Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
RTI Biologics |
---|---|
Information provided by: | RTI Biologics |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00255970 |
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether treatment with the bone grafting material Regenafil is as effective as the standard treatment using demineralized freeze dried bone. Regenafil is demineralized freeze dried bone in a special gel form.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Periodontal Diseases |
Other: DFDBA Device: Regenafil |
Phase II Phase III |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Prevention, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Regenerative Therapy for Vertical Defects Comparing Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft and Regenafil |
Enrollment: | 40 |
Study Start Date: | January 2006 |
Study Completion Date: | November 2007 |
Primary Completion Date: | November 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
1: Experimental
Regenafil
|
Device: Regenafil
Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone in a porcine gel carrier
|
2: Active Comparator
DFDBA
|
Other: DFDBA
Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft bone
|
To compare the regenerative effects of a demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) particulate in a biologic thermoplastic carrier (Regenafil) to the standard of DFDBA particulate in the treatment of intraosseous vertical defects following six months of healing. This will be accomplished by evaluating clinical parameters including probing depth, attachment level and bleeding upon probing, using attachment level as the primary outcome variable.
Treatment of the vertical osseous defect is a challenging problem in periodontics. There are many treatment options including:
Choice of treatment may depend on the defect depth and configuration. A shallow, narrow 3 wall defect may respond well to open flap debridement while a deep 2 wall defect may need regenerative therapy such as an osseous graft, a membrane or combined membrane and graft treatment. Studies of vertical defect therapy with defects about 4 mm or greater show that similar percent defect fill results are obtained with regenerative therapies.
Open flap debridement produces substantially less percent defect fill.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Have a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study:
United States, Indiana | |
Indiana University School of Dentistry | |
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202 | |
United States, Kentucky | |
University of Louisville School of Dentistry | |
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202 |
Principal Investigator: | Henry Greenwell, DMD | University of Louisville |
Principal Investigator: | Steven Blanchard, DDS | Indiana University School of Dentistry |
Responsible Party: | Regeneration Technologies, Inc ( Sponsor ) |
Study ID Numbers: | RegenF052005 |
Study First Received: | November 16, 2005 |
Last Updated: | October 2, 2008 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00255970 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Periodontal Treatment of Intraosseous Vertical Defects |
Mouth Diseases Periodontal Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases |
Mouth Diseases Periodontal Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases |