Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children. American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition).

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Monagle P, Chan A, Massicotte P, Chalmers E, Michelson AD. Antithrombotic therapy in children: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):645S-87S.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

  • February 28, 2008, Heparin Sodium Injection: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informed the public that Baxter Healthcare Corporation has voluntarily recalled all of their multi-dose and single-use vials of heparin sodium for injection and their heparin lock flush solutions. Alternate heparin manufacturers are expected to be able to increase heparin production sufficiently to supply the U.S. market. There have been reports of serious adverse events including allergic or hypersensitivity-type reactions, with symptoms of oral swelling, nausea, vomiting, sweating, shortness of breath, and cases of severe hypotension.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The grades of recommendation (1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Specific Indications for Antithrombotic Therapy

Neonatal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT): Central Venous Line and Non-Central Venous Line Related

In Neonates with Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (Central Venous Line [CVL] and Non-CVL Related)

  1. The guideline developers suggest that central venous lines (CVLs) or umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) associated with confirmed thrombosis be removed, if possible, after 3 to 5 days of anticoagulation (Grade 2C).
  2. The guideline developers suggest either initial anticoagulation, or supportive care with radiologic monitoring (Grade 2C); however, the guideline developers recommend subsequent anticoagulation if extension of the thrombosis occurs during supportive care (Grade 1B).
  3. The guideline developers suggest anticoagulation should be with either: (1) Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) given twice daily (bid) and adjusted to achieve an anti-FXa level of 0.5 to1.0 U/mL: or (2) UFH for 3 to 5 days adjusted to achieve an anti-FXa of 0.35 to 0.7 U/mL or a corresponding activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) range, followed by LMWH. The guideline developers suggest a total duration of anticoagulation of between 6 weeks and 3 months (Grade 2C).
  4. The guideline developers suggest that if either a CVL or a UVC is still in place on completion of therapeutic anticoagulation, a prophylactic dose of LMWH be given to prevent recurrent VTE until such time as the CVL or UVC is removed (Grade 2C).
  5. The guideline developers recommend against thrombolytic therapy for neonatal VTE unless major vessel occlusion is causing critical compromise of organs or limbs (Grade 1B).
  6. The guideline developers suggest that if thrombolysis is required the clinician use tPA and supplement with plasminogen (fresh frozen plasma) prior to commencing therapy (Grade 2C).

DVT in Children

In Children with VTE (CVL and Non-CVL Related): First Thromboembolism (TE) for Children

  1. In children with thrombosis, the guideline developers recommend anticoagulant therapy with either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or LMWH (Grade 1B). (For dosing information see the original guideline document.)
  2. The guideline developers recommend initial treatment with UFH or LMWH for at least 5 to 10 days (Grade 1B). For patients in whom clinicians will subsequently prescribe VKAs, the guideline developers recommend beginning oral therapy as early as day 1 and discontinuing UFH/LMWH on day 6 or later than day 6 if the international normalized ratio (INR) has not exceeded 2.0 (Grade 1B). After the initial 5- to 10-day treatment period, the guideline developers suggest LMWH rather than VKA therapy if therapeutic levels are difficult to maintain on VKA therapy or if VKA therapy is challenging for the child and family (Grade 2C).
  3. The guideline developers suggest children with idiopathic thromboembolism receive anticoagulant therapy for at least 6 months, using VKAs to achieve a target INR of 2.5 (INR range, 2.0 to 3.0) or alternatively using LMWH to maintain an anti-FXa level of 0.5 to 1.0 U/mL (Grade 2C).

    Underlying values and preferences: The suggestion to use anticoagulation therapy to treat idiopathic DVTs in children for at least 6 months rather than on a lifelong basis places a relatively high value on avoiding the inconvenience and bleeding risk associated with antithrombotic therapy, and a relative low value on avoiding the unknown risk of recurrence in the absence of an ongoing risk factor.

  4. In children with secondary thrombosis in whom the risk factor has resolved, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulant therapy be administered for at least 3 months using VKAs to achieve a target INR of 2.5 (INR range, 2.0 to 3.0) or alternatively using LMWH to maintain an anti-FXa level of 0.5 to 1.0 U/mL (Grade 2C).
  5. In children who have ongoing, but potentially reversible risk factors, such as active nephrotic syndrome or ongoing l-asparaginase therapy, the guideline developers suggest continuing anticoagulant therapy in either therapeutic or prophylactic doses until the risk factor has resolved (Grade 2C).

Recurrent Idiopathic TE for Children

  1. For children with recurrent idiopathic thrombosis, the guideline developers recommend indefinite treatment with VKAs to achieve a target INR of 2.5 (INR range, 2.0 to 3.0) (Grade 1A).

    Remark: For some patients, long-term LMWH may be preferable; however, there are little or no data about the safety of long-term LMWH in children.

Recurrent Secondary TE for Children

  1. For children with recurrent secondary TE with an existing reversible risk factor for thrombosis, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulation until the removal of the precipitating factor but for a minimum of 3 months (Grade 2C).

In Addition, with Specific Respect to the Management of CVL-related Thrombosis

  1. If a CVL is no longer required, or is nonfunctioning, the guideline developers recommend it be removed (Grade 1B). The guideline developers suggest at least 3 to 5 days of anticoagulation therapy prior to its removal (Grade 2C). If CVL access is required and the CVL is still functioning, the guideline developers suggest that the CVL remain in situ and the patient be anticoagulated (Grade 2C).
  2. For children with a first CVL-related DVT, the guideline developers suggest initial management as for secondary thromboembolism as previously described. The guideline developers suggest, after the initial 3 months of therapy, that prophylactic doses of VKAs (INR range 1.5 to 1.9) or LMWH (anti-FXa level range, 0.1 to 0.3) be given until the CVL is removed (Grade 2C). If recurrent thrombosis occurs while the patient is receiving prophylactic therapy, the guideline developers suggest continuing therapeutic doses until the CVL is removed but at least for a minimum of 3 months (Grade 2C).

Use of Thrombolysis in Pediatric Patients with DVT

In children with DVT, the guideline developers suggest that thrombolysis therapy not be used routinely (Grade 2C). If thrombolysis is used, in the presence of physiologic or pathologic deficiencies of plasminogen, the guideline developers suggest supplementation with plasminogen (Grade 2C).

Thrombectomy and IVC Filter Use in Pediatric Patients with DVT

  1. If life-threatening VTE is present, the guideline developers suggest thrombectomy (Grade 2C).
  2. The guideline developers suggest, following thrombectomy, anticoagulant therapy be initiated to prevent thrombus reaccumulation (Grade 2C).
  3. In children > 10 kg body weight with lower-extremity DVT and a contraindication to anticoagulation, the guideline developers suggest placement of a temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter (Grade 2C).
  4. The guideline developers suggest that temporary IVC filters should be removed as soon as possible if thrombosis is not present in the basket of the filter and when the risk of anticoagulation decreases (Grade 2C).
  5. In children who receive an IVC filter, the guideline developers recommend appropriate anticoagulation for DVT (see the "DVT in Children" section above) as soon as the contraindication to anticoagulation is resolved (Grade 1B).

Pediatric Cancer Patients with DVT

Use of Anticoagulants as Therapeutic Agents

  1. In children with cancer, the guideline developers suggest management of VTE follow the general recommendations for management of DVT in children. The guideline developers suggest the use of LMWH in the treatment of VTE for a minimum of 3 months until the precipitating factor has resolved (e.g., use of asparaginase) (Grade 2C).

    Remark: The presence of cancer, and the need for surgery, chemotherapy, or other treatments may modify the risk benefit ratio for treatment of DVT, and clinicians should consider these factors on an individual basis.

Use of Anticoagulant as Thromboprophylaxis

  1. The guideline developers suggest clinicians not use primary antithrombotic prophylaxis in children with cancer and central venous access devices (VADs) (Grade 2C).

Children with DVT and Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLAs)

For children with VTE, in the setting of APLAs, the guideline developers suggest management as per general recommendations for VTE management in children.

Remark: Depending on the age of the patient, it may be more appropriate to follow adult guidelines for management of VTE in the setting of APLAs. (See the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) summary of the American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP] chapter Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease by Kearon et al.).

Neonatal RVT

  1. For neonates or children with unilateral renal vein thrombosis (RVT) in the absence of renal impairment or extension into the IVC, the guideline developers suggest supportive care with monitoring of the RVT for extension or anticoagulation with UFH/LMWH or LMWH in therapeutic doses; the guideline developers suggest continuation for 3 months (Grade 2C).
  2. For unilateral RVT that extends into the IVC, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulation with UFH/LMWH or LMWH for 3 months (Grade 2C).
  3. For bilateral RVT with various degrees of renal failure, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulation with UFH and initial thrombolytic therapy with tPA, followed by anticoagulation with UFH/LMWH (Grade 2C).

    Remark: LMWH therapy requires careful monitoring in the presence of significant renal impairment.

Primary Antithrombotic Prophylaxis for CVL in Neonates and Children

  1. In children with CVLs, the guideline developers recommend against the use of routine systemic thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1B).
  2. In children receiving long-term home total parenteral nutrition, the guideline developers suggest thromboprophylaxis with VKAs with a target INR of 2.5 (range 2.0–3.0) (Grade 2C).
  3. For blocked CVLs, the guideline developers suggest tPA or recombinant urokinase (UK) to restore patency (Grade 2C). If after at least 30 min following local thrombolytic instillation CVL patency is not restored, the guideline developers suggest a second dose be administered. If the CVL remains blocked following two doses of local thrombolytic agent, the guideline developers suggest investigations to rule out a CVL-related thrombosis be initiated (Grade 2C).

Primary Prophylaxis for Blalock-Taussig Shunts

For pediatric patients having a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS), the guideline developers suggest intraoperative therapy with UFH followed by either aspirin (1–5 mg/kg/d) or no further antithrombotic therapy compared to prolonged LMWH or VKAs (Grade 2C).

Primary Prophylaxis for Stage 1 Norwoods in Neonates

For patients who underwent the Norwood procedure, the guideline developers suggest UFH immediately after the procedure, with or without ongoing antiplatelet therapy (Grade 2C).

Primary Prophylaxis for Glenn or Bilateral Cavopulmonary Shunts (BCPS) in Children

In patients who have bilateral cavopulmonary shunts, the guideline developers suggest postoperative UFH (Grade 2C). (For additional information, see Section 1.11 in the original guideline document titled "Primary Prophylaxis for Glenn or Bilateral Cavopulmonary Shunts in Children").

Primary Prophylaxis for Fontan Surgery in Children

For children after Fontan surgery, the guideline developers recommend aspirin (1–5 mg/kg/d) or therapeutic UFH followed by VKAs to achieve a target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) (Grade 1B).

Remark: The optimal duration of therapy is unknown. Whether patients with fenestrations require more intensive therapy until fenestration closure is unknown.

Primary Prophylaxis for Endovascular Stents in Children

For children having endovascular stents inserted, the guideline developers suggest administration of UFH perioperatively (Grade 2C).

Primary Prophylaxis for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Neonates and Children

The guideline developers suggest that pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy receive VKAs to achieve a target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) no later than their activation on a cardiac transplant waiting list (Grade 2C).

Underlying values and preferences: The guideline developer's suggestion for administration of VKAs places a high value on avoiding thrombotic complications, and a relatively low value on avoiding the inconvenience, discomfort and limitations of anticoagulant monitoring, in children who are eligible for transplant, which is a potentially curative therapy.

Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

In children with primary pulmonary hypertension, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulation with VKAs commencing when other medical therapy is commenced (Grade 2C).

Biological Prosthetic Heart Valves

For children with biological prosthetic heart valves, the guideline developers recommend that clinicians follow the relevant recommendations from the adult population (See the NGC summary of the ACCP chapter Valvular and Structural Heart Disease by Salem et al.)

Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves

  1. For children with mechanical prosthetic heart valves, the guideline developers recommend that clinicians follow the relevant recommendations from the adult population with respect to the intensity of anticoagulation therapy. (See the NGC summary of the ACCP chapter Valvular and Structural Heart Disease by Salem et al.)
  2. For children with mechanical prosthetic heart valves who have had thrombotic events while on therapeutic antithrombotic therapy or in patients in whom there is a contraindication to full-dose VKAs, the guideline developers suggest adding aspirin therapy (Grade 2C).

Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs)

  1. Following ventricular assist device (VAD) placement, in the absence of bleeding the guideline developers suggest administration of UFH targeted to an anti-factor Xa of 0.35 to 0.7 u/mL (Grade 2C). The guideline developers suggest starting UFH between 8 hours and 48 hours following implantation (Grade 2C).
  2. The guideline developers suggest antiplatelet therapy (either aspirin, 1 to 5 mg/kg/d, and/or dipyridamole, 3 to 10 mg/kg/d) to commence within 72 hours of VAD placement (Grade 2C).
  3. The guideline developers suggest that once clinically stable, pediatric patients be weaned from UFH to either LMWH (target anti-FXa 0.5–1.0 U/mL) or VKA (target INR, 3.0; range, 2.5–3.5) until transplanted or weaned from VAD (Grade 2C).

Cardiac Catheterization (CC)

  1. For neonates and children requiring CC via an artery, the guideline developers recommend administration of IV UFH prophylaxis (Grade 1A).
  2. The guideline developers recommend the use of UFH doses of 100 to 150 U/kg as a bolus (Grade 1B). The guideline developers suggest further doses of UFH rather than no further therapy in prolonged procedures (Grade 2B).
  3. The guideline developers recommend against the use of aspirin therapy for prophylaxis for CC (Grade 1B).

Therapy of Femoral Artery Thrombosis

  1. For pediatric patients with a femoral artery thrombosis, the guideline developers recommend therapeutic doses of IV UFH (Grade 1B). The guideline developers suggest treatment for at least 5 to 7 days (Grade 2C).
  2. The guideline developers recommend administration of thrombolytic therapy for pediatric patients with limb-threatening or organ-threatening (via proximal extension) femoral artery thrombosis who fail to respond to initial UFH therapy and who have no known contraindications (Grade 1B).
  3. For children with femoral artery thrombosis, the guideline developers suggest surgical intervention when there is a contraindication to thrombolytic therapy and organ or limb death is imminent (Grade 2C).
  4. The guideline developers suggest that for children in whom thrombolysis or surgery is not required, conversion to LMWH to complete 5 to 7 days of treatment (Grade 2C).

Peripheral Arterial Catheter Thrombosis in Neonates and Children

  1. For pediatric patients with peripheral arterial catheters in situ, the guideline developers recommend UFH through the catheter, preferably by continuous infusion (5 U/mL at 1 mL/h) (Grade 1A).
  2. For children with a peripheral arterial catheter-related thromboembolism (TE), the guideline developers suggest immediate removal of the catheter (Grade 1B). The guideline developers suggest UFH anticoagulation with or without thrombolysis, or surgical thrombectomy (Grade 2C).

Neonatal Aortic Thrombosis: UAC Related

  1. To maintain umbilical artery catheter (UAC) patency, the guideline developers suggest prophylaxis with a low-dose UFH infusion via the UAC (heparin concentration of 0.25–1 U/mL) (Grade 2A).
  2. For neonates with UAC-related thrombosis, the guideline developers suggest therapy with UFH or LMWH for at least 10 days (Grade 2C).
  3. For neonates with UAC-related thrombosis, the guideline developers recommend UAC removal (Grade 1B).
  4. For neonates with UAC-related thrombosis with potentially life-, limb-, or organ-threatening symptoms, the guideline developers suggest thrombolysis with tPA. When thrombolysis is contraindicated, the guideline developers suggest surgical thrombectomy (Grade 2C).

UAC-Related Thrombosis: Effect of Catheter Location

The guideline developers suggest UACs placement in a high position rather than a low position (Grade 2B).

Primary Prophylaxis for Venous Access Related to Hemodialysis

In patients undergoing hemodialysis, the guideline developers suggest against routine use of VKAs or LMWH for prevention of thrombosis related to central venous lines or fistulas (Grade 2C).

Use of UFH or LMWH for Hemodialysis

The guideline developers suggest the use of UFH or LMWH in hemodialysis (Grade 2C).

Kawasaki Disease

  1. In children with Kawasaki disease, the guideline developers recommend aspirin in high doses (80 to 100 mg/kg/d during the acute phase, for up to 14 days) as an anti-inflammatory agent, then in lower doses (1 to 5 mg/kg/d for 6 to 8 weeks) as an antiplatelet agent (Grade 1B).
  2. In children with Kawasaki disease, the guideline developers suggest against concomitant use of ibuprofen or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during aspirin therapy (Grade 2C).
  3. In children with Kawasaki disease, the guideline developers recommend IV gamma globulin (2 g/kg, single dose) within 10 days of the onset of symptoms (Grade 1A).
  4. In children with giant coronary aneurysms following Kawasaki disease, the guideline developers suggest warfarin (target INR, 2.5; INR range, 2.0 to 3.0) in addition to therapy with low-dose aspirin be given as primary thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2C).

Neonatal Sinovenous Thrombosis

  1. For neonates with cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) without significant intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), the guideline developers suggest anticoagulation, initially with UFH, or LMWH and subsequently with LMWH or VKA for a minimum of 6 weeks, and no longer than 3 months (Grade 2C).
  2. For children with cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) with significant hemorrhage, the guideline developers suggest radiologic monitoring of the thrombosis at 5 to 7 days and anticoagulation if thrombus propagation is noted (Grade 2C).

Childhood CSVT

  1. For children with cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT), without significant intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), the guideline developers recommend anticoagulation initially with UFH or LMWH and subsequently with LMWH or VKA for a minimum of 3 months relative to no anticoagulation (Grade 1B).
  2. The guideline developers suggest that if after 3 months of therapy there is incomplete radiologic recanalisation of CSVT or ongoing symptoms, administration of a further 3 months of anticoagulation (Grade 2C).
  3. For children with CSVT with significant hemorrhage, the guideline developers suggest radiologic monitoring of the thrombosis at 5 to 7 days. If thrombus propagation is noted at that time, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulation (Grade 2C).
  4. The guideline developers suggest children with CSVT in the context of a potentially recurrent risk factors (e.g., nephrotic syndrome, L-asparaginase therapy) should receive prophylactic anticoagulation at times of risk factor recurrence (Grade 2C).
  5. The guideline developers suggest thrombolysis thrombectomy or surgical decompression only in children with severe CSVT in whom there is no improvement with initial UFH therapy (Grade 2C).

Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke (AIS)

  1. In the absence of a documented ongoing cardioembolic source, the guideline developers recommend against anticoagulation or aspirin therapy for neonates with a first arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) (Grade 1B).
  2. In neonates with recurrent AIS, the guideline developers suggest anticoagulant or aspirin therapy (Grade 2C).

Childhood AIS

  1. For children with non–sickle-cell disease-related acute AIS, the guideline developers recommend UFH or LMWH or aspirin (1 to 5 mg/kg/d) as initial therapy until dissection and embolic causes have been excluded (Grade 1B).
  2. The guideline developers recommend, once dissection and cardioembolic causes are excluded, daily aspirin prophylaxis (1–5 mg/kg/d) for a minimum of 2 years (Grade 1B).
  3. The guideline developers suggest for AIS secondary to dissection or cardioembolic causes, anticoagulant therapy with LMWH or VKAs for at least 6 weeks, with ongoing treatment dependent on radiologic assessment (Grade 2C).
  4. The guideline developers recommend against the use of thrombolysis (tPA) for AIS in children, outside of specific research protocols (Grade 1B).
  5. The guideline developers recommend for children with sickle-cell disease and AIS, IV hydration and exchange transfusion to reduce sickle hemoglobin levels to at least < 30% total hemoglobin (Grade 1B).
  6. For children with sickle-cell disease and AIS, after initial exchange transfusion the guideline developers recommend a long-term transfusion program (Grade 1B).
  7. In children with sickle-cell anemia who have transcranial Doppler velocities > 200 cm/s on screening, the guideline developers recommend regular blood transfusion, which should be continued indefinitely (Grade 1B).
  8. The guideline developers recommend that children with moyamoya be referred to an appropriate center for consideration of revascularization (Grade 1B).
  9. For children receiving aspirin who have recurrent AIS or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) guideline developers suggest changing to clopidogrel or anticoagulant (LMWH or VKA) therapy (Grade 2C).

Purpura Fulminans

  1. For neonates with homozygous protein C deficiency, the guideline developers recommend administration of either 10 to 20 mL/kg of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) every 12 hours (q12h) or protein C concentrate, when available, at 20 to 60 U/kg until the clinical lesions resolve (Grade 1B).
  2. The guideline developers suggest long-term treatment with VKAs (Grade 2C), LMWH ((Grade 2C), protein C replacement (Grade 1B), or liver transplantation (Grade 2C).

Definitions:

Grading Recommendation
Grade of Recommendation* Benefit vs. Risk and Burdens Methodologic Quality of Supporting Evidence Implications
Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence, Grade 1A Desirable effects clearly outweigh undesirable effects, or vice versa Consistent evidence from RCTs without important limitations or exceptionally strong evidence from observational studies Recommendation can apply to most patients in most circumstances; further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence, Grade 1B Desirable effects clearly outweigh undesirable effects, or vice versa Evidence from RCTs with important limitations (inconsistent results, methodologic flaws, indirect or imprecise), or very strong evidence from observational studies Recommendation can apply to most patients in most circumstances; higher quality research may well have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
Strong recommendation, low or very low-quality evidence, Grade 1C Desirable effects clearly outweigh undesirable effects, or vice versa Evidence for at least one critical outcome from observational studies, case series, or from RCTs with serious flaws or indirect evidence Recommendation can apply to most patients in many circumstances; higher-quality research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may well change the estimate
Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence, Grade 2A Desirable effects closely balanced with undesirable effects Consistent evidence from RCTs without important limitations or exceptionally strong evidence from observational studies The best action may differ depending on circumstances or patient or society values; further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence, Grade 2B Desirable effects closely balanced with undesirable effects Evidence from RCTs with important limitations (inconsistent results, methodologic flaws, indirect or imprecise), or very strong evidence from observational studies Best action may differ depending on circumstances or patient or society values; higher-quality research may well have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
Weak recommendation, low or very low-quality evidence, Grade 2C Desirable effects closely balanced with undesirable effects Evidence for at least one critical outcome from observational studies, case series, or from RCTs with serious flaws or indirect evidence Other alternatives may be equally reasonable; higher-quality research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may well change the estimate

*The guideline developers use the wording recommend for strong (Grade 1) recommendations and suggest for weak (Grade 2) recommendations.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2001 Jan (revised 2008 Jun)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American College of Chest Physicians - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American College of Chest Physicians

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Expert Panel on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: Paul Monagle, MD, MBBS, MSc, FCCP; Elizabeth Chalmers, MD; Anthony Chan, MBBS; Gabrielle deVeber, MD, MHSc; Fenella Kirkham, MBBC; Patricia Massicotte, MD, MSc; and Alan D. Michelson, MD

Committee Co-Chairs: Jack Hirsh, MD, FCCP (Chair); Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, FCCP; Gregory W. Albers, MD; Robert A. Harrington, MD, FCCP; Holger J. Schünemann, MD, PhD, FCCP

Participants: Giancarlo Agnelli, MD; Pierre Amarenco, MD; Jack E. Ansell, MD; Collin Baigent; Shannon M. Bates, MD; Kenneth A. Bauer, MD; Richard C. Becker, MD; Peter B. Berger, MD; David Bergqvist, MD, PhD; Rebecca J. Beyth, MD; Christopher P. Cannon, MD; Elizabeth A. Chalmers, MB, ChB, MD; Anthony K.C. Chan, MBBS; Clifford W. Colwell, Jr., MD; Anthony J. Comerota, MD; Deborah Cook, MD; Mark A. Crowther, MD; James E. Dalen, MD; Gabrielle deVeber, MD, MHSc; Maria Benedetta Donati, MD, PhD; James D. Douketis, MD; Andrew Dunn, MD; J. Donald Easton, MD; Michael Ezekowitz, MD; Margaret Fang; William H. Geerts, MD, FCCP; Alan S. Go, MD; Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD, FCCP; Shaun D. Goodman, MD; Michael Gould, MD, FCCP; Ian A. Greer, MD; Andreas Greinacher, MD; David Gutterman, MD, FCCP, HSP; Jonathan L. Halperin, MD; John A. Heit, MD; Elaine M. Hylek, MD; Alan Jacobson, MD; Roman Jaeschke, MD, PhD; Amir K. Jaffer, MD; Susan Kahn; Clive Kearon, MBBCh, PhD; Fenella Kirkham, MBBC; Andreas Koster, MD, PhD; Michael R. Lassen, MD; Mark N. Levine, MD, MSc; Sandra Zelman Lewis, PhD; A. Michael Lincoff, MD; Gregory YH Lip, MD; Christopher Madias, MD; Warren J. Manning, MD; Daniel B. Mark, MD; M. Patricia Massicotte, MD, MSc; David Matchar, MD; Thomas W. Meade, DM, FCCP; Venu Menon, MD; Tracy Minichiello, MD; Paul Monagle, MBBS, MSc, MD, FCCP; Christopher M. O'Connor, MD; Patrick O'Gara, MD; E. Magnus Ohman, MD; Ingrid Pabinger, MD; Gualtiero Palareti, MD; Carlo Patrono, MD; Stephen G. Pauker, MD; Graham F. Pineo, MD; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD; Gary Raskob, PhD; Gerald Roth, MD; Ralph L. Sacco, MD; Deeb N. Salem, MD, FCCP; Charles-Marc Samama, MD, FCCP; Meyer Michel Samama, MD; Sam Schulman, MD, PhD; Daniel Singer, MD; Michael Sobel, MD; Shoshanna Sofaer, DrPH; Alex C. Spyropoulos, MD FCCP; Ph. Gabriel Steg, MD; Philip Teal, MD; Raymond Verhaeghe, MD; David A. Vorchheimer, MD; Theodore E. Warkentin, MD; Jeffrey Weitz, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Dr. Professor Monagle discloses that he has received grant monies from the University of Melbourne, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Roche, and Stago.

Dr. Chan reveals no real or potential conflicts of interest or commitment.

Dr. Massicotte discloses that she has received grant monies from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. She has also received consultant fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Berlin Heart, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, and Azai.

Dr. Chalmers reveals no real or potential conflicts of interest or commitment.

Dr. Michelson discloses that he has received grant monies from Accumetrics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Dade Behring, GL Synthesis, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Sanofi-Aventis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. He has also served on an advisory committee for Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Dr. deVeber reveals no real or potential conflicts of interest or commitment.

Professor Kirkham reveals no real or potential conflicts of interest or commitment.

ENDORSER(S)

American College of Clinical Pharmacy - Medical Specialty Society
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists - Professional Association

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Monagle P, Chan A, Massicotte P, Chalmers E, Michelson AD. Antithrombotic therapy in children: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):645S-87S.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available to subscribers of the Chest - The Cardiopulmonary and Critical Care Journal.

Print copies: Available from the American College of Chest Physicians, Products and Registration Division, 3300 Dundee Road, Northbrook IL 60062-2348.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on July 30, 2001. The information was verified by the guideline developer on October 31, 2001.This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on December 9, 2004. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on January 12, 2005. This summary was updated by ECRI on March 6, 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin sodium). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 22, 2007 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on heparin sodium injection. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on September 7, 2007 following the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory on Coumadin (warfarin). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 14, 2008 following the updated FDA advisory on heparin sodium injection. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on December 9, 2008. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on January 7, 2009.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo