Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Fetal lung maturity.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Fetal lung maturity. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG); 2008 Sep. 10 p. (ACOG practice bulletin; no. 97). [44 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The grades of evidence (I-III) and levels of recommendations (A-C) are defined at the end of "Major Recommendations" field.

The following recommendations and conclusions are based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence (Level B):

  • Testing for fetal lung maturity should not be performed, and is contraindicated, when delivery is mandated for fetal or maternal indications.
  • Fetal pulmonary maturity should be confirmed before scheduled delivery at less than 39 weeks of gestation unless fetal maturity can be inferred from historic criteria.
  • The probability of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is dependent on both the fetal lung maturity test result and the gestational age at which the fetal lung maturity test was performed.
  • Fluorescence polarization assays (TDx FLM II) using a defined mature profile of 55 mg/g or greater is appropriate for the determination of risk of neonatal RDS in pregnancies of women with diabetes mellitus.
  • Fetal lung maturity test results from amniotic fluid collected vaginally compared with those from fluid collected by transabdominal amniocentesis demonstrate that when results from fluid collected vaginally are mature, the results are reliable.
  • Complications from third-trimester amniocentesis for fetal lung maturity are uncommon when performed with ultrasound guidance.

The following conclusions are based primarily on consensus and expert opinion (Level C):

  • In general, the same threshold values for fetal lung maturity tests that predict low risk of neonatal RDS in pregnancies of women who do not have diabetes mellitus apply to pregnancies of women who have diabetes mellitus, whether it is gestational diabetes mellitus or pregestational diabetes mellitus.
  • Data suggest that amniocentesis of both twins be performed when the gestation is between 30 0/7 weeks and 32 6/7 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis of one twin appears to be sufficient when gestation is greater than 32 6/7 weeks.
  • Prior to elective delivery, fetal lung maturity testing in twins with well defined gestational ages at 38 0/7 weeks or greater may not be necessary.

Definitions:

Grades of Evidence

I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial.

II-1: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization.

II-2: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.

II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments also could be regarded as this type of evidence.

III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.

Levels of Recommendations

Level A - Recommendations are based on good and consistent scientific evidence.

Level B - Recommendations are based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidence.

Level C - Recommendations are based primarily on consensus and expert opinion.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Fetal lung maturity. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG); 2008 Sep. 10 p. (ACOG practice bulletin; no. 97). [44 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2008 Sep

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Practice Bulletins - Obstetrics

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Not stated

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

Proposed performance measures are included in the original guideline document.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on January 5, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on January 23, 2009.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo