Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Urinary tract infections in renal insufficiency, transplant recipients, diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression. In: Guidelines on the management of urinary and male genital tract infections.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • UTIs in renal insufficiency, transplant recipients, diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression. In: Grabe M, Bishop MC, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, Botto H, Cek M, Lobel B, Naber KG, Palou J, Tenke P. Guidelines on the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology (EAU); 2008 Mar. p. 52-63. [57 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

Note: This guideline has been updated. The National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) is working to update this summary.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note: This guideline has been updated. The National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) is working to update this summary. The recommendations that follow are based on the previous version of the guideline.

The following is a summary of the recommendations for urinary tract infections in renal insufficiency, transplant recipients, diabetes mellitus, and immunosuppression. Refer to the original guideline for more detailed recommendations and discussion.

Levels of evidence (Ia-IV) and grades of recommendation (A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Acute Effects of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on the Kidney

In acute pyelonephritis very dramatic changes can occur with focal reduction in perfusion on imaging and corresponding renal tubular dysfunction. However, if in the adult, the kidney is normal beforehand, chronic renal damage is most unlikely. There is no evidence that more prolonged or intensive antibiotic treatment of acute pyelonephritis will shorten the episode or prevent complications.

In diabetes mellitus, overwhelming infection can predispose to pyogenic infection with intrarenal perinephric abscess formation, emphysematous pyelonephritis, and, very rarely, a specific form of infective interstitial nephropathy. Papillary necrosis is a common consequence of pyelonephritis in diabetics. Females are more prone to asymptomatic bacteriuria than diabetic men, but in both sexes progression to clinical pyelonephritis is more likely than in normal individuals. The risk factors for developing asymptomatic bacteriuria differ between type I and type II diabetes.

It is arguable that diabetic patients are susceptible to rapid progression of parenchymal infection. However, the clearance of asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be attempted if the intention is to prevent complications, notably acute pyelonephritis (A).

Chronic Renal Disease and UTI

There are several factors of general potential importance predisposing to infection in uraemia, including the loss of several urinary defence mechanisms and a degree of immunosuppression. Typically, adult polycystic kidney disease (APCKD), gross vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) and endstage obstructive uropathy will harbour infective foci or promote ascending infection, but not invariably so. Clearly, severe UTI with accompanying bacteraemia can hasten progression of renal failure, but there is little evidence that vigorous treatment of lesser degrees of infection or prophylaxis will slow renal functional impairment once it is established (C).

In patients with VUR and UTI in endstage chronic renal failure bilateral nephroureterectomy should only be undertaken as a last resort (B).

Adult Polycystic Kidney Disease (APCKD)

In patients with acute pyelonephritis and infected cysts (presenting as recurrent bacteraemia or 'local sepsis') treatment requires a long course of high-dose systemic fluoroquinolones, followed by prophylaxis. Bilateral nephrectomy should be utilized as a last resort (B).

Calculi and UTI

Management is similar to that for patients without renal impairment (i.e., to clear the stones if possible and to minimize antibiotic treatment if the calculus cannot be removed). Nephrectomy should be performed as a last resort, but even residual renal function may be of vital importance (B).

Obstruction and UTI

As in all other situations, the combination of obstruction and infection is dangerous and should be treated vigorously. Obstruction may be covert and require specific diagnostic tests (e.g., video-urodynamics, upper tract pressure flow studies).

UTI in Renal Transplantation and Immunosuppression

The need to correct uropathy or to remove a potential focus of infection in a diseased endstage kidney is more pressing in a patient enlisted for renal transplantation. Even so, the results of nephrectomy for a scarred or hydronephrotic kidney may be disappointing.

Immunosuppression is of secondary importance, although if this is extreme, immunosuppression will promote, at least, persistent bacteriuria, which may become symptomatic. In the context of renal transplantation, UTI is very common, but immunosuppression is only one of many factors which are mainly classified as 'surgical'.

HIV infection is associated with acute and chronic renal disease, possibly through the mechanisms of thrombotic microangiopathy and immune mediated glomerulonephritis. Steroids, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and highly active retroviral therapy appear to have reduced progression to endstage renal disease.

Antibiotic Treatment for UTI in Renal Insufficiency and After Renal Transplantation

The principles of antibiotic treatment for UTI in the presence of renal impairment, during dialysis treatment and after renal transplantation, is discussed in the text (see original guideline document) and summarized in the tables below.

Table: Use of Antibiotics for UTI with Renal Impairment

  • Most antibiotics have a wide therapeutic index. No adjustment of dose is necessary until glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <20 mL/min, except antibiotics with nephrotoxic potential (e.g., aminoglycosides).
  • Drugs removed by dialysis should be administered after a dialysis treatment.
  • Combination of loop diuretics, (e.g., furosemide and a cephalosporin) is nephrotoxic.
  • Nitrofurantoin and tetracycline are contraindicated, but not doxycycline.

Table: Clearance of Antibiotics at Haemodialysis

Dialyzed Slightly Dialyzed Not Dialyzed
Amoxycillin/ampicillin Fluoroquinolones* Amphotericin
Carbenicillin Co-trimoxazole Methicillin
Cephalosporins* Erythromycin Teicoplanin
Aminoglycosides* Vancomycin  
Trimethoprim    
Metronidazole    
Aztreonam*    
Fluconazole*    
*Drugs cleared by peritoneal dialysis

Table: Treatment of Tuberculosis in Renal Failure

Rifampicin and isoniazid not cleared by dialysis. Give pyridoxine.
Ethambutol not dialyzed. Reduce dose if glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<30 mL/min.
Avoid rifampicin with cyclosporine.

Table: Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of UTI in Renal Transplantation

  • Treat infection in recipient before transplantation
  • Culture donor tissue sample and perfusate
  • Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
  • 6-month low-dose TMP-SMX (co-trimoxazole) (IbA)
  • Empirical treatment of overt infection (quinolone, TMP-SMX for 10-14 days)
TMP-SMX = trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole

Table: Drug Interactions with Cyclosporin and Tacrolimus

Rifampicin
Erythromycin
Aminoglycosides
TMP-SMX
Amphotericin B

TMP-SMX = trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

Ia Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomized trials

Ib Evidence obtained from at least one randomized trial

IIa Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed controlled study without randomization

IIb Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well-designed quasi-experimental study

III Evidence obtained from well-designed non-experimental studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies and case reports

IV Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions or clinical experience of respected authorities

Grades of Recommendation

  1. Based on clinical studies of good quality and consistency addressing the specific recommendations and including at least one randomized trial
  2. Based on well-conducted clinical studies, but without randomized clinical studies
  3. Made despite the absence of directly applicable clinical studies of good quality

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for some of the recommendations (see "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • UTIs in renal insufficiency, transplant recipients, diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression. In: Grabe M, Bishop MC, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, Botto H, Cek M, Lobel B, Naber KG, Palou J, Tenke P. Guidelines on the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology (EAU); 2008 Mar. p. 52-63. [57 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2008 Mar

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

European Association of Urology - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

European Association of Urology

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Management of Urinary and Male Genital Tract Infections Guidelines Writing Panel

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Panel Members: M. Grabe (Chairman); M.C. Bishop; T.E. Bjerklund-Johansen; H. Botto; M. Çek; B. Lobel; K.G. Naber; J. Palou; P. Tenke

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All members of the Management of Urinary and Male Genital Tract Infections guidelines writing panel have provided disclosure statements of all relationships which they have and which may be perceived as a potential source of conflict of interest. This information is kept on file in the European Association of Urology Central Office database. This guidelines document was developed with the financial support of the European Association of Urology (EAU). No external sources of funding and support have been involved. The EAU is a non-profit organisation and funding is limited to administrative assistance, travel, and meeting expenses. No honoraria or other reimbursements have been provided.

GUIDELINE STATUS

Note: This guideline has been updated. The National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) is working to update this summary.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies of the updated guideline: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the European Association of Urology Web site.

Print copies: Available from the European Association of Urology, PO Box 30016, NL-6803, AA ARNHEM, The Netherlands.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

  • EAU guidelines office template. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology (EAU); 2007. 4 p.
  • The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology (EAU); 18 p.

The following is also available:

  • Management of urinary and male genital tract infections. 2008, Ultra short pocket guidelines. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology (EAU); 2008 Mar. 17 p.

Print copies: Available from the European Association of Urology, PO Box 30016, NL-6803, AA ARNHEM, The Netherlands.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on September 8, 2008. The information was verified by the guideline developer on December 8, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

Downloads are restricted to one download and print per user, no commercial usage or dissemination by third parties is allowed.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo