

First Detected Episode, Duration Known >48 hours or Duration Unknown

  • Patients with stable atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with duration greater than 48 hours or duration unknown require appropriate anticoagulation (international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 2.0) for three weeks prior to electrical cardioversion or use of antiarrhythmics/chemical cardioversion. (Annotation #9)

Recurrent atrial fibrillation

  • Patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation require assessment for chronic anticoagulation (risk of thromboembolism compared with risk of bleeding) (Annotation #14) and adequate rate control (Annotation #15)
  • Patients with persistent symptoms despite adequate rate control may require intermittent cardioversion, antiarrhythmic agents, and/or electrophysiology consultation. (Annotation #20)

Recurrent atrial flutter

  • Patients with recurrent atrial flutter should be referred for an electrophysiology consultation. (Annotation #20)

Educate

Patient education is a critical component in the management of all patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Patients who have experienced one or more episodes of atrial fibrillation should be taught to periodically monitor their pulse and have a plan for treatment if they detect an irregular pulse. (Annotation #21)

Atrial Fibrillation Algorithm Annotations

  1. Patient Presentation: Symptoms or Physical Findings Suggestive of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter or Incidental Electrocardiogram Finding

    Key Points:

    • Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter can be symptomatic or asymptomatic – even in the same patient.

    Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter can be symptomatic or asymptomatic – even in the same patient. Symptoms may include:

    • Palpitations
    • Chest pain
    • Dyspnea
    • Fatigue
    • Lightheadedness
    • Confusion
    • Syncope - syncope is a rare but serious complication that usually indicates a sinus node dysfunction, an accessory atrioventricular pathway, valvular aortic stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or cerebrovascular disease.

    Physical findings may include:

    • Irregular pulse
    • Heart failure
    • Hypoxia
    • Thromboembolism

    [R]

  1. Electrocardiogram Confirms Atrial Fibrillation and/or Atrial Flutter?

    An electrocardiogram is essential to establish the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

    Electrocardiogram Characteristics of Atrial Fibrillation

    Atrial fibrillation is characterized by disorganized rapid atrial activity (greater than 350 beats per minute) and may be either coarse or fine. Ventricular complexes are irregular.

    Electrocardiogram Characteristics of Atrial Flutter

    Atrial flutter is an organized reentrant rhythm, which is characterized by quite regular atrial activity (flutter or F waves) which form a saw tooth pattern that is most prominent in electrocardiogram leads II, III, and AVF. Atrial rates are typically between 240-320 beats per minute in the untreated state, but can slow significantly with antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Ventricular rates can be either regular or irregular. Regular rates are commonly about 150 beats per minute with a 2:1 atrioventricular block. Atypical atrial flutter is also quite regular, but may differ in flutter wave morphology and rates. It is usually seen in patients who have had prior surgical atriotomies, particularly for correction of congenital heart disease.

    Atrial flutter can degenerate into atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation can initiate atrial flutter, or the electrocardiogram patterns can alternate between atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation.

    The distinction between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter is particularly important in that typical atrial flutter can be easily ablated. See Annotation #20 "Consultation with a Physician with Cardiology Expertise for Treatment Options."

    Atrioventricular Node Conduction (Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter)

    Ventricular response to atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter depends on the ability of the atrioventricular node to conduct electrical impulses to the ventricle. Atrioventricular nodal conduction is affected by intrinsic properties of the atrioventricular node, parasympathetic (vagal) inputs, sympathetic (adrenergic) inputs, drugs that depress atrioventricular nodal conduction such as beta-blockers, calcium blockers and digoxin and drugs that may enhance conduction.

    Associated Cardiac Conditions That May Influence Therapy

    The electrocardiogram should also be examined for other underlying cardiac conditions, which may influence choice of therapy:

    • Pre-excitation/Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
    • Bundle branch block
    • Left ventricular hypertrophy
    • Acute myocardial infarction
    • Prior acute myocardial infarction
    • QT prolongation
    • P-wave duration and morphology or fibrillatory waves
    • Other atrial arrhythmias

    [R]

  1. Atrial Fibrillation with Pre-Excitation/Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

    Atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome is characterized on the electrocardiogram by an irregular wide complex tachycardia (pre-excited QRS complexes conducted over the accessory atrioventricular pathway). Often there may be interspersed narrow QRS complexes from beats conducted over the atrioventricular node. The ventricular response can be dangerously rapid (R-R intervals greater than 250 milliseconds) with the potential for degeneration to ventricular fibrillation. Differential diagnosis includes ventricular tachycardia, which is usually regular when monomorphic, or polymorphic when irregular. Atrial fibrillation with bundle branch block aberrancy is also in the differential. Comparison with old electrocardiograms should show a short PR interval with a delta wave for Wolff-Parkinson-White.

    Recognition of atrial fibrillation with pre-excitation is critical. The drugs commonly used to control ventricular response such as diltiazem, verapamil and digoxin are ineffective and can facilitate conduction through the accessory pathway, increasing the risk for ventricular fibrillation. Direct current cardioversion is commonly the treatment of choice due to hemodynamic compromise related to rapid rates and risk of ventricular fibrillation. In less severely affected patients, rate can be controlled with intravenous amiodarone, intravenous ibutilide or intravenous procainamide by depressing accessory pathway conduction. Patients should be referred to an electrophysiologist for consideration of accessory pathway ablation. Ablation removes the potential for life-threatening rapid ventricular response and may decrease the likelihood of recurrent atrial fibrillation.

    [R]

  1. Stabilize Patient

    Key Points:

    • Hemodynamically unstable patients represent a unique group that often has underlying structural or electrical cardiopulmonary disease.
    • Hemodynamically unstable patients require hospitalization and emergent consultation from a physician with cardiology expertise, and if indicated, emergent direct current cardioversion.

    Hemodynamic Stabilization

    Hemodynamically unstable patients may exhibit the following symptoms:

    • Hypotension
    • Myocardial ischemia
    • Uncompensated heart failure
    • Altered mental status
    • End-organ dysfunction
    • Clinical deterioration

    These patients represent a unique group that often has underlying structural or electrical cardiopulmonary disease including Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, severe stenosis of the mitral or aortic valves, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, cardiac tamponade/pericarditis, severe coronary artery disease [C] or pulmonary embolism.

    Additional evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter presenting with hemodynamic instability may include:

    • Emergent echocardiography
    • Computed tomography scan of the chest
    • Coronary/pulmonary angiography

    Hemodynamically unstable patients require hospitalization and emergent consultation from a physician with cardiology expertise, and if indicated, emergent cardioversion.

    Additional urgent treatments may include:

    • Radiofrequency catheter ablation
    • Internal cardioversion
    • Balloon valvuloplasty
    • Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
    • Pericardiocentesis
    • Septal ablation (alcohol or surgical)
    • Pulmonary embolectomy
    • Coronary bypass or valve replacement/repair

    Antithrombotic is favored prior to and following emergent cardioversion if there are not specific contraindications, although little evidence exists [R]. Initiation of intravenous unfractionated heparin in addition to warfarin should be considered for the following:

    • Patients who have been in atrial fibrillation for a few days and then develop hemodynamic instability
    • Patients in whom recurrent atrial fibrillation is likely because of past experience
    • Patients with mitral valve disease or left ventricular dysfunction
    • Patients who, following cardioversion, demonstrate spontaneous echocardiogram contrast in the left atrium or left atrial appendage

    Heparin should be continued until the international normalized ratio is greater than 2.0. There is little experience reported on the use of low-molecular-weight heparins following cardioversion.

    For more information on anticoagulation, refer to the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) summary of the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) Antithrombotic Therapy Supplement guideline.

    [R]

    Acute Rate Control

    Adequate rate control may help relieve symptoms including palpitations, chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, or lightheadedness. Patients with acute myocardial infarction or acute coronary symptoms require lower ventricular rates to decrease myocardial oxygen demand and limit the infarction size [R].

    Amiodarone has become a popular antiarrhythmic choice but its use should be reserved for patients with coronary artery disease with heart failure or with substantial left ventricular hypertrophy. Refer to Table 11, "Medications Used for Rate Control," in the original guideline document.

    Acute Rate Control Agents

    Beta-blockers are generally favored for pharmacologic rate control. Beta-blockers control heart rate at rest and with exercise, and also provide cardioprotective benefits. They may be used with caution with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Beta-blockers are preferred for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

    Calcium channel blockers are alternative rate control agents when beta-blockers are contraindicated. Calcium channel blockers control heart rate at rest and with exercise, but may exacerbate heart failure. Calcium channel blockers should not be administered in the presence of wide QRS/Wolff-Parkinson-White/pre-excitation.

    Concomitant use of a beta-blocker with a calcium channel blocker can, in rare circumstances, cause profound negative dromotropic, chronotropic and inotropic effects. These effects may be further exacerbated by type I or type III antiarrhythmic agents or underlying structural heart disease.

    Digoxin is a third-line agent for rate control. Digoxin does not lower blood pressure and has a positive inotropic effect, but works more slowly than beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers, has no effect on the sympathetically mediated enhancement of atrioventricular node conduction during exercise [A], and is no better than placebo for conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Digoxin should not be administered with wide QRS/Wolff-Parkinson-White/pre-excitation, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and renal impairment.

    Amiodarone is a first-line agent for patients with decompensated heart failure. Amiodarone has side effects including thyroid disease, hepatic dysfunction, lung disease, neurologic dysfunction and bradycardia and should be reserved for patients with coronary artery disease with heart failure, moderate to severe systolic dysfunction, or hypertension with significant left ventricle hypertrophy.

    If ventricular response remains rapid despite attempts to control rate with beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or digoxin, consultation from a physician with cardiology expertise is recommended. Treatment options include immediate cardioversion if the risk of thromboembolism is acceptable.

  1. Assess Patient for Potentially Reversible Causes and Comorbidities

    Cardiovascular

    • Hypertension
    • Heart failure
    • Primary pulmonary hypertension
    • Acute myocardial infarction or unstable coronary syndrome
    • Atrioventricular node reentry/paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
    • Accessory pathway/Wolff-Parkinson-White
    • Pericarditis/myocarditis
    • Mitral valve disease/tricuspid disease
    • Amyloidosis
    • Congenital heart disease
    • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Pulmonary

    • Pulmonary embolus
    • Chronic obstruction pulmonary disease
    • Carbon monoxide poisoning
    • Obstructive sleep apnea

    Metabolic

    • Postoperative state/high catecholamine state
    • Hyperthyroidism

    Drugs

    • Alcohol
    • Caffeine
    • Medications including antiarrhythmic and anticholinergic
    • Illicit drugs including phencyclidine (PCP) cocaine and other stimulants
    • Absence of any of the risk factors listed above

    [R]

    Other

    • Perioperative period
    • Pregnancy

    Patients presenting with a first detected episode of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter should be assessed with:

    • Chest x-ray
    • Echocardiogram

    Patients presenting with a first detected episode of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter or with difficult rate control or with unexpected recurrence after cardioversion should also have:

    • Thyroid function tests
  1. First Detected Episode Duration Known >48 Hours or Duration Unknown

    Key Points:

    • Antithrombotic with warfarin (international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 2.0 for three weeks) is recommended before electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion back to sinus rhythm.
    • Transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion without traditional pre-cardioversion anticoagulation cannot be routinely recommended.
    • Amiodarone is the most effective antiarrhythmic drug for maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. However, it also is associated with the highest potential for non-cardiac toxicity, and requires regular scheduled medical follow-up.
    • Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have a role as adjunctive medical therapies to antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance of normal sinus rhythm.

    General Recommendations

    When the duration of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter is unknown, the risk of thromboembolic complications is as high as 7% following cardioversion without anticoagulation. Thus, in this setting, anticoagulation with warfarin is required (international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 2.0 for three consecutive weeks). Though not a consistent clinical practice, the American College of Chest Physicians also recommends anticoagulation with warfarin (international normalized ratio greater than or equal to 2.0 for three consecutive weeks) prior to the initiation of antiarrhythmics.

    Alternatively, the patient and/or physician may also opt for chronic anticoagulation (see Annotation #14, "Assess Patient for Chronic Anticoagulation") and chronic rate control (see Annotation #15, "Assess Patient for Rate Control Agents"). However, if this represents the first episode of persistent atrial fibrillation for the patient, there is general consensus that most patients deserve one trial of conversion back to normal sinus rhythm, given the high likelihood of initial success.

    Short-Term Antithrombotic Issues Prior to and Following Cardioversion

    Whenever possible, cardioversion should be undertaken with conventional anticoagulation prior to and following cardioversion.

    When anticoagulation is temporarily contraindicated (refer to Table 1 in the original guideline document and "Contraindications" field in this summary), cardioversion should be delayed if possible until appropriate anticoagulation can be given prior to and following cardioversion.

    When anticoagulation is contraindicated and cardioversion cannot be delayed, transesophageal echocardiography may identify high-risk patients but may not change therapeutic decisions.

    However, if transesophageal echocardiography is used to guide anticoagulant therapy, the patient must be anticoagulated with therapeutic (not prophylactic) levels of heparin and warfarin. Heparin should be continued until the international normalized ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0 for two consecutive days. Warfarin should be continued a minimum of four weeks following successful cardioversion.

    At this time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine transesophageal echocardiography to guide anticoagulant therapy prior to or following cardioversion [Conclusion Grade III: See Conclusion Grading Worksheet A - Annotation #9 (Transesophageal Echocardiography and Anticoagulation Therapy) in the original guideline document.] [A], [D], [M]

    There is little experience reported on the use of low-molecular-weight heparins prior to or following cardioversion (with or without transesophageal echocardiography). A pilot study of transesophageal echocardiography-guided enoxaparin plus warfarin versus transesophageal echocardiography-guided unfractionated heparin plus warfarin (ACUTE II) is in progress. Unfortunately, this trial does not include a conventional therapy group, which is a significant omission in light of the ACUTE trial results.

    For additional information on anticoagulation with warfarin, refer to the NGC summary of the ICSI Antithrombotic Therapy Supplement guideline.

    As atrial fibrillation persists for longer periods of time, the efficacy of pharmacologic cardioversion decreases. Though direct current cardioversion requires conscious sedation, pharmacologic cardioversion is less effective and may cause serious arrhythmias, including torsades de pointes. Antiarrhythmics like ibutilide or propafenone may be administered prior to direct current cardioversion to increase the likelihood of its success [A], [D].

    Direct Current Cardioversion

    Direct current cardioversion has been used to treat a variety of rhythm disturbances including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter since the early 1960s [D], [R]. The success of external direct current cardioversion depends on patient selection and cardioversion technique. Success rates range from 65% to 95%. Success of cardioversion is increased if the left atrium is less than 60 mm (3 cm/m2 body surface area and if the arrhythmia is of short duration.

    Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may now be performed with biphasic waveform defibrillation. It typically requires less energy and may have greater efficacy than monophasic wave forms [A].

    A recent study has shown that an anterior-posterior paddle position is superior to an anterior-lateral position in success of cardioversion. The anterior-posterior position also required lower energy levels for success [A]. If the first position is unsuccessful, paddle relocation should be considered.

    Complications of direct current cardioversion are uncommon but include embolization, pulmonary edema, and arrhythmias including ventricular fibrillation and asystole [D]. Direct current cardioversion should be avoided in patients with known or suspected digoxin toxicity. It is unnecessary to interrupt digoxin therapy for cardioversion in patients without manifestations of toxicity.

    See the original guideline document for specifics on direct current cardioversion technique and information on comparing electrical and chemical cardioversion.

    Antiarrhythmic/Chemical Cardioversion [R]

    All antiarrhythmics used to treat atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter can cause serious complications including the life-threatening arrhythmia torsades de pointes in up to 8% of patients [R]. Therefore, antiarrhythmics should be initiated in the presence of a physician or nurse with expertise in the administration of antiarrhythmics with telemetry monitoring for at least 4 hours, or longer if QT remains prolonged.

    Risk factors for proarrhythmia include:

    • Pre-existing bradycardia or atrioventricular block
    • Underlying structural heart disease
    • Active heart failure or ischemia- hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, and
    • Drug dosages (e.g., lower doses for quinidine and higher doses for sotalol)

    Pharmacologic therapy aimed at restoring sinus rhythm is often helpful in patients with atrial fibrillation. As a general rule, regardless of the agent or route used, the conversion rate of atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours duration is 60%-90%. Conversion rates drop to 15%-30% if present 48 hours or longer [R]. Successful conversion of atrial flutter is generally higher than for atrial fibrillation.

    A summary of the agents with proven efficacy for pharmacologic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of up to seven days duration or atrial fibrillation present for more than seven days is described in the tables below.

    Table. Pharmacological Cardioversion Up to Seven Days

    Recommendations for Pharmacological Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation of Up to Seven Days
    Agents with proven efficacy Dofetilide, flecainide, ibutilide, propafenone and amiodarone
    Less effective or incompletely studied patients Disopyramide, flecainide, procainamide, propafenone and quinidine
    Agents should not be administered Digoxin and sotalol

    Adapted from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Atrial Fibrillation 2006 guideline (pages e299 and e300)

    Table. Pharmacological Cardioversion for More Than Seven Days

    Recommendations for Pharmacological Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation Present for More Than Seven Days
    Agents with proven efficacy Dofetilide, amiodarone, ibutilide
    Less effective or incompletely studied patients Disopyramide, flecainide, procainamide, propafenone and quinidine
    Agents should not be administered Digoxin and sotalol

    Adapted from the American College of cardiology (ACC)/American heart Association (AHA) Atrial Fibrillation 2006 guideline (pages e299 and e300)

    Reported success rates vary in part because of the heterogeneity of patient populations– particularly with respect to the duration of atrial fibrillation in the published trials. Of the intravenous agents, only ibutilide is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication.

    Torsades de pointes is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia and requires prompt evaluation and treatment. See Table 7 in the original guideline document for treatment of torsades de pointes.

    Refer to Annotation #20, Table 13, "Antiarrhythmic Agents," in the original guideline document for more information on antiarrhythmic agents.

    Ibutilide has been studied extensively for the conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Efficacy rates between 30% and 40% have been quoted in acute reversal of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Generally patients convert within 30 minutes. Significant adverse effect of torsades de pointes was noted in 4.3% of patients, 1.7% requiring electrical termination. There were no deaths or severe morbidities [A], [R].

    Refer to Table 6 in the original guideline document for more information on use of ibutilide.

    Proarrhythmia associated with initiation of membrane antiarrhythmic agents relates to the presence of underlying structural heart disease as well as the type of drug initiated. The drugs sotalol, dofetilide, and quinidine should be initiated in all patients under telemetry guidance. These drugs should not be allowed to prolong QTc (similar to sotalol and dofetilide) to longer than 500 milliseconds. The QTc prolongation maybe associated with torsades de points. Refer to Table 7 in the original guideline document for treatment of torsades de points.

    Amiodarone, the other class III drug, is the subject of several articles regarding its efficacy in conversion of recent onset and permanent atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone is effective in converting atrial fibrillation both acutely and chronically. It has been studied by both the oral and intravenous routes. Amiodarone can be started at maintenance doses in the outpatient setting; when high-dose loading is required or the drug is initiated in patients with structural heart disease, hospitalization should be advised. The Class I-C drugs propafenone and flecainide can also be initiated in the outpatient setting with appropriate follow-up of QRS duration that should not lengthen more than 25%. For patients with structural heart disease, these agents should also be initiated in the inpatient setting [A].

    Oral flecainide (300 mg single dose) has similar conversion rates compared to oral propafenone (600 mg single dose) when used in patients with atrial fibrillation of acute onset (approximately 72%-78% conversion rate at eight hours) [A].

    Failed Cardioversion Treatment Options

    If initial attempts to restore normal sinus rhythm for atrial fibrillation fail, cardioversion can be repeated following a parenteral or oral loading dose of an appropriate antiarrhythmic agent [A], [R]. However, this approach should be avoided in patients with ejection fractions less than 30% because of the increased risk of torsades de pointes.

    Furthermore, it should be noted that this is not a strategy to maintain normal sinus rhythm but only a means to enhance conversion back to sinus rhythm. Appropriate anticoagulation practices are required prior to and following cardioversion if the duration of atrial fibrillation exceeds 48 hours. If atrial fibrillation continues despite these attempts, cardiology consultation is advised.

    The patient and/or physician may also opt for chronic anticoagulation and chronic rate control at this point - though the general consensus is that most patients with a first episode of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter have a high likelihood of successful conversion back to normal sinus rhythm.

    Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may be achieved by applying biphasic waveform for defibrillation. It has been shown to be equally effective and to use less energy than monophasic waveforms.

    Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm Following Conversion

    Several antiarrhythmic drugs have been demonstrated to improve sinus rhythm maintenance following cardioversion, including amiodarone, propafenone, disopyramide, sotalol, flecainide, dofetilide, and quinidine [M].

    It is essential to establish adequate rate control before administering antiarrhythmics. Class 1A drugs can accelerate ventricular rates via anticholinergic effects on the atrioventricular node. Class 1C drugs can also accelerate ventricular rates by organizing and slowing atrial activity allowing 1:1 conduction. Additional drugs to slow atrioventricular nodal conduction are recommended when using Class 1C drugs. Amiodarone has been shown to be the single most effective agent of the lot, although it also contributes the most to noncardiac drug-related toxicity [A]. When administered at 800 mg per day for 2 weeks prior to elective cardioversion, amiodarone chemically converts one-fifth of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, and when continued for eight weeks at 200 mg per day, doubled the number of patients in normal sinus rhythm at that time [A].

    Non-Antiarrhythmic Medical Therapies for Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm

    Both the ACE inhibitor, enalapril, and angiotensin receptor blocker, irbesartan, have been demonstrated to enhance the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after cardioversion when added to amiodarone [A]. A meta-analysis of studies using this class of compounds has added further credence to these initial observations [M].

    There has been a demonstrated correlation between stroke risk and inflammatory marker (C-reactive peptide [CRP]) elevation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation [B]. Retrospective and prospective studies of lipid lowering with statin therapies [A], [D] have demonstrated beneficial effects for the prevention of atrial fibrillation, both postcoronary artery bypass graft and de novo. Fish oil also has been demonstrated in small randomized control trials to have a significant beneficial effect [R].

    Intravenous hydrocortisone has been revealed to have an antiarrhythmic effect for post-cardiac surgery [A], while dexamethasone demonstrated no such effect [A].

    Further study of all these adjunctive medications will be required to assess their appropriate roles, post-coronary artery bypass graft, postdirect current cardioversion, postablation, and as primary prevention tools.

  1. Assess Patients for Chronic Anticoagulation

    Key Point:

    • All patients with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation should be assessed for chronic anticoagulation -- balancing the long-term risk of thromboembolism against the long-term risk of bleeding.

    Indications for Chronic Use of Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

    Patients with either paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation may benefit from anticoagulation. The long-term risk of thromboembolic complications must be balanced against the long-term risk of bleeding.

    Risk factors from many trials were identified that maximized the benefits of vitamin K antagonist therapy. These have been summarized in a scoring system that accurately reflects the relative risks of thromboembolic stroke when following atrial fibrillation patients. This has been termed the CHADS2 score and is calculated as in Table 8 of the original guideline document.

    Patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (and perhaps most or all patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) should be given warfarin or aspirin based on their CHADS2 score – unless the long-term risk of bleeding from warfarin or aspirin exceeds the long-term risk of thromboemboli. Trials evaluating the efficacy of warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation excluded 80% of patients on the basis of factors presumed to increase their risk of bleeding [R].

    Recommendation from the 2006 consensus paper for warfarin versus aspirin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation are shown in Table 8 of the original guideline document. These recommendations translate to warfarin therapy for patients with CHADS2 scores of two or more, while aspirin is a reasonable alternative in CHADS 2 = 0 patients. For those with a score of one, either approach is reasonable.

    In patients who are at moderate risk for bleeding, current trends favor use of anticoagulation in light of the defined benefits for anticoagulation and poorly defined criteria for bleeding risk.

    For detailed discussion of assessing risk factors for bleeding, refer to the NGC summary of the ICSI Antithrombotic Therapy Supplement guideline.

    Refer to Tables 9 and 10 in the original guideline document for exclusion criteria used in trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for information on risk factors for bleeding for long-term use of warfarin.

    It is critical that the international normalized ratio be regularly determined to enhance effectiveness of anticoagulation and avoid bleeding given the narrow therapeutic index of warfarin. See Figure 1 in the original guideline document.

    Refer to the NGC summary of the ICSI Antithrombotic Therapy Supplement guideline for a more complete discussion of the use of aspirin and warfarin.

    Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Management for Patients with Paroxysmal or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    A rapidly emerging area of uncertainty is the optimal management of patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who require percutaneous coronary intervention. For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, research has shown les restenosis with drug-eluting stents compared with uncoated stents. Unfortunately, recent experience has identified a prolonged risk of coronary thrombosis following implantation of drug-eluting stents. Warfarin alone does not reduce the risk of coronary thrombosis associated with stents. Aspirin and/or clopidogrel reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications associated with atrial fibrillation but are inferior to warfarin. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel and warfarin cause more hemorrhagic complications than any one of these drugs alone [A], [M].

    See original guideline document for a discussion of the areas requiring further research.

  1. Assess Patient for Rate Control Agents

    Key Point:

    • Drugs that can be used for rate control of chronic atrial fibrillation include: beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and digitalis.

    Beta-blockers are generally favored for pharmacologic rate control. Beta-blockers control heart rate at rest and with exercise and also provide cardioprotective benefits. They may be used with caution with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Beta-blockers are preferred for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

    Calcium channel blockers are alternative rate control agents when beta-blockers are contraindicated. Calcium channel blockers control heart rate at rest and with exercise but may exacerbate systolic heart failure. Calcium channel blockers should not be administered in the presence of wide QRS/Wolff-Parkinson-White/pre-excitation.

    Concomitant use of a beta-blocker with a calcium channel blocker can, in rare circumstances, cause profound negative dromotropic, chronotropic and inotropic effects. These effects may be further exacerbated by type I or type III antiarrhythmic agents or underlying structural heart disease.

    Digoxin is a third-line agent for rate control. Digoxin can be utilized for patients with significant systolic congestive heart failure, but is inferior for exercise rate control compared to the other agents [A]. Digoxin does not lower blood pressure and has a positive inotropic effect, but works more slowly than beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers, has no effect on the sympathetically mediated enhancement of atrioventricular node conduction during exercise, and is no better than placebo for conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Digoxin should not be administered with wide QRS/Wolff-Parkinson-White/pre-excitation, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and renal impairment.

    Refer to Table 11 in the original guideline document for more information on medications used for rate control.

  1. Inadequate Rate Control?

    Key Point:

    • Adequate atrial fibrillation rate control should be assessed both at rest and exercise to eliminate symptoms and prevent the development of heart failure from tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.

    Adequate rate control may help relieve symptoms including palpitations, chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, or lightheadedness. Also, tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy is an important reversible complication of inadequate rate control. Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy can produce symptomatic congestive heart failure, thromboembolic complications, and potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, it is essential to maintain adequate rate control both at rest and during exercise. Patients with an acute myocardial infarction or acute coronary symptoms may require lower ventricular rates to decrease myocardial oxygen demand and limit infarction size.

    At rest, the heart rate should be similar to individuals in sinus rhythm (less than 80-90 beats per minute). During exercise, the maximum rate should be no greater than the maximum set for individuals in sinus rhythm [0.7 x (220-age)] and should not be reached during light exercise. A six-minute office walk, exercise stress test or Holter monitor (24 hour average less than 100 beats per minute) can assess this [R].

    If ventricular response remains rapid despite attempts to control rate with beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or digoxin, consultation from a physician with cardiology expertise is recommended. When pharmacologic therapies fail, radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node/His bundle followed by placement of a permanent pacemaker may be considered in medically refractory patients. It should be emphasized that the latter approach is irreversible and the patients may become pacemaker dependent. Right ventricular pacing may also induce dyssynchrony leading to future risk for developing heart failure although this problem occurs infrequently. For further information, refer to Annotation #20, "Consultation with a Physician with Cardiology Expertise for Treatment Options."

  1. Inadequate Symptom Control?

    Key Point:

    • For the older patient over 65 years of age, rate control is an equal strategy to rhythm control for long-term management of atrial fibrillation.

    Patients presenting with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation should be assessed for symptoms and for underlying cardiac disease. Restoration of sinus rhythm with cardioversion and/or suppression of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs is a reasonable initial strategy, particularly in younger patients. Patients should be reassessed for symptoms, side effects of treatment and recurrence of atrial fibrillation with potential reconsideration of rate control strategy if appropriate. Patient with significant symptoms associated with atrial fibrillation may warrant repeated trials with antiarrhythmic drugs, possibly in combination with permanent pacing. Ablative therapies for symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to pharmacological management are emerging and promising [A], [R].

    There is no observed survival advantage to strategies aimed at restoring sinus rhythm over strategies to control rate in older patients with relatively asymptomatic atrial fibrillation based on the limited data available from studies that have compared these strategies. [Conclusion Grade II: See Conclusion Grading Worksheet B - Annotation #15 (Rhythm versus Rate Control) in the original guideline document]. [R]

  1. Consultation with a Physician with Cardiology Expertise for Treatment Options

    Key Points:

    • Patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation should be reassessed for symptoms during atrial fibrillation, side effects to treatment and review of past therapeutic results to plan future therapy.
    • Antiarrhythmic agents used for atrial fibrillation suppression are chosen based on risk of proarrhythmia related to underlying heart disease and potential side effects. Drugs should be used in adequate doses with the reduction of the frequency and severity of symptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes as the primary treatment goal.
    • Cardiac pacing may allow the use of antiarrhythmic drugs that are contraindicated due to bradycardia and also may provide definitive rate control when coupled with His ablation in patients with poorly controlled ventricular response.
    • Isthmus-dependent atrial flutter can be readily controlled with radiofrequency ablation.
    • Catheter-based and surgically based pulmonary vein isolation procedures show great promise in the suppression of atrial fibrillation, with better outcomes expected as techniques and experience develop.

    Intermittent Cardioversion

    • Intermittent electrical or chemical cardioversion may be considered for:
      • Infrequent recurrences
      • Hemodynamic instability (see Annotation #6, "Stabilize Patient"), or
      • Failure of an antiarrhythmic agent
    • Evaluate for potentially reversible causes.
    • Assess for chronic anticoagulation.
    • Future treatment option: implantable atrial defibrillator.

    Antiarrhythmics

    Antiarrhythmic agents should be individualized for the patient's anticipated proarrhythmia risks, based on underlying cardiac conditions and other comorbidities while attempting to minimize organ toxicity. Optimal antiarrythmic drug therapy should be effective in reducing symptoms, preventing recurrent atrial fibrillation and should have a low incidence of toxicity and proarrhythmia. Refer to Fig 2 in the original guideline document for specifics. For patients with antiarrhythmic drug therapy, monitoring for side effects such as proarrhythmia, bradycardia or other systemic side effects is essential.

    Refer to Table 12 in the original guideline document for information on drugs with a risk of QT prolongation and/or torsades de points. Refer to Table 13 in the original guideline document for dosage information of antiarrhythmic agents. Refer to Table 14 in the original guideline document for considerations when antiarrhythmic drug therapy fails.

    Electrophysiology Consult

    Non-pharmacologic treatment modalities for patients requiring such therapy have expanded in the last decade and include ablation, pacing, implantable defibrillation, and surgery.

    Options:

    • Cardiac pacing
      • Single site atrial pacing
      • Dual site atrial pacing
      • Implantable atrial defibrillator
    • Atrial fibrillation ablative therapies (non-atrioventricular node)
    • Catheter based ablative therapies
      • His ablation with permanent pacemaker implantation
      • Ablation for atrial flutter
    • Pulmonary vein isolation techniques
    • Surgical maze procedure

    Refer to the original guideline document for more information on these options.

  1. Aggressive Management of Patient Comorbidities (Hypertension)/Monitor for Recurrence/Patient Education

    Key Points:

    • Patients can monitor for recurrence of atrial fibrillation and should be given a treatment plan for managing recurrence of episodes of atrial fibrillation.
    • Patient education is essential for the successful management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
    • Education should begin at the time of diagnosis, and should occur and be documented at every visit.
    • An important part of patient education is defining expectations -- chronicity of disease, empiric treatment, and frequent recurrences despite therapy.

    Monitoring for Recurrence

    • Pulse Self-Monitoring

      Patients who have experienced one or more episodes of atrial fibrillation should be taught to periodically monitor their pulse. They should also be given a plan of treatment (elective versus urgent evaluation, "pill-in-the-pocket") if they detect an irregular pulse.

      [M]

    • Adjunctive Monitoring

      Holter monitors and event monitors may be helpful to monitor for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in selected patients. Adjunctive monitoring is not required for all patients with a history of atrial fibrillation.

    Patient Education

    Patient education is essential for the successful management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Patients should be encouraged and empowered to play an active role in the self-management of their disease. Self-management is best initiated and sustained through an education partnership between the patient and the multidisciplinary health care team.

    Education should begin at the time of diagnosis and should occur and be documented at every visit. Atrial fibrillation in and of itself is not a life-threatening arrhythmia, provided proper anticoagulation is used to prevent thromboembolic complications.

    Best patient education should include:

    • Description of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter including causes and symptoms
    • Risks associated with untreated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter
    • Review of individual treatment plan
    • Medication education
    • Reason for taking medication and action
      • How to take
      • Side effects
      • Drug interactions
      • Mechanism of action of warfarin; it depletes certain coagulation factor proteins in the blood
      • Time of day to take warfarin: it should be taken at approximately the same time each day. Due to the short half-life of factor VII and its influence on the international normalized ratio, this is especially important if the patient will have an international normalized ratio drawn the next morning
    • How to take a pulse
    • Explanation of international normalized ratio, target range, and regular testing
    • When to call the clinic:
      • Signs and symptoms of bleeding and that the provider should be contacted immediately if bleeding signs are present
      • Need to notify provider if illness, injury, or change in physical status occurs
      • Need to inform all health care providers of anticoagulation therapy, especially if potentially undergoing an invasive procedure, surgery, or dental work
    • When to go to the hospital:
      • Signs and symptoms of stroke
      • Chest pain
      • Loss of consciousness
      • Signs of significant bleeding

    Drug Interactions

    • What to do if a new medication is initiated or a medication is discontinued, especially if the interaction with warfarin in unknown: check international normalized ratio within three to four days
    • Drugs that affect the absorption of warfarin
    • Drugs that increase or decrease the effect of warfarin
    • Common over-the-counter medication interactions including aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, natural or herbal remedies, laxatives, antacids, and multivitamin preparations containing vitamin K
      • Role of vitamin K and the importance of consistency of vitamin K-rich foods in the diet rather than avoidance of vitamin K-rich foods
      • Importance of minimizing trauma risk associated with activities at high risk for injury
      • Effect of exercise: increased activity results in decreased effect of the drug
      • Effect of personal habits: alcohol, chewing tobacco, etc.
      • Effect of certain conditions: congestive heart failure, thyroid disease, gastroenteritis, and diarrhea
      • Importance of self-monitoring: maintain a log of international normalized ratios, dose of warfarin, etc.
      • Medic Alert bracelet/necklace and warfarin identification card

Definitions:

Conclusion Grades:

Grade I: The evidence consists of results from studies of strong design for answering the question addressed. The results are both clinically important and consistent with minor exceptions at most. The results are free of any significant doubts about generalizability, bias, and flaws in research design. Studies with negative results have sufficiently large samples to have adequate statistical power.

Grade II: The evidence consists of results from studies of strong design for answering the question addressed, but there is some uncertainty attached to the conclusion because of inconsistencies among the results from the studies or because of minor doubts about generalizability, bias, research design flaws, or adequacy of sample size. Alternatively, the evidence consists solely of results from weaker designs for the question addressed, but the results have been confirmed in separate studies and are consistent with minor exceptions at most.

Grade III: The evidence consists of results from studies of strong design for answering the question addressed, but there is substantial uncertainty attached to the conclusion because of inconsistencies among the results from different studies or because of serious doubts about generalizability, bias, research design flaws, or adequacy of sample size. Alternatively, the evidence consists solely of results from a limited number of studies of weak design for answering the question addressed.

Grade Not Assignable: There is no evidence available that directly supports or refutes the conclusion.

Classes of Research Reports:

  1. Primary Reports of New Data Collection:

    Class A:

    • Randomized, controlled trial

    Class B:

    • Cohort study

    Class C:

    • Nonrandomized trial with concurrent or historical controls
    • Case-control study
    • Study of sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test
    • Population-based descriptive study

    Class D:

    • Cross-sectional study
    • Case series
    • Case report
  1. Reports that Synthesize or Reflect upon Collections of Primary Reports:

    Class M:

    • Meta-analysis
    • Systematic review
    • Decision analysis
    • Cost-effectiveness analysis

    Class R:

    • Consensus statement
    • Consensus report
    • Narrative review

    Class X:

    • Medical opinion

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is classified for selected recommendations (see "Major Recommendations").

In addition, key conclusions contained in the Work Group's algorithm are supported by a grading worksheet that summarizes the important studies pertaining to the conclusion. The type and quality of the evidence supporting these key recommendations (i.e., choice among alternative therapeutic approaches) is graded for each study.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Atrial fibrillation. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2008 Oct. 62 p. [91 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2000 Oct (revised 2008 Oct)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement - Private Nonprofit Organization

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

Organizations participating in the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI): Affiliated Community Medical Centers, Allina Medical Clinic, Altru Health System, Aspen Medical Group, Avera Health, CentraCare, Columbia Park Medical Group, Community-University Health Care Center, Dakota Clinic, ENT Specialty Care, Fairview Health Services, Family HealthServices Minnesota, Family Practice Medical Center, Gateway Family Health Clinic, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital, HealthEast Care System, HealthPartners Central Minnesota Clinics, HealthPartners Medical Group and Clinics, Hutchinson Area Health Care, Hutchinson Medical Center, Lakeview Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Mercy Hospital and Health Care Center, MeritCare, Mille Lacs Health System, Minnesota Gastroenterology, Montevideo Clinic, North Clinic, North Memorial Care System, North Suburban Family Physicians, Northwest Family Physicians, Olmsted Medical Center, Park Nicollet Health Services, Pilot City Health Center, Quello Clinic, Ridgeview Medical Center, River Falls Medical Clinic, Saint Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System, St. Paul Heart Clinic, Sioux Valley Hospitals and Health System, Southside Community Health Services, Stillwater Medical Group, SuperiorHealth Medical Group, University of Minnesota Physicians, Winona Clinic, Ltd., Winona Health

ICSI, 8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425; telephone, (952) 814-7060; fax, (952) 858-9675; e-mail: icsi.info@icsi.org; Web site: www.icsi.org.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

The following Minnesota health plans provide direct financial support: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, HealthPartners, Medica, Metropolitan Health Plan, PreferredOne and UCare Minnesota. In-kind support is provided by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement's (ICSI) members.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Cardiovascular Steering Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Work Group Members: Thomas Munger, MD (Work Group Leader) (Mayo Clinic) (Cardiology/Electrophysiology); David Dunbar, MD (St. Paul Heart Clinic) (Cardiology/Electrophysiology); Humberto Vidaillet, MD (Marshfield Clinic) (Cardiology/Electrophysiology); Mark Morrow, MD (Aspen Medical Group) (Internal Medicine); Tonja Larson, PharmD, BCPS (Marshfield Clinic) (Pharmacy); Krissa Skoglund, PharmD, BCPS (HealthPartners Medical Group) (Pharmacy); Penny Fredrickson (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) (Measurement/Implementation Advisor); Joann Foreman, RN (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) (Facilitator)

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Atrial fibrillation. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2007 Feb. 64 p.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) Web site.

Print copies: Available from ICSI, 8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425; telephone, (952) 814-7060; fax, (952) 858-9675; Web site: www.icsi.org; e-mail: icsi.info@icsi.org.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

Print copies: Available from ICSI, 8009 34th Avenue South, Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425; telephone, (952) 814-7060; fax, (952) 858-9675; Web site: www.icsi.org; e-mail: icsi.info@icsi.org.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on August 26, 2002. The information was verified by the guideline developer on September 23, 2002. This summary was updated by ECRI on April 29, 2004 and January 19, 2005. This summary was updated by ECRI on March 6, 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin sodium). This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on May 21, 2007. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 26, 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on heparin sodium injection. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on September 7, 2007 following the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 14, 2008 following the updated FDA advisory on heparin sodium injection. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on May 14, 2009.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary (abstracted Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement [ICSI] Guideline) is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

The abstracted ICSI Guidelines contained in this Web site may be downloaded by any individual or organization. If the abstracted ICSI Guidelines are downloaded by an individual, the individual may not distribute copies to third parties.

If the abstracted ICSI Guidelines are downloaded by an organization, copies may be distributed to the organization's employees but may not be distributed outside of the organization without the prior written consent of the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc.

All other copyright rights in the abstracted ICSI Guidelines are reserved by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. assumes no liability for any adaptations or revisions or modifications made to the abstracts of the ICSI Guidelines.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo