Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of cyclosporine A.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of cyclosporin A. Westmead NSW (Australia): CARI - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment; 2005 Sep. 9 p. [9 references]


  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of cyclosporine A. Nephrology 2006 Apr;11(S1):S185-8.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references drugs for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions for the levels of evidence (I–IV) can be found at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Guidelines

Cyclosporin may be effective in preserving filtration function in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), in those with steroid dependence or in those who frequently relapse on conventional therapy. (Level II evidence)

Suggestions for Clinical Care

(Suggestions are based on Level III and IV evidence)

A number of open studies have shown that cyclosporin is able to induce complete and partial remission in both adults and children with steroid resistant FSGS and steroid-dependent FSGS. Partial or complete remission is most likely in steroid-dependent FSGS, while the response rate in steroid-resistant FSGS is variable, ranging between 20% and 70% in most studies.

Cyclosporin is also associated with significant toxicity, which means that use of this agent should be reasonably restricted to patients at high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD), or in whom toxicity from steroid-dependence confers a greater danger than chronic cyclosporin therapy.

What Dose Should Be Used?

Optimal dosing and monitoring of cyclosporin has not been fully clarified. Most studies have used doses of approximately 5 mg/kg/day with a blood level of 100–200 mg/mL. (Level III evidence)

Should Steroids Also Be Used?

Most studies have also continued a low dose of steroids while using cyclosporin. There is anecdotal evidence that this approach may be more effective in achieving remission in children than cyclosporin alone.

Optimal Duration of Therapy

A minimum effective dose of cyclosporin should be continued for at least 2 years. (Level IV evidence) Relapse is common after tapering or discontinuing the drug. Patients who are in complete remission for more than 1 year on cyclosporin appear to be more likely to remain in remission if the cyclosporine is gradually tapered and discontinued, rather than stopped suddenly. (Level IV evidence, anecdotal reports)

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

Level I: Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Level II: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed RCT

Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed pseudo-randomized controlled trials (alternate allocation or some other method); comparative studies with concurrent controls and allocation not randomized, cohort studies, case-control studies, interrupted time series with a control group; comparative studies with historical control, two or more single arm studies, interrupted time series without a parallel control group

Level IV: Evidence obtained from case series, either post-test or pretest/post-test

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of cyclosporin A. Westmead NSW (Australia): CARI - Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment; 2005 Sep. 9 p. [9 references]


  • Thomas M. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: use of cyclosporine A. Nephrology 2006 Apr;11(S1):S185-8.

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Apr

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment - Disease Specific Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Industry-sponsored funding administered through Kidney Health Australia

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Author: Merlin Thomas

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All guideline writers are required to fill out a declaration of conflict of interest.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment Web site.

Print copies: Available from Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment, Locked Bag 4001, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead NSW, Australia 2145

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on May 5, 2008. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on August 18, 2009, following the revised FDA advisory on CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil).

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo