Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Acutely ill patients in hospital: recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Acutely ill patients in hospital. Recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2007 Jul. 106 p. (Clinical guideline; no. 50). [63 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Physiological Observations in Acute Hospital Settings

Adult patients in acute hospital settings, including patients in the emergency department for whom a clinical decision to admit has been made, should have:

  • Physiological observations recorded at the time of their admission or initial assessment
  • A clear written monitoring plan that specifies which physiological observations should be recorded and how often. The plan should take account of the:
    • Patient's diagnosis
    • Presence of comorbidities
    • Agreed treatment plan

Physiological observations should be recorded and acted upon by staff who have been trained to undertake these procedures and understand their clinical relevance.

As a minimum, the following physiological observations should be recorded at the initial assessment and as part of routine monitoring:

  • Heart rate
  • Respiratory rate
  • Systolic blood pressure
  • Level of consciousness
  • Oxygen saturation
  • Temperature

Identifying Patients Whose Clinical Condition Is Deteriorating or Is At Risk of Deterioration

Physiological track and trigger systems should be used to monitor all adult patients in acute hospital settings.

  • Physiological observations should be monitored at least every 12 hours, unless a decision has been made at a senior level to increase or decrease this frequency for an individual patient.
  • The frequency of monitoring should increase if abnormal physiology is detected, as outlined in the recommendation on graded response strategy (see "Graded Response Strategy" below).

Choice of Physiological Track and Trigger System

Track and trigger systems should use multiple-parameter or aggregate weighted scoring systems, which allow a graded response. These scoring systems should:

  • Define the parameters to be measured and the frequency of observations
  • Include a clear and explicit statement of the parameters, cut-off points, or scores that should trigger a response.

Physiological Parameters To Be Used by Track and Trigger Systems

Multiple-parameter or aggregate weighted scoring systems used for track and trigger systems should measure:

  • Heart rate
  • Respiratory rate
  • Systolic blood pressure
  • Level of consciousness
  • Oxygen saturation
  • Temperature

In specific clinical circumstances, additional monitoring should be considered; for example:

  • Hourly urine output
  • Biochemical analysis, such as lactate, blood glucose, base deficit, arterial pH
  • Pain assessment

Critical Care Outreach Services for Patients Whose Clinical Condition Is Deteriorating

Staff caring for patients in acute hospital settings should have competencies in monitoring, measurement, interpretation, and prompt response to the acutely ill patient appropriate to the level of care they are providing. Education and training should be provided to ensure staff have these competencies, and they should be assessed to ensure they can demonstrate them.

The response strategy for patients identified as being at risk of clinical deterioration should be triggered by either physiological track and trigger score or clinical concern.

Trigger thresholds for track and trigger systems should be set locally. The threshold should be reviewed regularly to optimise sensitivity and specificity.

Graded Response Strategy

No specific service configuration can be recommended as a preferred response strategy for individuals identified as having a deteriorating clinical condition.

A graded response strategy for patients identified as being at risk of clinical deterioration should be agreed and delivered locally. It should consist of the following three levels.

  • Low-score group:
    • Increased frequency of observations and the nurse in charge alerted
  • Medium-score group:
    • Urgent call to team with primary medical responsibility for the patient
    • Simultaneous call to personnel with core competencies for acute illness. These competencies can be delivered by a variety of models at a local level, such as a critical care outreach team, a hospital-at-night team, or a specialist trainee in an acute medical or surgical specialty.
  • High-score group:
    • Emergency call to team with critical care competencies and diagnostic skills. The team should include a medical practitioner skilled in the assessment of the critically ill patient, who possesses advanced airway management and resuscitation skills. There should be an immediate response.

Patients identified as "clinical emergency" should bypass the graded response system. With the exception of those with a cardiac arrest, they should be treated in the same way as the high-score group.

For patients in the high- and medium-score groups, healthcare professionals should:

  • Initiate appropriate interventions
  • Assess response
  • Formulate a management plan, including location and level of care

If the team caring for the patient considers that admission to a critical care area is clinically indicated, then the decision to admit should involve both the consultant caring for the patient on the ward and the consultant in critical care.

Transfer of Patients from Critical Care Areas to General Wards

After the decision to transfer a patient from a critical care area to the general ward has been made, he or she should be transferred as early as possible during the day. Transfer from critical care areas to the general ward between 22.00 and 07.00 should be avoided whenever possible, and should be documented as an adverse incident if it occurs.

Care on the General Ward Following Transfer

The critical care area transferring team and the receiving ward team should take shared responsibility for the care of the patient being transferred. They should jointly ensure:

  • There is continuity of care through a formal structured handover of care from critical care area staff to ward staff (including both medical and nursing staff), supported by a written plan
  • That the receiving ward, with support from critical care if required, can deliver the agreed plan

The formal structured handover of care should include:

  • A summary of critical care stay, including diagnosis and treatment
  • A monitoring and investigation plan
  • A plan for ongoing treatment, including drugs and therapies, nutrition plan, infection status and any agreed limitations of treatment
  • Physical and rehabilitation needs
  • Psychological and emotional needs
  • Specific communication or language needs

When patients are transferred to the general ward from a critical care area, they should be offered information about their condition and encouraged to actively participate in decisions that relate to their recovery. The information should be tailored to individual circumstances. If they agree, their family and carers should be involved.

Staff working with acutely ill patients on general wards should be provided with education and training to recognise and understand the physical, psychological and emotional needs of patients who have been transferred from critical care areas.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

The original guideline document contains a clinical algorithm for Care Pathway (Assessment and Monitoring, Response, and Critical Care).

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence supporting each recommendation is identified and discussed in the "evidence review" sections of the original guideline document.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Acutely ill patients in hospital. Recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2007 Jul. 106 p. (Clinical guideline; no. 50). [63 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2007 Jul

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Guideline Development Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Guideline Development Group Members: Mrs Sheila Adam, Nurse Consultant in Critical Care; Dr Mary Armitage (Guideline Development Group Chair) Consultant Physician; Mr Peter Brewer, Patient/carer representative; Dr Brian Cuthbertson, Clinical Senior Lecturer and Consultant in Intensive Care; Dr Jane Eddleston (Guideline Development Group Clinical Adviser) Consultant in Intensive Care Medicine; Mr Peter Gibb, Patient/carer representative; Dr Paul Glynne, Consultant Physician in Acute Medicine and Critical Care; Dr David Goldhill, Consultant in Anaesthesia; Dr John Hindle, Geriatrician/Consultant Physician and Clinical Director for Medicine; Dr Paul Jenkins, Consultant in Acute Medicine; Dr Simon Mackenzie, Consultant in Critical Care; Dr Patrick Nee, Consultant in Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine; Professor Brian J Rowlands, Consultant Surgeon; Mrs Kirsty Ward, Registered Nurse

Short Clinical Guidelines Technical Team: Dr Tim Stokes, Guideline Lead and Associate Director – Centre for Clinical Practice (from December 2006); Nicole Elliott, Commissioning Manager; Michael Heath, Project Manager (from December 2006); Toni Tan, Technical Analyst, (from January 2007); Janette Boynton, Senior Information Scientist; Francis Ruiz, Technical Adviser in Health Economics; Emma Banks, Coordinator; Dr Jayne Spink, Associate Director – Centre for Clinical Practice (until December 2007); Dr Philippa Davies, Technical Analyst (until January 2007); Dr Françoise Cluzeau, Technical Adviser (until December 2007)

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • Monitoring patients in hospital and caring for them if their health becomes worse. Understanding NICE guidance. Information for people who use NHS services. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007 Jul. 7 p. (Clinical guideline; no. 50).

Electronic copies: Available in English and Welsh in Portable Document Format Portable Document Format (PDF) from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the National Health Service (NHS) Response Line 0870 1555 455. ref: N1288. 11 Strand, London, WC2N 5HR.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo