Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of other therapies.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of other therapies. Nephrology 2006 Apr;11(S1):S196-7.


  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of other therapies. Westmead NSW (Australia): CARI - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment; 2005 Sep. 4 p. [8 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references drugs for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions for the levels of evidence (I–IV) can be found at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Guidelines

No recommendations possible based on Level I or II evidence

Suggestions for Clinical Care

(Suggestions are based on Level III and IV sources)

There have been a number of case series using mycophenolate mofetil in patients with resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Most demonstrate that although mycophenolate mofetil can induce some reduction of proteinuria, complete remission of proteinuria is rare. No data on long-term follow-up evaluation with this drug are currently available.

  • One group of authors performed an open-label, 6-month trial of mycophenolate mofetil in 18 patients with biopsy-proven FSGS who were resistant to corticosteroid therapy. Seventy-five percent had also failed to respond to a cytotoxic agent and/or a cyclosporin. A substantial improvement in proteinuria was seen in 44% (8/18) of patients by 6 months. However, no patient achieved complete remission. In addition, relapses were common after therapy was discontinued.
  • One group of authors previously reported the use of mycophenolate mofetil in 7 patients, in whom a substantial improvement in proteinuria was also observed.
  • One group of authors investigated the effect of mycophenolate mofetil in 7 children with a resistant nephrotic syndrome (6 of whom had minimal change disease and one with FSGS). In this patient, mycophenolate mofetil resulted in complete remission for a follow-up of 28 months.

Other therapies have been used in patients with FSGS who prove resistant to standard treatment:

  • Partial remission has been observed in a few case reports using tacrolimus.
  • Vincristine has also been used for the treatment of steroid- and cyclophosphamide-resistant nephrotic syndrome. In a series of eight cases presented by one group of authors, two children treated with vincristine achieved complete remission associated with preserved renal function. Another experienced transient relapses. Although studied in primary FSGS, there may be particular advantages of vincristine in secondary forms of nephrotic syndrome associated with malignancy (see Guideline titled "FSGS: cytotoxic therapy" in the original guideline document).
  • Plasma exchange, lipid apheresis and immunoadsorption have also been reported to induce remission of proteinuria in selected patients.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

Level I: Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Level II: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed RCT

Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed pseudo-randomized controlled trials (alternate allocation or some other method); comparative studies with concurrent controls and allocation not randomized, cohort studies, case-control studies, interrupted time series with a control group; comparative studies with historical control, two or more single arm studies, interrupted time series without a parallel control group

Level IV: Evidence obtained from case series, either post-test or pretest/post-test

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of other therapies. Nephrology 2006 Apr;11(S1):S196-7.


  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of other therapies. Westmead NSW (Australia): CARI - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment; 2005 Sep. 4 p. [8 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Apr

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment - Disease Specific Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Industry-sponsored funding administered through Kidney Health Australia

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Author: Merlin Thomas

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All guideline writers are required to fill out a declaration of conflict of interest.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment Web site.

Print copies: Available from Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment, Locked Bag 4001, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead NSW, Australia 2145

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on June 4, 2008. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on August 18, 2009, following the revised FDA advisory on CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil). This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on August 24, 2009, following the revised FDA advisory on CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil).

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo